An experimental investigation into fluid injection-induced fault slip and fracturing under true triaxial stress

Abstract

This study investigates fluid injection-induced fault slip under true triaxial stress, focusing on cases where injection boreholes are either hydraulically connected or disconnected from the fault. Through stress and displacement monitoring, acoustic emission analysis, spectral and source mechanism inversion, and CT scanning, three stages of fluid injection-induced fault slip were identified: injection-induced disturbance, hydraulic fracturing, and pore pressure buildup within the fault zone. The results reveal the dynamic evolution of fracture initiation, pressure accumulation, and fracture propagation leading to fault slip, and show that the fault slip state significantly influences pressure buildup. The observations confirmed a poroelastic coupling mechanism: as pore pressure within the fault zone rises, slip velocity initially increases with the injection rate and subsequently decreases. Source mechanism analysis indicates that fault slip is dominated by compressive-shear motion, whereas hydraulic fracturing exhibits tensile-shear characteristics. Rock mechanical strength, permeability, and stress field evolution analyses showed that fault reactivation precedes hydraulic fracturing of surrounding rock in hard rocks, whereas hydraulic fracturing occurs before fault slip in soft rock. In addition, for low-permeability faults, direct fluid injection is more effective in controlling slip than that for high-permeability faults.

Keywords

Fault slip / Fluid injection / Source mechanism / Spectral analysis / Acoustic emission monitoring

References

[1] Ratouis TMP, Snæbjörnsdóttir SÓ, Voigt MJ, Sigfússon B, Gunnarsson G, Aradóttir ES, et al. Carbfix 2: a transport model of long—term CO₂ and H₂S injection into basaltic rocks at Hellisheidi. SW—Iceland Int J Greenh Gas Control 2022; 114:103586.

[2] Montgomery—Brown EK, Shelly DR, Hsieh PA. Snowmelt—triggered earthquake swarms at the margin of long valley caldera. California Geophys Res Lett 2019; 46(7):3698-705.

[3] Wilson MP, Foulger GR, Gluyas JG, Davies RJ, Julian BR. HiQuake: the human—induced earthquake database. Seismol Res Lett 2017; 88(6):1560—5.

[4] Zhuang JX, Mu ZL, Cai W, He H, Lee JH, Xi GJ, et al. Multistage hydraulic fracturing of a horizontal well for hard roof related coal burst control: insights from numerical modelling to field application. Int J Min Sci Technol 2024; 34(8):1095-114.

[5] Ju Y, Fu GM, Zhou HW, Ge SR, Peng SP. Fault reactivation and seismic risks induced by deep reservoir fracturing: mechanisms, prediction and perspectives. Int J Min Sci Technol 2025; 35(8):1211—32.

[6] Healy JH, Rubey WW, Griggs DT, Raleigh CB. The Denver earthquakes. Science 1968; 161(3848):1301—10.

[7] Elsworth D, Spiers CJ, Niemeijer AR. Understanding induced seismicity. Science 2016; 354(6318):1380-1.

[8] Raleigh CB, Healy JH, Bredehoeft JD. An experiment in earthquake control at Rangely. Colorado Science 1976; 191(4233):1230—7.

[9] Ling FL, Duan K, Shang JL. Hydro—mechanical behavior of mineralized faults in granite during fluid injection: insights from triaxial shear—flow experiments. Eng Geol 2026; 361:108499.

[10] Huang YM, Ma SL, Li XH. Research progress on injection—induced earthquakes. J Earthq Eng 2023; 45(2):387-400. in Chinese.

[11] Grigoli F, Cesca S, Priolo E, Rinaldi AP, Clinton JF, Stabile TA, et al. Current challenges in monitoring, discrimination, and management of induced seismicity related to underground industrial activities: a European perspective. Rev Geophys 2017; 55(2):310-40.

[12] Hainzl S, Ogata Y. Detecting fluid signals in seismicity data through statistical earthquake modeling. J Geophys Res 2005; 110(B5).

[13] Liang X, Xu TF, Chen JY, Jiang ZJ. A deep—learning based model for fracture network characterization constrained by induced micro—seismicity and tracer test data in enhanced geothermal system. Renew Energy 2023; 216:119046.

[14] House L, Phillips WS, Fehler M, Rutledge J. Can hydraulic fracture—induced microearthquakes show where the fluid went? Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 1997; 34(3—4):133.e1-133.e15.

[15] Orlecka—Sikora B, Cielesta S, Lasocki S. Tracking the development of seismic fracture network from the Geysers geothermal field. Acta Geophys 2019; 67(1):341-50.

[16] Zhang HL, Eaton DW, Li G, Liu YJ, Harrington RM. Discriminating induced seismicity from natural earthquakes using moment tensors and source spectra. JGR Solid Earth 2016; 121(2):972-93.

[17] Zhao Y, Yang TH, Zhang PH, Xu HY, Wang SH. Inversion of seepage channels based on mining—induced microseismic data. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 2020; 126:104180.

[18] Yan X, Yu HT, Jing HW. Numerical investigation of the stress regime effect on injection—induced fault reactivation and associated seismicity. Comput Geotech 2024; 169:106251.

[19] Wang L, Kwiatek G, Renard F, Guérin—Marthe S, Rybacki E, Bohnhoff M, et al. Fault roughness controls injection—induced seismicity. PNAS 2024; 121(3):e2310039121.

[20] Lv YX, Yuan C, Zhu XH, Gan Q, Li HB. THMD analysis of fluid injection—induced fault reactivation and slip in EGS. Geothermics 2022; 99:102303.

[21] Cao WZ, Shi JQ, Si GY, Durucan S, Korre A. Numerical modelling of microseismicity associated with longwall coal mining. Int J Coal Geol 2018; 193:30-45.

[22] Oye V, Stanchits S, Cerasi P, Seprodi N, Goertz—Allmann B, Bauer RA. Understanding the causes of fluid—induced seismicity through large—block ~1 m³ laboratory experiments. 14th GHGT—14 Melbourne 2018; 10:21-6.

[23] Rodríguez—Pradilla G, Eaton DW, Verdon JP. Basin—scale multi—decadal analysis of hydraulic fracturing and seismicity in western Canada shows non—recurrence of induced runaway fault rupture. Sci Rep 2022; 12:14463.

[24] Cao WZ, Zhang R, Nie XF, Ren L. Laboratory fracture slip and seismicity subjected to fluid injection—related stress and pressure paths. Rock Mech Rock Eng 2024; 57(2):1245-61.

[25] Cao WZ, Yildirim B, Durucan S, Wolf KH, Cai W, Agrawal H, et al. Fracture behaviour and seismic response of naturally fractured coal subjected to true triaxial stresses and hydraulic fracturing. Fuel 2021; 288:119618.

[26] Huang YH, De Barros L, Cappa F. Illuminating the rupturing of microseismic sources in an injection—induced earthquake experiment. Geophys Res Lett 2019; 46(16):9563-72.

[27] Guglielmi Y, Cappa F, Avouac JP, Henry P, Elsworth D. Seismicity triggered by fluid injection—induced aseismic slip. Science 2015; 348(6240):1224-6.

[28] Wang L, Kwiatek G, Rybacki E, Bonnelye A, Bohnhoff M, Dresen G. Laboratory study on fluid—induced fault slip behavior: the role of fluid pressurization rate. Geophys Res Lett 2020; 47(6).

[29] Gori M, Rubino V, Rosakis AJ, Lapusta N. Dynamic rupture initiation and propagation in a fluid—injection laboratory setup with diagnostics across multiple temporal scales. PNAS 2021; 118(51):e2023433118.

[30] Aben FM, Farsi A, Brantut N. Permeability development during fault growth and slip in granite. JGR Solid Earth 2024; 129(12).

[31] Zhang X, Si GY, Oh J, Zhao GZ. Evolution of crack source mechanisms in laboratory hydraulic fracturing on Harcourt granite. Rock Mech Rock Eng 2024; 57(10):7945-61.

[32] Zhang HW, Wan ZJ, Zhao YX, Zhang Y, Lu SF. A review of the research on the mechanism of hydro—shearing in geothermal reservoir. J Coal Soc 2021; 46(10):3172-85. in Chinese.

[33] Liu B, Geng Z, Kang YS, Liu XW, Zhou Y, Liu QS, et al. Fault slip behaviors and frictional stability controlled by particle size of fault gouge under fluid injection. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 2024; 183:105919.

[34] Cai W, Dou LM, Si GY, Hu YW. Fault—induced coal burst mechanism under mining—induced static and dynamic stresses. Engineering 2021; 7(5):687-700.

[35] Wang TA, Dunham EM. Hindcasting injection—induced aseismic slip and microseismicity at the Cooper Basin enhanced geothermal systems project. Sci Rep 2022; 12:19481.

[36] Lapins S, Roman DC, Rougier J, De Angelis S, Cashman KV, Kendall JM. An examination of the continuous wavelet transform for volcano—seismic spectral analysis. J Volcanol Geoth Res 2020; 389:106728.

[37] Das I, Long—period ZMD. long—duration seismic events during hydraulic stimulation of shale and tight—gas reservoirs. Part 1: Waveform characteristics. Geophysics 2013; 78(6):KS107-18.

[38] Peng ZG, Gomberg J. An integrated perspective of the continuum between earthquakes and slow—slip phenomena. Nature Geosci 2010; 3(9):599-607.

[39] Wang L, Kwiatek G, Bohnhoff M, Rybacki E, Dresen G. Injection—induced fault slip and associated seismicity in the lab: insights from source mechanisms, local stress states and fault geometry. Earth Planet Sci Lett 2024; 626:118515.

[40] Hudson JA, Pearce RG, Rogers RM. Source type plot for inversion of the moment tensor. J Geophys Res 1989; 94(B1):765-74.

[41] Fu PC, Schoenball M, Ajo—Franklin JB, Chai CP, Maceira M, Morris JP, et al. Close observation of hydraulic fracturing at EGS Collab Experiment 1: fracture trajectory, microseismic interpretations, and the role of natural fractures. JGR Solid Earth 2021; 126(7).

[42] Zhu AY, Sun ZH, Jiang CS, Chen S, Zhang DN, Cui GL. The dynamic mechanical response of the fault under different water injection schedules. Acta Seismol Sin 2021; 43(6):730—44. in Chinese.

[43] Li J, Zhang R, Yu Y, Yu JD, Xie PS, Lang D. Risk assessment of roof fault activation induced by mining stress deflection in mining roadway. J Rock Mech Eng 2023; 42(S2):4109—20. in Chinese.

[44] Wei T, Chen GQ, Zhu Z, Tang P, Yan M. Slope instability mechanism with differential rock mass structure along a fault: a mine landslide from Southwest China. Geomech Geophys Geo Energy Geo Resour 2024; 10(1):76.

[45] Zhang SP, Ji YL, Hofmann H, Li SD, Rybacki E, Zimmermann G, et al. A laboratory study on fault slip caused by fluid injection directly versus indirectly into a fault: implications for induced seismicity in EGSs. Phil Trans R Soc A 2024; 382(2276):20230186.

[46] Vavryčuk V. Iterative joint inversion for stress and fault orientations from focal mechanisms. Geophys J Int 2014; 199(1):69-77.

[47] Tang C, Li SL, Zhou MJ, Liu YC. Stress inversion based on microseismic monitoring and its engineering application. J Geotech Eng 2021; 43(9):1730. in Chinese.

[48] Bott MHP. The mechanics of oblique slip faulting. Geol Mag 1959; 96(2):109-17.

[49] Zhu JB, Kang JQ, Elsworth D, Xie HP, Ju Y, Zhao J. Controlling induced earthquake magnitude by cycled fluid injection. Geophys Res Lett 2021; 48(19).