A surrogate model for estimating rock stress by a hollow inclusion strain cell in a three-layer medium

Changkun Qin , Wusheng Zhao , Weizhong Chen , Peiyao Xie , Shuai Zhou

Int J Min Sci Technol ›› 2025, Vol. 35 ›› Issue (3) : 363 -381.

PDF (21364KB)
Int J Min Sci Technol ›› 2025, Vol. 35 ›› Issue (3) : 363 -381. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijmst.2025.02.003

A surrogate model for estimating rock stress by a hollow inclusion strain cell in a three-layer medium

Author information +
History +
PDF (21364KB)

Abstract

Accurate acquisition of the rock stress is crucial for various rock engineering applications. The hollow inclusion (HI) technique is widely used for measuring in-situ rock stress. This technique calculates the stress tensor by measuring strain using an HI strain cell. However, existing analytical solutions for stress calculation based on an HI strain cell in a double-layer medium are not applicable when an HI strain cell is used in a three-layer medium, leading to erroneous stress calculations. To address this issue, this paper presents a method for calculating stress tensors in a three-layer medium using numerical simulations, specifically by obtaining a constitutive matrix that relates strain measurements to stress tensors in a three-layer medium. Furthermore, using Latin hypercube sampling (LHS) and orthogonal experimental design strategies, 764 groups of numerical models encompassing various stress measurement scenarios have been established and calculated using FLAC3D software. Finally, a surrogate model based on artificial neural network (ANN) was developed to predict constitutive matrices, achieving a goodness of fit (R2) of 0.999 and a mean squared error (MSE) of 1.254. A software program has been developed from this surrogate model for ease of use in practical engineering applications. The method’s accuracy was verified through numerical simulations, analytical solution and laboratory experiment, demonstrating its effectiveness in calculating stress in a three-layer medium. The surrogate model was applied to calculate mining-induced stress in the roadway roof rock of a coal mine, a typical case for stress measurement in a three-layer medium. Errors in stress calculations arising from the use of existing analytical solutions were corrected. The study also highlights the significant errors associated with using double-layer analytical solutions in a three-layer medium, which could lead to inappropriate engineering design.

Keywords

Stress measurement / Over-coring stress relief method / Three-layer medium / Surrogate model / Numerical simulation

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Changkun Qin, Wusheng Zhao, Weizhong Chen, Peiyao Xie, Shuai Zhou. A surrogate model for estimating rock stress by a hollow inclusion strain cell in a three-layer medium. Int J Min Sci Technol, 2025, 35(3): 363-381 DOI:10.1016/j.ijmst.2025.02.003

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

Acknowledgements

We acknowledge the funding support from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Nos. 42477208 and 52079134), the Natural Science Foundation of Hubei Province, China (No. 2024AFA072), the Youth Innovation Promotion Association CAS (No. 2022332), the National Key R&D Program of China (No. 2024YFF0508203), and the Open Research Fund of State Key Laboratory of Geomechanics and Geotechnical Engineering Safety (Nos. SKLGME-JBGS2402 and SKLGME022022).

Supplementary material

Supplementary material to this article can be found online at https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmst.2025.02.003.

References

[1]

Amadei B, Stephansson O. Rock Stress and Its Measurement. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands; 1997.

[2]

Guo J, Huang WB, Feng GR, Bai JW, Li LR, Wang Z, Yu LY, Wen XZ, Zhang J, Feng WM. Stability analysis of longwall top-coal caving face in extra-thick coal seams based on an innovative numerical hydraulic support model. Int J Min Sci Technol 2024; 34(4):491-505.

[3]

Gao K, Guyer R, Rougier E, Ren CX, Johnson PA. From stress chains to acoustic emission. Phys Rev Lett 2019; 123(4):048003.

[4]

Puller JW, Mills KW, Jeffrey RG, Walker RJ. In-situ stress measurements and stress change monitoring to monitor overburden caving behaviour and hydraulic fracture pre-conditioning. Int J Min Sci Technol 2016; 26(1):103-10.

[5]

Ge X, Hou M. Principle of in-situ 3D rock stress measurement with borehole wall stress relief method and its preliminary applications to determination of in-situ rock stress orientation and magnitude in Jinping hydropower station. Sci China Technol Sci 2012;55:939-49.

[6]

Lai CY, Wong LNY, Wallace M. Review and assessment of in-situ rock stress in Hong Kong for territory-wide geological domains and depth profiling. Eng Geol 2019;248:267-82.

[7]

Li P, Cai MF, Miao SJ, Li Y, Sun L, Wang JT, Gorjian M. Comparison and evaluation of overcoring and hydraulic fracturing stress measurements. Sci Rep 2024;14:8771.

[8]

Li Y, Fu SS, Qiao L, Liu ZB, Zhang YH. Development of twin temperature compensation and high-level biaxial pressurization calibration techniques for CSIRO in-situ stress measurement in depth. Rock Mech Rock Eng 2019; 52 (4):1115-31.

[9]

Wang C, Han ZQ, Wang YT, Wang CY, Wang JC, Hu S. Rapid in-situ stress measurement in vertical borehole based on borehole diametrical deformation analysis. Rock Mech Rock Eng 2023; 56(11):8289-303.

[10]

Leeman ER. The CSIR “doorstopper” and triaxial rock stress measuring instruments. Rock Mech 1971; 3(1):25-50.

[11]

Fairhurst C. Stress estimation in rock: A brief history and review. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 2003; 40(7-8):957-73.

[12]

Herget G. First experiences with the CSIR triaxial strain cell for stress determinations. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci Geomech Abstr 1973; 10(6):509-22.

[13]

Worotnicki G. CSIRO triaxial stress measurement cell Rock, Testing and Site Characterization. Amsterdam: Elsevier; 1993. p. 329-94.

[14]

Feng Y, Harrison JP, Bozorgzadeh N. A Bayesian approach for uncertainty quantification in overcoring stress estimation. Rock Mech Rock Eng 2021; 54 (2):627-45.

[15]

Yevgeny DY, Lasko GV. Field of stresses in an isotropic plane with circular inclusion under tensile stress. Engineering 2012; 4(9):583-9.

[16]

Fama MED, Pender MJ. Analysis of the hollow inclusion technique for measuring in situ rock stress. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci Geomech Abstr 1980; 17(3):137-46.

[17]

Qin CK, Zhao WS, Zhong K, Chen WZ. Prediction of longwall mining-induced stress in roof rock using LSTM neural network and transfer learning method. Energy Sci Eng 2022; 10(2):458-71.

[18]

Zheng MZ, Li SJ, Feng ZJ, Xu HS, Xiao YX. Three-dimensional stress variation characteristics in deep hard rock of CJPL-II project based on in situ monitoring. Int J Min Sci Technol 2024; 34(2):179-95.

[19]

Leite MH, Boivin V, Corthésy R. Stress calculation methods for overcoring techniques in heterogeneous rocks. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 2010; 47 (7):1180-92.

[20]

Feng YJ, Pan PZ, Wang ZF, Liu XF, Miao ST. A novel indirect optical method for rock stress measurement using micro-deformation field analysis. J Rock Mech Geotech Eng 2024; 16(9):3616-28.

[21]

Jin Z. Induced stress monitoring method considering nonlinear characteristics of deep rock mass. Doctoral dissertation. Beijing: University of Science and Technology Beijing; 2024; p.15-44.

[22]

Zheng MZ, Li SJ, Feng ZJ, Liu L, Jia W. Determination of the stress tensor of a triaxial strain cell in a three-layer model using the genetic algorithm and support vector machine. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 2024;175:105668.

[23]

Furtney JK, Thielsen C, Fu W, Le Goc R. Surrogate models in rock and soil mechanics: Integrating numerical modeling and machine learning. Rock Mech Rock Eng 2022; 55(5):2845-59.

[24]

Moustapha M, Sudret B. Learning non-stationary and discontinuous functions using clustering, classification and Gaussian process modelling. Comput Struct 2023;281:107035.

[25]

Bouhlel MA, Hwang JT, Bartoli N, Lafage R, Morlier J, Martins JRRA. A Python surrogate modeling framework with derivatives. Adv Eng Softw 2019;135:102662.

[26]

He XZ, Wang F, Li WG, Sheng DC. Efficient reliability analysis considering uncertainty in random field parameters: Trained neural networks as surrogate models. Comput Geotech 2021;136:104212.

[27]

Bi SF, Beer M, Cogan S, Mottershead J. Stochastic model updating with uncertainty quantification: An overview and tutorial. Mech Syst Sig Process 2023;204:110784.

[28]

Chang JQ, Zhang DM, Huang HW, Jia JW. A hybrid sensing of rotation-induced stress of segmental lining during shield tunneling via WSN and surrogate numerical modeling. Tunn Undergr Space Technol 2023;140:105315.

[29]

Ninić J, Freitag S, Meschke G. A hybrid finite element and surrogate modelling approach for simulation and monitoring supported TBM steering. Tunn Undergr Space Technol 2017;63:12-28.

[30]

Liu Y, Zhu J. Research on hollow inclusion triaxial strain gauge for geostress measurement. Chinese J Rock Mech Eng 2001; 32(5):448-53. in Chinese.

[31]

Vitali OPM, Celestino TB, Bobet A. 3D finite element modelling optimization for deep tunnels with material nonlinearity. Undergr Space 2018; 3(2):125-39.

[32]

Zheng MZ, Li SJ, Xu HS, Liang ZQ, Lu XG. Investigation of the rock failure effect on overcoring stress relief test in deep hard rock. Bull Eng Geol Environ 2023; 82(9):353.

AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF (21364KB)

459

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

AI思维导图

/