Understanding Risk Communication Through a Postcolonial Theory Perspective: Lessons from Three Studies on COVID-19 Vaccine Hesitancy

Abstract

This article uses postcolonial theory to examine optimal risk communication practices of new risks and scientific information to non-indigenous communities. The article calls on risk communication scholars and health practitioners to embrace postcolonial theory as it provides a critical and reflective framework to examine ontological beliefs and methodological and structural aspects in the communication of public health messages. The article draws on insight from three studies on COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy within Scotland’s African, Caribbean, and Black communities between March 2021 and April 2022. The article offers new insight into why some communities hesitate to respond to public health messages such as vaccine uptake advice. Therefore, risk communication scholars should use the postcolonial lens to examine their assumptions, thinking, and perspectives on communicating new science and risk information in emergencies. Postcolonial theory enables risk communication scholars to address power imbalances, representation, and inclusion challenges in public health communication and trust-building efforts.

References

[1] AbramsEM, GreenhawtM. Risk communication during COVID-19. The Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology: In Practice, 2020, 8(6): 1791-1794

[2] AdekolaJ. Social amplification and policy making: Understanding the roles of power and expertise in public health risk communication, 2017 Glasgow, UK Ph.D. thesis University of Glasgow

[3] AdekolaJ. Power and risk in policymaking: Understanding public health debates, 2019 Cham Springer Nature

[4] AdekolaJ. AdekolaJ. The policy evaluation risk communication framework. Power and risk in policymaking: Understanding public health debates, 2020 Cham Palgrave Pivot 85-101

[5] AdekolaJ, Fischbacher-SmithM, Fischbacher-SmithD, AdekolaO. Health risks from environmental degradation in the Niger Delta, Nigeria. Environment and Planning C: Politics and Space, 2017, 35(2): 334-354

[6] AmmonU. CouplandN. World languages: Trends and futures. The handbook of language and globalization, 2010 Hoboken, NJ Wiley 101-122

[7] BachrachP, BaratzMS. Two faces of power. American Political Science Review, 1962, 56(4): 947-952

[8] BarnettM, DuvallR. Power in international politics. International Organization, 2005, 59(1): 39-75

[9] Batts, H., R. Joseph, and S.W. Stoeffler. 2022. Addressing engagement suppression in Black and Brown racialized communities. Social Development Issues 43(3): Article 3.

[10] BhabhaH. Debating cultural hybridity: Multicultural identities and the politics of anti-racism, 2015 London Bloomsbury Publishing

[11] BhattRM. CouplandN. Unraveling post-colonial identity through language. The handbook of language and globalization, 2010 Hoboken, NJ Wiley 520-539

[12] BlackwellJE. The Black community diversity and unity, 1975 New York University of Massachusetts

[13] BraunV, ClarkeV. CooperH, CamicPM, LongDL, PanterAT, RindskopfD, SherKJ. Thematic analysis. APA handbook of research methods in psychology, Vol. 2. Research designs: Quantitative, qualitative, neuropsychological, and biological, 2012 Washington, DC American Psychological Association 57-71

[14] Cénat, J.M., J.M. Cénat, S.M.M.M. Farahi, S.M. Bakombo, R.D. Dalexis, R. Pongou, L. Caulley, S. Yaya, et al. 2023. Vaccine mistrust among Black individuals in Canada: The major role of health literacy, conspiracy theories, and racial discrimination in the healthcare system. Journal of Medical Virology 95(4): Article e28738.

[15] CésaireA. Discourse on colonialism. Discourse on colonialism, 1972 New York New Monthly Press 29-79

[16] ChennellsA. Essential diversity: Post-colonial theory and African literature. Brno Studies in English, 1999, 25(1): 109-126

[17] CollingridgeD, ReeveC. Science speaks to power: The role of experts in policy making, 1986 New York St. Martin’s Press

[18] CookeRM. Experts in uncertainty: Opinion and subjective probability in science, 1991 Oxford, UK Oxford University Press

[19] CovelloVT. HeathRL, Dan O’HairH. Strategies for overcoming challenges to effective risk communication. Handbook of risk and crisis communication, 2010 New York Routledge 143-167

[20] CowanG. Statistical data analysis, 1998 Oxford, UK Oxford University Press

[21] CreswellJW, PothCN. Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches, 2016 Los Angeles, CA Sage publications

[22] CruzJM. Invisibility and visibility in alternative organizing: A communicative and cultural model. Management Communication Quarterly, 2017, 31(4): 614-639

[23] Diagne, S.B. 2010. Négritude. In The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Spring 2010 edn., ed. E.N. Zalta, and U. Nodelman. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2010/entries/negritude/. Accessed 8 Aug 2023.

[24] DoneyPM, CannonJP, MullenMR. Understanding the influence of national culture on the development of trust. Academy of Management Review, 1998, 23(3): 601-620

[25] DouglasM. SixP, MarsG. Four cultures: The evolution of a parsimonious model. The institutional dynamics of culture, Vols. I and II, 2018 New York Routledge 45-50

[26] DouglasM, WildavskyA. Risk and culture: An essay on the selection of technological and environmental dangers, 1983 Oakland, CA University of California Press

[27] DumlaoRJ. Collaborating successfully with community partners and clients in online service-learning classes. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication, 2023, 53(3): 218-239

[28] FanonF. LonghoferW, WinchesterD. Black skin, white masks. Social theory re-wired, 2023 New York Routledge 355-361

[29] FanonF, MarkmannCL. BackL, BackL, SolomosJ. The fact of blackness. Theories of race and racism, 2020 New York Routledge 326-335

[30] Finlay, S.M., S. Raman, E. Rasekoala, V. Mignan, E. Dawson, L. Neeley, and L.A. Orthia. 2021. From the margins to the mainstream: Deconstructing science communication as a white, Western paradigm. Journal of Science Communication 20(1): Article C02.

[31] FischhoffB. Risk perception and communication. Annual Review of Public Health, 1993, 14(1): 183-203

[32] FoucaultM. DreyfusHL, RabinowP. The subject and power. Michel Foucault: Beyond structuralism and hermeneutics, 1982 Chicago The University of Chicago Press 208-226

[33] FrewerL. The public and effective risk communication. Toxicology Letters, 2004, 149(1–3): 391-397

[34] Fricker, M. 2007. Epistemic injustice: Power and the ethics of knowing. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198237907.001.0001. Accessed 21 May 2024.

[35] Gillibrand, S., D. Kapadia, R. Watkinson, B. Issa, C. Kwaku-Odoi, and C. Sanders. 2024. Marginalisation and distrust in the context of the COVID-19 vaccination programme: Experiences of communities in a northern UK city region. BMC Public Health 24(1): Article 853.

[36] GrimshawJM, EcclesMP, LavisJN, HillSJ, SquiresJE. Knowledge translation of research findings. Implementation Science, 2012, 7: 1-17

[37] HendersonLS. Encoding and decoding communication competencies in project management – An exploratory study. International Journal of Project Management, 2004, 22(6): 469-476

[38] HiddlestonJ. Understanding postcolonialism, 2014 London Routledge

[39] HilgartnerS. The dominant view of popularization: Conceptual problems, political uses. Social Studies of Science, 1990, 20(3): 519-539

[40] Holden, K., T. Akintobi, J. Hopkins, A. Belton, B. McGregor, S. Blanks, and G. Wrenn. 2016. Community engaged leadership to advance health equity and build healthier communities. Social Sciences 5(1): Article 2.

[41] HorvathRJ. A definition of colonialism. Current Anthropology, 1972, 13(1): 45-57

[42] KaspersonRE, KaspersonJX. The social amplification and attenuation of risk. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 1996, 545(1): 95-105

[43] KaspersonRE, GoldingD, TulerS. Social distrust as a factor in siting hazardous facilities and communicating risks. Journal of Social Issues, 1992, 48(4): 161-187

[44] KaspersonRE, RennO, SlovicP, BrownHS, EmelJ, GobleR, KaspersonJX, RatickS. The social amplification of risk: A conceptual framework. Risk Analysis, 1988, 8(2): 177-187

[45] KenneyM. Counting, accounting, and accountability: Helen Verran’s relational empiricism. Social Studies of Science, 2015, 45(5): 749-771

[46] LaskerRD, GuidryJA. Engaging the community in decision making: Case studies tracking participation, voice and influence, 2009 Jefferson, NC McFarland

[47] LeissW. Three phases in the evolution of risk communication practice. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 1996, 545(1): 85-94

[48] Lukes, S. 2012. Power: A radical view [2005]. Contemporary Sociological Theory 266(3): 1–22.

[49] MetagJ. Tension between visibility and invisibility: Science communication in new information environments. Studies in Communication Sciences, 2021, 21(1): 129-144

[50] NilssonM, MattesJ. The spatiality of trust: Factors influencing the creation of trust and the role of face-to-face contacts. European Management Journal, 2015, 33(4): 230-244

[51] Ogbodo, J.N., E.C. Onwe, J. Chukwu, C.J. Nwasum, E.S. Nwakpu, S.U. Nwankwo, S. Nwamini, S. Elem, et al. 2020. Communicating health crisis: A content analysis of global media framing of COVID-19. Health Promotion Perspectives 10(3): Article 257.

[52] PettsJ, DraperH, IvesJ, DameryS. BennettP, CalmanK, CurtisS, Fischbacher-SmithD. Risk communication and pandemic influenza. Risk communication and public health, 2010 Oxford, UK Oxford University Press 147-163

[53] PidgeonN, KaspersonRE, SlovicP. The social amplification of risk, 2003 Cambridge, UK Cambridge University Press

[54] PloughA, KrimskyS. GlickmanTS, GoughM. The emergence of risk communication studies: Social and political context. Readings in risk, 2013 London Taylor & Francis Group 223-231

[55] QuinnR. An analysis of Frantz Fanon’s the wretched of the earth, Macat Library, 2017 London Taylor & Francis Group

[56] RavenelleAJ, NewellA, KowalskiKC. The looming, crazy stalker coronavirus: Fear mongering, fake news, and the diffusion of distrust. Socius, 2021

[57] RennO, LevineD. Credibility and trust in risk communication, 1991 Cham Springer

[58] RizviUZ. LiebmannM, RizviUZ, BorgstedeG, CipollaCN, GullapalliP, LilleyI, Pagan JiménezJR, PattersonTC. Conclusion: Archaeological futures and the postcolonial critique. Archaeology and the postcolonial critique, 2008 Lanham, MD AltaMira Press 197-203

[59] RoweG, FrewerLJ. Public participation methods: A framework for evaluation. Science, Technology, & Human Values, 2000, 25(1): 3-29

[60] RoweG, FrewerLJ. A typology of public engagement mechanisms. Science, Technology, & Human Values, 2005, 30(2): 251-290

[61] SaidEW. Orientalism: Western conceptions of the Orient, 2016 London Penguin UK

[62] Shannon, C.E. 1961. Two-way communication channels. In Proceedings of the Fourth Berkeley Symposium on Mathematical Statistics and Probability, Vol. 1: Contributions to the theory of statistics. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

[63] ShinH, KubotaR. SpolskyB, HultFM. Post-colonialism and globalization in language education. The handbook of educational linguistics, 2008 Hoboken, NJ Wiley 206-219

[64] SlovicP. Perception of risk. Science, 1987, 236(4799): 280-285

[65] SlovicP, PetersE. Risk perception and affect. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 2006, 15(6): 322-325

[66] SmithA. LazarusN. Migrancy, hybridity, and postcolonial literary studies. The Cambridge companion to postcolonial literary studies, 2004 Cambridge, UK Cambridge University Press 241-261

[67] SmithD, McCloskeyJ. Risk and crisis management in the public sector: Risk communication and the social amplification of public sector risk. Public Money and Management, 1998, 18(4): 41-50

[68] SmithAC, WoernerJ, PereraR, HaenyAM, CoxJM. An investigation of associations between race, ethnicity, and past experiences of discrimination with medical mistrust and COVID-19 protective strategies. Journal of Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities, 2022, 9(4): 1430-1442

[69] SpivakGC. NelsonC, GrossbergL. Can the subaltern speak?. Marxism and the interpretation of culture, 1988 London Macmillan 66-111

[70] SpivakGC. VenutiL. The politics of translation. The translation studies reader, 2021 New York Routledge 320-338

[71] StaleyK, DohertyC. It’s not evidence, it’s insight: Bringing patients’ perspectives into health technology appraisal at NICE. Research Involvement and Engagement, 2016, 2: 1-12

[72] StolerAL, CooperF. CooperF, StolerAL. Between metropole and colony. Tensions of empire: Colonial cultures in a bourgeois world, 1997 Berkeley, CA University of California Press 1-56

[73] StreetonR, CookeM, CampbellJ. Researching the researchers: Using a snowballing technique. Nurse Researcher, 2004, 12(1): 35-47

[74] SturgisP, AllumN. Science in society: Re-evaluating the deficit model of public attitudes. Public Understanding of Science, 2004, 13(1): 55-74

[75] Svara, J.H., and J. Denhardt. 2010. Connected communities: Local governments as a partner in citizen engagement and community building. A white paper prepared for the Alliance for Innovation. https://icma.org/documents/connected-communities-local-governments-partner-citizen-engagement-and-community-building. Accessed 24 Nov 2024.

[76] TurnbullD. Masons, tricksters and cartographers: Comparative studies in the sociology of scientific and indigenous knowledge, 2003 London Taylor & Francis

[77] WalkerG, SimmonsP, IrwinA, WynneB. Risk communication, public participation and the Seveso II directive. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 1999, 65(1–2): 179-190

[78] Watson-VerranH, TurnbullD, JasanoffS. StehrN, GrundmannR. Science and other indigenous knowledge systems. Knowledge: Critical concepts, 2005 London Routledge 345-369

[79] WendlingC, RadischJ, JacobzoneS. The use of social media in risk and crisis communication, 2013 Paris Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)

[80] Wilkes, R., and C. Wu. 2019. Immigration, discrimination, and trust: A simply complex relationship. Frontiers in Sociology 4: Article 32.

[81] WilliamsonLD. Beyond personal experiences: Examining mediated vicarious experiences as an antecedent of medical mistrust. Health Communication, 2022, 37(9): 1061-1074

[82] WrightN, NerlichB. Use of the deficit model in a shared culture of argumentation: The case of foot and mouth science. Public Understanding of Science, 2006, 15(3): 331-342

[83] WynneB. Creating public alienation: Expert cultures of risk and ethics on GMOs. Science as Culture, 2001, 10(4): 445-481

[84] YoungI. HeldkeL, O’ConnorP. The five faces of oppression. Oppression, privilege and resistance, 2000 Boston McGraw Hill Publishers 5-16

[85] YoungR. YoungR. Colonialism and the politics of postcolonial critique. Postcolonialism: An historical introduction, 2001 Oxford, UK Blackwell 1-11

[86] YumiyaY, GotoA, MurakamiM, OhiraT, RuddRE. Communication between health professionals and community residents in Fukushima: A focus on the feedback loop. Health Communication, 2019, 35(10): 1274-1282

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

The Author(s)