How Can Practitioners Support Citizen Volunteers in Disaster Risk Reduction? Insight from “Good and Ready” in Aotearoa New Zealand
Loïc Le Dé, Steve Ronoh, Ei Mon Thinn Kyu, Brigitte Rive
International Journal of Disaster Risk Science ›› 2024, Vol. 15 ›› Issue (3) : 374-387.
How Can Practitioners Support Citizen Volunteers in Disaster Risk Reduction? Insight from “Good and Ready” in Aotearoa New Zealand
Global and national policy frameworks emphasize the importance of people’s participation and volunteers’ role in disaster risk reduction. While research has extensively focused on volunteers in disaster response and recovery, less attention has been paid on how organizations involved in disaster risk management can support volunteers in leading and coordinating community-based disaster risk reduction. In 2019, the New Zealand Red Cross piloted the Good and Ready initiative in Auckland, Aotearoa New Zealand, with the objective to empower local people in resilience building with a focus on volunteers and community participation. This research examined the positive and negative outcomes of Good and Ready and investigated volunteers’ experiences in the disaster resilience initiative. It involved the codesign of a questionnaire-based survey using participatory methods with Good and Ready volunteers, the dissemination of the survey to gather volunteers’ viewpoints, and a focus group discussion with participatory activities with Red Cross volunteers. The findings highlight that a key challenge lies in finding a balance between a program that provides flexibility to address contextual issues and fosters communities’ ownership, versus a prescriptive and standardized approach that leaves little room for creativity and self-initiative. It pinpoints that supporting volunteers with technical training is critical but that soft skills training such as coordinating, communicating, or facilitating activities at the local level are needed. It concludes that the sustainability of Good and Ready requires understanding and meeting volunteers’ motivations and expectations and that enhancing partnerships with local emergency management agencies would strengthen the program.
Community-based approach / Disaster risk reduction / New Zealand / Participation / Volunteers
[] |
|
[] |
|
[] |
|
[] |
|
[] |
Bubb, J., and L. Le Dé. 2022. Participation as a requirement: Towards more inclusion or further exclusion? The community disaster and climate change committees in Vanuatu as a case study. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction 76: Article 102992.
|
[] |
|
[] |
|
[] |
|
[] |
|
[] |
Cull, P. 2019. Community-based disaster response teams for vulnerable groups and developing nations: Implementation, training and sustainability. Master’s thesis. Massey University, Palmerston North, New Zealand.
|
[] |
|
[] |
|
[] |
|
[] |
|
[] |
|
[] |
Grant, A., and E.R. Langer. 2021. Wildfire volunteering and community disaster resilience in New Zealand: Institutional change in a dynamic rural social-ecological setting. Ecology and Society 26(3): Article 18.
|
[] |
|
[] |
Haynes, K., D.K. Bird, and J. Whittaker. 2020. Working outside “The Rules”: Opportunities and challenges of community participation in risk reduction. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction 44: Article 101396.
|
[] |
Heijmans, A. 2009. The social life of community-based disaster risk reduction: Origins, politics and framing. Disaster Studies Working Paper 20. Aon Benfield University College London Hazard Research Centre, London.
|
[] |
Heijmans, A., and L.P. Victoria. 2001. Citizenry-based and development oriented disaster response: Experiences and practices in disaster management of the citizens’ disaster response network in the Philippines. Center for Disaster Preparedness, Quezon City, Philippines.
|
[] |
|
[] |
|
[] |
|
[] |
|
[] |
|
[] |
|
[] |
MCDEM (Ministry of Civil Defence and Emergency Management). 2019. National disaster resilience strategy Rautaki ā-Motu Manawaroa Aituā. Department of the Prime Minister and Cabinet, Wellington, New Zealand.
|
[] |
|
[] |
|
[] |
|
[] |
|
[] |
Nahkur, O., K. Orru, S. Hansson, P. Jukarainen, M. Myllylä, M. Krüger, M. Max, L. Savadori, et al. 2022. The engagement of informal volunteers in disaster Management in Europe. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction 83: Article 103413.
|
[] |
NZRC (New Zealand Red Cross). n.d. Youth engagement strategy 2020–2030. https://www.redcross.org.nz/about-us/what-we-do/our-strategy/. Accessed 16 May 2024.
|
[] |
Okita, Y., S. Glassey, and R. Shaw. 2022. COVID-19 and the expanding role of international urban search and rescue (USAR) teams: The case of the 2020 Beirut explosions. Journal of International Humanitarian Action 7(1): Article 8.
|
[] |
Quarantelli, E.L. 1984. Emergent citizen groups in disaster preparedness and recovery activities. Final Project Report no. 33. Disaster Research Center, University of Delaware, Delaware, USA.
|
[] |
|
[] |
Ryan, B., K.A. Johnston, M. Taylor, and R. McAndrew. 2020. Community engagement for disaster preparedness: A systematic literature review. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction 49: Article 101655.
|
[] |
|
[] |
|
[] |
|
[] |
UNDRR (United Nations Office for Disaster Risk Reduction). 2015. Sendai framework for disaster risk reduction 2015–2030. https://www.unisdr.org/files/43291_sendaiframeworkfordrren.pdf. Accessed 16 May 2024.
|
[] |
Wenger, D.E., and J.M. Weller. 1973. Disaster subcultures: The cultural residues of community disasters. Preliminary paper 9. Disaster Research Center, University of Delaware, Newark, USA.
|
[] |
|
[] |
WREMO (Wellington Region Emergency Management Office). 2024. Hub guide. https://www.wremo.nz/get-ready/community-ready/community-emergency-hubs/find-your-hub/. Accessed 16 May 2024.
|
[] |
|
/
〈 |
|
〉 |