Coupling effect of size and strain rate on uniaxial compressive properties of coral reef limestone

Hongya Li , Linjian Ma , Mingyang Wang , Jiawen Wu , Jiajun Deng , Zeng Li

Int J Min Sci Technol ›› 2025, Vol. 35 ›› Issue (11) : 1905 -1919.

PDF (7043KB)
Int J Min Sci Technol ›› 2025, Vol. 35 ›› Issue (11) :1905 -1919. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijmst.2025.07.009
Research article
research-article

Coupling effect of size and strain rate on uniaxial compressive properties of coral reef limestone

Author information +
History +
PDF (7043KB)

Abstract

As the main geomaterials for coral reefs oil or gas extraction and underground infrastructure construction, coral reef limestone demonstrates significantly distinct mechanical responses compared to terrigenous rocks. To investigate the mechanical behaviour of coral reef limestone under the coupling impact of size and strain rate, the uniaxial compression tests were conducted on reef limestone samples with length-to-diameter (L/D) ratio ranging from 0.5 to 2.0 at strain rate ranging from 10-5 ·s-1 to 10-2 ·s-1. It is revealed that the uniaxial compressive strength (UCS) and residual compressive strength (RCS) of coral reef limestone exhibits a decreasing trend with L/D ratio increasing. The dynamic increase factor (DIF) of UCS is linearly correlated with the logarithm of strain rate, while increasing the L/D ratio further enhances the DIF. The elastic modulus increases with strain rate or L/D ratio increasing, whereas the Poisson’s ratio approximates to a constant value of 0.24. The failure strain increases with strain rate increasing or L/D ratio decreasing, while the increase in L/D ratio will inhibit the enhancing effect of the strain rate. The high porosity and low mineral strength are the primary factors contributing to a high RCS of 16.7%-64.9% of UCS, a lower brittleness index and multiple irregular fracture planes. The failure pattern of coral reef limestone transits from the shear-dominated to the splitting-dominated failure with strain rate increasing or L/D ratio decreasing, which is mainly governed by the constrained zones induced by end friction and the strain rate-dependent crack propagation. Moreover, a predictive formula incorporating coupling effect of size and strain rate for the UCS of reef limestone was established and verified to effectively capture the trend of UCS.

Keywords

Coral reef limestone / Strain rate / Size / Failure mode / Coupling effect

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Hongya Li, Linjian Ma, Mingyang Wang, Jiawen Wu, Jiajun Deng, Zeng Li. Coupling effect of size and strain rate on uniaxial compressive properties of coral reef limestone. Int J Min Sci Technol, 2025, 35(11): 1905-1919 DOI:10.1016/j.ijmst.2025.07.009

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

Acknowledgments

This work is supported by the National Natural Science Founda-tion of China (Nos. 52222110, 52401354, and 52301353). The authors gratefully acknowledge this support.

References

[1]

Jones LA, Mannion PD, Farnsworth A, Bragg F, Lunt DJ. Climatic and tectonic drivers shaped the tropical distribution of coral reefs. Nat Commun 2022; 13 (1):3120.

[2]

Lyons MB, Murray NJ, Kennedy EV, Kovacs EM, Castro-Sanguino C, Phinn SR, Acevedo RB, Alvarez AO, Say C, Tudman P, Markey K, Roe M, Canto RF, Fox HE, Bambic B, Lieb Z, Asner GP, Martin PM, Knapp DE, Li JW, Skone M, Goldenberg E, Larsen K, Roelfsema CM. New global area estimates for coral reefs from high-resolution mapping. Cell Rep Sustain 2024; 1(2):100015.

[3]

Mehrabi H, Bagherpour B. Scale, origin, and predictability of reservoir heterogeneities in shallow-marine carbonate sequences: A case from Cretaceous of Zagros. Iran J Petrol Sci Eng 2022;214:110571.

[4]

Zhang GC, Wang DD, Lan L, Liu SX, Su L, Wang L, Tang W, Guo J, Sun R. The geological characteristics of the large- and medium-sized gas fields in the South China Sea. Acta Oceanol Sin 2021; 40(2):1-12.

[5]

Thirukumaran S, Oliveira D. Innovative design of slender rock pillar formed within large span road tunnels and cavern Y-junction in Hawkesbury sandstone. Tunn Undergr Space Technol 2023;141:105376.

[6]

Esterhuizen GS, Dolinar DR, Ellenberger JL. Pillar strength in underground stone mines in the United States. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 2011; 48(1):42-50.

[7]

Xiao XH, Xiao PW, Dai F, Li HB, Zhang XB, Zhou JW. Large deformation characteristics and reinforcement measures for a rock pillar in the Houziyan underground powerhouse. Rock Mech Rock Eng 2018; 51(2):561-78.

[8]

Ma LJ, Deng JJ, Wang MY, Wang JP, Fang B, Wu JW. Effect of diagenetic variation on the static and dynamic mechanical behaviour of coral reef limestone. Int J Min Sci Technol 2024; 34(7):893-908.

[9]

Zhang MC, Luo Y, Gong HL, Zhu YW, Li XP. Fine characterization of pore structures in coral reef limestones based on three-dimensional geometrical reconstruction. Mar Georesour Geotechnol 2024; 42(6):721-35.

[10]

Mahmood W, Mohammed A, HamaHussein S. Predicting mechanical properties and ultimate shear strength of gypsum, limestone and sandstone rocks using Vipulanandan models. Geomech Geoengin 2020; 15(2):90-106.

[11]

Liu HF, Ma CH, Zhu CQ. X-ray micro CT based characterization of pore-throat network for marine carbonates from South China Sea. Appl Sci 2022; 12 (5):2611.

[12]

Wu K, Meng QS, Wang C, Qin QL, Li CS. Experimental investigation of damage evolution characteristics of coral reef limestone based on acoustic emission and digital volume correlation techniques. Rock Mech Rock Eng 2023; 56 (3):2357-74.

[13]

Luo Y, Gong HL, Wei XQ, Zheng SL, Pei CH, Li XP. Dynamic compressive characteristics and damage constitutive model of coral reef limestone with different cementation degrees. Constr Build Mater 2023;362:129783.

[14]

Wang X, Shan HG, Wang XZ, Zhu CQ. Strength characteristics of reef limestone for different cementation types. Geotech Geol Eng 2020; 38(1):79-89.

[15]

Wang XZ, Wang X, Shen JH, Ding HZ, Wen DS, Zhu CQ, Lv SZ. Foundation filling performance of calcareous soil on coral reefs in the South China Sea. Appl Ocean Res 2022;129:103386.

[16]

Huang J, Li JQ, Li MH, Pan YH, Zong ZH. Dynamic response and failure mechanism of ocean coral reef limestone under high strain rate loading. Ocean Eng 2024;299:117370.

[17]

Ma LJ, Wu JW, Wang MY, Dong L, Wei HZ. Dynamic compressive properties of dry and saturated coral rocks at high strain rates. Eng Geol 2020;272:105615.

[18]

Meng QS, Wu K, Zhao Y, Luo L, Li XR, Wang C, Zhong Y, Shen TL. Dynamic compressive properties and self-similarity characteristics of deep coral reef limestone subjected to high loading rates. J Build Eng 2024;86:108853.

[19]

Wei HZ, Ma LJ, Wu JW, Yu J, Li Z, Xu R. Dynamic mechanical behaviour of coral rock subjected to high strain rate loading. Mar Geophys Res 2022; 43(3):30.

[20]

Wu K, Meng QS, Li HY, Deng JJ, Liu HF, Wang C, Luo L, Shen TL. Insights from tensile fracture properties and full-field strain evolution of deep coral reef limestone under dynamic loads. Eng Geol 2024;341:107738.

[21]

Stavrou A, Murphy W. Quantifying the effects of scale and heterogeneity on the confined strength of micro-defected rocks. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 2018;102:131-43.

[22]

Bahrani N, Kaiser PK. Numerical investigation of the influence of specimen size on the unconfined strength of defected rocks. Comput Geotech 2016;77:56-67.

[23]

Guo YX, Zhao YH, Wang SW, Feng GR, Zhang YJ, Ran HY. Stress-strain-acoustic responses in failure process of coal rock with different height to diameter ratios under uniaxial compression. J Cent South Univ 2021; 28(6):1724-36.

[24]

Bazˇant ZP. Size effect in blunt fracture: Concrete, rock, metal. J Eng Mech 1984; 110(4):518-35.

[25]

Bazˇant ZP. Concrete fracture models: Testing and practice. Eng Fract Mech 2002; 69(2):165-205.

[26]

Masoumi H, Saydam S, Hagan PC. Unified size-effect law for intact rock. Int J Geomech 2016; 16(2):04015059.

[27]

Huang M, Liu D, Hong CJ, Tao ZG, Du SG, Huang YX. New statistical quantification method for the size effect behaviour of rock mass using compressive strength as an example. Int J Geomech 2022; 22(11):06022031.

[28]

Meng QB, Han LJ, Pu H, Li H, Wen SY, Li H. Effect of the size and strain rate on the mechanical behaviour of rock specimens. J China Univ Min Technol 2016; 45(2):233-43. in Chinese.

[29]

Liang CY, Zhang QB, Li X, Xin P. The effect of specimen shape and strain rate on uniaxial compressive behaviour of rock material. Bull Eng Geol Environ 2016; 75(4):1669-81.

[30]

Yang BB, He MM, Wang HT, Zhang ZQ, Zhu JW, Li N. Experimental investigation on brittleness characteristics of rock based on the ubiquitiformal complexity: Strain rate effect and size effect. Bull Eng Geol Environ 2023; 82(8):306.

[31]

Qi CZ, Wang MY, Bai JP, Wei XK, Wang HS. Investigation into size and strain rate effects on the strength of rock-like materials. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 2016;86:132-40.

[32]

Li HY, Ma LJ, Yang C, Yan SM, Liu J, Li YZ. Experimental investigation on the damage and deterioration of sandstone subjected to cycling pore water pressure. Bull Eng Geol Environ 2023; 82(4):107.

[33]

Qi CZ, Wang MY, Bai JP, Li KR. Mechanism underlying dynamic size effect on rock mass strength. Int J Impact Eng 2014;68:1-7.

[34]

Tutluog˘lu L, Öge IF, Karpuz C. Relationship between pre-failure and post-failure mechanical properties of rock material of different origin. Rock Mech Rock Eng 2015; 48(1):121-41.

[35]

Zhu QZ, Min ZZ, Wang YY, Wang W. Study on sample size effect in triaxial compression test of siltstone. Chin J Rock Mech Eng 2019; 38(S2):3296-303. in Chinese.

[36]

Kuang ZH, Qiu SL, Li SJ, Du SH, Huang Y, Chen XQ. A new rock brittleness index based on the characteristics of complete stress-strain behaviours. Rock Mech Rock Eng 2021; 54(3):1109-28.

[37]

Zou CJ, Cheng Y, Li JC. Strain rate and size effects on the brittleness indexes of Carrara marble. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 2021;146:104860.

[38]

Nicolas A, Fortin J, Regnet JB, Dimanov A, Guéguen Y. Brittle and semi-brittle behaviours of a carbonate rock: Influence of water and temperature. Geophys J Int 2016; 206(1):438-56.

[39]

Xu RC, Zhang SZ, Li Z, Yan XM. Experimental investigation of the strain rate effect on crack initiation and crack damage thresholds of hard rock under quasi-static compression. Acta Geotech 2023; 18(2):903-20.

[40]

Zhang QB, Zhao J. A review of dynamic experimental techniques and mechanical behaviour of rock materials. Rock Mech Rock Eng 2014; 47 (4):1411-78.

[41]

Jin L, Yu WX, Du XL, Zhang S, Li D. Meso-scale modelling of the size effect on dynamic compressive failure of concrete under different strain rates. Int J Impact Eng 2019;125:1-12.

[42]

Wang MZ, Cai M. Numerical modelling of time-dependent spalling of rock pillars. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 2021;141:104725.

[43]

Du K, Li XF, Su R, Tao M, Lv SZ, Luo J, Zhou J. Shape ratio effects on the mechanical characteristics of rectangular prism rocks and isolated pillars under uniaxial compression. Int J Min Sci Technol 2022; 32(2):347-62.

[44]

Pichot T, Delescluse M, Chamot-Rooke N, Pubellier M, Qiu Y, Meresse F, Sun G, Savva D, Wang KP, Watremez L, Auxiètre JL. Deep crustal structure of the conjugate margins of the SW South China Sea from wide-angle refraction seismic data. Mar Petrol Geol 2014;58:627-43.

[45]

Hou BB, Xing HZ, Yue SL, Fan PX, Qiu YY, Wang MY. Laboratory investigation of rock pillar reinforcement against impact loading by using high-tensile-strength polyurea with different coating thicknesses. Tunn Undergr Space Technol 2024;154:106075.

PDF (7043KB)

91

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/