A Convolutional Neural Network-Weighted Cellular Automaton Model for the Fast Prediction of Urban Pluvial Flooding Processes

Jiarui Yang, Kai Liu, Ming Wang, Gang Zhao, Wei Wu, Qingrui Yue

International Journal of Disaster Risk Science ›› 2024, Vol. 15 ›› Issue (5) : 754-768.

International Journal of Disaster Risk Science ›› 2024, Vol. 15 ›› Issue (5) : 754-768. DOI: 10.1007/s13753-024-00592-4
Article

A Convolutional Neural Network-Weighted Cellular Automaton Model for the Fast Prediction of Urban Pluvial Flooding Processes

Author information +
History +

Abstract

Deep learning models demonstrate impressive performance in rapidly predicting urban floods, but there are still limitations in enhancing physical connectivity and interpretability. This study proposed an innovative modeling approach that integrates convolutional neural networks with weighted cellular automaton (CNN-WCA) to achieve the precise and rapid prediction of urban pluvial flooding processes and enhance the physical connectivity and reliability of modeling results. The study began by generating a rainfall-inundation dataset using WCA and LISFLOOD-FP, and the CNN-WCA model was trained using outputs from LISFLOOD-FP and WCA. Subsequently, the pre-trained model was applied to simulate the flood caused by the 20 July 2021 rainstorm in Zhengzhou City. The predicted inundation spatial distribution and depth by CNN-WCA closely aligned with those of LISFLOOD-FP, with the mean absolute error concentrated within 5 mm, and the prediction time of CNN-WCA was only 0.8% that of LISFLOOD-FP. The CNN-WCA model displays a strong capacity for accurately predicting changes in inundation depths within the study area and at susceptible points for urban flooding, with the Nash-Sutcliffe efficiency values of most flood-prone points exceeding 0.97. Furthermore, the physical connectivity of the inundation distribution predicted by CNN-WCA is better than that of the distribution obtained with a CNN. The CNN-WCA model with additional physical constraints exhibits a reduction of around 34% in instances of physical discontinuity compared to CNN. Our results prove that the CNN model with multiple physical constraints has significant potential to rapidly and accurately simulate urban flooding processes and improve the reliability of prediction.

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Jiarui Yang, Kai Liu, Ming Wang, Gang Zhao, Wei Wu, Qingrui Yue. A Convolutional Neural Network-Weighted Cellular Automaton Model for the Fast Prediction of Urban Pluvial Flooding Processes. International Journal of Disaster Risk Science, 2024, 15(5): 754‒768 https://doi.org/10.1007/s13753-024-00592-4

References

[]
Aldridge, T., O. Gunawan, R.J. Moore, S.J. Cole, and D. Price. 2016. A surface water flooding impact library for flood risk assessment. In Proceedings of the 3rd European Conference on Flood Risk Management (FLOODrisk 2016), 1721 October 2016, Lyon, France.
[]
BatesPD, HorrittMS, FewtrellTJ. A simple inertial formulation of the shallow water equations for efficient two-dimensional flood inundation modelling. Journal of Hydrology, 2010, 387(1–2): 33-45
CrossRef Google scholar
[]
Beijing Institute of Municipal Engineering Design and Research. Water supply and drainage design manual, 2004 2 Beijing China Architecture and Building Publisher (in Chinese)
[]
CeaL, GarridoM, PuertasJ. Experimental validation of two-dimensional depth-averaged models for forecasting rainfall-runoff from precipitation data in urban areas. Journal of Hydrology, 2010, 382(1–4): 88-102
CrossRef Google scholar
[]
ChangnonSA, WestcottNE. Heavy rainstorms in Chicago: INCREASING frequency, altered impacts, and future implications. JAWRA Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 2007, 38(5): 1467-1475
CrossRef Google scholar
[]
CouclelisH. Cellular worlds: A framework for modeling micro-macro dynamics. Environment and Planning A, 1985, 17(5): 585-596
CrossRef Google scholar
[]
Disaster Investigation Group of the State Council of China. 2022. Investigation report of the “7-20” extreme rainstorm disaster in Zhengzhou City, Henan (in Chinese).
[]
DonnellyJ, DaneshkhahA, AbolfathiS. Physics-informed neural networks as surrogate models of hydrodynamic simulators. Science of the Total Environment, 2024, 912: 168814
CrossRef Google scholar
[]
Dottori, F., and E. Todini. 2010. A 2D flood inundation model based on cellular automata approach. In Proceeedings of the XVIII International Conference on Computational Methods in Water Resources, 21–24 June 2010, Barcelona, Spain.
[]
Farsal, W., S. Anter, and M. Ramdani. 2018. Deep learning. In Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Intelligent Systems: Theories and Applications, 24–25 October 2018, New York, USA.
[]
FraehrN, WangQJ, WuW, NathanR. Supercharging hydrodynamic inundation models for instant flood insight. Nature Water, 2023, 1(10): 835-843
CrossRef Google scholar
[]
FraehrN, WangQJ, WuW, NathanR. Assessment of surrogate models for flood inundation: the physics-guided LSG model vs. state-of-the-art machine learning models. Water Research, 2024, 252: 121202
CrossRef Google scholar
[]
GhimireB, ChenAS, GuidolinM, KeedwellEC, DjordjevićS, SavićDA. Formulation of a fast 2D urban pluvial flood model using a cellular automata approach. Journal of Hydroinformatics, 2013, 15(3): 676-686
CrossRef Google scholar
[]
GoutteC, GaussierE. LosadaDE, Fernández-LunaJM. A probabilistic interpretation of precision, recall and F-score, with implication for evaluation. Advances in information retrieval: 27th European Conference on IR Research, ECIR 2005, Santiago de Compostela, Spain, March 21–23, 2005, Proceedings, 2005 Berlin Springer 345-359
CrossRef Google scholar
[]
GuJ, WangZ, KuenJ, MaL, ShahroudyA, ShuaiB, LiuT, WangX, et al. . Recent advances in convolutional neural networks. Pattern Recognition, 2018, 77: 354-377
CrossRef Google scholar
[]
GuhaS, JanaRK, SanyalMK. Artificial neural network approaches for disaster management: a literature review. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 2022, 81: 103276
CrossRef Google scholar
[]
GuidolinM, ChenAS, GhimireB, KeedwellEC, DjordjevićS, SavićDA. A weighted cellular automata 2D inundation model for rapid flood analysis. Environmental Modelling & Software, 2016, 84: 378-394
CrossRef Google scholar
[]
GuoZ, LeitãoJP, SimõesNE, MoosaviV. Data-driven flood emulation: speeding up urban flood predictions by deep convolutional neural networks. Journal of Flood Risk Management, 2020, 14(1): e12684
CrossRef Google scholar
[]
GuptaHV, KlingH, YilmazKK, MartinezGF. Decomposition of the mean squared error and NSE performance criteria: Implications for improving hydrological modelling. Journal of Hydrology, 2009, 377(1–2): 80-91
CrossRef Google scholar
[]
HanY, WuZ, GuoY, HuY. Comparative study on Chicago rainstorm pattern and urban disastrous precipitation. Yangtze River, 2022, 53(5): 35-40
[]
ItamiRM. Simulating spatial dynamics: Cellular automata theory. Landscape and Urban Planning, 1994, 30(1–2): 27-47
CrossRef Google scholar
[]
KabirS, PatidarS, XiaX, LiangQ, NealJ, PenderG. A deep convolutional neural network model for rapid prediction of fluvial flood inundation. Journal of Hydrology, 2020, 590: 125481
CrossRef Google scholar
[]
KeiferCJ, ChuHH. Synthetic storm pattern for drainage design. Journal of the Hydraulics Division, 1957, 83(4): 1332-1325
CrossRef Google scholar
[]
Kiranyaz, S., T. Ince, R. Hamila, and M. Gabbouj. 2015. Convolutional neural networks for patient-specific ECG classification. In Proceedings of the 2015 37th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC), 2529 August 2015, Milan, Italy.
[]
LeandroJ, ChenAS, DjordjevićS, SavićDA. Comparison of 1D/1D and 1D/2D coupled (sewer/surface) hydraulic models for urban flood simulation. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 2009, 135(6): 495-504
CrossRef Google scholar
[]
LeCunY, BengioY. ArbibMA. Convolutional networks for images, speech, and time series. The handbook of brain theory and neural networks, 1998 Cambridge, MA MIT Press 255-258
[]
LeCunY, BengioY, HintonG. Deep learning. Nature, 2015, 521(7553): 436-444
CrossRef Google scholar
[]
LiaoY, WangZ, ChenX, LaiC. Fast simulation and prediction of urban pluvial floods using a deep convolutional neural network model. Journal of Hydrology, 2023, 624: 129945
CrossRef Google scholar
[]
LinL, WuZ, LiangQ. Urban flood susceptibility analysis using a GIS-based multi-criteria analysis framework. Natural Hazards, 2019, 97(2): 455-475
CrossRef Google scholar
[]
LöweR, BöhmJ, JensenDG, LeandroJ, RasmussenSH. U-FLOOD–Topographic deep learning for predicting urban pluvial flood water depth. Journal of Hydrology, 2021, 603: 126898
CrossRef Google scholar
[]
LuanQ, FuX, SongC, WangH, LiuJ, WangY. Runoff effect evaluation of LID through SWMM in typical mountainous, low-lying urban areas: a case study in China. Water, 2017, 9(6): 439
CrossRef Google scholar
[]
MishraC, GuptaD. Deep machine learning and neural networks: an overview. IAES International Journal of Artificial Intelligence, 2017, 6(2): 66
[]
NandiS, ReddyMJ. An integrated approach to streamflow estimation and flood inundation mapping using VIC. RAPID and LISFLOOD-FP. Journal of Hydrology, 2022, 610: 127842
CrossRef Google scholar
[]
NealJ, KeefC, BatesP, BevenK, LeedalD. Probabilistic flood risk mapping including spatial dependence. Hydrological Processes, 2013, 27(9): 1349-1363
CrossRef Google scholar
[]
NealJ, SchumannG, FewtrellT, BudimirM, BatesP, MasonD. Evaluating a new LISFLOOD-FP formulation with data from the summer 2007 floods in Tewkesbury, UK. Journal of Flood Risk Management, 2011, 4(2): 88-95
CrossRef Google scholar
[]
PallaA, ColliM, CandelaA, AronicaG, LanzaL. Pluvial flooding in urban areas: the role of surface drainage efficiency. Journal of Flood Risk Management, 2018, 11: S663-S676
CrossRef Google scholar
[]
ReichsteinM, Camps-VallsG, StevensB, JungM, DenzlerJ, CarvalhaisN, PrabhatF. Deep learning and process understanding for data-driven Earth system science. Nature, 2019, 566(7743): 195-204
CrossRef Google scholar
[]
RosbjergD, MadsenH. Initial design of urban drainage systems for extreme rainfall events using intensity-duration-area (IDA) curves and Chicago design storms (CDS). Hydrological Sciences Journal, 2019, 64(12): 1397-1403
CrossRef Google scholar
[]
RoyS, BoseA, SinghaN, BasakD, ChowdhuryIR. Urban waterlogging risk as an undervalued environmental challenge: An integrated MCDA-GIS based modeling approach. Environmental Challenges, 2021, 4: 100194
CrossRef Google scholar
[]
SalehF, DucharneA, FlipoN, OudinL, LedouxE. Impact of river bed morphology on discharge and water levels simulated by a 1D Saint-Venant hydraulic model at regional scale. Journal of Hydrology, 2013, 476: 169-177
CrossRef Google scholar
[]
SampsonCC, SmithAM, BatesPD, NealJC, AlfieriL, FreerJE. A high-resolution global flood hazard model. Water Resources Research, 2015, 51(9): 7358-7381
CrossRef Google scholar
[]
SavićDA, DjordjevićS, KeedwellEC, GuidolinM, ChenAS, GhimireB. Formulation of a fast 2D urban pluvial flood model using a cellular automata approach. Journal of Hydroinformatics, 2013, 15(3): 676-686
CrossRef Google scholar
[]
SchumannGJP, StampoulisD, SmithAM, SampsonCC, AndreadisKM, NealJC, BatesPD. Rethinking flood hazard at the global scale. Geophysical Research Letters, 2016, 43(19): 10249-10256
CrossRef Google scholar
[]
SidekLM, JaafarAS, MajidWHAWA, BasriH, MarufuzzamanM, FaredMM, MoonWCh. High-resolution hydrological-hydraulic modeling of urban floods using InfoWorks ICM. Sustainability, 2021, 13(18): 10259
CrossRef Google scholar
[]
SituZ, WangQ, TengS, FengW, ChenG, ZhouQ, FuG. Improving urban flood prediction using LSTM-DeepLabv3+ and Bayesian optimization with spatiotemporal feature fusion. Journal of Hydrology, 2024, 630: 130743
CrossRef Google scholar
[]
TrongNG, QuangPN, CuongNV, LeHA, NguyenHL, Tien BuiD. Spatial prediction of fluvial flood in high-frequency tropical cyclone area using TensorFlow 1D-convolution neural networks and geospatial data. Remote Sensing, 2023, 15(22): 5429
CrossRef Google scholar
[]
WangH, HuY, GuoY, WuZ, YanD. Urban flood forecasting based on the coupling of numerical weather model and stormwater model: a case study of Zhengzhou City. Journal of Hydrology: Regional Studies, 2022, 39: 100985
[]
WangH-W, LinG-F, HsuC-T, WuS-J, TfwalaSS. Long-term temporal flood predictions made using convolutional neural networks. Water, 2022, 14(24): 4134
CrossRef Google scholar
[]
Weesakul, U., W. Chaowiwat, M. Mudassar Rehan, and S. Weesakul. 2017. Modification of a design storm pattern for urban drainage systems considering the impact of climate change. Engineering & Applied Science Research 44(3). https://doi.org/10.14456/easr.2017.24.
[]
WillmottCJ, MatsuuraK. Advantages of the mean absolute error (MAE) over the root mean square error (RMSE) in assessing average model performance. Climate Research, 2005, 30(1): 79-82
CrossRef Google scholar
[]
WingOEJ, BatesPD, SmithAM, SampsonCC, JohnsonKA, FargioneJ, MorefieldP. Estimates of present and future flood risk in the conterminous United States. Environmental Research Letters, 2018, 13(3): 034023
CrossRef Google scholar
[]
WolframS. Cellular automata as models of complexity. Nature, 1984, 311(5985): 419-424
CrossRef Google scholar
[]
XuG, RenT, ChenY, CheW. A one-dimensional CNN-LSTM model for epileptic seizure recognition using EEG signal analysis. Frontiers in Neuroscience, 2020, 14: 578126
CrossRef Google scholar
[]
YanX, XuK, FengW, ChenJ. A rapid prediction model of urban flood inundation in a high-risk area coupling machine learning and numerical simulation approaches. International Journal of Disaster Risk Science, 2021, 12(6): 903-918
CrossRef Google scholar
[]
YoussefAM, PradhanB, DikshitA, Al-KatheriMM, MatarSS, MahdiAM. Landslide susceptibility mapping using CNN-1D and 2D deep learning algorithms: comparison of their performance at Asir Region, KSA. Bulletin of Engineering Geology and the Environment, 2022, 81(4): 165
CrossRef Google scholar
[]
YuH, ZhaoY, FuY, LiL. Spatiotemporal variance assessment of urban rainstorm waterlogging affected by impervious surface expansion: a case study of Guangzhou. China Sustainability, 2018, 10(10): 3761
CrossRef Google scholar
[]
ZhangW, LiuY, TangW, ChenS, XieW. Rapid spatio-temporal prediction of coastal urban floods based on deep learning approaches. Urban Climate, 2023, 52: 101716
CrossRef Google scholar
[]
ZhangZ, TianJ, HuangW, YinL, ZhengW, LiuS. A haze prediction method based on one-dimensional convolutional neural network. Atmosphere, 2021, 12(10): 1327
CrossRef Google scholar
[]
ZhangQ, WuZ, ZhangH, Dalla FontanaG, TarolliP. Identifying dominant factors of waterlogging events in metropolitan coastal cities: the case study of Guangzhou. China. Journal of Environmental Management, 2020, 271: 110951
[]
ZhaoG, PangB, XuZ, PengD, ZuoD. Urban flood susceptibility assessment based on convolutional neural networks. Journal of Hydrology, 2020, 590: 125235
CrossRef Google scholar
[]
ZhaoG, XuZ, PangB, TuT, XuL, DuL. An enhanced inundation method for urban flood hazard mapping at the large catchment scale. Journal of Hydrology, 2019, 571: 873-882
CrossRef Google scholar
[]
ZhengX, DuanC, ChenY, LiR, WuZ. Disaster loss calculation method of urban flood bimodal data fusion based on remote sensing and text. Journal of Hydrology: Regional Studies, 2023, 47: 101410
[]
Zounemat-KermaniM, BatelaanO, FadaeeM, HinkelmannR. Ensemble machine learning paradigms in hydrology: A review. Journal of Hydrology, 2021, 598: 126266
CrossRef Google scholar

Accesses

Citations

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/