Mineralogical controls on Ni and Co recovery during HCl leaching of laterites
Fernando Prado Araujo , Nívea Magalhães , Elvira Vassilieva , Gavyn Rollinson , Jens C. Ø. Andersen , Richard Crane , Stylianos Tampouris , Hannah S. R. Hughes , Philippe Muchez
International Journal of Minerals, Metallurgy and Materials ›› 2026, Vol. 33 ›› Issue (9) : 2951 -2964.
Demand for nickel (Ni) and cobalt (Co) is rising, with laterite deposits being an increasingly important source. However, current processing methods (e.g., smelting or high-pressure acid leaching) are energy-intensive and pose environmental hazards. To address this challenge, there has been increasing interest in chloride leaching, particularly with HCl, due to its flexibility and efficacy at ambient conditions. To date, much of the focus on advancing the chloride leaching technology has been on the downstream separation and recovery stages, to overcome its inherent disadvantages, such as a high acid-to-ore ratio, impure leachates due to non-selective leaching, and difficulties in Ni–Co purification (e.g., co-adsorption losses). Nonetheless, effective metal extractions depend on understanding the underlying behavior of ore minerals during acid dissolution. The deportment of target metals (Ni–Co) and impurities, and their leaching mechanisms, remains poorly understood. Given the complex mineralogy of laterites, information on how minerals behave in HCl leaching is paramount to improve leaching efficiency. This study reveals that metal extraction during HCl leaching (8 mol/L, 3 h, 95°C, ambient pressure) is uneven and controlled by specific ore minerals. The release of Ni is governed by its distribution in acid-soluble minerals asbolane (Mn-hydroxide), Fe oxyhydroxides (e.g., goethite), chlorite, serpentine, and clay minerals (Ni-bearing smectite group) in the laterite feed. Conversely, for Co, although predominantly hosted by acid-soluble minerals (asbolane, with minor contributions from Fe oxyhydroxides and chlorite), it is also present in insoluble chromite. Deportment of Co in chromite varies from around 2wt% to 55wt% in the laterite ores. Examination of leaching residues confirms that HCl effectively dissolves most ore minerals, except refractory chromite. Therefore, chromite retention in the residue sequesters part of the Co content and prevents the total Co recovery during atmospheric HCl leaching. Overall, this work highlights the vital role of mineral-specific dissolution mechanisms in controlling metallurgical performance. This knowledge is crucial for flowsheet development, enabling precise adjustment of leaching steps to target ore minerals, account for mineralogical factors that limit recovery, and thereby maximize metal yield.
nickel laterites / chloride leaching / cobalt recovery / chromite / process mineralogy / forensic geometallurgy
| [1] |
L. Gregoir and K.V. Acker, Metals for Clean Energy: Pathways to Solving Europe’s Raw Materials Challenge, Eurometaux, Brussels [2022-07-13]. https://www.metaalnederland.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/04/KU-Leuven_metals-for-clean-energy.pdf. |
| [2] |
I.E. Agency, The Role of Critical Minerals in Clean Energy Transitions. OECD, Paris [2021-05-14]. https://www.oecd.org/content/dam/oecd/en/publications/reports/2021/05/the-role-of-critical-minerals-in-clean-energy-transitions_4ce961a5/f262b91c-en.pdf. |
| [3] |
S. Horn, A.G. Gunn, E. Petavratzi, et al., Cobalt resources in Europe and the potential for new discoveries, Ore Geol. Rev., 130(2021), art. No. 103915. |
| [4] |
|
| [5] |
|
| [6] |
|
| [7] |
European Commission, RMIS-Raw Materials Information System, European Commission, Brussels [2025-07-15]. https://rmis.jrc.ec.europa.eu/rmp/Nickel. |
| [8] |
USGS. Mineral Commodity Summaries 2024. United States Geological Survey, [2024-01-31]. https://www.usgs.gov/public-ations/mineral-commodity-summaries-2024. |
| [9] |
G. Bartzas and K. Komnitsas, Cradle to gate life-cycle assessment of battery grade nickel sulphate production through high-pressure acid leaching, Sci. Total Environ., 952(2024), art. No. 175902. |
| [10] |
|
| [11] |
|
| [12] |
|
| [13] |
|
| [14] |
|
| [15] |
|
| [16] |
|
| [17] |
|
| [18] |
C.A.J. Tupaz, Y. Watanabe, K. Sanematsu, and T. Echigo, Mineralogy and geochemistry of the Berong Ni-Co laterite deposit, Palawan, Philippines, Ore Geol. Rev., 125(2020), art. No. 103686. |
| [19] |
|
| [20] |
|
| [21] |
|
| [22] |
|
| [23] |
|
| [24] |
S. Stanković, M. Martin, S. Goldmann, et al., Effect of mineralogy on Co and Ni extraction from Brazilian limonitic laterites via bioleaching and chemical leaching, Miner. Eng., 184(2022), art. No. 107604. |
| [25] |
|
| [26] |
Q. Dehaine, L.T. Tijsseling, H.J. Glass, T. Törmänen, and A.R. Butcher, Geometallurgy of cobalt ores: A review, Miner. Eng., 160(2021), art. No. 106656. |
| [27] |
|
| [28] |
|
| [29] |
|
| [30] |
|
| [31] |
|
| [32] |
|
| [33] |
|
| [34] |
|
| [35] |
|
| [36] |
G. Acquah, G.B.A. Wood, J.A. Mensah, and R. Asamoah, Selective comminution for upgrading nickel and cobalt in nickel laterite ores, Miner. Eng., 233(2025), art. No. 109667. |
| [37] |
|
| [38] |
|
| [39] |
|
| [40] |
|
| [41] |
|
| [42] |
E. Keskinkilic, Nickel laterite smelting processes and some examples of recent possible modifications to the conventional route, Metals, 9(2019), No. 9, art. No. 974. |
| [43] |
G. Bartzas, P.E. Tsakiridis, and K. Komnitsas, Nickel industry: Heavy metal(loid)s contamination - sources, environmental impacts and recent advances on waste valorization, Curr. Opin. Environ. Sci. Health, 21(2021), art. No. 100253. |
| [44] |
|
| [45] |
|
| [46] |
|
| [47] |
|
| [48] |
|
| [49] |
H.E. Jeong, H. Kang, S. Choi, and H. Kim, Comparative study of limonitic and saprolitic laterite ores on the leaching characteristics under atmospheric pressure, Miner. Eng., 226(2025), art. No. 109250. |
| [50] |
|
| [51] |
|
| [52] |
|
| [53] |
|
| [54] |
|
| [55] |
|
| [56] |
|
| [57] |
|
| [58] |
|
| [59] |
|
| [60] |
|
| [61] |
R. Lommelen, B. Dewulf, J. Bussé, and K. Binnemans, Predictive thermodynamic model for solvent extraction of Iron(III) by tri-n-butyl phosphate (TBP) from chloride media, Sep. Purif. Technol., 348(2024), art. No. 127708. |
| [62] |
S.M. Sadeghi, C. Vermoere, S. Tampouris, K. Binnemans, and B. Dewulf, Recovery of nickel and cobalt from ferronickel alloy by hydrochloric acid leaching and continuous counter-current solvent extraction, Sep. Purif. Technol., 397 (2026), art. No. 138092. |
| [63] |
|
| [64] |
|
| [65] |
K. Komnitsas, E. Petrakis, and G. Bartzas, A novel and greener sequential column leaching approach for the treatment of two different Greek laterites, Sci. Total Environ., 854(2023), art. No. 158748. |
| [66] |
|
| [67] |
|
| [68] |
|
| [69] |
|
| [70] |
|
| [71] |
|
| [72] |
|
| [73] |
|
| [74] |
|
| [75] |
M.L. Machado, C.G. Porto, L. Santoro, et al., The origin of supergene nickeliferous chlorite in the Santa Fé Ni-Laterite Deposit, GO, Brazil, Braz. J. Geol., 51(2021), No. 3, art. No. e20200119. |
| [76] |
|
| [77] |
|
| [78] |
L. Santoro, F. Putzolu, N. Mondillo, M. Boni, and R. Herrington, Trace element geochemistry of iron-(oxy)-hydroxides in Ni(Co)-laterites: Review, new data and implications for ore forming processes, Ore Geol. Rev., 140(2022), art. No. 104501. |
The Author(s)
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |