The Role of the Spatial Network in Urban Disaster Risk Variations: Reimagining the Notion of Spatial Vulnerability at the Urban Scale
Monia Del Pinto, Ksenia Chmutina, Falli Palaiologou, Lee Bosher
International Journal of Disaster Risk Science ›› 2024, Vol. 15 ›› Issue (3) : 303-316.
The Role of the Spatial Network in Urban Disaster Risk Variations: Reimagining the Notion of Spatial Vulnerability at the Urban Scale
The notion of “spatial vulnerability” is present in most disaster studies with a strong geographical connotation and accordingly is adopted at all scales, including the urban. While enabling mapping and visualizing risk patterns at macroscales, this geocentric foundation fails to capture disaster risk dynamics associated with the urban spatial network—an element that plays a significant role in the everyday and emergency functioning of cities, enabling users’ movement and interaction. Yet, urban vulnerability assessment overlooks this aspect and thus leaves urban disaster risk mechanisms partially unexplored. This study investigated the role of the network of urban public open spaces (UPOS) in the creation and progression of urban disaster risk in earthquake-prone settlements. Through a multimethod approach that integrates quantitative and qualitative methods and explores spatial configuration, planning policies, and practices of use of UPOS in everyday and emergency scenarios, our study demonstrated that UPOS configuration plays an active role in urban disaster risk. Urban public open spaces impact risk by influencing the exposure of pedestrians and their capacity for self-protection. The study further reconceptualized spatial vulnerability at the urban scale, as the fraction of vulnerability associated to the spatial network, highlighting the interplay of planning policies and spatial practices in its production and progression. Our findings make the notion of spatial vulnerability less ambiguous at the urban scale, by viewing the variable as an imbalance in capacities and exposure that generates spatially unsafe conditions. This refined conceptualization of spatial vulnerability becomes a lens for a more granular approach to urban disaster risk reduction and city planning by identifying and integrating sociospatial considerations.
Central Italy Earthquakes / Pedestrian evacuation / Space syntax / Spatial vulnerability / Urban disaster risk
[] |
|
[] |
|
[] |
|
[] |
|
[] |
|
[] |
|
[] |
|
[] |
|
[] |
|
[] |
|
[] |
|
[] |
|
[] |
Contreras, D., T. Blaschke, S. Kienberger, and P. Zeil. 2011. Spatial vulnerability indicators: “Measuring” recovery processes after earthquakes. In Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Information Systems for Crisis Response and Management: From Early-Warning Systems to Preparedness and Training, ISCRAM 2011, 8–11 May 2011, Lisbon, Portugal, 1–5.
|
[] |
Cutini, V. 2013. The city, when it trembles: Earthquake destructions, post-earthquake reconstructions and grid configuration. In Proceedings of the 9th International Space Syntax Symposium, 31 October–3 November 2013, Seoul, South Korea, 5–17.
|
[] |
|
[] |
|
[] |
|
[] |
De Sherbinin, A. 2014. Spatial climate change vulnerability assessment: A review of data, methods, and issues. Climatelinks, 1 August 2014.
|
[] |
Del Pinto, M., G. Palaiologou, K. Chmutina, and L. Bosher. 2021. Urban morphology in support of disaster risk reduction: Towards theory and methods for a spatial approach to tackling urban vulnerability to earthquakes. In Proceedings of the XXVIII International Seminar on Urban Form ISUF2021: Urban Form and the Sustainable and Prosperous Cities, 29 June–3 July 2021, Glasgow, UK, 354–362.
|
[] |
|
[] |
|
[] |
|
[] |
|
[] |
|
[] |
|
[] |
|
[] |
|
[] |
Giuliani, F., A. De Falco, and V. Cutini. 2020. The role of urban configuration during disasters. A scenario-based methodology for the post-earthquake emergency management of Italian historic centres. Safety Science 127: Article 104700.
|
[] |
Gold, J.R. 1998. Creating the charter of Athens: CIAM and the functional city, 1933–43. Town Planning Review 69(3): Article 225.
|
[] |
Griffiths, S. 2012. The use of space syntax in historical research: Current practice and future possibilities. In Proceedings of the 8th International Space Syntax Symposium, 3–6 January 2012, Santiago, Chile, 1–26.
|
[] |
|
[] |
|
[] |
|
[] |
|
[] |
Hewitt, K. 1997. Regions of risk: A geographical introduction to disasters. London: Longman.
|
[] |
|
[] |
|
[] |
|
[] |
|
[] |
|
[] |
|
[] |
|
[] |
|
[] |
|
[] |
|
[] |
Krenz, K. 2017. Employing volunteered geographic information in space syntax analysis. In Proceedings of the 11th International Space Syntax Symposium, 3–7 July 2017, Lisbon, Portugal, 1–26.
|
[] |
|
[] |
|
[] |
|
[] |
|
[] |
Marin Maureira, V., and K. Karimi. 2017. The everyday and the post-disaster urban systems as one thing. In Proceedings of the 11th International Space Syntax Symposium, 3–7 July 2017, Lisbon, Portugal, 1–17.
|
[] |
|
[] |
|
[] |
|
[] |
|
[] |
Pezzica, C., C. Valerio, and C.B.D. Souza. 2019. Rapid configurational analysis using OSM data: Towards the use of space syntax to orient post-disaster decision making. In Proceedings of the 12th International Space Syntax Symposium, 8–13 July 2019, Beijing, China.
|
[] |
|
[] |
|
[] |
|
[] |
Raduszynski, T., and M. Numada. 2023. Measure and spatial identification of social vulnerability, exposure and risk to natural hazards in Japan using open data. Scientific Reports 13(1): Article 664.
|
[] |
|
[] |
|
[] |
|
[] |
|
[] |
|
[] |
|
[] |
Sritart, H., H. Miyazaki, S. Kanbara, and T. Hara. 2020. Methodology and application of spatial vulnerability assessment for evacuation shelters in disaster planning. Sustainability 12(18): Article 7355.
|
[] |
|
[] |
Turner, A. 2001. Angular analysis. In Proceedings of the 3rd International Symposium on Space Syntax, 7–11 May 2001, Atlanta, USA.
|
[] |
|
[] |
|
[] |
|
[] |
|
[] |
|
[] |
|
[] |
|
[] |
|
/
〈 |
|
〉 |