Response properties of geometries of coal penetrating fracture on seepage behavior

Abstract

The fracture surfaces of coal-rock masses formed under mining-induced stress generally exhibit complex geometries, and the fracture geometry is one of the primary factors affecting the seepage characteristics of coal-rock penetrating fracture. This paper investigates the seepage characteristics of 5 groups of coal penetrating fracture (CPF) with different joint roughness coefficients (JRCs). Based on 3D morphology scanner tests and hydraulic coupling tests, a characterization method of effective geometric parameters in fracture surfaces under various confining pressures was improved, and a relationship between effective geometric parameters and the confining pressure is established. The results indicate that the nonlinear flow behavior in a CPF primarily includes three types: non-Newtonian fluid seepage under high confining pressure and low JRC, non-Darcy seepage under low confining pressure and high JRC, and the whole process of seepage characteristics between these two conditions. Among them, non-Newtonian fluid seepage is caused by significant fracture expansion, while non-Darcy seepage can be attributed to turbulence effects. During the seepage process, the geometric parameters with different JRC fracture samples all exhibit exponential changes with the increase of confining pressure. In addition, under high confining pressure, the effective contact ratio, effective fracture aperture, and void deviation ratio with high JRC fracture samples under high confining pressure increase by 93.5%, 67.4%, and 24.9%, respectively, compared with those of low JRC fracture samples. According to the variation of geometric parameters in a CPF with external stress, a seepage model considering geometric parameters in a CPF is proposed. By introducing the root mean square error (RMSE) and coefficient of determination (R²) to evaluate the error and goodness of fit between model curves and experimental data, it is found that the theoretical curves of model in this paper have the best matching with the experimental data. The average values of RMSE and R² for model in this paper are 0.002 and 0.70, respectively, which are better than models in the existing literature.

Keywords

Coal penetrating fracture / Roughness / Geometries / Seepage characteristics

Acknowledgements

This research is supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Nos. 52474161, and 52404093), Fundamental Research Program of Shanxi Province (Nos. 202303021222168 and 202203021221143), and Taiyuan University of Science and Technology Scientific Research Initial Funding (No. 20242103), and the Postdoctoral Research Foundation of China (No. 2023M733778).

References

[1] Zhang C, Bai QS, Han PH. A review of water rock interaction in underground coal mining: Problems and analysis. Bull Eng Geol Environ 2023; 82(5):157.

[2] Han PH, Zhang C, Wang XJ, Wang L. Study of mechanical characteristics and damage mechanism of sandstone under long-term immersion. Eng Geol 2023; 315:107020.

[3] Yao QL, Chen T, Tang CJ, Sedighi M, Wang SW, Huang QX. Influence of moisture on crack propagation in coal and its failure modes. Eng Geol 2019; 258:105156.

[4] Han PH, Zhang C, Wang W. Failure analysis of coal pillars and gateroads in longwall faces under the mining-water invasion coupling effect. Eng Fail Anal 2022; 131:105912.

[5] Hu QT, Zhang YB, Li QG, Cao J, Song MY, Hu LP, Liu JC, Deng YZ, Shi JL, Zheng XW. Experimental research on progressive failure characteristics of waterimmersed coal: Implications for hydraulic fracturing. Eng Geol 2022; 308:106809.

[6] Xia BW, Zhou YM, Zhang XG, Zhou L, Ma ZK. Physical and numerical investigations of target stratum selection for ground hydraulic fracturing of multiple hard roofs. Int J Min Sci Technol 2024; 34(5):699-712.

[7] Lavrov A. Flow of non-Newtonian fluids in single fractures and fracture networks: Current status, challenges, and knowledge gaps. Eng Geol 2023; 321:107166.

[8] Sukop MC, Huang HB, Alvarez PF, Variano EA, Cunningham KJ. Evaluation of permeability and non-Darcy flow in vuggy macroporous limestone aquifer samples with lattice Boltzmann methods. Water Resour Res 2013; 49(1):216-30.

[9] Zimmerman RW, Bodvarsson GS. Hydraulic conductivity of rock fractures. Transp Porous Medium 1996; 23(1):1-30.

[10] Javadi M, Sharifzadeh M, Shahriar K, Mitani Y. Critical Reynolds number for nonlinear flow through rough-walled fractures: The role of shear processes. Water Resour Res 2014; 50(2):1789-804.

[11] Zhang ZY, Nemcik J. Fluid flow regimes and nonlinear flow characteristics in deformable rock fractures. J Hydrol 2013; 477:139-51.

[12] Zhou JQ, Chen YF, Tang HM, Wang LC, Cardenas MB. Disentangling the simultaneous effects of inertial losses and fracture dilation on permeability of pressurized fractured rocks. Geophys Res Lett 2019; 46(15):8862-71.

[13] Zimmerman RW, Al-Yaarubi A, Pain CC, Grattoni CA. Non-linear regimes of fluid flow in rock fractures. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 2004; 41:163-9.

[14] Luo Y, Zhang ZY, Wang YK, Nemcik J, Wang JH. On fluid flow regime transition in rough rock fractures: insights from experiment and fluid dynamic computation. J Hydrol 2022; 607:127558.

[15] Chen YF, Zhou JQ, Hu SH, Hu R, Zhou CB. Evaluation of Forchheimer equation coefficients for non-Darcy flow in deformable rough-walled fractures. J Hydrol 2015; 529:993-1006.

[16] Chen YF, Hu SH, Hu R, Zhou CB. Estimating hydraulic conductivity of fractured rocks from high-pressure packer tests with an Izbash’s law-based empirical model. Water Resour Res 2015; 51(4):2096-118.

[17] Rong G, Tan J, Zhan HB, He RH, Zhang ZY. Quantitative evaluation of fracture geometry influence on nonlinear flow in a single rock fracture. J Hydrol 2020; 589:125162.

[18] Xie YC, Liao JX, Zhao PF, Xia KW, Li CB. Effects of fracture evolution and non- Darcy flow on the thermal performance of enhanced geothermal system in 3D complex fractured rock. Int J Min Sci Technol 2024; 34(4):443-59.

[19] Zhang YB, Han X, Liang P, Yao XL, Li Q, Yu GY, Wang Q. A deformation measurement method based on surface texture information of rocks and its application. Int J Min Sci Technol 2023; 33(9):1117-30.

[20] Xie LZ, Gao C, Ren L, Li CB. Numerical investigation of geometrical and hydraulic properties in a single rock fracture during shear displacement with the Navier-Stokes equations. Environ Earth Sci 2015; 73(11):7061-74.

[21] Yeo W. Effect of contact obstacles on fluid flow in rock fractures. Geosci J 2001; 5(2):139-43.

[22] Chen YD, Selvadurai APS, Zhao ZH. Modeling of flow characteristics in 3D rough rock fracture with geometry changes under confining stresses. Comput Geotech 2021;130:103910.

[23] Zhang C, Wang XJ, Han PH, Zhang T, Zhang L, Wang FT. Acoustic emission and splitting surface roughness of sandstone in a Brazilian splitting test under the influence of water saturation. Eng Geol 2024;329:107369.

[24] Han PH, Zhao YX, Zhang C, Wang XJ, Wang W. Effects of water on mechanical behavior and acoustic emission characteristics of coal in Brazilian tests. Theor Appl Fract Mech 2022; 122:103636.

[25] Barton N, Bandis S, Bakhtar K. Strength, deformation and conductivity coupling of rock joints. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci Geomech Abstr 1985; 22(3):121-40.

[26] Tse R, Cruden DM. Estimating joint roughness coefficients. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci Geomech Abstr 1979; 16(5):303-7.

[27] Yin Q, Liu RC, Jing HW, Su HJ, Yu LY, He LX. Experimental study of nonlinear flow behaviors through fractured rock samples after high-temperature exposure. Rock Mech Rock Eng 2019; 52(9):2963-83.

[28] Chen YD, Liang WG, Lian HJ, Yang JF, Nguyen VP. Experimental study on the effect of fracture geometric characteristics on the permeability in deformable rough-walled fractures. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 2017; 98:121-40.

[29] Hopkins DL. The implications of joint deformation in analyzing the properties and behavior of fractured rock masses, underground excavations, and faults. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 2000; 37(1-2):175-202.

[30] Xie HP, Wang JN, Stein E. Direct fractal measurement and multifractal properties of fracture surfaces. Phys Lett A 1998; 242(1-2):41-50.

[31] Ai T, Zhang R, Zhou HW, Pei JL. Box-counting methods to directly estimate the fractal dimension of a rock surface. Appl Surf Sci 2014; 314:610-21.

[32] Zhou HW, Xie H. Direct estimation of the fractal dimensions of a fracture surface of rock. Surf Rev Lett 2003; 10(5):751-62.

[33] Xu XL, Karakus M. A coupled thermo-mechanical damage model for granite. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 2018; 103:195-204.