Extraterrestrial rock mechanics and brittleness indices of simulated Martian rocks with implications for in-situ resource utilization on Mars

Carol Mgiba , Oladoyin Kolawole

Int J Min Sci Technol ›› 2026, Vol. 36 ›› Issue (7) : 1345 -1358.

PDF (3040KB)
Int J Min Sci Technol ›› 2026, Vol. 36 ›› Issue (7) :1345 -1358. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijmst.2026.04.016
Research article
research-article
Extraterrestrial rock mechanics and brittleness indices of simulated Martian rocks with implications for in-situ resource utilization on Mars
Author information +
History +
PDF (3040KB)

Abstract

Brittleness Index (BI), while not universally standardized, is one of the most critical parameters in the assessment of rock failure behavior, drillability, and excavation efficiency in mining; however, its applicability to extraterrestrial environments remains poorly constrained for the In-Situ Resource Utilization (ISRU) mission on Mars. This study qualitatively and quantitatively investigated the mechanistic attributes (compressive strength, σc; tensile strength, σt) and BI of simulated Martian rocks under distinct conditions. Martian analog rock specimens, developed using Mars Global Simulant, were subjected to controlled bulk-scale mechanical tests (uniaxial compression and Brazilian disc tests) to determine σc and σt, supported by SEM-EDS analyses, to validate mineralogical similarity with Martian samples. Results revealed that the simulated Martian rocks are representative of Jezero crater lithologies and exhibit behavior characterized by linear elastic deformation followed by abrupt failure under stress. A gravity-modified brittleness index (BIM1, BIM2, BIM3, and BIM4) was proposed, which yielded lower brittleness thresholds consistent with a mechanically weaker Martian lithosphere. Further, the Martian-specific brittleness classification indicated that the analog Martian rocks fall predominantly within low-to-moderately brittle categories (0.1<BIM4<9.3) under Martian conditions, suggesting favorable drillability and relatively low energy requirements for excavation. These findings offer novel insights into the feasibility of predicting Martian excavation performance for ISRU.

Keywords

Extraterrestrial rock mechanics / Brittleness indices / Drillability / Mars global simulant / In-situ resource utilization (ISRU) / Extractability

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Carol Mgiba, Oladoyin Kolawole. Extraterrestrial rock mechanics and brittleness indices of simulated Martian rocks with implications for in-situ resource utilization on Mars. Int J Min Sci Technol, 2026, 36 (7) : 1345-1358 DOI:10.1016/j.ijmst.2026.04.016

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

References

[1]

Sanders GB. Space Resources and Mining: Current Objectives, Plans, and Missions. In: Proceedings of Canadian Aeronautics and Space Institute ASTRO. Quebec: CASI ASTRO; 2018.p.1-2.

[2]

National Academies of Sciences (NAS), Engineering, and Medicine. A Science Strategy for the Human Exploration of Mars. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press; 2025.

[3]

Sanders GB, Larson WE. Integration of In—Situ Resource Utilization into lunar/Mars exploration through field analogs. Adv Space Res 2011; 47(1):20-9.

[4]

Averesch NJH. Choice of microbial system for in—situ resource utilization on Mars. Front Astron Space Sci 2021; 8:700370.

[5]

Tang XH, Paluszny Rodriguez A, Zhao Q. Guest editorial to the special issue planetary rock and soil mechanics. Int J Min Sci Technol 2024; 34(9):1197—9.

[6]

Shorthill RW, Hutton RE, Moore II HJ, Scott RF, Spitzer CR. Physical properties of the Martian surface from the Viking 1 lander: preliminary results. Science 1976; 193(4255):805-9.

[7]

Arvidson RE, Gooding JL, Moore HJ. The Martian surface as imaged, sampled, and analyzed by the Viking landers. Rev Geophys 1989; 27(1):39-60.

[8]

Farrand WH, Johnson JR, Rice MS, Wang AL, Bell III JF. VNIR multispectral observations of aqueous alteration materials by the Pancams on the Spirit and Opportunity Mars Exploration Rovers. Am Mineral 2016; 101(9):2005—19.

[9]

Golombek M, Warner NH, Grant JA, Hauber E, Ansan V, Weitz CM, et al. Geology of the InSight landing site on Mars. Nat Commun 2020; 11:1014.

[10]

Heap MJ, Byrne PK, Mikhail S. Low surface gravitational acceleration of Mars results in a thick and weak lithosphere: Implications for topography, volcanism, and hydrology. Icarus 2017; 281:103-14.

[11]

NASA (2024). Mars landing sites, including Perseverance. National Aeronautics and Space Administration, NASA Science, NASA/JPL—Caltech 2024. https://science.nasa.gov/resource/mars—landing—sites—including—perseverance/.

[12]

Mao HY, Xu NW, Zhou Z, Sha C, Xiao PW, Li B. Failure mechanism and deformation forecasting of surrounding rock mass in an underground cavern based on engineering analogy method. Tunn Undergr Space Technol 2024; 143:105497.

[13]

Tang JY, Deng ZQ, Quan QQ, Jiang SY. Real—time drilling strategy for planetary sampling: method and validation. J Aerosp Eng 2016; 29(5):04016033.

[14]

Kronyak RE, Arndt C, Kah LC, TerMaath SC. Predicting the mechanical and fracture properties of Mars analog sedimentary lithologies. Earth Space Sci 2020; 7(9):e2019EA000926.

[15]

Zhang YH, Xu JJ, Tang XH, Paluszny A. Determining the mechanical property of Martian rocks using accurate grain—based model. In: Proceedings of the 56th U.S. Rock Mechanics/Geomechanics Symposium. Santa Fe: ARMA; 2022. https://doi.org/10.56952/arma—2022—0508.

[16]

Yin SH, Wang YJ, Liu JG. Predicting the probability distribution of Martian rocks mechanical property based on microscale rock mechanical experiments and accurate grain—based modeling. Int J Min Sci Technol 2024; 34(9):1327—39.

[17]

Mason B. Meteorites. Am Sci 1967; 5(4):429-55.

[18]

Udry A, Ostwald AM, Day JMD, Hallis LJ. Fundamental constraints and questions from the study of Martian meteorites and the need for returned samples. PNAS 2025; 122(2):e2404254121.

[19]

Treiman AH, Hernández—Montenegro JD, Wiens RC, Wade L, VanBommel S, Van Beek J, et al. The Brac/Dourbes olivine—cumulate rock, Séítah formation, Jezero crater floor, Mars: its parent magma, and relation to basalts of the máaz formation. JGR Planets 2025; 130(4):e2024JE008539.

[20]

Malin MC, Edgett KS. Sedimentary rocks of early Mars. Science 2000; 290(5498):1927-37.

[21]

Bishop JL, Murchie SL, Pieters CM, Zent AP. A model for formation of dust, soil, and rock coatings on Mars: physical and chemical processes on the Martian surface. J—Geophys—Res 2002; 107(E11):1-7.

[22]

Cousin A, Sautter V, Payré V, Forni O, Mangold N, Gasnault O, et al. Classification of igneous rocks analyzed by ChemCam at Gale crater. Mars Icarus 2017; 288:265-83.

[23]

Lewis KW, Aharonson O. Occurrence and origin of rhythmic sedimentary rocks on Mars. JGR Planets 2014; 119(6):1432-57.

[24]

Halevy I, Zuber MT, Schrag DP. A sulfur dioxide climate feedback on early Mars. Science 2007; 318(5858):1903—7.

[25]

Gaillard F, Michalski J, Berger G, McLennan SM, Scaillet B. Geochemical reservoirs and timing of sulfur cycling on Mars. Space Sci Rev 2013; 174(1):251-300.

[26]

Smith RJ, McLennan SM, Sutter B, Rampe EB, Dehouck E, Siebach KL, et al. X—ray amorphous sulfur—bearing phases in sedimentary rocks of gale crater, Mars. JGR Planets 2022; 127(5):e2021JE007128.

[27]

Schmidt ME, Kizovski TV, Liu Y, Hernandez—Montenegro JD, Tice MM, Treiman AH, et al. Diverse and highly differentiated lava suite in Jezero crater, Mars: Constraints on intracrustal magmatism revealed by Mars 2020 PIXL. Sci Adv 2025; 11(4):eadr2613.

[28]

Tosca NJ, Tice MM, Hurowitz JA, Pedersen DAK, Henneke J, Mandon L, et al. In situ evidence for serpentinization within the Máaz formation, Jezero crater. Mars Sci Adv 2025; 11(27):eadr8793.

[29]

King PL, McLennan SM. Sulfur on Mars. Elements 2010; 6(2):107—12.

[30]

Gruber SH, Bode M, Marcher T, Lackner R. Thermomechanical loading scenarios of habitat structures on Mars: experimental material characterization and numerical assessment of sulfur—concrete constructions. Dev Built Environ 2025; 24:100793.

[31]

Boboye OA, Jaiyeoba OK, Okon EE. Sedimentological characteristics and mineralogical studies of some Cretaceous sandstones in Nigeria: implications for depositional environment and provenance. J Sediment Environ 2021; 6(4):531—50.

[32]

Space Resource Technology. MGS—1 Mars Global Simulant—Fact Sheet. Accessed: September 30, 2025. https://cdn.shopify.com/s/files/1/0398/9268/0862/files/mgs—1—spec—sheet—Jun2025—house—basalt.pdfv=1753368205.

[33]

ISRM. Suggested methods for determining tensile strength of rock materials. Part 2: Suggested method for determining indirect tensile strength by the Brazil test. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 1978; 15:99-103.

[34]

Bieniawski ZT, Bernede MJ. Suggested methods for determining the uniaxial compressive strength and deformability of rock materials. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci Geomech Abstr 1979; 16(2):138—40.

[35]

Meng FZ, Wong LNY, Zhou H. Rock brittleness indices and their applications to different fields of rock engineering: a review. J Rock Mech Geotech Eng 2021; 13(1):221-47.

[36]

Yagiz S, Yazitova A, Karahan H. Application of differential evolution algorithm and comparing its performance with literature to predict rock brittleness for excavatability. Int J Min Reclam Environ 2020; 34(9):672-85.

[37]

Williams DR. Mars Fact Sheet. Tech Rep 2016. https://nssdc.gsfc.nasa.gov/planetary/factsheet/marsfact.html. Accessed March 6, 2026.

[38]

Nimmo F. Admittance estimates of mean crustal thickness and density at the Martian hemispheric dichotomy. J—Geophys—Res 2002; 107(E11).

[39]

Goossens S, Sabaka TJ, Genova A, Mazarico E, Nicholas JB, Neumann GA. Evidence for a low bulk crustal density for Mars from gravity and topography. Geophys Res Lett 2017; 44(15):7686-94.

[40]

Steigerwald W. New gravity map suggests Mars has a porous crust—NASA 2023. https://www.nasa.gov/missions/new—gravity—map—suggests—mars—has—a—porous—crust/.

[41]

Wilson L, Head III JW. Mars: Review and analysis of volcanic eruption theory and relationships to observed landforms. Rev Geophys 1994; 32(3):221-63.

[42]

Wang B, Liu ZB, Xue J, Lu B, Zeng W, Zhang DK. A rock brittleness index based on the postpeak energy release rate and damage surface characteristics for brittle hard rock. Deep Undergr Sci Eng 2025; dug2:70058.

[43]

Wong TF, Baud P. The brittle—ductile transition in porous rock: a review. J Struct Geol 2012; 44:25-53.

[44]

Clout JMF, Manuel JR. Mineralogical, chemical, and physical characteristics of iron ore. Iron Ore. Amsterdam: Elsevier; 2015:45-84.

[45]

Wellman EC, Riley D, Hughes A, Risso N, Momayez M, Kemeny J. A proposed concept for classifying uniaxial compressive strength (UCS) from SWIR hyperspectral data. Eng Geol 2025; 356:108300.

[46]

Gao MB, Li TB, Meng LB. An evaluation method of rock brittleness based on the prepeak crack initiation and postpeak stress drop characteristics. Math Probl Eng 2021; 2021:5639649.

[47]

Kong FM, Han MY, Zhao YT, Lu HT, Liu SA, Luan PY, et al. Influence of rock heterogeneity on the correlation between uniaxial compressive strength and Brazilian tensile strength. Sci Rep 2025; 15:437.

[48]

Teale R. The concept of specific energy in rock drilling. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci Geomech Abstr 1965; 2(1):57-73.

[49]

Kolapo P. Investigating the effects of mechanical properties of rocks on specific energy and penetration rate of borehole drilling. Geotech Geol Eng 2021; 39(2):1715-26.

[50]

Kahraman S. Correlation of TBM and drilling machine performances with rock brittleness. Eng Geol 2002; 65(4):269-83.

PDF (3040KB)

0

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/