Fatigue Life Prediction Under Multiaxial Loading Using Machine Learning and Dependency-Aware Sensitivity Analysis

Tran C. H. Nguyen , Xiaoying Zhuang , Anh Tuan Le , Van Hai Luong , N. Vu-Bac

International Journal of Mechanical System Dynamics ›› 2025, Vol. 5 ›› Issue (4) : 736 -761.

PDF
International Journal of Mechanical System Dynamics ›› 2025, Vol. 5 ›› Issue (4) :736 -761. DOI: 10.1002/msd2.70043
RESEARCH ARTICLE
Fatigue Life Prediction Under Multiaxial Loading Using Machine Learning and Dependency-Aware Sensitivity Analysis
Author information +
History +
PDF

Abstract

Accurate prediction of fatigue life under multiaxial loading conditions remains challenging due to complex stress–strain interactions. In this study, we integrate machine-learning (ML) regression with variance-based sensitivity analysis (SA) to predict multiaxial fatigue life in CuZn37 brass and to identify the dominant mechanical factors influencing fatigue damage. Several surrogate models were evaluated, with the Gaussian Process model achieving the highest accuracy (R2 = 0.991) while maintaining robust generalization across loading paths. Gradient Boosting, Random Forest, and Penalized Spline Regression models also demonstrated strong predictive capabilities. Importantly, the SA explicitly accounted for statistical dependencies among input parameters, revealing that normal strain–stress interactions account for over 40% of the total variance in fatigue life. In contrast, shear-related parameters exhibited secondary, compensatory effects. These results highlight the importance of capturing parameter dependencies in fatigue modeling and demonstrate that ML-based surrogates can help provide both high-fidelity predictions and physical insights under complex multiaxial loading conditions.

Keywords

fatigue life prediction / machine learning / multiaxial loading / parameter dependency / spline regression / variance-based sensitivity analysis

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Tran C. H. Nguyen, Xiaoying Zhuang, Anh Tuan Le, Van Hai Luong, N. Vu-Bac. Fatigue Life Prediction Under Multiaxial Loading Using Machine Learning and Dependency-Aware Sensitivity Analysis. International Journal of Mechanical System Dynamics, 2025, 5(4): 736-761 DOI:10.1002/msd2.70043

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

References

[1]

A. Fatemi and N. Shamsaei, “Multiaxial Fatigue: An Overview and Some Approximation Models for Life Estimation,” International Journal of Fatigue33, no. 8 (2011): 948-958.

[2]

A. Karolczuk and E. Macha, “A Review of Critical Plane Orientations in Multiaxial Fatigue Failure Criteria of Metallic Materials,” International Journal of Fracture134, no. 3 (2005): 267-304.

[3]

A. Karolczuk, K. Kluger, and T. Łagoda, “A Correction in the Algorithm of Fatigue Life Calculation Based on the Critical Plane Approach,” International Journal of Fatigue83 (2016): 174-183.

[4]

L. Zhang, B. Jiang, P. Zhang, et al., “Methods for Fatigue-Life Estimation: A Review of the Current Status and Future Trends,” Nanotechnology and Precision Engineering6, no. 2 (2023): 025001.

[5]

A. P. Vassilopoulos and R. P. L. Nijssen, “Fatigue Life Prediction Under Realistic Loading Conditions,” in Fatigue Life Prediction of Composites and Composite Structures (2019), 387-423.

[6]

I. M. Sobol, “Global Sensitivity Indices for Nonlinear Mathematical Models and Their Monte Carlo Estimates,” Mathematics and Computers in Simulation55, no. 1–3 (2001): 271-280.

[7]

A. Saltelli, M. Ratto, T. Andres, et al., Global Sensitivity Analysis: The Primer (Wiley, 2008).

[8]

N. Vu-Bac, R. Rafiee, X. Zhuang, T. Lahmer, and T. Rabczuk, “Uncertainty Quantification for Multiscale Modeling of Polymer Nanocomposites With Correlated Parameters,” Composites B68 (2015): 446-464.

[9]

S. P. Zhu, Q. Liu, and H. Z. Huang, “Probabilistic Modeling of Damage Accumulation for Fatigue Reliability Analysis,” Procedia Structural Integrity4 (2017): 3-10.

[10]

J. Gao, J. Wang, Z. Xu, C. Wang, and S. Yan, “Multiaxial Fatigue Prediction and Uncertainty Quantification Based on Back Propagation Neural Network and Gaussian Process Regression,” International Journal of Fatigue168 (2023): 107361.

[11]

N. Vu-Bac, A. H. Nguyen, and V. H. Luong, “Uncertainty Analysis of Static Fatigue of Hi-Nicalon Bundles,” Engineering Analysis With Boundary Elements167 (2024): 6.

[12]

T. T. Pleune and O. K. Chopra, “Using Artificial Neural Networks to Predict the Fatigue Life of Carbon and Low-Alloy Steels,” Nuclear Engineering and Design197, no. 1–2 (2000): 1-12.

[13]

J. C. Figueira Pujol and J. M. Andrade Pinto, “A Neural Network Approach to Fatigue Life Prediction,” International Journal of Fatigue33, no. 3 (2011): 313-322.

[14]

J. Gao, F. Heng, Y. Yuan, and Y. Liu, “A Novel Machine Learning Method for Multiaxial Fatigue Life Prediction: Improved Adaptive Neuro-Fuzzy Inference System,” International Journal of Fatigue178 (2024): 108007.

[15]

E. Samaniego, C. Anitescu, S. Goswami, et al., “An Energy Approach to the Solution of Partial Differential Equations in Computational Mechanics via Machine Learning: Concepts, Implementation and Applications,” Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering362 (2020): 112790.

[16]

N. Konda, R. Verma, and R. Jayaganthan, “Machine Learning Based Predictions of Fatigue Crack Growth Rate of Additively Manufactured Ti6Al4V,” Metals12, no. 1 (2022): 50.

[17]

J. Horňas, J. Běhal, P. Homola, et al., “Modelling Fatigue Life Prediction of Additively Manufactured Ti-6Al-4V Samples Using Machine Learning Approach,” International Journal of Fatigue169 (2023): 107483.

[18]

T. C. H. Nguyen, N. Vu-Bac, and P. R. Budarapu, “A Kriging-Based Uncertainty Quantification for Fracture Assessment,” International Journal of Computational Methods22, no. 1 (2024): 2316-2343.

[19]

S. P. Zhu, H. Z. Huang, W. Peng, H. K. Wang, and S. Mahadevan, “Probabilistic Physics of Failure-Based Framework for Fatigue Life Prediction of Aircraft Gas Turbine Discs Under Uncertainty,” Reliability Engineering & System Safety146 (2016): 1-12.

[20]

S. Suresh, Fatigue of Materials (Cambridge University Press, 1998).

[21]

A. Karolczuk, M. Słoński, D. Skibicki, and Ł. Pejkowski, “Gaussian Process for Machine Learning-Based Fatigue Life Prediction Model Under Multiaxial Stress–Strain Conditions,” Materials15, no. 21 (2022): 7797.

[22]

D. Skibicki and Ł. Pejkowski, “Low-Cycle Multiaxial Fatigue Behaviour and Fatigue Life Prediction for CuZn37 Brass Using the Stress–Strain Models,” International Journal of Fatigue102 (2017): 18-36.

[23]

A. Fatemi and D. F. Socie, “A Critical Plane Approach to Multiaxial Fatigue Damage Including Out-of-Phase Loading,” Fatigue & Fracture of Engineering Materials & Structures11, no. 3 (1988): 149-165.

[24]

S. S. Manson and G. R. Halford, “Practical Implementation of the Double Linear Damage Rule and Damage Curve Approach for Treating Cumulative Fatigue Damage,” International Journal of Fracture17, no. 2 (1981): 169-192.

[25]

R. I. Stephens, A. Fatemi, R. R. Stephens, and H. O. Fuchs, Metal Fatigue in Engineering, 2nd ed. (Wiley-Interscience, 2000).

[26]

H. Jahed, A. Varvani‑Farahan, M. Noban, and I. Khalaji, “An Energy-Based Fatigue Life Assessment Model for Various Metallic Materials Under Proportional and Non‑Proportional Loading Conditions,” International Journal of Fatigue29, no. 4 (2007): 647-655.

[27]

N. Vu-Bac, M. Silani, T. Lahmer, X. Zhuang, and T. Rabczuk, “A Unified Framework for Stochastic Predictions of Mechanical Properties of Polymeric Nanocomposites,” Computational Materials Science96 (2015): 520-535.

[28]

T. A. Mara and S. Tarantola, “Variance-Based Sensitivity Indices for Models With Dependent Inputs,” Reliability Engineering & System Safety107 (2012): 115-121.

[29]

B. Iooss and P. Lemaître, “A Review on Global Sensitivity Analysis Methods,” in Uncertainty Management in Simulation–Optimization of Complex Systems: Algorithms and Applications, eds. G. Dellino and C. Meloni (Springer, 2015), 101-122.

[30]

F. J. Massey, “The Kolmogorov–Smirnov Test for Goodness of Fit,” Journal of the American Statistical Association46, no. 253 (1951): 68-78.

[31]

C. E. Rasmussen and C. K. I. Williams, Gaussian Processes for Machine Learning (MIT Press, 2006).

[32]

A. J. Smola and B. Schölkopf, “A Tutorial on Support Vector Regression,” Statistics and Computing14, no. 3 (2004): 199-222.

[33]

L. Breiman, “Random Forests,” Machine Learning45, no. 1 (2001): 5-32.

[34]

T. Chen and C. Guestrin, “XGBoost: A Scalable Tree Boosting System,” Proceedings of the 22nd ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (2016): 785-794.

[35]

J. H. Friedman, “Greedy Function Approximation: A Gradient Boosting Machine,” Annals of Statistics29, no. 5 (2001): 1189-1232.

[36]

D. Ruppert, M. P. Wand, and R. J. Carroll, Semiparametric Regression (Cambridge University Press, 2003).

[37]

T. Akiba, S. Sano, T. Yanase, T. Ohta, and M. Koyama, “Optuna: A Next-Generation Hyperparameter Optimization Framework,” in Proceedings of the 25th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery & Data Mining, edited by D. Ruppert, M. P. Wand, and R. J. Carroll (ACM, 2019), 2623-2631.

[38]

D. F. Socie and G. B. Marquis, Multiaxial Fatigue (Society of Automotive Engineers International, 2000).

[39]

M. W. Brown and K. J. Miller, “A Theory for Fatigue Failure Under Multiaxial Stress–Strain Conditions,” Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers187, no. 1 (1973): 745-755.

[40]

N. Vu-Bac, X. Zhuang, and T. Rabczuk, “Uncertainty Quantification for Mechanical Properties of Polyethylene Based on Fully Atomistic Model,” Materials12, no. 21 (2019): 3613.

[41]

J. C. Helton and F. J. Davis, “Latin Hypercube Sampling and the Propagation of Uncertainty in Analyses of Complex Systems,” Reliability Engineering & System Safety81, no. 1 (2003): 23-69.

[42]

N. Vu-Bac, T. Lahmer, H. Keitel, J. Zhao, X. Zhuang, and T. Rabczuk, “Stochastic Predictions of Bulk Properties of Amorphous Polyethylene Based on Molecular Dynamics Simulations,” Mechanics of Materials68 (2014): 70-84.

[43]

N. Vu-Bac, T. Lahmer, Y. Zhang, X. Zhuang, and T. Rabczuk, “Stochastic Predictions of Interfacial Characteristic of Polymeric Nanocomposites (PNCs),” Composites B59 (2014): 80-95.

[44]

N. Vu-Bac, T. Lahmer, X. Zhuang, T. Nguyen-Thoi, and T. Rabczuk, “A Software Framework for Probabilistic Sensitivity Analysis for Computationally Expensive Models,” Advances in Engineering Software100 (2016): 19-31.

[45]

N. E. Dowling, Mechanical Behavior of Materials: Engineering Methods for Deformation, Fracture, and Fatigue, 4th ed. (Pearson Education, 2013).

[46]

T. Itoh and T. Yang, “Material Dependence of Multiaxial Low Cycle Fatigue Lives Under Non-Proportional Loading,” International Journal of Fatigue33, no. 8 (2011): 1025-1031.

[47]

J. W. Doong, M. R. Hill, and D. F. Socie, “Nonproportional Cyclic Deformation and Fatigue of 1045 Steel,” Journal of Engineering Materials and Technology113, no. 1 (1991): 23-30.

[48]

Q. Y. Deng, S. P. Zhu, X. Niu, G. Lesiuk, W. Macek, and Q. Wang, “Load Path Sensitivity and Multiaxial Fatigue Life Prediction of Metals Under Non-Proportional Loadings,” International Journal of Fatigue166 (2023): 107281.

[49]

E. Jiménez-Ruiz, R. Lostado-Lorza, and C. Berlanga-Labari, “A Comprehensive Review of Fatigue Strength in Pure Copper Metals (DHP, of, ETP),” Metals14, no. 4 (2024): 464.

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

2025 The Author(s). International Journal of Mechanical System Dynamics published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of Nanjing University of Science and Technology.

PDF

34

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/