Fusion-Based Constitutive Model (FuCe): Toward Model-Data Augmentation in Constitutive Modeling

Sawan Kumar , Souvik Chakraborty

International Journal of Mechanical System Dynamics ›› 2025, Vol. 5 ›› Issue (1) : 86 -100.

PDF
International Journal of Mechanical System Dynamics ›› 2025, Vol. 5 ›› Issue (1) : 86 -100. DOI: 10.1002/msd2.70005
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Fusion-Based Constitutive Model (FuCe): Toward Model-Data Augmentation in Constitutive Modeling

Author information +
History +
PDF

Abstract

Constitutive modeling is crucial for engineering design and simulations to accurately describe material behavior. However, traditional phenomenological models often struggle to capture the complexities of real materials under varying stress conditions due to their fixed forms and limited parameters. While recent advances in deep learning have addressed some limitations of classical models, purely data-driven methods tend to require large data sets, lack interpretability, and struggle to generalize beyond their training data. To tackle these issues, we introduce “Fusion-based Constitutive model (FuCe): Toward model-data augmentation in constitutive modeling.” This approach combines established phenomenological models with an Input Convex Neural Network architecture, designed to train on the limited and noisy force-displacement data typically available in practical applications. The hybrid model inherently adheres to necessary constitutive conditions. During inference, Monte Carlo dropout is employed to generate Bayesian predictions, providing mean values and confidence intervals that quantify uncertainty. We demonstrate the model's effectiveness by learning two isotropic constitutive models and one anisotropic model with a single fiber direction, across six different stress states. The framework's applicability is also showcased in finite element simulations across three geometries of varying complexities. Our results highlight the framework's superior extrapolation capabilities, even when trained on limited and noisy data, delivering accurate and physically meaningful predictions across all numerical examples.

Keywords

approximate Bayesian / hybrid constitutive model / hyper-elasticity / ICNN / model-data fusion / physics enhanced

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
, Sawan Kumar, Souvik Chakraborty. Fusion-Based Constitutive Model (FuCe): Toward Model-Data Augmentation in Constitutive Modeling. International Journal of Mechanical System Dynamics, 2025, 5(1): 86-100 DOI:10.1002/msd2.70005

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

References

[1]

E. J. Fern and K. Soga, “The Role of Constitutive Models in MPM Simulations of Granular Column Collapses,” Acta Geotechnica 11, no. 3 (2016): 659–678.

[2]

Y. Kim, G. H. Gu, O. Bouaziz, Y. Estrin, and H. S. Kim, “A Simple Physics-Based Constitutive Model to Describe Strain Hardening in a Wide Strain Range,” International Journal of Material Forming 16, no. 2 (2023): 19.

[3]

K. Upadhyay, G. Subhash, and D. Spearot, “Hyperelastic Constitutive Modeling of Hydrogels Based on Primary Deformation Modes and Validation Under 3D Stress States,” International Journal of Engineering Science 154 (2020): 103314.

[4]

D. P. Rosen and J. Jiang, “A Comparison of Hyperelastic Constitutive Models Applicable to Shear Wave Elastography (SWE) Data in Tissue-Mimicking Materials,” Physics in Medicine & Biology 64, no. 5 (2019): 055014.

[5]

G. Puglisi and G. Saccomandi, “Multi-Scale Modelling of Rubber-Like Materials and Soft Tissues: An Appraisal,” Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences 472, no. 2187 (2016): 20160060.

[6]

Z. Guo and L. J. Sluys, “Constitutive Modelling of Hyperelastic Rubber-Like Materials,” Heron 53, no. 3 (2008): 109–132.

[7]

T. Kirchdoerfer and M. Ortiz, “Data-Driven Computational Mechanics,” Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering 304 (2016): 81–101.

[8]

C. K. Williams and C. E. Rasmussen, Gaussian Processes for Machine Learning (MIT Press, 2006).

[9]

J. N. Fuhg, M. Marino, and N. Bouklas, “Local Approximate Gaussian Process Regression for Data-Driven Constitutive Models: Development and Comparison With Neural Networks,” Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering 388 (2022): 114217.

[10]

C. M. Bishop and H. Bishop, Deep Learning: Foundations and Concepts (Springer Nature, 2023).

[11]

S. Kollmannsberger, D. D'Angella, M. Jokeit, L. Herrmann, et al., Deep Learning in Computational Mechanics (Springer, 2021).

[12]

J. Ghaboussi, J. Garrett , and X. Wu, “Knowledge-Based Modeling of Material Behavior With Neural Networks,” Journal of Engineering Mechanics 117, no. 1 (1991): 132–153.

[13]

X. Ma, N. An, Q. Cong, et al., “Design, Modeling, and Manufacturing of High Strain Composites for Space Deployable Structures,” Communications Engineering 3, no. 1 (2024): 78.

[14]

A. Joshi, P. Thakolkaran, Y. Zheng, et al., “Bayesian-EUCLID: Discovering Hyperelastic Material Laws With Uncertainties,” Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering 398 (2022): 115225.

[15]

Z. Yuan and J. Fish, “Toward Realization of Computational Homogenization in Practice,” International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering 73, no. 3 (2008): 361–380.

[16]

K. Wang and W. Sun, “A Multiscale Multi-Permeability Poroplasticity Model Linked by Recursive Homogenizations and Deep Learning,” Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering 334 (2018): 337–380.

[17]

P. Thakolkaran, A. Joshi, Y. Zheng, M. Flaschel, L. De Lorenzis, and S. Kumar, “NN-EUCLID: Deep-Learning Hyperelasticity Without Stress Data,” Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids 169 (2022): 105076.

[18]

M. Flaschel, S. Kumar, and L. De Lorenzis, “Automated Discovery of Generalized Standard Material Models With EUCLID,” Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering 405 (2023): 115867.

[19]

J. N. Fuhg, C. Böhm, N. Bouklas, A. Fau, P. Wriggers, and M. Marino, “Model-Data-Driven Constitutive Responses: Application to a Multiscale Computational Framework,” International Journal of Engineering Science 167 (2021): 103522.

[20]

M. Raissi, P. Perdikaris, and G. E. Karniadakis, “Physics-Informed Neural Networks: A Deep Learning Framework for Solving Forward and Inverse Problems Involving Nonlinear Partial Differential Equations,” Journal of Computational physics 378 (2019): 686–707.

[21]

Y. Wang, J. Bai, Z. Lin, et al., “ Artificial Intelligence for Partial Differential Equations in Computational Mechanics: A Review,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2410.19843 (2024).

[22]

E. Samaniego, C. Anitescu, S. Goswami, et al., “An Energy Approach to the Solution of Partial Differential Equations in Computational Mechanics via Machine Learning: Concepts, Implementation and Applications,” Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering 362 (2020): 112790.

[23]

V. M. Nguyen-Thanh, X. Zhuang, and T. Rabczuk, “A Deep Energy Method for Finite Deformation Hyperelasticity,” European Journal of Mechanics-A/Solids 80 (2020): 103874.

[24]

V. M. Nguyen-Thanh, C. Anitescu, N. Alajlan, T. Rabczuk, and X. Zhuang, “Parametric Deep Energy Approach for Elasticity Accounting for Strain Gradient Effects,” Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering 386 (2021): 114096.

[25]

S. Goswami, C. Anitescu, S. Chakraborty, and T. Rabczuk, “Transfer Learning Enhanced Physics Informed Neural Network for Phase-Field Modeling of Fracture,” Theoretical and Applied Fracture Mechanics 106 (2020): 102447.

[26]

S. Chakraborty, “Transfer Learning Based Multi-Fidelity Physics Informed Deep Neural Network,” Journal of Computational Physics 426 (2021): 109942.

[27]

Tushar and S. Chakraborty, “DPA-WNO: A Gray Box Model for a Class of Stochastic Mechanics Problem,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2309.15128 (2023).

[28]

Tushar and S. Chakraborty, “Deep Physics Corrector: A Physics Enhanced Deep Learning Architecture for Solving Stochastic Differential Equations,” Journal of Computational Physics 479 (2023): 112004.

[29]

G. A. Padmanabha, J. N. Fuhg, C. Safta, R. E. Jones, and N. Bouklas, “Improving the Performance of Stein Variational Inference Through Extreme Sparsification of Physically-Constrained Neural Network Models,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2407.00761 (2024).

[30]

Y. Gal and Z. Ghahramani, “ Dropout as a Bayesian Approximation: Representing Model Uncertainty in Deep Learning,” in International Conference on Machine Learning (PMLR, 2016), 1050–1059.

[31]

C. B. Morrey , “Quasi-Convexity and the Lower Semicontinuity of Multiple Integrals,” Pacific Journal of Mathematics 2 (1952): 25–53.

[32]

J. Schröder, Anisotropie Polyconvex Energies (Springer, 2010).

[33]

J. M. Ball, “Convexity Conditions and Existence Theorems in Nonlinear Elasticity,” Archive for Rational Mechanics and Analysis 63 (1976): 337–403.

[34]

B. Amos, L. Xu, and J. Z. Kolter, “ Input Convex Neural Networks,” in International Conference on Machine Learning, ed, D. Precup and Y. W. Teh (PMLR, 2017), 146–155.

[35]

B. D. Coleman and W. Noll, “On the Thermostatics of Continuous Media,” Archive for Rational Mechanics and Analysis 4 (1959): 97–128.

[36]

F. As'ad, P. Avery, and C. Farhat, “A Mechanics-Informed Artificial Neural Network Approach in Data-Driven Constitutive Modeling,” International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering 123, no. 12 (2022): 2738–2759.

[37]

D. Yang Gao, P. Neff, I. Roventa, and C. Thiel, “On the Convexity of Nonlinear Elastic Energies in the Right Cauchy-Green Tensor,” Journal of Elasticity 127 (2017): 303–308.

[38]

I. Goodfellow, Y. Bengio, and A. Courville, Deep Learning, Vol. 1, no. 2 (MIT Press, 2016).

[39]

K. He, X. Zhang, S. Ren, and J. Sun, “Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognition,” Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (2016): 770–778.

[40]

M. S. Alnaes, J. Blechta, J. Hake, et al., “The FEniCS Project Version 1.5,” Archive of Numerical Software 3 (2015), https://doi.org/10.11588/ans.2015.100.20553.

[41]

S. K. Melly, L. Liu, Y. Liu, and J. Leng, “A Review on Material Models for Isotropic Hyperelasticity,” International Journal of Mechanical System Dynamics 1, no. 1 (2021): 71–88.

[42]

R. Rivlin, “Large Elastic Deformations of Isotropic Materials. I. Fundamental Concepts,” Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series A, Mathematical and Physical Sciences 240, no. 822 (1948): 459–490.

[43]

A. Isihara, “Theory of Anisotropic Colloidal Solutions,” Journal of Chemical Physics 19, no. 9 (1951): 1142–1147.

[44]

E. M. Arruda and M. C. Boyce, “A Three-Dimensional Constitutive Model for the Large Stretch Behavior of Rubber Elastic Materials,” Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids 41, no. 2 (1993): 389–412.

[45]

M. Hossain, A. Amin, and M. N. Kabir, “Eight-Chain and Full-Network Models and Their Modified Versions for Rubber Hyperelasticity: A Comparative Study,” Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Materials 24, no. 1–2 (2015): 11–24, https://doi.org/10.1515/jmbm-2015-0002.

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

2025 The Author(s). International Journal of Mechanical System Dynamics published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of Nanjing University of Science and Technology.

AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF

35

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

AI思维导图

/