Developing low-carbon mine backfill: Performance optimization and carbon storage using CO2 nanobubble and high-volume fly ash

Xiaoxiao Cao , Haoyan Lyu , Feng Ju , Meng Xiao , Juan Xu , Hideki Shimada , Takashi Sasaoka , Akihiro Hamanaka

Int J Min Sci Technol ›› 2026, Vol. 36 ›› Issue (7) : 1433 -1451.

PDF (7742KB)
Int J Min Sci Technol ›› 2026, Vol. 36 ›› Issue (7) :1433 -1451. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijmst.2026.04.014
Research article
research-article
Developing low-carbon mine backfill: Performance optimization and carbon storage using CO2 nanobubble and high-volume fly ash
Author information +
History +
PDF (7742KB)

Abstract

Achieving carbon neutrality and large-scale industrial waste utilization requires low-carbon mine backfill materials. This study investigates a strategy to enhance cement-fly ash based composites using CO2 nanobubble water. Normal cement-fly ash based backfill and CO2 nanobubble-modified cement-fly ash based backfill were compared through mechanical and microstructural analyses, including uniaxial compression, mercury intrusion porosimetry, scanning electron microscopy and thermogravimetric analysis. The results demonstrate that CO2 nanobubbles effectively mitigate the strength degradation induced by high fly ash replacement. Compared with normal backfill, the uniaxial compressive strength and elastic modulus of modified samples increased by 6.5%–13.4% and 14.8%–59.1%, respectively, enabling high-volume fly ash utilization without compromising mechanical integrity. Microstructural analyses reveal that CO2 nanobubble water promotes hydration and in-situ carbonation reactions, leading to the formation of uniformly distributed C-S-H gels and calcium carbonate crystals that refine the pore structure and reduce total porosity by approximately 20%. Thermogravimetric results further confirm that CO2 nanobubble significantly enhance carbonation efficiency, with the maximum carbonation degree reaching 13.07% at a fly ash content of 60%. Balancing performance and cost, the optimal fly ash content is identified within 20%–60%, providing a green pathway for mining waste valorization.

Keywords

Low-carbon backfill / CO2 nanobubble / High-volume fly ash / Carbon sequestration / Cost-benefit analysis

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Xiaoxiao Cao, Haoyan Lyu, Feng Ju, Meng Xiao, Juan Xu, Hideki Shimada, Takashi Sasaoka, Akihiro Hamanaka. Developing low-carbon mine backfill: Performance optimization and carbon storage using CO2 nanobubble and high-volume fly ash. Int J Min Sci Technol, 2026, 36 (7) : 1433-1451 DOI:10.1016/j.ijmst.2026.04.014

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

References

[1]

Shao S, Liu JH, Geng Y, Miao Z, Yang YC. Uncovering driving factors of carbon emissions from China’s mining sector. Appl Energy 2016; 166:220—38.

[2]

Shang DL, Yin GZ, Li XS, Li YJ, Jiang CB, Kang XT, et al. Analysis for green mine (phosphate) performance of China: An evaluation index system. Resour Policy 2015; 46(P2):71-84.

[3]

Li M, Zhang JX, Li AL, Zhou N. Reutilisation of coal gangue and fly ash as underground backfill materials for surface subsidence control. J Clean Prod 2020; 254:120113.

[4]

Zhou N, Zhang JX, Zhang YZ, Yan H. Carbon sequestration amount evolution characteristics and reaction mechanisms in coal—based solid waste backfill: A new whole—process carbon sequestration technique. Int J Min Sci Technol 2026; 36(1):43-55.

[5]

Cheng BC, Liu RT, Li XH, del Rey CE, Chen MJ, Li SC. Synergistic mechanisms of steel slag, granulated blast furnace slag, and desulfurization gypsum in high—content steel slag—based cementitious backfill materials. Int J Min Sci Technol 2025; 35(6):1005—18.

[6]

Fall M, Benzaazoua M, Saa EG. Mix proportioning of underground cemented tailings backfill. Tunn Undergr Space Technol 2008; 23(1):80-90.

[7]

Ma JH, Wang Q, Jiao HZ, Li ZT, Li GC, Xu P, et al. Solidification/stabilization and leaching behavior of heavy metals in low—binder cemented tailings backfill. Case Stud Constr Mater 2024; 21:e03934.

[8]

Deschner F, Winnefeld F, Lothenbach B, Seufert S, Schwesig P, Dittrich S, et al. Hydration of Portland cement with high replacement by siliceous fly ash. Cem Concr Res 2012; 42(10):1389-400.

[9]

Thongsanitgarn P, Wongkeo W, Chaipanich A. Hydration and compressive strength of blended cement containing fly ash and limestone as cement replacement. J Mater Civ Eng 2014; 26(12):04014088.

[10]

Xu RB, Liu YQ, Li XP, Yao GY, Xu Y, She KL. Research on leakage environmental risk assessment and risk prevention and control measures in the long—term landfill process of ultra—alkaline fly ash. Waste Manag 2023; 172:320-5.

[11]

Duan SY, Liao HQ, Cheng FQ, Tao MJ. Effect of curing condition and carbonization enhancement on mechanical properties of fly ash—desulfurization gypsum—steel slag blocks. J CO2 Util 2020; 38:282-90.

[12]

Li XF, Peng B, Liu Q, Liu JW, Shang LW. Micro and nanobubbles technologies as a new horizon for CO2—EOR and CO2 geological storage techniques: A review. Fuel 2023; 341:127661.

[13]

Wang ZX, Bai L, Dong HF, Liu YW, Jiang HY, Bai YG, et al. Modulation of nanobubble behaviors through ionic liquids during CO2 electroreduction. ACS Sustain Chem Eng 2023; 11(5):1909—16.

[14]

Zhang XH, Maeda N, Craig VSJ. Physical properties of nanobubbles on hydrophobic surfaces in water and aqueous solutions. Langmuir 2006; 22(11):5025—35.

[15]

Antonio Cerrón—Calle G, Luna Magdaleno A, Graf JC, Apul OG, Garcia—Segura S. Elucidating CO2 nanobubble interfacial reactivity and impacts on water chemistry. J Colloid Interface Sci 2022; 607(Pt 1):720-8.

[16]

Khan MA, Monjur Morshed AKM. Coalescence behavior of fully submerged CO2 nanobubbles: A molecular dynamics based parametric study. J Mol Liq 2024; 397:124126.

[17]

Choi HJ, Oh T, Lee N, Jang I, Park JJ, Yoo DY. Carbon consuming concrete (CCC): A comprehensive study on mechanical properties and carbon uptake with electric arc furnace reduction slag. J CO2 Util 2024; 85:102889.

[18]

Feng MM, Cao XX, Jiang TQ, Zhang WL. Effects of particle gradation and material proportions on the mechanical properties of crushed stone aggregates under cyclic loading. J Build Eng 2024; 97:110777.

[19]

Nath P, Sarker PK. Effect of GGBFS on setting, workability and early strength properties of fly ash geopolymer concrete cured in ambient condition. Constr Build Mater 2014; 66:163-71.

[20]

Maarup C, Hjuler K, Dam—Johansen K. High temperature cement raw meal flowability. Powder Technol 2014; 253:686-90.

[21]

Shi CJ, Wu YZ, Riefler C, Wang H. Characteristics and pozzolanic reactivity of glass powders. Cem Concr Res 2005; 35(5):987—93.

[22]

Ahmaruzzaman M. A review on the utilization of fly ash. Prog Energy Combust Sci 2010; 36(3):327-63.

[23]

Singh M, Siddique R. Effect of coal bottom ash as partial replacement of sand on properties of concrete. Resour Conserv Recycl 2013; 72:20-32.

[24]

Zhang Y, Nan XT, Zhang ST, Jia L, Zhu FB, Yu WW, et al. Enhancing performance of mining phenolic filling materials by tailoring closed cell morphology with fly ash geopolymer. Int J Min Sci Technol 2025; 35(7):1197-210.

[25]

Liu HR, Tian ZH, Sun X, Xiang JZ, Jiao XC. Study on the multiscale properties of cement—based materials containing nano—bubble water. Constr Build Mater 2022; 360:129595.

[26]

Chen QS, Zhang QL, Qi CC, Fourie A, Xiao CC. Recycling phosphogypsum and construction demolition waste for cemented paste backfill and its environmental impact. J Clean Prod 2018; 186:418—29.

[27]

Trtnik G, Turk G, Kavčič F, Bosiljkov VB. Possibilities of using the ultrasonic wave transmission method to estimate initial setting time of cement paste. Cem Concr Res 2008; 38(11):1336-42.

[28]

Ji L, Yu H, Wang XL, Grigore M, French D, Gözükara YM, et al. CO2 sequestration by direct mineralisation using fly ash from Chinese Shenfu coal. Fuel Process Technol 2017; 156:429—37.

[29]

Li Z, Zhu WB, Qu QD, Xu JL, Feng GR, Guo CL, et al. Influence of aggregate particle size on fracture behavior and energy evolution of cemented rockfill in the post—peak stage. Int J Min Sci Technol 2026; 36(3):667-85.

[30]

Yao YB, Liu DM. Comparison of low—field NMR and mercury intrusion porosimetry in characterizing pore size distributions of coals. Fuel 2012; 95:152—8.

[31]

Zeng Q, Li KF, Fen—chong T, Dangla P. Pore structure characterization of cement pastes blended with high—volume fly—ash. Cem Concr Res 2012; 42(1):194-204.

[32]

Gaviria X, Borrachero MV, Payá J, Monzó JM, Tobón JI. Mineralogical evolution of cement pastes at early ages based on thermogravimetric analysis (TG). J Therm Anal Calorim 2018; 132(1):39-46.

[33]

Huijgen WJJ, Witkamp GJ, Comans RNJ. Mechanisms of aqueous wollastonite carbonation as a possible CO2 sequestration process. Chem Eng Sci 2006; 61(13):4242-51.

[34]

Jiang Y, Ma ZH, Gu ZJ, Liu FQ, Shen PL, Poon CS. A novel approach for improving aqueous carbonation kinetics with CO2 micro— and nano—bubbles. Chem Eng J 2024; 500:157363.

[35]

Lan XL, Lu JX, Fan DQ, Zhu HS, Moon J, Noguchi T, et al. Unlocking the hydration—carbonation mechanism and Nano—CaCO3 crystallization in cement paste governed by CO2 nanobubble water. Cem Concr Compos 2026; 168:106501.

[36]

Liu Z, Du J, Meng WN. Achieving low—carbon cementitious materials with high mechanical properties using CaCO3 suspension produced by CO2 sequestration. J Clean Prod 2022; 373:133546.

[37]

Steenbakkers RJA. Laplace’s law and the interfacial momentum source in two—phase models. Phys Rev E 2010; 81(6):066306.

[38]

Deng XJ, Jiao Y, Li SC, Zhou N, An Y, Yilmaz E, et al. Evaluation of the migration and environmental effects of metal elements within cementitious gangue—fly ash backfill in underground coal mines. Int J Min Sci Technol 2024; 34(11):1551—62.

PDF (7742KB)

0

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/