Reorientation of hydraulic fractures and stress-shadow effect in double-well fracturing of hydrocarbon reservoirs: 3D numerical model and analysis

Abstract

Multistage fracturing technology has been used to enhance tight hydrocarbon resource recovery. Determining the proper well spacing and fracturing strategy is crucial for generating a complex fracture network that facilitates oil and gas flow in reservoirs. The stress-shadow effect that occurs between multiple wells significantly affects the development of fracture networks in reservoirs. However, the quantification of the stress-shadow effect and its influence on fracture networks has not been satisfactorily resolved because of the difficulties in detecting and identifying fracture propagation and reorientation in reservoirs. In this study, based on the geological information from the Shengli oilfield, we applied a hybrid finite element-discrete element method to analyze engineering-scale three-dimensional fracture propagation and reorientation by altering well spacings and fracturing strategies. The results indicate that the fracturing area generated by the synchronous fracturing scheme is much smaller than those generated by the sequential and alternative schemes. An alternative hydrofracturing scheme is optimal with respect to fracturing area. The stress-blind area was defined to quantify the mechanical disturbance between adjacent wells. Our study improves the understanding of the effect of fracturing schemes on fracture networks and the impact of independent factors contributing to stress-shadow effects.

Keywords

Multistage fracturing / Double wells / Stress-shadow effect / Fracturing strategies / 3D reorientation / Engineering-scale model

Acknowledgements

This work was supported in part by the National Key Research and Development Project of China (No. 2022YFC3004602), and in part by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Nos. 52121003 and 52342403). The authors gratefully appreciate the invaluable and constructive suggestions from the editors and the anonymous reviewers for improving this manuscript.

References

[1] Rodrigues VF, Neumann LF, Torres DS, de Carvalho G. Horizontal well completion and stimulation techniques. In:Proceedings of the Latin American and Caribbean Petroleum Engineering Conference. Buenos Aires: SPE. p. 15-28.

[2] Waters GA, Barry KD, Robert CD, Kenneth JK, Lance A. Simultaneous hydraulic fracturing of adjacent horizontal wells in Woodford shale. In:Proceedings of SPE Hydraulic Fracturing Technology Conference. Woodlands: SPE. p. 19-21.

[3] Soliman MY, East L, Adams D. Geomechanics aspects of multiple fracturing of horizontal and vertical wells. SPE Drill Complet 2008; 23(3):217-28.

[4] AbuAisha M, Loret B. Influence of hydraulic fracturing on impedance and efficiency of thermal recovery from HDR reservoirs. Geomech Energy Environ 2016;7:10-25.

[5] Fan LB, Wang Y, Zhang TY, Yang ZC, Liu JW. Study on optimization and characteristics of three-dimensional horizontal well pattern in massive reservoir with bottom water. Oil Drill Prod Technol 2012; 34(S1):41-3. in Chinese.

[6] Li SB, Firoozabadi A, Zhang DX. Hydromechanical modeling of non-planar three-dimensional fracture propagation using an iteratively coupled approach. J Geophys Res Solid Earth 2020; 125(8):e2020JB020115.

[7] Zangeneh N, Eberhardt E, Bustin RM. Investigation of the influence of stress shadows on horizontal hydraulic fractures from adjacent lateral wells. J Unconv Oil Gas Resour 2015;9:54-64.

[8] Gorjian M, Hendi S, Hawkes C. An analytical framework for stress shadow analysis during hydraulic fracturing—applied to the Bakken formation, Saskatchewan, Canada. Solid Earth Discuss 2021:1-42.

[9] Duan K, Li YC, Yang WD. Discrete element method simulation of the growth and efficiency of multiple hydraulic fractures simultaneously-induced from two horizontal wells. Geomech Geophys Geo Energy Geo Resour 2020; 7(1):3.

[10] Zeng SP, Zhang GQ, Han JX, Yuan B, Wang YP, Ji Z. Model of multi-fracture stress shadow effect and optimization design for staged fracturing of horizontal wells. Nat Gas Ind 2015; 35(3):55-9. in Chinese.

[11] Sneddon IN. A note on the problem of the penny-shaped crack. Math Proc Camb Phil Soc 1965; 61(2):609-11.

[12] Olson J. Multi-fracture propagation modeling:Applications to hydraulic fracturing in shales and tight gas sands. In:Proceedings of ARMA US Rock Mechanics/Geomechanics Symposium. San Francisco: American Rock Mechanics Association; 2008.p.ARMA-2008-327.

[13] Downie RC, Le Calvez JH, Kerrihard K. Real-time microseismic monitoring of simultaneous hydraulic fracturing treatments in adjacent horizontal wells in the Woodford shale. Calgary: American Association of Petroleum Geologists; 2009. p.484-92..

[14] Le Calvez JH, Craven ME, Klem RC, Baihly JD, Bennett LA, Brook K. Real-time microseismic monitoring of hydraulic fracture treatment:A tool to improve completion and reservoir management. In:Proceedings of SPE Hydraulic Fracturing Technology Conference. Texas: College Station; 2007.p. SPE- 106159-MS.

[15] Fu YK, Dehghanpour H. How far can hydraulic fractures go? A comparative analysis of water flowback, tracer, and microseismic data from the Horn River Basin. Mar Petrol Geol 2020;115:104259.

[16] Duan YL, Li Q, Yao WP. Microseismic fracture monitoring technology of hydraulic fracturing and its application. Fault Block Oil Gas Field 2013; 20 (5):644-8. in Chinese.

[17] Luo ZF, Zhang NL, Zhao LQ, Yao LM, Liu F. Seepage-stress coupling mechanism for intersections between hydraulic fractures and natural fractures. J Petrol Sci Eng 2018;171:37-47.

[18] Ishida T. Acoustic emission monitoring of hydraulic fracturing in laboratory and field. Constr Build Mater 2001; 15(5-6):283-95.

[19] Shah KR, Labuz JF. Damage mechanisms in stressed rock from acoustic emission. J Geophys Res Solid Earth 1995; 100(B8):15527-39.

[20] Ishida T, Aoyagi K, Niwa T, Chen YQ, Murata S, Chen Q, Nakayama Y. Acoustic emission monitoring of hydraulic fracturing laboratory experiment with supercritical and liquid CO₂. Geophys Res Lett 2012; 39(16):1-6.

[21] Zoback MD, Rummel F, Jung R, Raleigh CB. Laboratory hydraulic fracturing experiments in intact and pre-fractured rock. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci Geomech Abstr 1977; 14(2):49-58.

[22] Goodfellow SD, Nasseri MHB, Maxwell SC, Young RP. Hydraulic fracture energy budget: Insights from the laboratory. Geophys Res Lett 2015; 42(9): 3179-87.

[23] Song MY, Li QG, Hu QT, Wu YQ, Ni GH, Xu YC, Deng Y. Resistivity response of coal under hydraulic fracturing with different injection rates: A laboratory study. Int J Min Sci Technol 2022; 32(4):807-19.

[24] Zhou J, Jin Y, Chen M. Experimental investigation of hydraulic fracturing in random naturally fractured blocks. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 2010; 47 (7):1193-9.

[25] Ju Y, Wang YT, Ren ZY, Mao LT, Wang YL, Chiang FP. Optical method to quantify the evolution of whole-field stress in fractured coal subjected to uniaxial compressive loads. Opt Lasers Eng 2020;128:106013.

[26] Tang CM. Numerical simulation of progressive rock failure and associated seismicity. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 1997; 34(2):249-61.

[27] Cundall PA, Hart RD. Numerical Modeling of Discontinua: Analysis and Design Methods. Amsterdam: Elsevier; 1993.

[28] Cheng W, Wang RJ, Jiang GS, Xie JY. Modelling hydraulic fracturing in a complex-fracture-network reservoir with the DDM and graph theory. J Nat Gas Sci Eng 2017;47:73-82.

[29] Zhao Z, Shou YD, Zhou XP. Microscopic cracking behaviors of rocks under uniaxial compression with microscopic multiphase heterogeneity by deep learning. Int J Min Sci Technol 2023; 33(4):411-22.

[30] Cheng Y. Mechanical interaction of multiple fractures: Exploring impacts of the selection of the spacing/number of perforation clusters on horizontal shale-gas wells. SPE J 2012; 17(4):992-1001.

[31] Moës N, Dolbow J, Belytschko T. A finite element method for crack growth without remeshing. Int J Numer Meth Eng 1999; 46(1):131-50.

[32] Gordeliy E, Peirce A. Coupling schemes for modeling hydraulic fracture propagation using the XFEM. Comput Meth Appl Mech Eng 2013;253: 305-22.

[33] Ju Y, Liu P, Chen JL, Yang YM, Ranjith PG. CDEM-based analysis of the 3D initiation and propagation of hydrofracturing cracks in heterogeneous glutenites. J Nat Gas Sci Eng 2016;35:614-23.

[34] Stone TJ, Babuška I. A numerical method with a posteriori error estimation for determining the path taken by a propagating crack. Comput Meth Appl Mech Eng 1998; 160(3-4):245-71.

[35] Gupta P, Duarte CA. Simulation of non-planar three-dimensional hydraulic fracture propagation. Int J Numer Anal Meth Geomech 2014; 38(13):1397-430.

[36] Ghassemi A. Application of rock failure simulation in design optimization of the hydraulic fracturing. In: PorousRock Fracture Mechanics. Amsterdam: Elsevier; 2017. p. 3-23.

[37] Ghassemi A, Zhang ZN. Modeling hydraulic fracturing of unconventional reservoirs. Shale 2018:213-34.

[38] Huang MS, Yue ZQ, Tham LG, Zienkiewicz OC. On the stable finite element procedures for dynamic problems of saturated porous media. Int J Numer Meth Eng 2004; 61(9):1421-50.

[39] Ju Y, Li Y, Wang YL, Yang YM. Stress shadow effects and microseismic events during hydrofracturing of multiple vertical wells in tight reservoirs: A threedimensional numerical model. J Nat Gas Sci Eng 2020;84:103684.

[40] Ju Y, Wu GJ, Wang YL, Liu P, Yang YM. 3D numerical model for hydraulic fracture propagation in tight ductile reservoirs, considering multiple influencing factors via the entropy weight method. SPE J 2021; 26 (5):2685-702.

[41] Profit M.L., Dutko M.J., Yu J., Armstrong J., Parfitt D., Mutlu U. Application of state-of-the-art hydraulic fracture modelling techniques for safe-optimized design and for enhanced production. In:Proceedings of the 50th US Rock Mechanics/Geomechanics Symposium. Houston: American Rock Mechanics Association; 2016.p.ARMA-2016-792.

[42] Profit M, Dutko M, Yu JG, Cole S, Angus D, Baird A. Complementary hydromechanical coupled finite/discrete element and microseismic modelling to predict hydraulic fracture propagation in tight shale reservoirs. Comput Part Mech 2016; 3(2):229-48.

[43] Li Y, Lan TX. Multivariate nonlinear regression analysis of hydraulic fracturing parameters based on hybrid FEM-DEM. Eng Comput 2023; 40(9/10): 3075-99.

[44] Zienkiewicz OC, Zhu JZ. The superconvergent patch recovery (SPR) and adaptive finite element refinement. Comput Meth Appl Mech Eng 1992; 101 (1-3):207-24.

[45] Geertsma J, De Klerk F. A rapid method of predicting width and extent of hydraulically induced fractures. J Petrol Technol 1969; 21(12):1571-81.

[46] Kumar D., Ghassemi A. 3D simulation of multiple fracture propagation from horizontal wells. In:Proceedings of the 49th US Rock Mechanics/ Geomechanics Symposium. San Francisco: American Rock Mechanics Association; 2015;p.ARMA-2015-585.

[47] Kumar D, Ghassemi A. Three-Dimensional modeling and analysis of sequential and simultaneous hydraulic fracturing of horizontal wells. J Pet Sci Eng 2016;46:1006-25.

[48] Olson JE, Laubach SE, Lander RH. Natural fracture characterization in tight gas sandstones: Integrating mechanics and diagenesis. Bulletin 2009; 93 (11):1535-49.

[49] Li Y. Theoretical and numerical analysis of stress shadow effect between echelon fractures in hydraulic fracturing of double vertical wells. Eng Fract Mech 2023;284:109238.

[50] Yu T, Guan GQ, Abudula A, Wang DY. 3D investigation of the effects of multiple-well systems on methane hydrate production in a low-permeability reservoir. J Nat Gas Sci Eng 2020;76:103213.

[51] Liu ZY, Pan ZJ, Li SB, Zhang LG, Wang FS, Han LL, Li W. Study on the effect of cemented natural fractures on hydraulic fracture propagation in volcanic reservoirs. Energy 2022;241:122845.

[52] Liao SZ, Hu JH, Zhang Y. Investigation on the influence of multiple fracture interference on hydraulic fracture propagation in tight reservoirs. J Petrol Sci Eng 2022;211:110160.