Pull-out capacity and energy absorption of cable bolts under impact loading

Adel Mottahedi , Naj Aziz , Alex Remennikov , Ali Mirzaghorbanali

Int J Min Sci Technol ›› 2026, Vol. 36 ›› Issue (1) : 23 -42.

PDF (6919KB)
Int J Min Sci Technol ›› 2026, Vol. 36 ›› Issue (1) :23 -42. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijmst.2025.10.013
Research article
research-article

Pull-out capacity and energy absorption of cable bolts under impact loading

Author information +
History +
PDF (6919KB)

Abstract

This study investigates the performance of high-strength cable bolts under impact loading conditions representative of rock bursts in underground environments. Although widely used, the dynamic behaviour of these cable bolts has received limited experimental attention, and their effectiveness in seismically active zones remains a subject of ongoing debate. To address this gap, a reverse pull-out test machine integrated with a drop hammer rig was employed. Tests were conducted on 70-t SUMO bulbed and non-bulbed cable bolts with encapsulation lengths of 300 and 450 mm, subjected to an impact energy of 14.52 kJ. Results indicate that non-bulbed cables, despite showing lower initial peak loads (average 218 vs. 328 kN for bulbed cables at 300 mm encapsulation), demonstrated superior energy absorption (average 11.26 vs. 8.75 kJ) and displacement capacity (average 48.40 vs. 36.25 mm). Increasing the encapsulation length for bulbed cables led to a reduction in initial peak load but improved displacement and energy absorption. The dominant failure mechanism was debonding at the cable-grout interface, characterised by frictional sliding and cable rotation. These findings provide new insights into the energy dissipation mechanisms of cables and support the development of more resilient ground support systems for dynamically active conditions.

Keywords

Rock reinforcement / Cable bolt / Impact loading / Pull-out testing / Mine seismicity / Rock burst

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Adel Mottahedi, Naj Aziz, Alex Remennikov, Ali Mirzaghorbanali. Pull-out capacity and energy absorption of cable bolts under impact loading. Int J Min Sci Technol, 2026, 36(1): 23-42 DOI:10.1016/j.ijmst.2025.10.013

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

CRediT authorship contribution statement

Adel Mottahedi: Writing - review & editing, Writing - original draft, Visualization, Methodology, Investigation, Formal analysis, Conceptualization. Naj Aziz: Writing - review & editing, Valida-tion, Supervision, Methodology, Formal analysis, Conceptualiza-tion. Alex Remennikov: Writing - review & editing, Validation, Supervision, Conceptualization. Ali Mirzaghorbanali: Writing -review & editing, Validation, Supervision, Methodology.

Declaration of competing interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing finan-cial interests or personal relationsh ips that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to express their appreciation to Jennmar Australia Pty Ltd for supplying the required materials and the uni-versity personnel who assisted in completing the tests conducted at the University of Wollongong, especially Mr. Travis Marshall and Mr. Ritchie McLean.

References

[1]

Mottahedi A, Aziz N, Remennikov A, Mirzaghorbanali A, Marston K. A critical review on development of laboratory testing technologies of tendons applied to stabilize underground structures. Rock Mech Rock Eng 2025; 58(7):7531-67.

[2]

Hutchinson DJ, Diederichs MS.Cablebolting in Underground Mines. Richmond: BiTech Publishers; 1996.

[3]

Jodeiri Shokri B, Mirzaghorbanali A, Nourizadeh H, McDougall K, Karunasena W, Aziz N, Entezam S, Entezam A. Axial load transfer mechanism in fully grouted rock bolting system: A systematic review. Appl Sci 2024; 14(12):5232.

[4]

Fuller P. Pre-reinforcement of cut and fill stopes. In:Proceedings of the conference on application of rock mechanics to cut-and-fill mining. Lulea, Sweden; 1981.p.155-79.

[5]

Galvin JM. Support and reinforcement systems. In: Ground engineering:Principles and practices for underground coal mining. Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2016.p.211-69.

[6]

Thompson AG, Villaescusa E. Case studies of rock reinforcement components and systems testing. Rock Mech Rock Eng 2014; 47(5):1589-602.

[7]

Windsor CR. Rock reinforcement systems. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 1997; 34 (6):919-51.

[8]

Hadjigeorgiou J, Potvin Y. A critical assessment of dynamic rock reinforcement and support testing facilities. Rock Mech Rock Eng 2011; 44(5):565-78.

[9]

Li CC, Mikula P, Hadjigeorgiou J, Simser B, He MC, Canbulat I, Joughin W. ISRM suggested method for determining the properties of rock bolt assemblies by mass freefall impact testing in the laboratory. Rock Mech Rock Eng 2025; 58 (1):165-79.

[10]

Tannant DD, Brummer RK, Yi X. Rockbolt behaviour under dynamic loading: Field tests and modelling. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci Geomech Abstr 1995; 32 (6):537-50.

[11]

Player J, Thompson A, Villaescusa E. Dynamic testing of reinforcement systems. In: Proceedings of the 6th international symposium on ground support in mining and civil engineering construction. Kalgoorlie: Western Australia School of Mines; 2008.p.597-622.

[12]

St-Pierre L, Hassani FP, Radziszewski PH, Ouellet J. Development of a dynamic model for a cone bolt. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 2009; 46(1):107-14.

[13]

Cai M. Principles of rock support in burst-prone ground. Tunn Undergr Space Technol 2013;36:46-56.

[14]

Stacey TR, Rojas E. A potential method of containing rockburst damage and enhancing safety using a sacrificial layer. J S Afr N Inst Min Metall 2013;113:565-73.

[15]

Mottahedi A, Aziz N, Remennikov A, Mirzaghorbanali A, Marston K. Impact loading of tendon reinforcement systems used for ground control: A critical literature review. Arch Min Sci 2024:711-43.

[16]

Li CC, Hadjigeorgiou J, Mikula P, Knox G, Darlington B, Royer R,Pytlik A, HospM. Performance of identical rockbolts tested on four dynamic testing rigs employing the direct impact method. J Rock Mech Geotech Eng 2021; 13 (4):745-54.

[17]

Yan C. Bond between reinforcing bars and concrete under impact loading. Doctoral dissertation. Vancouver: University of British Columbia Library; 1992. p. 64.

[18]

Ansell A. Laboratory testing of a new type of energy absorbing rock bolt. Tunn Undergr Space Technol 2005; 20(4):291-300.

[19]

Chunlin LC. A new energy-absorbing bolt for rock support in high stress rock masses. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 2010; 47(3):396-404.

[20]

Li CC, Doucet C. Performance of D-bolts under dynamic loading. Rock Mech Rock Eng 2012; 45(2):193-204.

[21]

Knox G, Berghorst A. Dynamic testing:Determining the residual dynamic capacity of an axially strained tendon. In: Proceedings of the 9th international symposium on ground support in mining and underground construction. Perth: Australian Centre for Geomechanics; 2019. p. 231-42.

[22]

Crompton B, Knox G. Dynamic testing:Determining the relationship between rockbolt diameter and the residual dynamic capacity of an axially strained tendon. In: Proceedings of the 5th international conference on block and sublevel caving. Perth: Australian Centre for Geomechanics; 2022. p. 141-51.

[23]

Darlington B, Vallati O, Young P. A comparison between laboratory and in situ dynamic testing on the MDX bolt. In: Proceedings of the 10th international conference on ground support in mining. Perth: Australian Centre for Geomechanics; 2023. p. 361-70.

[24]

Li CC. Principles and methods of rock support for rockburst control. J Rock Mech Geotech Eng 2021; 13(1):46-59.

[25]

Anzanpour S, Aziz N, Memcik J, Mirzaghorbanali A, Wallace J, Marshall T, Khaleghparast S. Introduction to new methods of static and dynamic pull testing of rock bolts and cable bolts. In: Proceedings of the 2021 resource operators conference. Wollongong: University of Wollongong; 2021. p. 210-17.

[26]

Anzanpour S, Aziz N, Nemcik J, Remennikov A, Mirzaghorbanali A, Wallace J. Static and dynamic tendon pull-out test research at the University of Wollongong. In: Proceedings of the 2022 resource operators conference. Wollongong: University of Wollongong; 2022. p. 182-89.

[27]

Ortlepp W, Stacey T. Testing of tunnel support: Dynamic load testing of rockbolt elements to provide data for safer support design. Safety in Mines Research Advisory Committee 1998:3.

[28]

Villaescusa E, Thompson A, Player J. Dynamic testing of rock reinforcement systems. In: Proceedings of the Australian mining technology conference. Fremantle: Australasian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy; 2005.p.79-95.

[29]

Pytlik A, Szot M. Comparative testing of cable bolt and wire rope lacing resistance to static and dynamic loads. Arch Min Sci 2023; 68(4):707-24.

[30]

JENNMAR coal catalogue. Jennmar Australia Pty Ltd; 2025. p. 22-4.

[31]

Thenevin I, Blanco-Martín L, Hadj-Hassen F, Schleifer J, Lubosik Z, Wrana A. Laboratory pull-out tests on fully grouted rock bolts and cable bolts: Results and lessons learned. J Rock Mech Geotech Eng 2017; 9(5):843-55.

[32]

Bawden WF, Hyett AJ, Lausch P. An experimental procedure for the in situ testing of cable bolts. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci Geomech Abstr 1992; 29 (5):525-33.

[33]

Clifford B, Kent L, Altounyan P, Bigby D.Systems used in coal mining development in long tendon reinforcement. In:Proceedings of the 20th international conference on ground control in mining. West Virginia: International Conference on Ground Control in Mining; 2001.p.235-41.

[34]

Chen JH, Hagan PC, Saydam S. A new laboratory short encapsulation pull test for investigating load transfer behavior of fully grouted cable bolts. Geotech Test J 2018; 41(3):435-47.

[35]

Anzanpour S. The load transfer mechanism of ground tendons subjected to static and dynamic loading conditions. Doctoral dissertation. Wollongong: University of Wollongong; 2022.p.162.

[36]

Chen JH, Hagan PC, Saydam S. Sample diameter effect on bonding capacity of fully grouted cable bolts. Tunn Undergr Space Technol 2017;68:238-43.

[37]

Kaewunruen S. Experimental and numerical studies for evaluating dynamic behaviour of pre-stressed concrete sleepers subject to severe impact loading. J Proc R Soc N S W 2008; 141(3-4):52-3.

[38]

Khaleghparast S, Aziz N, Remennikov A, Anzanpour S. An experimental study on shear behaviour of fully grouted rock bolt under static and dynamic loading conditions. Tunn Undergr Space Technol 2023;132:104915.

[39]

Chen Y, Li CC. Influences of loading condition and rock strength to the performance of rock bolts. Geotech Test J 2015; 38(2):208-18.

[40]

Han JY, Liu D, Guan YP, Chen Y, Li TL, Jia DF, Yan FS, Jia PJ, Zhao Y. Study on shear behavior and damage constitutive model of tendon-grout interface. Constr Build Mater 2022;320:126223.

[41]

Hyett AJ, Bawden WF, Reichert RD. The effect of rock mass confinement on the bond strength of fully grouted cable bolts. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci Geomech Abstr 1992; 29(5):503-24.

[42]

Klar A, Nissim O, Elkayam I. A hardening load transfer function for rock bolts and its calibration using distributed fiber optic sensing. J Rock Mech Geotech Eng 2023; 15(11):2816-30.

[43]

Aziz N, Yang G, Khaleghparast S, Marshall T.Development of double shear testing of tendons. In:Proceedings of the 2019 Coal Operators’ Conference. Wollongong: University of Wollongong; 2019. p. 150-161.

[44]

Blanco Martín L, Tijani M, Hadj-Hassen F, Noiret A. Assessment of the bolt-grout interface behaviour of fully grouted rockbolts from laboratory experiments under axial loads. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 2013;63:50-61.

[45]

AS_1012.17. Australian Standards: Methods of testing concrete determination of the static chord modulus of elasticity and Poisson’s ratio of concrete specimens; 1997. p. 3.

[46]

AS_1012.14. Australian Standard: Method for testing concrete, and method for securing and testing cores from hardened concrete for compressive strength and mass per unit volume; 2018. p. 4.

[47]

Hagan P, Li D, Masoumi H, Saydam S. Performance of cable bolts under axial loading subjected to varying geotechnical conditions. UNSW Sydney 2017:9.

[48]

ACI Committee 308. Standard practice for curing concrete ( ACI308-92). American Concrete Institute (ACI); 1980. p. 4.

[49]

Zhang YY, Pan RY, Xiao F. Numerical research on impact performance of bridge columns with aluminum foam protection devices. Int J Distrib Sens Netw 2020; 16(11). 155014772097453.

[50]

Knox G, Berghorst A. Increased agility for the research and development of dynamic roof support products. In: Rock Dynamics and Applications 3. Boca Raton: CRC Press; 2018. p. 373-78.

[51]

Sharma HK, Sharma RK, Saxena RS, Prasad R. A review of nanoindentation and related cathodoluminescence studies on semiconductor materials. J Mater Sci Mater Electron 2022; 33(27):21223-45.

[52]

Rajaie H. Experimental and numerical investigations of cable bolt support systems. Doctoral dissertation. Montreal: McGill University; 1990. p. 126.

[53]

Ren FF, Yang ZJ, Chen JF, Chen WW. An analytical analysis of the full-range behaviour of grouted rockbolts based on a tri-linear bond-slip model. Constr Build Mater 2010; 24(3):361-70.

[54]

Mottahedi A, Sereshki F, Ataei M, Qarahasanlou AN, Barabadi A. Resilience estimation of critical infrastructure systems: Application of expert judgment. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 2021;215:107849.

PDF (6919KB)

184

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/