Barriers and facilitators to the implementation of cell phone interventions to improve the use of family planning services among women in Sub-Saharan Africa: A systematic review

Abstract

Background: Mobile health (mHealth) interventions are being tested to improve contraceptive uptake in Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA). However, few attempts have systematically reviewed the mHealth programs to enhance family planning (FP) services among women in SSA. At the same time, more than half of low-income countries’ population have a cell phone. This review identifies and highlights facilitators and barriers to implementing cell phone interventions designed to target women FP services.
Methods: Databases including PubMed, CINAHL, Epistemonikos, Embase, and Global Health were systematically searched for studies from January 1, 2010, to December 31, 2020, to identify various mHealth interventions used to improve the use of FP services among women in SSA. Two authors independently selected eligible publications based on inclusion/exclusion criteria, assessed study quality and extracted data using a pre-defined data extraction sheet. In addition, a content analysis was conducted using a validated extraction grid with a pre-established categorization of barriers and facilitators.
Results: The search strategy led to 8,188 potentially relevant papers, of which 16 met the inclusion criteria. Most included studies evaluated the impact of mHealth interventions on FP services, access (n = 9), and use of FP outcomes (n = 6). At the same time, only one article was interested in implementing a mHealth intervention. The most-reported cell phone use was for women reproductive health education, contraceptive knowledge and use. Barriers and facilitators of the use of mhealth were categorized into three main outcomes: behavioral outcomes, data collection and reporting, and health outcomes. mHealth interventions addressed barriers to provider prejudice, stigmatization, discrimination, lack of privacy, and confidentiality. The studies also identified barriers to uptake of mHealth interventions for FP services, including decreased technological literacy and lower linguistic competency.
Conclusions: The review provides detailed information about implementing mobile phones at different healthcare system levels to improve FP service outcomes. Barriers to uptake mHealth interventions must be adequately addressed to increase the potential use of mobile phones to improve access to Sexual and Reproductive Health (SRH) awareness and FP services.

Keywords

Cell phone / mHealth, Women / Sub-Saharan Africa / Systematic review / Facilitators / Barriers

References

[1] Rubee Dev, Woods NF, Unger JA, et al. Acceptability, feasibility and utility of a Mobile health family planning decision aid for postpartum women in Kenya. Reprod Health. 2019; 16(1): 97. PMid:31286989.https://doi.org/10.1186/s12978-019-0767-9

[2] Harrington EK, McCoy EE, Drake AL, et al. Engaging men in an mHealth approach to support postpartum family planning among couples in Kenya: a qualitative study. Reprod Health. 2019;16. PMid:30744697. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12978-019-0669-x

[3] Velonjara J, Crouthamel B, O’Malley G, et al. Motherhood increases support for family planning among Kenyan adolescents. Sex Reprod Healthc. 2018; 16: 124-31. PMid:29804756. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.srhc.2018.03.002

[4] Achwoka D, Pintye J, McGrath CJ, et al. Uptake and correlates of contraception among postpartum women in Kenya: results from a national cross-sectional survey. Contraception. 2018; 97(3): 227-35.PMid:29031815. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.contraception.2017.10.001

[5] Rubee D, Woods NF, Unger JA, et al. Acceptability, feasibility and utility of a Mobile health family planning decision aid for postpartum women in Kenya. Reprod Health. 2019; 16(1): 97. PMid:31286989.https://doi.org/10.1186/s12978-019-0767-9

[6] Lopez LM, Grey TW, Chen M, et al. Strategies for improving postpartum contraceptive use:evidence from non-randomized studies. In: TheCochrane Collaboration, éditeur. CochraneDatabase of Systematic Reviews. Ltd; Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons, 2014.CD011298 p. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD011298.pub2

[7] Feroz AS, Ali NA, Khoja A, et al. Using mobile phones to improve young people sexual and reproductive health in low and middleincome countries: a systematic review to identify barriers, facilitators, and range of mHealth solutions. Reprod Health. 2021; 18(1): 9. PMid:33453723. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12978-020-01059-7

[8] Mwaisaka J, Gonsalves L, Thiongo M, et al. Young People’s Experiences Using an On-Demand Mobile Health Sexual and Reproductive Health Text Message Intervention in Kenya: Qualitative Study. JMIR MHealth UHealth. 2021; 9(1): e19109. PMid:33448930.https://doi.org/10.2196/19109

[9] Haile A, Fantahun M. Demand for long acting and permanent contraceptive methods and associated factors among family planning service users, Batu town, Central Ethiopia. Ethiop Med J. 2012; 50(1): 31-42.

[10] Mathe JK, Kasonia KK, Maliro AK. Barriers to Adoption of Family Planning among Women in Eastern Democratic Republic of Congo. Afr J Reprod Health. 2011; 15(1): 69-77.

[11] Adibi S. Mobile Health:A Technology Road Map. Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2015. PMid:26503114. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-12817-7

[12] Kay M, Santos J, Takane M. mHealth:new horizons for health through mobile technologies. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2011. Available from: http://www.who.int/goe/publications/goe_mhealth_web.pdf

[13] Odeny TA, Bukusi EA, Cohen CR, et al. Texting improves testing :a randomized trial of two-way SMS to increase postpartum prevention of mother-to-child transmission retention and infant HIV testing. AIDS. 2014; 28(15): 2307-12. PMid:25313586. https://doi.org/10.1097/QAD.0000000000000409

[14] Smith C, Gold J, Ngo TD, et al. Mobile phone-based interventions for improving contraception use. Cochrane Fertility Regulation Group. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD011159.pub2

[15] Feroz A, Abrejo F, Ali SA, et al. Using mobile phones to improve young people’s sexual and reproductive health in low- and middleincome countries: a systematic review protocol to identify barriers,facilitators and reported interventions. Syst Rev. 2019; 8(1): 117. PMid:31103044. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-019-1033-5

[16] Feroz AS, Ali NA, Khoja A, et al. Using mobile phones to improve young people sexual and reproductive health in low and middleincome countries: a systematic review to identify barriers, facilitators,and range of mHealth solutions. Reprod Health. 2021; 18(1): 9. PMid:33453723. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12978-020-01059-7

[17] Wiffen P. Change blindness. Eur J Hosp Pharm. 2018; 25(3): 117. PMid:31157003. https://doi.org/10.1136/ejhpharm-2018-001587

[18] Gunther E, CONSORT-EHEALTH Group. CONSORT-EHEALTH: Improving and Standardizing Evaluation Reports of Web-based and Mobile Health Interventions. J Med Internet Res. 2011; 13(4): e126. PMid:22209829. https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.1923

[19] van der Kleij RMJJ, Kasteleyn MJ, Meijer E, et al. SERIES:eHealth in primary care. Part 1: Concepts, conditions and challenges. Eur J Gen Pract. 2019; 25(4): 179-89. PMid:31597502.https://doi.org/10.1080/13814788.2019.1658190

[20] Wallis L, Blessing P, Dalwai M, et al. Integrating mHealth at point of care in low- and middle-income settings: the system perspective. Glob Health Action. 2017; 10(sup3): 1327686. PMid:28838302.https://doi.org/10.1080/16549716.2017.1327686

[21] Bergström DA. mHealth: can mobile technology improve health in low- and middleincome countries. UCL PUBLIC POLICY. 2015;3. Available from: http://www.who.int/goe/publications/goe_mhealth_web.pdf

[22] Greenleaf AR, Ahmed S, Moreau C, et al. Cell phone ownership and modern contraceptive use in Burkina Faso: implications for research and interventions using mobile technology. Contraception. 2019; 99(3): 170-4. PMid:30468721. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.contraception.2018.11.006

[23] Wike R, Oates R. Cell Phones Nearly Ubiquitous in Many Countries. Wash DC Pew Res Cent. 2014; 43. Available from: https://www.yumpu.com/en/document/download/36820465/32735-0aeeb-8ecb9-255c7-3a17f-8b722-fef45-80571

[24] Greenleaf AR, Gadiaga A, Choi Y, et al. Automated and Interviewer-Administered Mobile Phone Surveys in Burkina Faso: Sociodemographic Differences Among Female Mobile Phone Survey Respondents and Nonrespondents. JMIR MHealth UHealth. 2020; 8(7):e17891. PMid:32673250. https://doi.org/10.2196/17891

[25] Greenleaf AR, Gadiaga A, Guiella G, et al. Comparability of modern contraceptive use estimates between a face-to-face survey and a cellphone survey among women in Burkina Faso. PloS One. 2020; 15(5): e0231819. PMid:32401773. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0231819

[26] Jadhav A, Weis J. Mobile phone ownership, text messages, and contraceptive use: is there a digital revolution in family planning? Contraception. 2020; 101(2): 97-105. PMid:31782990. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.contraception.2019.10.004

[27] Ippoliti NB, L’Engle K. Meet us on the phone: mobile phone programs for adolescent sexual and reproductive health in low-to-middle income countries. Reprod Health. 2017; 14(1): 11. PMid:28095855.https://doi.org/10.1186/s12978-016-0276-z

[28] Johnson D, Juras R, Riley P, et al. A randomized controlled trial of the impact of a family planning mHealth service on knowledge and use of contraception. Contraception. 2017; 95(1): 90-7. PMid:27421767. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.contraception.2016.07.009

[29] Rokicki S, Fink G. Assessing the reach and effectiveness of mHealth: evidence from a reproductive health program for adolescent girls in Ghana. BMC Public Health. 2017; 17(1): 969. PMid:29262823.https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-017-4939-7

[30] Vahdat HL, L’engle KL, Plourde KF, et al. There are some questions you may not ask in a clinic: providing contraception information to young people in Kenya using SMS. Int J Gynecol Obstet. 2013; 123: e2-6. PMid:24012514. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijgo.2013.07.009

[31] Fantom N, Serajuddin U. The World Bank’s Classification of Countries by Income. World Bank, Washington, DC; 2016. https://doi.org/10.1596/1813-9450-7528

[32] Von Elm E, Altman DG, Egger M, et al. Declaración de la Iniciativa STROBE (Strengthening the Reporting of Observational studies in Epidemiology): directrices para la comunicación de estudios observacionales. Gac Sanit. 2008; 22(2): 144-50. PMid:18420014.https://doi.org/10.1157/13119325

[33] von Elm E, Altman DG, Egger M, et al. The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement:Guidelines for Reporting Observational Studies. PLoS Med. 2007; 4(10): e296. PMid:17941714. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.0040296

[34] Johnson D, Juras R, Riley P, et al. A randomized controlled trial of the impact of a family planning mHealth service on knowledge and use of contraception. Contraception. 2017; 95(1): 90-7. PMid:27421767. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.contraception.2016.07.009

[35] Jones RM, Kimenju G, Subbiah S, et al. A Short Message Service (SMS) increases postpartum care-seeking behavior and uptake of family planning of mothers in peri-urban public facilities in Kenya. PloS One. 2020; 15(9): e0239213. PMid:32997684.https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0239213

[36] Lee S, Begley CE, Morgan R, et al. Addition of mHealth (mobile health) for family planning support in Kenya: disparities in access to mobile phones and associations with contraceptive knowledge and use. Int Health. 2019; 11(6): 463-71. PMid:30576546.https://doi.org/10.1093/inthealth/ihy092

[37] Harrington EK, Drake AL, Matemo D, et al. An mHealth SMS intervention on Postpartum Contraceptive Use Among Women and Couples in Kenya: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Am J Public Health. 2019; 109(6): 934-41. PMid:31067089. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2019.305051

[38] Ampt FH, Lim MSC, Agius PA, et al. Effect of a mobile phone intervention for female sex workers on unintended pregnancy in Kenya (WHISPER or SHOUT): a cluster-randomised controlled trial. Lancet Glob Health. 2020; 8(12): e1534-45. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2214-109X(20)30389-2

[39] Nuwamanya E, Nalwanga R, Nuwasiima A, et al. Effectiveness of a mobile phone application to increase access to sexual and reproductive health information, goods, and services among university students in Uganda: a randomized controlled trial. Contracept Reprod Med. 2020; 5(1). PMid:33292724. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40834-020-00134-5

[40] Babalola S, Loehr C, Oyenubi O, et al. Efficacy of a Digital Health Tool on Contraceptive Ideation and Use in Nigeria: Results of a Cluster-Randomized Control Trial. Glob Health Sci Pract. 2019; 7(2): 273-88. PMid:31249023. https://doi.org/10.9745/GHSP-D-19-00066

[41] Harrington EK, McCoy EE, Drake AL, et al. Engaging men in an mHealth approach to support postpartum family planning among couples in Kenya: a qualitative study. Reprod Health. 2019; 16(1): 17. PMid:30744697. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12978-019-0669-x

[42] L’Engle KL, Vahdat HL, Ndakidemi E, et al. Evaluating feasibility, reach and potential impact of a text message family planning information service in Tanzania. Contraception. 2013; 87(2): 251-6.PMid:22935322. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.contraception.2012.07.009

[43] Shelus V, Ashcroft N, Burgess S, et al. Preventing Pregnancy in Kenya Through Distribution and Use of the CycleBeads Mobile Application. Int Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2017; 43(3): 131-41.PMid:29553474. https://doi.org/10.1363/43e4617

[44] Unger JA, Ronen K, Perrier T, et al. Short message service communication improves exclusive breastfeeding and early postpartum contraception in a low- to middle-income country setting: a randomizedtrial. BJOG Int J Obstet Gynaecol. 2018; 125(12): 1620-9.PMid:29924912. https://doi.org/10.1111/1471-0528.15337

[45] Hu Y, Huang R, Ghose B, et al. SMS-based family planning communication and its association with modern contraception and maternal healthcare use in selected low-middle-income countries. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2020; 20(1): 218. PMid:32912201. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12911-020-01228-5

[46] Vahdat HL, L’Engle KL, Plourde KF, et al. There are some questions you may not ask in a clinic: providing contraception information to young people in Kenya using SMS. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2013;123Suppl 1: e2-6. PMid:24012514. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijgo.2013.07.009

[47] Laidlaw R, Dixon D, Morse T, et al. Using participatory methods to design an mHealth intervention for a low income country, a case study in Chikwawa, Malawi. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2017; 17(1): 98. PMid:28679428. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12911-017-0485-6

[48] Sondaal SFV, Browne JL, Amoakoh-Coleman M, et al. Assessing the Effect of mHealth Interventions in Improving Maternal and Neonatal Care in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: A Systematic Review. PloS One. 2016; 11(5): e0154664. PMid:27144393.https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0154664

[49] Colaci D, Chaudhri S, Vasan A. mHealth Interventions in Low-Income Countries to Address Maternal Health: A Systematic Review. Ann Glob Health. 2017; 82(5): 922. PMid:28283147. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aogh.2016.09.001

[50] Ilozumba O, Abejirinde IOO, Dieleman M, et al. Targeting strategies of mHealth interventions for maternal health in low and middleincome countries: a systematic review protocol. BMJ Open. 2018; 8(2). PMid:29478019. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-019345

[51] Ahinkorah BO, Ameyaw EK, Seidu AA. Socio-economic and demographic predictors of unmet need for contraception among young women in sub-Saharan Africa: evidence from cross-sectional surveys. Reprod Health. 2020; 17(1): 163. PMid:33097088. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12978-020-01018-2

[52] Gahungu J, Vahdaninia M, Regmi PR. The unmet needs for modern family planning methods among postpartum women in Sub-Saharan Africa: a systematic review of the literature. Reprod Health. 2021; 18(1): 35. PMid:33568180. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12978-021-01089-9

[53] Teshale AB. Factors associated with unmet need for family planning in sub-Saharan Africa: A multilevel multinomial logistic regression analysis. Navaneetham K, éditeur. PLOS ONE. 2022; 17(2): e0263885. PMid:35143584. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0263885

[54] Zotero.Manuel d’utilisation de Zotero Version 0.2.5. 2020; 22. Available from: https://www.unige.ch/lettres/index.php/download_file/view/863/279/

[55] Hong Q, Pluye P, Fabregues S, et al. version 2018.Mixed Methods Appraisol Tool (MMAT), Can Intellect Prop Off Can. 2018; 11.Available from: http://mixedmethodsappraisaltoolpublic.pbworks.com/

[56] Hong QN, Fàbregues S, Bartlett G, et al. The Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT) version 2018 for information professionals and researchers. Educ Inf. 2018; 34(4): 285-91. https://doi.org/10.3233/EFI-180221

[57] Damschroder LJ, Aron DC, Keith RE, et al. Fostering implementation of health services research findings into practice: a consolidated framework for advancing implementation science. Implement Sci. 2009; 4(1): 50. PMid:19664226. https://doi.org/10.1186/1748-5908-4-50

[58] Wienert J, Zeeb H. Implementing Health Apps for Digital Public Health-An Implementation Science Approach Adopting the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research. Front Public Health. 2021; 9: 610237. PMid:34026702. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2021.610237

[59] Damschroder LJ, Reardon CM, et al.Opra Widerquist MA, Conceptualizing outcomes for use with the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR): the CFIR Outcomes Addendum. Implement Sci. 2022; 17(1): 7. PMid:35065675. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13012-021-01181-5

[60] Davis FD. Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology. MIS Q. 1989; 13(3): 319.https://doi.org/10.2307/249008

[61] Delone WH, McLean ER. The DeLone and McLean Model of Information Systems Success: A Ten-Year Update. J Manag Inf Syst. 2003; 19(4): 9-30. https://doi.org/10.1080/07421222.2003.11045748

[62] Badawy SM, Kuhns LM. Texting and Mobile Phone App Interventions for Improving Adherence to Preventive Behavior in Adolescents:A Systematic Review. JMIR MHealth UHealth. 2017; 5(4): e50.PMid:28428157. https://doi.org/10.2196/mhealth.6837

[63] United Nations. Report of the International Conference on Population and Development: Cairo, 5-13 September 1994. New York: United Nations; 1995. 193 p.

[64] Tao AR, Onono M, Baum S, et al. Providers’ perspectives on male involvement in family planning in the context of a clusterrandomized controlled trial evaluating integrating family planning into HIV care in Nyanza Province, Kenya. AIDS Care-Psychol Socio-Med Asp AIDS/HIV. 2015; 27(1): 31-7. PMid:25329436.https://doi.org/10.1080/09540121.2014.954982

[65] Cho YM, Lee S, Islam SMS, et al. Theories Applied to m-Health Interventions for Behavior Change in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: A Systematic Review. Telemed J E-Health Off J Am Telemed Assoc. 2018; 24(10): 727-41. PMid:29437546. https://doi.org/10.1089/tmj.2017.0249

[66] Webb TL, Joseph J, Yardley L, et al. Using the internet to promote health behavior change: a systematic review and meta-analysis of the impact of theoretical basis, use of behavior change techniques, and mode of delivery on efficacy. J Med Internet Res. 2010; 12(1): e4.PMid:20164043. https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.1376