Strategies that make mobile apps effective in increasing physical activity: A scoping review

Abstract

Objective: The objective of this study is to analyse the researchers’ studies on the effectiveness of mobile Apps to encourage people to undertake physical activity (PA), to determine what strategy makes utilising the mobile Apps an effective experience in increasing PA in healthy people, and to identify the gaps in their research studies.
Study design: The researcher utilised a scoping review following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Scoping Review extension protocol.
Methods: This scoping review was conducted to identify under what conditions the mobile Apps could lead to the increased PA of the participants through analysing the research studies on mobile App features and participants’ characteristics. Studies included those with high internal validity (randomised controlled trials) that dealt mainly with PA. The articles were selected according to specific criteria including 1) quantitative studies in English language, 2) participants from 18-70 years of age, 3) healthy participants who were recruited from community/primary healthcare centres and at high risk of cardiovascular diseases, and 4) the studies’ outcomes on the apps’ effectiveness and efficiency in increasing PA. The articles were critiqued using the Specialist Unit for Review Evidence.
Results: Eight articles were finally selected and analysed. Four intervention strategies were identified from the studies-social aspect (3/8 studies), texting (3/8 studies), health sessions (3/8 studies), and feedback (5/8 studies). Results showed that some of the motivational strategies had a significant influence in improving PA.
Conclusions: The long-term effect was not tested on all studies. Therefore, long-term studies need to be conducted to test the consistency of the PA. Additionally, subgroup analysis should be performed to gauge the influence of individual characteristics on increasing PA.

Keywords

Mobile Apps / Physical activity / Healthy participants / Motivational interventions

References

[1] Arksey H, O’Malley L. Scoping studies: Towards a methodological framework. International Journal of Social Research Methodology. 2005; 8(1): 19-32. https://doi.org/10.1080/1364557032000119616

[2] Munn Z, Peters MD, Stern C, et al. Systematic review or scoping review? Guidance for authors when choosing between a systematic or scoping review approach. BioMed Central Medical Research Methodology Journal. 2018; 18. PMid:30453902. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-018-0611-x

[3] Gough D, Thomas J, Oliver S. Clarifying differences between review designs and methods. Systematic Reviews Journal. 2012; 28(1): 1-9. PMid:22681772. https://doi.org/10.1186/2046-4053-1-28

[4] Levac D, Colquhoun H, O’Brien KK. Scoping studies: Advancing the methodology. Implementation Science. 2010; 69(5): 1-9.PMid:20854677. https://doi.org/10.1186/1748-5908-5-69

[5] Pham MT, Rajic A, Greig JD, et al. A scoping review of scoping reviews: Advancing the approach and enhancing the consistency. Research Synthesis Methods Journal. 2014; 5(4): 371-385. PMid:26052958. https://doi.org/10.1002/jrsm.1123

[6] Davis K, Drey N, Gould D. What are scoping studies? A review of the nursing literature. International Journal of Nursing Studies. 2009; 46(10): 1386-1400. PMid:19328488. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2009.02.010

[7] Aromatario O, Van Hoye A, Vuillemin A, et al. How do mobile health applications support behaviour changes? A scoping review of mobile health applications relating to physical activity and eating behaviours. Journal of Public Health. 2019; 175: 8-18. PMid:31374453.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.puhe.2019.06.011

[8] Ghanvatkar S, Kankanhalli A, Rajan V. User models for personalized physical activity interventions: Scoping review. Journal of Medical Internet Research. 2019; 7(1): e11098. PMid:30664474.https://doi.org/10.2196/11098

[9] Joseph-Shehu EM, Ncama BP, Mooi N, et al. The use of information and communication technologies to promote healthy lifestyle behaviour: A systematic scoping review. British Medical Journal Open. 2019; 9(10): e029872. PMid:31662364. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-029872

[10] Monteiro-Guerra F, Rivera-Romero O, Fernandez-Luque L, et al. Personalization in real-time physical activity coaching using mobile applications: A scoping review. Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics. 2020; 24(6): 1738-1751. PMid:31751254. https://doi.org/10.1109/JBHI.2019.2947243

[11] Holland K, Rees C. Nursing:Evidence-based practice skills. Oxford University Press. 2010.

[12] Rees C.Introduction to research for midwives. Elsevier. 2011.

[13] Fain J. Reading, understanding and applying nursing research. F. A.Davis Company. 2009.

[14] Moher D, Stewart L, Shekelle P. All in the family: Systematic reviews,rapid reviews, scoping reviews, realist reviews, and more. Systematic Reviews Journal. 2015; 4(1): 183-194. PMid:26693720.https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-015-0163-7

[15] Peterson NE, Sirard JR, Kulbok PA, et al. Sedentary behavior and physical activity of young adult university students. Journal of Research in Nursing and Health. 2018; 41(1): 30-38. PMid:29315656.https://doi.org/10.1002/nur.21845

[16] Lockwood C, Santos KB, Pap R. Practical guidance for knowledge synthesis: Scoping review methods. Asian Nursing Research Journal. 2019; 13(5): 287-294. PMid:31756513. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anr.2019.11.002

[17] Peters MD. In no uncertain terms: The importance of a defined objective in scoping reviews. JBI Database of Systematic Review and Implementation Reports Journal. 2016; 14(2): 1-4. PMid:27536788.https://doi.org/10.11124/jbisrir-2016-2838

[18] Joseph-Shehu EM, Ncama BP. Evidence on health-promoting lifestyle practices and information and communication technologies:Scoping review protocol. British Medical Journal Open. 2017; 7(3):e014358. PMid:28360246. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-014358

[19] Specialist Unit for Review Evidence (SURE). Questions to assist with the critical appraisal of randomised controlled trials and other experimental studies. Retrieved February 21, 2021, Available from: https://www.unisa.edu.au/contentassets/72bf75606a2b4abcaf7f17404af374ad/sure_rcts-and-other-experimental-studies_checklist_2016.pdf

[20] Peters MD. Guidance for conducting systematic scoping reviews. International Journal of Evidence-Based Healthcare. 2015; 13(3):141-146. PMid:26134548. https://doi.org/10.1097/XEB.0000000000000050

[21] Tricco AC, Lillie E, Zarin W, et al. PRISMA extension for scoping reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and explanation. Annals of Internal Medicine Journal. 2018; 169(7): 467-473. PMid:30178033.https://doi.org/10.7326/M18-0850

[22] Liberati A, Altman DG, Tetzlaff J, et al. The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: Explanation and elaboration. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology. 2009; 62(10): e1-34. PMid:19631507.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2009.06.006

[23] Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, et al. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology. 2009; 62(10): 1006-1012.PMid:19631508. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2009.06.005

[24] Harries T, Eslambolchilar P, Rettie R, et al. Effectiveness of a smartphone app in increasing physical activity amongst male adults: A randomised controlled trial. PubMed Central Journal of Public Health. 2016; 16: 925. PMid:27590255. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-016-3593-9

[25] Fukuoka Y, Haskell W, Lin F, et al. Short- and long-term effects of a mobile phone app in conjunction with brief in-person counseling on physical activity among physically inactive women. The Journal of the American Medical Association. 2019; 2(5): e194281.PMid:31125101. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.4281

[26] Edney S, Ryan JC, Olds T, et al. User engagement and attrition in an app-based physical activity intervention: Secondary analysis of a randomized controlled trial. Journal of Medical Internet Research. 2019; 21(11): e14645. PMid:31774402. https://doi.org/10.2196/14645

[27] King AC, Hekler EB, Grieco LA, et al. Effects of three motivationally targeted mobile device applications on initial physical activity and sedentary behavior change in midlife and older adults: A randomized trial. The Public Library of Science. 2016; 11(6): e0156370.PMid:27352250. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0156370

[28] Kramer N, Tinschert P, Scholz U, et al. A cluster-randomized trial on small incentives to promote physical activity. American Journal of Preventive Medicine. 2019; 56(2): e45-e54. PMid:30553693.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2018.09.018

[29] Martin SS, Feldman DI, Blumenthal RS, et al. mActive: A randomized clinical trial of an automated health intervention for physical activity promotion. Journal of American Heart Association. 2015; 4:e002239. PMid:26553211. https://doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.115.002239

[30] Peacock OJ, Western MJ, Batterham AM, et al. Effect of novel technology-enabled multidimensional physical activity feedback in primary care patients at risk of chronic disease-the MIPACT study: A randomised controlled trial. International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity. 2020; 17: 99. PMid:32771018.https://doi.org/10.1186/s12966-020-00998-5

[31] Glynn LG, Hayes PS, Casey M, et al. Effectiveness of a smartphone application to promote physical activity in primary care:The SMART MOVE randomised controlled trial. British Journal of General Practice. 2014; 64: 384-391. PMid:24982490. https://doi.org/10.3399/bjgp14X680461

[32] Samuel GO, Hoffmann S, Wright RA, et al. Guidance on assessing the methodological and reporting quality of toxicologically relevant studies: A scoping review. Environmental International Journal. 2016; 93: 630-646. PMid:27039952. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2016.03.010

[33] Higgins JP, Green S. Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions: Cochrane Book Series. 2011. Available from: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/book/10.1002/9780470712184

[34] Steckler A, McLeroy K. The importance of external validity. American Journal of Public Health. 2008; 98(1): 9-10. PMid:18048772.https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2007.126847

[35] Bettany-Saltikov J, McSherry R. How to do a systematic literature review in nursing: A step-by-step guide (2nd ed.). Open University Press. 2012.

[36] Polit DF, Beck CT.Essentials of nursing research: Appraising evidence for nursing practice (8th ed.). Wolters Kluwer Health. 2014.

[37] National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. The Guidelines Manual. 2022. Available from: https://www.nice.org.uk/process/pmg6/resources/the-guidelines-manual-pdf-2007970804933

[38] Britton A, McKee M, Black N, et al. Threats to applicability of randomised trials: Exclusions and selective participation. Journal of Health Services Research and Policy. 1999; 4(2): 112-121.PMid:10387403. https://doi.org/10.1177/135581969900400210

[39] Wang R, Lagakos SW, Ware JH, et al. Statistics in medicine-Reporting of subgroup analyses in clinical trials. The New England Journal of Medicine. 2007; 357: 2189-2194. PMid:18032770.https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMsr077003

[40] Pildal J, Hobjartsson A, Jorgensen KJ, et al. Impact of allocation concealment on conclusions drawn from meta-analyses of randomized trials. International Journal of Epidemiology. 2007; 36(4): 847-857.PMid:17517809. https://doi.org/10.1093/ije/dym087

[41] Harries T, Eslambolchilar P, Stride C, et al. Walking in the wild-Using an always-on smartphone application to increase physical activity. In KotzeP. et al. Human-computer interaction ( 19-36). Springer Berlin., pp. 2013. Available from: https://doi.org/:10.1007/978-3-642-40498-6_2

[42] Western MJ, Peacock OJ, Stathi A, et al. The understanding and interpretation of innovative technology-enabled multidimensional physical activity feedback in patients at risk of future chronic disease. The Public Library of Science Journal. 2015; 10(5): e0126156.PMid:25938455. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0126156

[43] Western MJ, Thompson D, Peacock OJ, et al. The impact of multidimensional physical activity feedback on healthcare practitioners and patients. Royal College of General Practice Journal. 2019; 3(1).PMid:31049409. https://doi.org/10.3399/bjgpopen18X101628