Comparative Analysis of Tsunami Casualty Estimation Approaches: Agent-Based Modeling versus Simplified Approach in Japanese Coastal Cities

Abstract

Estimating potential casualties from a significant earthquake and tsunami event is crucial to enhance disaster preparedness and response. Although various approaches exist to assess potential casualties, few studies have made direct comparisons between them. The present study aimed to clarify the differences in the estimation of casualties between an agent-based model (ABM), which can capture detailed evacuation behavior but demands significant computational resources, and a simplified approach at less computational cost by assuming that evacuees would move along a straight line from their initial location to the closest evacuation destination. These different approaches were applied to three coastal cities in Japan—Mihama, Kushimoto, and Shingu in Wakayama Prefecture—revealing significant differences in the estimated results between the ABM and the simplified approach. Notably, when the effects of building collapse due to an earthquake were considered, the mortality rates estimated by the ABM were higher than those estimated by the simplified approach in the three cities. There were also significant differences in the spatial distribution of the estimated mortality rates between the ABM and the simplified approach. The findings suggest that while the simplified approach can yield results more quickly, casualty estimates derived from such models should be interpreted with caution.

References

[] AldrichPD, SawadaY. The physical and social determinants of mortality in the 3.11 tsunami. Social Science & Medicine, 2015, 124: 66-75

[] AndoM. Source mechanisms and tectonic significance of historical earthquakes along the Nankai Trough, Japan. Tectonophysics, 1975, 27: 119-140

[] Anguelov, B. 2011. Video game pathfinding and improvements to discrete search on grid-based maps. Master thesis. University of Pretoria, Pretoria, South Africa.

[] AthukoralaP, ResosudarmoBP. The Indian Ocean Tsunami: Economic impact, disaster management, and lessons. Asian Economic Papers, 2005, 4(1): 1-39

[] CDMC (Central Disaster Management Council of Japan). 2012a. Tsunami fault modeling: Tsunami fault model, tsunami height, inundation area. https://www.bousai.go.jp/jishin/nankai/taisaku/pdf/20120829_2nd_report01.pdf. Accessed 5 Dec 2023 (in Japanese).

[] CDMC (Central Disaster Management Council of Japan). 2012b. Tsunami fault modeling: Tsunami fault model, tsunami height, inundation area: Tsunami calculation results (tsunami height). https://www.bousai.go.jp/jishin/nankai/taisaku/pdf/20120829_2nd_report07.pdf. Accessed 5 Dec 2023 (in Japanese).

[] CDMC (Central Disaster Management Council of Japan). 2016. Working group for countermeasures against Nankai Trough megathrust earthquake. https://www.geospatial.jp/ckan/organization/naikakufu-01. Accessed 5 Dec 2023) (in Japanese).

[] CDMC (Central Disaster Management Council of Japan). 2019a. Damage estimation for the Nankai Trough megathrust earthquake (damage to buildings and human casualties). https://www.bousai.go.jp/jishin/nankai/taisaku_wg/pdf/1_sanko2.pdf. Accessed 5 Dec 2023 (in Japanese).

[] CDMC (Central Disaster Management Council of Japan). 2019b. Overview of damage estimation items and assumption methodology for Nankai Trough megathrust earthquake: Damage to buildings and human casualties. https://www.bousai.go.jp/jishin/nankai/taisaku_wg/pdf/2_sanko2.pdf. Accessed 5 Dec 2023 (in Japanese).

[] Cox, R.J., T.D. Shand, and M.J. Blacka. 2010. Australian rainfall and runoff revision projects project 10: Appropriate safety criteria for people. http://arr.ga.gov.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0006/40578/ARR_Project_10_Stage1_report_Final.pdf. Accessed 21 May 2019.

[] FathianpourA, EvansB, JelodarMB, WilkinsonS. Tsunami evacuation modelling via micro-simulation model. Progress in Disaster Science, 2023, 17: Article 100277

[] Fujita, R., H. Yoshida, M. Hori, and M. Lalith. 2015. Evacuation simulation regarding building damage caused by earthquake. Journal of Japan Society of Civil Engineers, Ser. A2 (Applied Mechanics) 71(2): I_643–I_654 (in Japanese).

[] Geospatial Information Authority of Japan. 2023. Digital map (fundamental national land information). https://www.gsi.go.jp/kibanjoho/kibanjoho40027.html. Accessed 6 Aug 2023.

[] HasegawaK, KobayakawaS, InagakiT, UshirookaH. A study on accessibility to shelters considering building collapse in case of large scale earthquake. JSTE Journal of Traffic Engineering, 2017, 3(2): A_287-A_294

[] ItoE, KawaseH, MatsushimaS, HatayamaM. Tsunami evacuation simulation considering road blockage by collapsed buildings evaluated from predicted strong ground motion. Natural Hazards, 2020, 101: 959-980

[] KimK, KaviariF, PantP, YamashitaE. An agent-based model of short-notice tsunami evacuation in Waikiki, Hawaii. Transportation Research Part D, 2022, 105: Article 103239

[] KimJ, TakabatakeT, NistorI, ShibayamaT. A comparison between agent-based and GIS-based tsunami evacuation simulations: A case study for Tofino, BC. Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering, 2022, 49(4): 511-526

[] KoyanoK, TakabatakeT, EstebanM, ShibayamaT. Influence of edge waves on tsunami characteristics along Kujukuri beach, Japan. Journal of Waterway, Port, Coastal, and Ocean Engineering, 2021, 147: Article 04020049

[] Kozo Keikaku Engineering Inc. 2020. artisoc4 simulation platform specialized for MAS. https://mas.kke.co.jp/artisoc4/ . Accessed 6 Aug 2023.

[] Kumagai, K. 2014. Validation of tsunami evacuation simulation to evacuation activity from the 2011 off the Pacific Coast of Tohoku Earthquake Tsunami. Journal of Japan Society of Civil Engineers, Ser. D3 (Infrastructure Planning and Management) 70(5): 187–196 (in Japanese).

[] KuwasawaN, KatadaT. Simulation analysis on human casualty caused by earthquake and following tsunami. Doboku Gakkai Ronbunshuu D, 2008, 64(3): 380-390

[] LatcharoteP, LeelawatN, SuppasriA, ThamaruxP, ImamuraF. Estimation of fatality ratios and investigation of influential factors in the 2011 Great East Japan Tsunami. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 2018, 29: 37-54

[] MasE, SuppasriA, ImamuraF, KoshimuraS. Agent-based simulation of the 2011 Great East Japan Earthquake/Tsunami evacuation: An integrated model of tsunami inundation and evacuation. Journal of Natural Disaster Science, 2012, 34(1): 41-57

[] Ministry of Land, Infrastructure, Transport and Tourism. 2013. Guidelines for planning Tsunami Disaster Prevention City, 1st edn. https://www.mlit.go.jp/common/001000488.pdf . Accessed 4 Sept 2021 (in Japanese).

[] MoriN, TakahashiT, YasudaT, YanagisawaH. Survey of 2011 Tohoku Earthquake Tsunami inundation and run-up. Geophysical Research Letters, 2011, 38(7): Article L00G14

[] MostafiziA, WangH, CoxD, CramerLA, DongS. Agent-based tsunami evacuation modeling of unplanned network disruptions for evidence-driven resource allocation and retrofitting strategies. Natural Hazards, 2017, 88(3): 1347-1372

[] MostafiziA, WangH, CoxD, DongS. An agent-based vertical evacuation model for a near-field tsunami: Choice behavior, logical shelter locations, and life safety. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 2019, 34(3): 467-479

[] MuhammadA, De RisiR, De LucaF, MoriN, YasudaT, GodaK. Are current tsunami evacuation approach safe enough?. Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment, 2021, 35: 759-779

[] MuraoO, YamazakiF. Development of fragility curves for buildings based on damage survey data of a local government after the 1995 Hyogoken-Nanbu Earthquake. Journal of Structural and Construction Engineering (Transactions of AIJ), 2000, 65: 189-196

[] OmiraR, DoğanG, HidayatR, HusrinS, PrasetyaG, AnnunziatoA, ProiettiC, ProbstP, et al. . The September 28th, 2018, tsunami in Palu-Sulawesi, Indonesia: A post-event field survey. Pure and Applied Geophysics, 2019, 176: 1379-1395

[] OsaragiT, KishimotoM, OkiT. Assessment of street network accessibility in Tokyo metropolitan area after a large earthquake. Journal of Disaster Research, 2018, 13(2): 262-271

[] TakabatakeT, ChenxiDH, EstebanM, ShibayamaT. Influence of road blockage on tsunami evacuation: A comparative study of three different coastal cities in Japan. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 2022, 68: Article 102684

[] TakabatakeT, EstebanM, NistorI, ShibayamaT, NishizakiS. Effectiveness of hard and soft tsunami countermeasures on loss of life under different population scenarios. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 2020, 45: Article 101491

[] TakabatakeT, FujisawaK, EstebanM, ShibayamaT. Simulated effectiveness of a car evacuation from a tsunami. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 2020, 47: Article 101532

[] TakabatakeT, NistorI, St-GermainP. Tsunami evacuation simulation for the District of Tofino, Vancouver Island, Canada. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 2020, 48: Article 1101573

[] TakabatakeT, ShibayamaT, EstebanM, AchiariH, NurismanN, GelfiM, TariganTA, KencanaER, et al. . Field survey and evacuation behaviour during the 2018 Sunda Strait Tsunami. Coastal Engineering Journal, 2019, 61(4): 423-443

[] TakabatakeT, ShibayamaT, EstebanM, IshiiH, HamanoG. Simulated tsunami evacuation behavior of local residents and visitors in Kamakura, Japan. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 2017, 23: 1-14

[] TakabatakeT, St-GermainP, NistorI, StolleJ. Numerical modelling of coastal inundation from Cascadia subduction zone tsunamis and implications for coastal communities on western Vancouver Island, Canada. Natural Hazards, 2019, 98: 267-291

[] Wakayama Prefecture. 2014. Wakayama Prefecture earthquake damage estimation survey report (summary version). https://www.pref.wakayama.lg.jp/prefg/011400/d00153668_d/fil/wakayama_higaisoutei.pdf. Accessed 6 Aug 2023.

[] Wakayama Prefecture. 2022. Regarding evacuation locations and shelters. https://www.pref.wakayama.lg.jp/prefg/011400/hinannsaki.html. Accessed 7 Jul 2023.

[] WangZ, JiaG. A novel agent-based model for tsunami evacuation simulation and risk assessment. Natural Hazards, 2021, 105: 2045-2071

[] WangZ, JiaG. Simulation-based and risk-informed assessment of the effectiveness of tsunami evacuation routes using agent-based modeling: A case study of Seaside, Oregon. International Journal of Disaster Risk Science, 2022, 13: 66-86

[] WangH, MostafiziA, CramerLA, CoxD, ParkH. An agent-based model of a multimodal near-field tsunami evacuation: Decision-making and life safety. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 2016, 64: 86-100

[] WoodNJ, SchmidtleinMC. Anisotropic path modeling to assess pedestrian-evacuation potential from cascadia-related tsunamis in the US Pacific Northwest. Natural Hazards, 2012, 62(2): 275-300

[] YunNY, HamadaM. Evacuation behavior and fatality rate during the 2011 Great East Japan Earthquake and Tsunami. Earthquake Spectra, 2015, 31(3): 1237-1265