The Peace Imperative for the Sendai Framework for Disaster Risk Reduction

Abstract

Disasters disproportionately affect conflict-affected regions, where approximately two billion people reside, posing significant challenges for disaster risk reduction (DRR). This reality has increasingly spurred calls for violent conflict to be included in the global DRR agenda. However, consideration of peace has been lacking, despite that challenges for peace can distinctly impact capacities to set, pursue, and achieve DRR objectives. This study investigated how the Sendai Framework for Disaster Risk Reduction 2015–2030 (SFDRR) engages with peace through a document analysis, revealing three key findings. First, the SFDRR does not mention “peace,” mirroring its lack of reference to conflict. Second, while peace-related terms appear throughout the SFDRR in themes related to partnership and all-of-society approaches, this engagement is superficial. Third, the SFDRR’s approach is fundamentally problematic for advancing peace due to its avoidance of the complex social and political dynamics inherent to disaster risk and its reduction. The SFDRR united United Nations Member States in its ambition to “leave no one behind,” but has taken approaches that smooth over diversity rather than strengthen pluralistic connections. A radical, integrated DRR-peacebuilding agenda must take conflict as the new starting point and carve new pathways toward peace including through disaster diplomacy and environmental peacebuilding. By embracing the ambiguity between war and peace and addressing the root causes of risk, societies can cultivate peaceful interactions and collectively advance safety. This study concludes with recommendations for a global DRR policy that not only implicitly relies on peace but actively contributes to peacebuilding in the world’s diverse and divided societies.

References

[1] AmoakoC, InkoomDKB. The production of flood vulnerability in Accra, Ghana: re-thinking flooding and informal urbanisation. Urban Studies, 2018, 55(13): 2903-2922

[2] AndersonMB. Do no harm: how aid can support peace—or war, 1999 Boulder Lynne Rienner Publishers

[3] AtkinsonP, CoffeyA. SilermanD. Analysing documentary realities. Qualitative research: theory, method and practice, 1997 London Sage 45-62

[4] Autesserre, S. 2019. The crisis of peacekeeping: why the UN can’t end wars. Foreign Affairs 98(1): Article 101.

[5] AutesserreS. The frontlines of peace: an insider’s guide to changing the world, 2021 Oxford Oxford University Press

[6] BakerND, LudwigLG. Disaster preparedness as social control. Critical Policy Studies, 2018, 12(1): 24-43

[7] BallN. The myth of the natural disaster, 1975 Emmitsburg National Emergency Training Center

[8] BankoffG. Rendering the world unsafe: “Vulnerability” as Western discourse. Disasters, 2001, 25(1): 19-35

[9] BowenGA. Document analysis as a qualitative research method. Qualitative Research Journal, 2009, 9(2): 27-41

[10] BraunV, ClarkeV. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 2006, 3(2): 77-101

[11] BressanS, SulgML. Welcome to the grey zone: future war and peace. New Perspectives, 2020, 28(3): 379-397

[12] BrightJ, GledhillJ. A divided discipline? Mapping peace and conflict studies. International Studies Perspectives, 2018, 19(2): 128-147

[13] ByrneS, LevasseurK, ReimerLE. Building peace in Northern Ireland: hopes for the future. Humanity & Society, 2022, 47(1): 49-68

[14] Canavan, C., and T. Ide. 2024. Contention, cooperation, and context: A systematic review of research on disasters and political conflicts. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction 108: Article 104558.

[15] Caso, N., D. Hilhorst, and R. Mena. 2023. The contribution of armed conflict to vulnerability to disaster: Empirical evidence from 1989 to 2018. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction 95: Article 103881.

[16] ChandhokeN. Contested secessions: rights, self-determination, democracy, and Kashmir, 2012 Oxford Oxford University Press

[17] ComfortLK. Turning conflict into cooperation: organizational designs for community response in disasters. International Journal of Mental Health, 1990, 19(1): 89-108

[18] ConcaK, WallaceJ. Environment and peacebuilding in war-torn societies: lessons from the UN Environment Programme’s experience with postconflict assessment. Global Governance: A Review of Multilateralism and International Organizations, 2009, 15(4): 485-504

[19] CourtheynC. Peace geographies: expanding from modern-liberal peace to radical trans-relational peace. Progress in Human Geography, 2018, 42(5): 741-758

[20] DalglishSL, KhalidH, McMahonSA. Document analysis in health policy research: the READ approach. Health Policy and Planning, 2020, 35(10): 1424-1431

[21] Davis, K., L.E.R. Peters, J. Van Den Hoek, and K. Conca. 2023. Power in environmental peacebuilding. World Development Sustainability 3: Article 100110.

[22] DesportesI, HilhorstD. Disaster governance in conflict-affected authoritarian contexts: the cases of Ethiopia, Myanmar, and Zimbabwe. Politics and Governance, 2020, 8(4): 343-354

[23] DesportesI, Moyo-NyoniN. Depoliticising disaster response in a politically saturated context: the case of the 2016–19 droughts in Zimbabwe. Disasters, 2022, 46(4): 1098-1120

[24] DiehlPF, GoertzG, GallegosY. Peace data: concept, measurement, patterns, and research agenda. Conflict Management and Peace Science, 2021, 38(5): 605-624

[25] DresseA, FischhendlerI, NielsenJØ, ZikosD. Environmental peacebuilding: towards a theoretical framework. Cooperation and Conflict, 2019, 54(1): 99-119

[26] Duda, P.I., and I. Kelman. 2023. Informal disaster diplomacy. Societies 13(1): Article 8.

[27] DudaPI, KelmanI, GlickN. Informal disaster governance. Politics and Governance, 2020, 8(4): 375-385

[28] DuntonC, LaurenceM, VlavonouG. Pragmatic peacekeeping in a multipolar era: liberal norms, practices, and the future of UN peace operations. Journal of Intervention and Statebuilding, 2023, 17(3): 215-234

[29] FirchowP. Reclaiming everyday peace: local voices in measurement and evaluation after war, 2018 Cambridge, UK Cambridge University Press

[30] Freedom House. 2024. Freedom in the world 2024. https://freedomhouse.org/sites/default/files/2024-02/FIW_2024_DigitalBooklet.pdf. Accessed 8 Nov 2024.

[31] GaltungJ. Violence, peace, and peace research. Journal of Peace Research, 1969, 6(3): 167-191

[32] GaltungJ. Cultural violence. Journal of Peace Research, 1990, 27(3): 291-305

[33] GaltungJ. Peace by peaceful means: peace and conflict, development and civilization, 1996 Oslo International Peace Research Institute

[34] GleditschNP, NordkvelleJ, StrandH. Peace research—just the study of war?. Journal of Peace Research, 2014, 51(2): 145-158

[35] GNDR (Global Network of Civil Society Organisations for Disaster Reduction). 2023. Policy analysis & call to action for Sendai Mid-Term Review High-Level Meeting. https://www.gndr.org/resource/advocacy/gndrs-policy-analysis-call-to-action-for-the-sendai-mid-term-review-high-level-meeting-may-2023/. Accessed 8 Nov 2024.

[36] Hagelsteen, M., and P. Becker. 2019. Systemic problems of capacity development for disaster risk reduction in a complex, uncertain, dynamic, and ambiguous world. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction 36: Article 101102.

[37] Hore, K., J.C. Gaillard, T. Davies, and R. Kearns. 2020. People’s participation in disaster-risk reduction: Recentering power. Natural Hazards Review 21(2): Article 04020009.

[38] Hyndman, J. 2009. Siting conflict and peace in post-tsunami Sri Lanka and Aceh, Indonesia. Norsk Geografisk Tidsskrift – Norwegian Journal of Geography 63: 89–96.

[39] IdeT. The impact of environmental cooperation on peacemaking: definitions, mechanisms, and empirical evidence. International Studies Review, 2019, 21(3): 327-346

[40] IEP (Institute for Economics & Peace). 2023. Global peace index 2023. https://www.visionofhumanity.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/06/GPI-2023-Web.pdf. Accessed 8 Nov 2024.

[41] Jaime, C., E. Coughlan de Perez, M. van Aalst, and E. Easton-Calabria. 2024. Beyond the forecast: knowledge gaps to anticipate disasters in armed conflict areas with high forced displacement. Environmental Research Letters 19(2): Article 023001.

[42] JayawardanaJ, PriyanthaR, MagniM, MarincioniF. Disaster resilience among war-affected people resettled in northern Sri Lanka: challenges revisited. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 2019, 34: 356-362

[43] Katz, Y. 2020. Interacting for peace: rethinking peace through interactive digital platforms. Social Media + Society 6(2): Article 2056305120926620.

[44] KelmanI. Disaster diplomacy: how disasters affect peace and conflict, 2012 Abingdon Routledge

[45] KelmanI. Lost for words amongst disaster risk science vocabulary?. International Journal of Disaster Risk Science, 2018, 9(3): 281-291

[46] KelmanI, KoukisT. Disaster diplomacy. Review of International Affairs, 2000, 1(14): 214-294

[47] KriesbergL. Constructive conflicts: from escalation to resolution, 2007 3 Lanham Rowman & Littlefield

[48] LeBasA. Can polarization be positive? Conflict and institutional development in Africa. American Behavioral Scientist, 2018, 62(1): 59-74

[49] LederachJP. Building peace: sustainable reconciliation in divided societies, 1998 Washington United States Institute of Peace Press

[50] LederachAJ. Feel the grass grow: ecologies of slow peace in Colombia, 2023 Redwood City Stanford University Press

[51] Mac GintyR. Everyday peace: Bottom-up and local agency in conflict-affected societies. Security Dialogue, 2014, 45(6): 548-564

[52] Mac GintyR. Everyday peace: how so-called ordinary people can disrupt violent conflict, 2021 Oxford Oxford University Press

[53] MacKinnonD, DericksonKD. From resilience to resourcefulness: a critique of resilience policy and activism. Progress in Human Geography, 2013, 37(2): 253-270

[54] ManyenaSB. The concept of resilience revisited. Disasters, 2006, 30(4): 434-450

[55] MarktannerM, MienieE, NoisetL. From armed conflict to disaster vulnerability. Disaster Prevention and Management: An International Journal, 2015, 24(1): 53-69

[56] McElvainB. Autorecovery and everyday disaster in Mexico City’s peripheries. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 2023, 41(2): 253-274

[57] McEntireDA. Why vulnerability matters: exploring the merit of an inclusive disaster reduction concept. Disaster Prevention and Management: An International Journal, 2005, 14(2): 206-222

[58] McGillD, BoestenJ, IdlerA, PalmaO. From vicious to virtuous cycles: a conceptual framework on (de-) marginalisation and citizen security in Colombia. Bulletin of Latin American Research, 2024, 43(1): 18-31

[59] MeadM. BettsR. Warfare is only an invention—not a biological necessity. Conflict after the cold war, 2012 Abingdon, UK Routledge 254-258

[60] MenaR. Advancing “no natural disasters” with care: risks and strategies to address disasters as political phenomena in conflict zones. Disaster Prevention and Management: An International Journal, 2023, 32(6): 14-28

[61] MenaR, HilhorstD. The (im)possibilities of disaster risk reduction in the context of high-intensity conflict: the case of Afghanistan. Environmental Hazards, 2021, 20(2): 188-208

[62] O’KeefeP, WestgateK, WisnerB. Taking the naturalness out of natural disasters. Nature, 1976, 260(5552): 566-567

[63] Patel, S.S., B. McCaul, G. Cáceres, L.E.R. Peters, R.B. Patel, and A. Clark-Ginsberg. 2021. Delivering the promise of the Sendai Framework for Disaster Risk Reduction in fragile and conflict-affected contexts (FCAC): A case study of the NGO GOAL’s response to the Syria conflict. Progress in Disaster Science 10: Article 100172.

[64] Peters, K. 2018. Accelerating Sendai framework implementation in Asia: disaster risk reduction in contexts of violence, conflict and fragility. London: Overseas Development Institute. https://odi.org/en/publications/accelerating-sendai-framework-implementation-in-asia-disaster-risk-reduction-in-contexts-of-violence-conflict-and-fragility/. Accessed 8 Nov 2024.

[65] PetersK, HollowayK, PetersLER. Disaster risk reduction in conflict contexts: the state of the evidence, 2019 London Overseas Development Institute

[66] PetersK, PetersLER, TwiggJ, WalchC. Disaster risk reduction strategies: navigating conflict contexts, 2019 London Overseas Development Institute

[67] Peters, L.E.R. 2021. Beyond disaster vulnerabilities: an empirical investigation of the causal pathways linking conflict to disaster risks. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction 55: Article 102092.

[68] PetersLER. Disasters as ambivalent multipliers: influencing the pathways from disaster to conflict risk and peace potential through disaster risk reduction. Journal of Peacebuilding & Development, 2022, 17(2): 151-172

[69] PetersLER, KelmanI. Critiquing and joining intersections of disaster, conflict, and peace research. International Journal of Disaster Risk Science, 2020, 11(5): 555-567

[70] Peters, L.E.R., A. Clark-Ginsberg, B. McCaul, G. Cáceres, A.L. Nuñez, J. Balagna, A. López, S.S. Patel, et al. 2022. Informality, violence, and disaster risks: coproducing inclusive early warning and response systems in urban informal settlements in Honduras. Frontiers in Climate 4: Article 937244.

[71] SelbyJ. PughM, CooperN, TurnerM. The political economy of peace processes. Whose peace? Critical perspectives on the political economy of peacebuilding, 2008 London Palgrave Macmillan 11-29

[72] SiddiqiA. Disasters in conflict areas: finding the politics. Disasters, 2018, 42(S2): S161-S172

[73] SiddiqiA, PetersK, ZulverJ. “Doble afectación”: living with disasters and conflict in Colombia, 2019 London Overseas Development Institute

[74] StivachtisYA. AkandeA. Making war and building peace: what future for the United Nations and regional peace operations. Politics between nations: power, peace, and diplomacy, 2023 Cham Springer 131-147

[75] StrömbomL, BramsenI. Agonistic peace: advancing knowledge on institutional dynamics and relational transformation. Third World Quarterly, 2022, 43(6): 1237-1250

[76] SusmanP, OeefeP, WisnerB. HewittK. Global disasters, a radical interpretation. Interpretations of calamity, 1983 London Routledge

[77] TirantiD. The un-natural disasters, 1977 Emmitsburg National Emergency Training Center

[78] Titz, A., T. Cannon, and F. Krüger. 2018. Uncovering “community”: challenging an elusive concept in development and disaster related work. Societies 8(3): Article 71.

[79] Tozier de la PoterieA, BaudoinMA. From Yokohama to Sendai: approaches to participation in international disaster risk reduction frameworks. International Journal of Disaster Risk Science, 2015, 6(2): 128-139

[80] UNDRR (United Nations Office for Disaster Risk Reduction). 2019. Global assessment report on disaster risk reduction 2019. https://www.undrr.org/publication/global-assessment-report-disaster-risk-reduction-2019. Accessed 8 Nov 2024.

[81] UNDRR-ISC (United Nations Office for Disaster Risk Reduction – International Science Council). 2021. Hazard information profiles: Supplement to: UNDRR-ISC hazard definition & classification review – Technical report. https://www.undrr.org/publication/hazard-information-profiles-hips. Accessed 8 Nov 2024.

[82] UNGA (General Assembly of the United Nations). 2016. Report of the Open-Ended Intergovernmental Expert Working Group on indicators and terminology relating to disaster risk reduction. https://www.preventionweb.net/files/50683_oiewgreportenglish.pdf. Accessed 8 Nov 2024.

[83] UNGA (General Assembly of the United Nations). 2023. Political declaration of the high-level meeting on the midterm review of the Sendai Framework for Disaster Risk Reduction 2015–2030. https://sendaiframework-mtr.undrr.org/media/88232. Accessed 8 Nov 2024.

[84] UNISDR (United Nations International Strategy for Disaster Reduction). 2015. Sendai framework for disaster risk reduction 2015–2030. Geneva: UNISDR. https://www.undrr.org/publication/sendai-framework-disaster-risk-reduction-2015-2030. Accessed 8 Nov 2024.

[85] UNSG (United Nations Secretary-General). 2022. “War’s greatest cost is its human toll”, Secretary-General reminds Peacebuilding Commission, warning of “perilous impunity” taking hold. https://press.un.org/en/2022/sgsm21216.doc.htm#:~:text=As%20we%20meet%20today%2C%20one,million%20will%20need%20humanitarian%20assistance. Accessed 17 Nov 2024.

[86] von MedingJ, ChmutinaK. From labelling weakness to liberatory praxis: a new theory of vulnerability for disaster studies. Disaster Prevention and Management: An International Journal, 2023, 32(2): 364-378

[87] WalchC. Expertise and policy-making in disaster risk reduction. Nature Climate Change, 2015, 5(8): 706-707

[88] WalchC. Disaster risk reduction amidst armed conflict: informal institutions, rebel groups, and wartime political orders. Disasters, 2018, 42(S2): S239-S264

[89] WisnerB. Five years beyond Sendai—can we get beyond frameworks?. International Journal of Disaster Risk Science, 2020, 11(2): 239-249

[90] WisnerB, BlaikieP, CannonT, DavisI. At risk: Natural hazards, people’s vulnerability, and disasters, 2004 2 London Routledge

[91] Yarina, L. 2018. Your sea wall won’t save you. Places Journal, March 2018. https://placesjournal.org/article/your-sea-wall-wont-save-you/?gclid=EAIaIQobChMIxb-Xw8-t6wIVhK7ICh1NsQfaEAMYASAAEgLnVfD_BwE&cn-reloaded=1#0. Accessed 07 Nov 2024.

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

The Author(s)