Improving Tsunami Risk Analysis by Integrating Spatial Resolution and the Population’s Evacuation Capacities: A Case Study of Cartagena, Chile
Jorge León, Carolina Martínez, Simón Inzunza, Alonso Ogueda, Alejandro Urrutia
International Journal of Disaster Risk Science ›› 2024, Vol. 15 ›› Issue (6) : 1001-1016.
Improving Tsunami Risk Analysis by Integrating Spatial Resolution and the Population’s Evacuation Capacities: A Case Study of Cartagena, Chile
Intensive human activity in global coastal areas has led to increasing exposure to hazards. Cartagena Bay in Chile, an area with a long history of tsunami disasters, has undergone significant urbanization and experiences heavy tourist activity during the summer. While some studies have examined risk in Cartagena by focusing on hazard and vulnerability characteristics, challenges remain in delivering more spatially accurate studies and incorporating the population’s coping capacities. We undertook a tsunami risk assessment of Cartagena Bay that disaggregates social vulnerability to the census block level and assesses the inhabitants’ pedestrian evacuation potential through an agent-based model. Our findings indicate that urban coastal areas in Cartagena Bay might face substantial tsunami risk in a worst-case scenario, with 31.0% to 54.1% of its territory—depending on the scale of analysis—classified as high-risk areas. Of the examined urban blocks, 31.4% have average evacuation times exceeding 17 min (the critical time required by the tsunami to reach its run-up), and the most disadvantaged census block is 1,971.9 m away from its nearest shelter. We also demonstrated that a more spatially accurate vulnerability analysis is more conservative too. For instance, zones with high-risk levels decreased by 42.8% when the study scale moved from the block to the zone level of analysis. Similarly, areas with low risk increased by 80%. In comparison to previous studies, our findings show that tsunami risk in Cartagena Bay is significantly lower if coping capacities such as evacuation potential are included in the analysis.
[] |
|
[] |
|
[] |
|
[] |
|
[] |
Buchmüller, S., and U. Weidmann. 2006. Parameters of pedestrians, pedestrian traffic and walking facilities. Zürich: Institut for Transport Planning and Systems (IVT).
|
[] |
|
[] |
|
[] |
|
[] |
|
[] |
|
[] |
|
[] |
|
[] |
|
[] |
|
[] |
|
[] |
|
[] |
|
[] |
FEMA (Federal Emergency Management Agency). Hazus tsunami model technical guidance, 2017 Washington, DC FEMA
|
[] |
|
[] |
|
[] |
Gonzálezmuzzio, C. 2013. The role of place and social capital in post-disaster community resilience (El Rol Del Lugar y El Capital Social En La Resiliencia Comunitaria Posdesastre). Aproximaciones Mediante Un Estudio de Caso Después Del Terremoto Del 27/F. Eure 39: 25.
|
[] |
|
[] |
|
[] |
Huerta, S. 2011. Tsunami death toll of 27.02.2010 (Nómina de Fallecidos Por El Tsunami Del 27.02.2010). Santiago, Chile: Fiscalía, Ministerio Público de Chile (in Spanish).
|
[] |
INE (Instituto Nacional de Estadísticas). 2018. Summary of results. Census 2017 (Síntesis de Resultados. Censo 2017). Santiago de Chile: INE.
|
[] |
|
[] |
IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change). Managing the risks of extreme events and disasters to advance climate change adaptation, 2012 Cambridge, UK Cambridge University Press
|
[] |
IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change). The concept of risk in the IPCC Sixth Assessment Report: A summary of cross-working group discussions, 2020 Geneva IPCC
|
[] |
|
[] |
|
[] |
|
[] |
|
[] |
|
[] |
|
[] |
|
[] |
|
[] |
|
[] |
March, A., and S. Dovers. 2015. Disaster risk reduction and urban planning: a case of uneven mainstreaming? In Proceedings of the 7th State of Australian Cities Conference, 9–11 December 2015, Gold Coast, Australia.
|
[] |
|
[] |
|
[] |
|
[] |
|
[] |
MDSF (Ministry of Social Development). 2020. Social household registry (Registro Social de Hogares). https://registrosocial.gob.cl/. Accessed 24 Jul 2022.
|
[] |
|
[] |
|
[] |
|
[] |
|
[] |
|
[] |
|
[] |
|
[] |
|
[] |
SHOA (Servicio Hidrográfico y Oceanográfico de la Armada de Chile). 2012. Proyecto CITSU. Valparaíso. http://www.shoa.cl/index.htm. Accessed 15 Mar 2022.
|
[] |
|
[] |
|
[] |
|
[] |
|
[] |
|
[] |
|
[] |
UNDRR (United Nations Office for Disaster Risk Reduction). Our world at risk: transforming governance for a resilient future, 2022 Geneva UNDRR
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[] |
UNDRR (United Nations Office for Disaster Risk Reduction). 2022. Terminology. https://www.undrr.org/terminology. Accessed 14 Jul 2022.
|
[] |
UNISDR (United Nations International Strategy for Disaster Reduction). 2004. Living with risk. A global review of disaster reduction initiatives. Geneva: UNISDR.
|
[] |
UNISDR (United Nations International Strategy for Disaster Reduction). 2009. Making disaster risk reduction gender-sensitive. Policy and practical guidelines. Geneva: UNISDR, UNDP, IUCN.
|
[] |
Vecchio, G., P. Hernández, G. Basías, P. Vega, M. Vicuña, R. Moris, and C. Martínez. 2022. Territorial vulnerability and institutional capacity in Chile’s central coastal region (Vulnerabilidad Territorial y Capacidad Institucional En El Litoral Central de Chile). In Towards a coastal law in Chile: Bases for integrated management of coastal areas (Hacia Una Ley de Costas En Chile: Bases Para Una Gestión Integrada de Áreas Costeras), ed. C. Martínez, R. Cienfuegos, J.M. Barragán, S. Navarrete, R. Hidalgo, F. Arenas, and L. Fuentes, 491–504. Santiago, Chile: Instituto de Geografía, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile.
|
[] |
|
[] |
Villagrán de León, J.C. 2006. Vulnerability: A conceptional and methodological review. Tokyo: UNU-EHS. http://collections.unu.edu/eserv/unu:1871/pdf3904.pdf. Accessed 13 May 2022.
|
[] |
|
[] |
|
[] |
|
[] |
|
[] |
|
/
〈 |
|
〉 |