Sulfonated Li-metal–organic frameworks-enhanced wide-temperature all solid-state lithium metal batteries
Yanjun She , Hongxiang Si , Jiaxing Li , Wenbin Xu , Mohamed Mamlouk , Fang Tian , Mindrov K. Anatolyevich , Tao Wei
International Journal of Minerals, Metallurgy and Materials ›› : 1 -11.
A sulfonic-functionalized Zr-type metal–organic framework (UiO-66-SO3H) was synthesized, and UiO-66-SO3Li was obtained via subsequent lithiation treatment. The UiO-66-SO3H framework was incorporated into a polymer matrix as a functional filler to obtain high-performance solid composite electrolytes (SCEs). Structural and morphological analyses, as well as various electrochemical tests, were performed. Owing to well-defined porous channels, abundant lithium-ion transport sites, and effective regulation of polymer crystallinity by SO3− moieties at 60°C, the optimized SCE-2 (10wt% UiO-66-SO3Li) exhibited a high ionic conductivity of 5.36 × 10−4 S·cm−1 (1.86 × 10−4 S·cm−1 at the room temperature of 25°C), along with a wide electrochemical stability window of 4.7 V and a lithium-ion transference number as high as 0.623. The Li∣SCE-2∣LiFePO4 full cell exhibited excellent long-cycle stability at both 60°C and room temperature, as well as an excellent rate capability up to 5 C (1 C is equivalent to 170 mA·g−1). Moreover, SCE-2 can also be coupled with high-voltage LiNi0.5Co0.1Mn0.3O2 cathodes. This study demonstrates that sulfonic-modified UiO-66-SO3Li can effectively regulate Li+ migration, suppress lithium dendrite growth, and enhance interfacial compatibility, offering a viable approach for designing advanced solid composite electrolytes.
all-solid-state lithium batteries / metal–organic frameworks / high-temperature / solid composite electrolytes / UiO-66-SO3Li
| [1] |
|
| [2] |
|
| [3] |
T. Mathivanan, N. Panjulingam, S. Dolui, S. Lakshmipathi, S. Banerjee, and R.K. Selvan, Enhancement of electrochemical performances of Li–S batteries using PPESK and Nelumbo nucifera derived porous carbon modified separator, Mater. Lett., 315(2022), art. No. 131935. |
| [4] |
|
| [5] |
L. Wu, F. Pei, D.M. Cheng, et al., Flame-retardant polyurethane-based solid-state polymer electrolytes enabled by covalent bonding for lithium metal batteries, Adv. Funct. Mater., 34(2024), No. 16, art. No. 2310084. |
| [6] |
|
| [7] |
|
| [8] |
|
| [9] |
|
| [10] |
M.T. Wang, T. Wei, J.H. Lu, et al., Bimetallic MOFs-derived NiFe2O4/Fe2O3 enabled dendrite-free lithium metal anodes with ultra-high area capacity based on an intermittent lithium deposition model, ChemSusChem, 17(2024), No. 21, art. No. e202400569. |
| [11] |
|
| [12] |
|
| [13] |
|
| [14] |
M.U. Javed, S. Muhammad, Z.R. Wang, et al., Metal-organic framework/polymer composites for solid state electrolytes-a critical review, J. Power Sources, 640(2025), art. No. 236720. |
| [15] |
|
| [16] |
|
| [17] |
S. Ai, X.L. Wu, J.T. Wang, X. Li, X.F. Hao, and Y.Z. Meng, Research progress on solid-state electrolytes in solid-state lithium batteries: Classification, ionic conductive mechanism, interfacial challenges, Nanomaterials, 14(2024), No. 22, art. No. 1773. |
| [18] |
Z.J. Wu, S.N. He, C. Zheng, et al., Fabrication pressures and stack pressures in solid-state battery, eScience, 4(2024), No. 4, art. No. 100247. |
| [19] |
|
| [20] |
Z.Y. Wang, Z.J. Du, Y.Y. Liu, et al., Metal–organic frameworks and their derivatives for optimizing lithium metal anodes, eScience, 4(2024), No. 4, art. No. 100189. |
| [21] |
|
| [22] |
|
| [23] |
|
| [24] |
|
| [25] |
|
| [26] |
|
| [27] |
F.Q. Liang and Z.Y. Wen, MOF/poly(ethylene oxide) composite polymer electrolyte for solid-state lithium battery, J. Inorg. Mater., 36(2021), No. 3, art. No. 332. |
| [28] |
|
| [29] |
|
| [30] |
|
| [31] |
|
| [32] |
W. Yu, N.P. Deng, Y. Feng, et al., Understanding multi-scale ion-transport in solid-state lithium batteries, eScience, 5(2025), No. 1, art. No. 100278. |
| [33] |
W.H. Huang, S. Wang, X.X. Zhang, et al., Universal F4-modified strategy on metal–organic framework to chemical stabilize PVDF-HFP as quasi-solid-state electrolyte, Adv. Mater., 35(2023), No. 52, art. No. 2310147. |
| [34] |
|
| [35] |
S.R.D. Raveendran, L.P. Teh, R. Othaman, and C.H. Chia, Enhanced carbon dioxide adsorption performance of UiO-66-SO3H with a mixed ligand strategy, J. Environ. Chem. Eng., 12(2024), No. 5, art. No. 113404. |
| [36] |
D. Guo, D.B. Shinde, W. Shin, et al., Foldable solid-state batteries enabled by electrolyte mediation in covalent organic frameworks, Adv. Mater., 34(2022), No. 23, art. No. 2201410. |
| [37] |
|
| [38] |
Y.L. Zhang, M. Irfan, Z.H. Yang, K. Liu, J.H. Su, and W.X. Zhang, Lithium hydroxyphenyl propanesulfonate imparts composite solid polymer electrolytes with ultrahigh ionic conductivity for dendrite free lithium batteries, Chem. Eng. J., 435(2022), art. No. 134775. |
| [39] |
|
| [40] |
|
| [41] |
|
| [42] |
|
| [43] |
J.J. Yang, L. Shao, X. Wang, et al., Effect of intermolecular interactions on the performance of UiO-66-laden solid composite polymer electrolytes, J. Alloy. Compd., 845(2020), art. No. 155179. |
| [44] |
|
| [45] |
Y.X. Zhu, J.X. Li, L.L. Xiang, et al., Room-temperature quasi-solid lithium metal batteries enabled by IL@HKUST-1 gel polymer electrolyte, Chin. J. Chem. Eng., 2026. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cjche.2026.04.015 |
| [46] |
|
| [47] |
|
| [48] |
|
University of Science and Technology Beijing
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |