Impact of AI-powered virtual triage and care referral on patient care seeking behavior in a Middle Eastern health plan

A. Gellert George , Karat-Karabon Aleksandra , Price Tim , A. Nowicka Anna , L. Gellert Gabriel

International Journal of Healthcare ›› 2025, Vol. 11 ›› Issue (1) : 21 -30.

PDF (603KB)
International Journal of Healthcare ›› 2025, Vol. 11 ›› Issue (1) : 21 -30. DOI: 10.5430/ijh.v11n1p21
Original Articles
research-article

Impact of AI-powered virtual triage and care referral on patient care seeking behavior in a Middle Eastern health plan

Author information +
History +
PDF (603KB)

Abstract

Objective: To assess whether automated AI-based virtual triage and care referral (VTCR) improves appropriate acuity-based care by aligning patient healthcare seeking intent and potential care seeking behavior with triage output in a leading multinational healthcare plan based in the Middle East.
Methods: Data were derived from an AI-based symptom checker application and analyzed the pre- and post-VTCR care intentions of eligible health plan patients (N = 4,985) to examine how VTCR influenced potential care seeking behavior across five levels of care acuity. Pre- and post-triage care intentions were compared, and changes as a result of triage, including acuity level escalation and de-escalation, were assessed for statistical significance using Z-tests.
Results: Overall alignment with VTCR clinical guidance was 37.6% following virtual triage, improved from a 22.2% level of acuity alignment prior to VTCR. VTCR significantly decreased the number of patients with uncertain healthcare intention (62.9% or - 22.1 PP; p =.05), the largest group of whom decided to engage self-care after VTCR (13.9% of all patients). The largest changes in care intent occurred where patients altered their care plan to engage self-care (an increase of 128.2% or +18.8 PP; p =.05), reducing avoidable use of higher acuity services. Post-triage intent to access emergency care increased 138.8% (+ 1.9 PP; p =.05). The largest de-escalation of care acuity was observed among patients who before VTCR intended to engage a non-urgent outpatient consultation, but instead chose self-care after VTCR (9.3% of patients; p =.05).
Conclusions: Virtual triage reduced potential clinically inappropriate utilization of both higher and lower acuity care services by patients, and post-VTCR care seeking was better aligned with patients’ actual clinical needs. VTCR improved early detection of and care referral for emergent conditions, and simultaneously reduced inappropriate ED and outpatient care utilization for symptoms that could be managed by patients through self-care. VTCR was able to reduce care acuity-level misalignment and potentially unnecessary and avoidable healthcare utilization.

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
A. Gellert George, Karat-Karabon Aleksandra, Price Tim, A. Nowicka Anna, L. Gellert Gabriel. Impact of AI-powered virtual triage and care referral on patient care seeking behavior in a Middle Eastern health plan. International Journal of Healthcare, 2025, 11(1): 21-30 DOI:10.5430/ijh.v11n1p21

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

References

[1]

Gellert GA, Rasławska-Socha J, Marcjasz N, et al. How virtual triage can improve patient experience and satisfaction: A narrative review and look forward. Telemedicine Reports. 2023; 4(1): 292-306. https://doi.org/10.1089/tmr.2023.0037

[2]

Ratnapradipa KL, Jadhav S, Kabayundo J, et al. Factors associated with delaying medical care: Cross-sectional study of Nebraska adults. BMC Health Services Research. 2023; 23(1): 118. PMid:36739376. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-023-09140-0

[3]

Findling MG, Blendon RJ, Benson JM. Delayed care with harm-ful health consequences-reported experiences from national surveys during Coronavirus disease 2019. Journal of the American Medical Association Health Forum. 2020; 1(12): e201463. PMid:36218479. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamahealthforum.2020.1463

[4]

Rose GL, Bonnell LN, Clifton J, et al. Outcomes of delay of care after the onset of COVID-19 for patients managing multiple chronic conditions. Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine. 2022; 35(6): 1081-1091. PMid:36396416. https://doi.org/10.3122/jabfm.2022.220112R1

[5]

Atula M, Aro K, Irjala H, et al. Patient and health care delays in large (class T3-T4) oral, oropharyngeal, and laryngeal carci-nomas. Head & Neck. 2023; 45(5): 1215-1225. PMid:36880833. https://doi.org/10.1002/hed.27335

[6]

Merkland D, Gjötterberg M. Fördröjd vård är den vanligaste avvikelsen inom ögonsjukvården - Granskning av 102 Ivo-ärenden inom ögonsjukvården [Care delay the most common error in oph-thalmic health care]. Lakartidningen. 2019; 116: FSMU.

[7]

Matarredona-Quiles S, et al.Martínez Ruíz de Apodaca P, Serrano Badía E, Factors associated with diagnosis delay in head and neck cancer. Factores asociados a la demora diagnóstica en tumores de cabeza y cuello. Acta Otorrinolaringologica Espanola. 2021; S0001- 6519(20): 30195-3. Advance online publication.

[8]

Sun JK, Smith J. Self-perceptions of aging and perceived barriers to care: Reasons for health care delay. The Gerontologist. 2017; 57(suppl_2): S216-S226. PMid:28854604. https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/gnx014

[9]

Gellert GA, Rasławska-Socha J, Marcjasz N, et al. The role of virtual triage in improving clinician experience and satisfaction: A narrative review. Telemedicine Reports. 2023; 4(1): 180-191. PMid:37529770. https://doi.org/10.1089/tmr.2023.0020

[10]

Kraft AD, Quimbo SA, Solon O, et al. The health and cost im-pact of care delay and the experimental impact of insurance on re-ducing delays. The Journal of Pediatrics. 2009; 155(2): 281-5.e1. PMid:19394034. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpeds.2009.02.035

[11]

Agodirin O, Olatoke S, Rahman G, et al. Impact of primary care delay on progression of breast cancer in a black African population: A mul-ticentered survey. Journal of Cancer Epidemiology. 2019; 2407138. PMid:31485229. https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/2407138

[12]

Ashing-Giwa K, Rosales M. Evaluation of therapeutic care delay among Latina- and European-American cervical cancer survivors. Gynecologic Oncology. 2013; 128(2): 160-165. PMid:23168174. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ygyno.2012.11.015

[13]

David P, Fracci S, Wojtowicz J, et al. Ethnicity, social determinants of health, and pediatric primary care during the COVID-19 pan-demic. Journal of Primary Care & Community Health. 2022; 13. PMid:35822762. https://doi.org/10.1177/21501319221112248

[14]

Whitaker J, O’Donohoe N, Denning M, et al. Assessing trauma care systems in low-income and middle-income countries: A sys-tematic review and evidence synthesis mapping the Three De-lays Framework to injury health system assessments. British Med-ical Journal Global Health. 2021; 6(5): e004324. PMid:33975885. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2020-004324

[15]

Gellert GA, Garber L, Kabat-Karabon A, et al. Using AI-based vir-tual triage to improve acuity-level alignment of patient care seeking in an ambulatory care setting. International Journal of Healthcare. 2024; 10(1): 41. https://doi.org/10.5430/ijh.v10n1p41

[16]

Gellert GA, Almeida Carvalho D, Price T, et al. Impact of inte-grated virtual and live nurse triage on patient care seeking and health plan efficiency. Telemedicine Reports. 2024; 5: 1, 330-338. https://doi.org/10.1089/tmr.2024.0054

[17]

Riboli-Sasco E, El-Osta A, Alaa A, et al. Triage and diagnostic accuracy of online symptom checkers: Systematic review. Journal of Medical Internet Research. 2023; 25: e43803. PMid:37266983. https://doi.org/10.2196/43803

[18]

Melodena SB. Dubai-a star in the east: a case study in strategic des-tination branding. Journal of Place Management and Development. 2008; 1(1): 62-91. https://doi.org/10.1108/17538330810865345

[19]

Koornneef E, Robben P, Blair I. Progress and outcomes of health systems reform in the United Arab Emirates: A systematic review. BMC Health Services Research. 2017; 17(1): 627. PMid:28931388. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-017-2597-1

[20]

Gellert GA, Kabat-Karabon A, Gellert GL, et al. The potential of virtual triage AI to improve early detection, care acuity align-ment and emergent care referral of life-threatening conditions. Fron-tiers in Public Health. 2024; 12: 1362246. PMid:38807993. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2024.1362246

[21]

Gellert GA, Orzechowski PM, Price T, et al. A multinational survey of patient utilization of and value conveyed through virtual symp-tom triage and healthcare referral. Frontiers in Public Health. 2023; 10: 1047291. PMid:36817183. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2022.1047291

[22]

Esmaeilzadeh P, Mirzaei T, Dharanikota S. Patients’ perceptions to-ward human-artificial intelligence interaction in health care: Experi-mental study. The Journal of Medical Internet Research. 2021; 23(11): e25856. PMid:34842535. https://doi.org/10.2196/25856

[23]

Kuppanda PM, Janda M, Soyer HP, et al. What are patients’ per-ceptions and attitudes regarding the use of artificial intelligence in skin cancer screening and diagnosis? Narrative review. The Journal of Investigative Dermatology. Published online February 27, 2025. PMid:40019459. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jid.2025.01.013

[24]

Robertson C, Woods A, Bergstrand K, et al. Diverse patients’ atti-tudes towards artificial intelligence (AI) in diagnosis. PLOS Digital Health. 2023; 2(5): e0000237. PMid:37205713. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pdig.0000237

AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF (603KB)

122

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

AI思维导图

/