Economic Risk Assessment of Future Debris Flows by Machine Learning Method

Chenchen Qiu, Lijun Su, Alessandro Pasuto, Giulia Bossi, Xueyu Geng

International Journal of Disaster Risk Science ›› 2024, Vol. 15 ›› Issue (1) : 149-164. DOI: 10.1007/s13753-024-00545-x
Article

Economic Risk Assessment of Future Debris Flows by Machine Learning Method

Author information +
History +

Abstract

A reliable economic risk map is critical for effective debris-flow mitigation. However, the uncertainties surrounding future scenarios in debris-flow frequency and magnitude restrict its application. To estimate the economic risks caused by future debris flows, a machine learning-based method was proposed to generate an economic risk map by multiplying a debris-flow hazard map and an economic vulnerability map. We selected the Gyirong Zangbo Basin as the study area because frequent severe debris flows impact the area every year. The debris-flow hazard map was developed through the multiplication of the annual probability of spatial impact, temporal probability, and annual susceptibility. We employed a hybrid machine learning model—certainty factor-genetic algorithm-support vector classification—to calculate susceptibilities. Simultaneously, a Poisson model was applied for temporal probabilities, while the determination of annual probability of spatial impact relied on statistical results. Additionally, four major elements at risk were selected for the generation of an economic loss map: roads, vegetation-covered land, residential buildings, and farmland. The economic loss of elements at risk was calculated based on physical vulnerabilities and their economic values. Therefore, we proposed a physical vulnerability matrix for residential buildings, factoring in impact pressure on buildings and their horizontal distance and vertical distance to debris-flow channels. In this context, an ensemble model (XGBoost) was used to predict debris-flow volumes to calculate impact pressures on buildings. The results show that residential buildings occupy 76.7% of the total economic risk, while road-covered areas contribute approximately 6.85%. Vegetation-covered land and farmland collectively represent 16.45% of the entire risk. These findings can provide a scientific support for the effective mitigation of future debris flows.

Keywords

Economic risk / Future debris flows / Gyirong Zangbo Basin / Machine learning model / Physical vulnerability matrix / Southwest Tibet, China

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Chenchen Qiu, Lijun Su, Alessandro Pasuto, Giulia Bossi, Xueyu Geng. Economic Risk Assessment of Future Debris Flows by Machine Learning Method. International Journal of Disaster Risk Science, 2024, 15(1): 149‒164 https://doi.org/10.1007/s13753-024-00545-x

References

[]
Angillieri MYE. Debris flow susceptibility mapping using frequency ratio and seed cells, in a portion of a mountain international route, Dry Central Andes of Argentina. Catena, 2020, 189: Article 104504
[]
Ardabili S, Amir M, Várkonyi-Kóczy AR. Várkonyi-Kóczy AR. Advances in machine learning modeling reviewing hybrid and ensemble methods. Engineering for sustainable future: Selected papers of the 18th International Conference on Global Research and Education Inter-Academia-2019, 2020 Cham Springer 215-227
[]
Bednarik M, Yilmaz I, Marschalko M. Landslide hazard and risk assessment: A case study from the Hlohovec-Sered’ landslide area in south-west Slovakia. Natural Hazards, 2012, 64(1): 547-575
[]
Burbidge, R., and B. Buxton. 2001. An introduction to support vector machines for data mining. Keynote papers, young OR12: 3–15 https://svms.org/tutorials/BurbidgeBuxton2001.pdf. Accessed 10 Feb 2024.
[]
Chen XZ, Chen H, You Y, Liu JF. Susceptibility assessment of debris flows using the analytic hierarchy process method—A case study in Subao River valley, China. Journal of Rock Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, 2015, 7(4): 404-410
[]
Corominas J, van Westen C, Frattini P, Cascini L, Malet JP, Fotopoulou S, Catani F, Van Den Eeckhaut M, et al.. Recommendations for the quantitative analysis of landslide risk. Bulletin of Engineering Geology and the Environment, 2014, 73: 209-263
[]
Crovelli RA, Coe JA. . Probabilistic methodology for estimation of number and economic loss (cost) of future landslides in the San Francisco Bay Region, California, 2008 Reston, VA U.S. Geological Survey
[]
Cui P, Xiang LZ, Zou Q. Risk assessment of highways affected by debris flows in Wenchuan Earthquake area. Journal of Mountain Science, 2013, 10: 173-189
[]
Dai FC, Lee CF, Ngai YY. Landslide risk assessment and management: An overview. Engineering Geology, 2002, 64: 65-87
[]
Dong JW, Chen Y, Yao BY, Zhang X, Zeng NF. A neural network boosting regression model based on XGBoost. Applied Soft Computing, 2022, 125: Article 109067
[]
Fu S, Chen L, Woldai T, Yin KL, Gui L, Li DY, Du J, Zhou C, et al.. Landslide hazard probability and risk assessment at the community level: A case of western Hubei, China. Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences, 2020, 20(2): 581-601
[]
Gartner JE, Cannon SH, Santi PM, Dewolfe VG. Empirical models to predict the volumes of debris flows generated by recently burned basins in the western US. Geomorphology, 2008, 96(3–4): 339-354
[]
Guzzetti F, Galli M, Reichenbach P, Ardizzone F, Cardinali M. Landslide hazard assessment in the Collazzone area, Umbria, central Italy. Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences, 2006, 6(1): 115-131
[]
Hardwick Jones R, Westra S, Sharma A. Observed relationships between extreme sub-daily precipitation, surface temperature, and relative humidity. Geophysical Research Letters, 2010,
CrossRef Google scholar
[]
Huang J, Hales TC, Huang RQ, Ju NP, Li Q, Huang Y. A hybrid machine-learning model to estimate potential debris-flow volumes. Geomorphology, 2020, 367: Article 107333
[]
Hungr O, Evans SG, Bovis MM, Hutchinson JN. A review of the classification of landslides of the flow type. Environmental & Engineering GeoScience, 2001, 7(3): 221-238
[]
Jakob M, Stein D, Ulmi M. Vulnerability of buildings to debris flow impact. Natural Hazards, 2012, 60(2): 241-261
[]
Kang HS, Kim YT. The physical vulnerability of different types of building structure to debris flow events. Natural Hazards, 2016, 80(3): 1475-1493
[]
Khosravi K, Khozani ZS, Mao L. A comparison between advanced hybrid machine learning algorithms and empirical equations applied to abutment scour depth prediction. Journal of Hydrology, 2021, 596: Article 126100
[]
Koch T. Testing various constitutive equations for debris flow modelling. IAHS-AISH Publication, 1998, 248: 249-257
[]
Laigle D, Bardou E. Mass-movement types and processes: Flow-like mass movements, debris flows and earth flows. Treatise on Geomorphology (2nd edn.), 2022, 5: 61-84
[]
Lee DH, Cheon E, Lim HH, Choi SK, Kim YT, Lee SR. An artificial neural network model to predict debris-flow volumes caused by extreme rainfall in the central region of South Korea. Engineering Geology, 2021, 281: Article 105979
[]
Liu KF, Li HC, Hsu YC. Debris flow hazard assessment with numerical simulation. Natural Hazards, 2009, 49(1): 137-161
[]
Marcato G, Bossi G, Rivelli F, Borgatti L. Debris flood hazard documentation and mitigation on the Tilcara alluvial fan (Quebrada de Humahuaca, Jujuy Province, North-West Argentina). Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences, 2012, 12(6): 1873-1882
[]
Marchi L, Brunetti MT, Cavalli M, Crema S. Debris-flow volumes in northeastern Italy: Relationship with drainage area and size probability. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms, 2019, 44(4): 933-943
[]
Mohamed AE. Comparative study of four supervised machine learning techniques for classification. International Journal of Applied Science and Technology, 2017, 7(2): 5-18
[]
Mondal S, Maiti R. Integrating the analytical hierarchy process (AHP) and the frequency ratio (FR) model in landslide susceptibility mapping of Shiv-khola watershed, Darjeeling Himalaya. International Journal of Disaster Risk Science, 2013, 4(4): 200-212
[]
Nguyen H, Vu T, Vo TP, Thai HT. Efficient machine learning models for prediction of concrete strengths. Construction and Building Materials, 2021, 266: Article 120950
[]
Osman AIA, Ahmed AN, Chow MF, Huang YF, El-Shafie A. Extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost) model to predict the groundwater levels in Selangor Malaysia. Ain Shams Engineering Journal, 2021, 12(2): 1545-1556
[]
Papathoma-Köhle M, Gems B, Sturm M, Fuchs S. Matrices, curves and indicators: A review of approaches to assess physical vulnerability to debris flows. Earth-Science Reviews, 2017, 171: 272-288
[]
Pei YQ, Qiu HJ, Yang DD, Liu ZJ, Ma SY, Li JY, Cao MM, Wufuer W. Increasing landslide activity in the Taxkorgan River Basin (eastern Pamirs Plateau, China) driven by climate change. Catena, 2023, 223: Article 106911
[]
Qiu CC, Su LJ, Zou Q, Geng XY. A hybrid machine-learning model to map glacier-related debris flow susceptibility along Gyirong Zangbo watershed under the changing climate. Science of the Total Environment, 2022, 818: Article 151752,
Pubmed
[]
Quan Luna B, Blahut J, Camera C, van Westen C, Apuani T, Jetten V, Sterlacchini S. Physically based dynamic run-out modelling for quantitative debris flow risk assessment: A case study in Tresenda, northern Italy. Environmental Earth Sciences, 2014, 72(3): 645-661
[]
Remondo J, Bonachea J, Cendrero A. A statistical approach to landslide risk modelling at basin scale: From landslide susceptibility to quantitative risk assessment. Landslides, 2005, 2(4): 321-328
[]
Rickenmann D. Empirical relationships for debris flows. Natural Hazards, 1999, 19(1): 47-77
[]
Schick AP, Grodek T, Wolman MG. Hydrologic processes and geomorphic constraints on urbanization of alluvial fan slopes. Geomorphology, 1999, 31(1–4): 325-335
[]
Shi MY, Chen JP, Sun DY, Cao C. Hazard assessment of debris flows based on the catastrophe progression method: A case study from the Wudongde Dam site. International Journal of Heat and Technology, 2015, 33(1–4): 217-220
[]
Staley DM, Negri JA, Kean JW, Laber JL, Tillery AC, Youberg AM. Prediction of spatially explicit rainfall intensity-duration thresholds for post-fire debris-flow generation in the western United States. Geomorphology, 2017, 278: 149-162
[]
Stoffel M, Mendlik T, Schneuwly-Bollschweiler M, Gobiet A. Possible impacts of climate change on debris-flow activity in the Swiss Alps. Climatic Change, 2014, 122: 141-155
[]
Sturm M, Gems B, Keller F, Mazzorana B, Fuchs S, Papathoma-Köhle M, Aufleger M. Understanding impact dynamics on buildings caused by fluviatile sediment transport. Geomorphology, 2018, 321: 45-59
[]
Totschnig R, Fuchs S. Mountain torrents: Quantifying vulnerability and assessing uncertainties. Engineering Geology, 2013, 155: 31-44, pmcid: 4819033
Pubmed
[]
Varnes DJ. . Landslide hazard zonation: A review of principles and practice, 1984 Washington, DC The National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine
[]
Vranken L, Vantilt G, Van Den Eeckhaut M, Vandekerckhove L, Poesen J. Landslide risk assessment in a densely populated hilly area. Landslides, 2015, 12(4): 787-798
[]
Wang RR, Wang LP, Zhang J, He M, Xu JG. XGBoost machine learning algorism performed better than regression models in predicting mortality of moderate-to-severe traumatic brain injury. World Neurosurgery, 2022, 163: e617-e622,
Pubmed
[]
Zanchetta G, Sulpizio R, Pareschi MT, Leoni FM, Santacroce R. Characteristics of May 5–6, 1998 volcaniclastic debris flows in the Sarno area (Campania, southern Italy): Relationships to structural damage and hazard zonation. Journal of Volcanology and Geothermal Research, 2004, 133(1–4): 377-393
[]
Zhang M, Ren Q, Wei X, Wang J, Yang X, Jiang Z. Climate change, glacier melting and streamflow in the Niyang River Basin, southeast Tibet, China. Ecohydrology, 2011, 4(2): 288-298

Accesses

Citations

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/