The role of participatory tools and vernacular knowledge in interpreted landscapes: Two examples from the French Alps

Abstract

The popularity of geotourism is on the rise, and participatory approach projects are becoming increasingly common within the UNESCO Global Geoparks network. Nevertheless, geoparks may occasionally fail in the purpose of connecting with communities, and the application of community participation may be confusing. This paper, through a qualitative analysis, explores the integration of participatory tools and vernacular knowledge in managing geotourism in the Northern French Alps, focusing on their potential to enhance geotrails and interpretation centers. While these practices can strengthen community engagement and project success, they are still underutilized in geotourism management. The data were collected through a combination of methods, including observation of interpretation panels, supplementary materials, and technologies, as well as through direct observation and seven expert interviews. The findings indicate that geotrails and interpretive centers are considered essential for popularizing geology, diversifying tourism, and achieving regional sustainable development. Furthermore, the importance of participatory tools and popular knowledge for interpreted environments and the achievement of territorial sustainable development is emphasized. However, the qualitative data analysis suggests that there is an underemphasis on participatory tools and an inadequate integration of vernacular knowledge in the study areas, which raises questions about the long-term efficacy of these approaches with absolute certainty. This highlights the need for standardized models to guide participatory approaches and evaluate their effectiveness, as well as the integration of vernacular knowledge into geotrails. Additionally, recognizing the potential value of these elements, it is essential to increase local community involvement in the design of geotrails and to better incorporate vernacular knowledge into the narrative.

Keywords

Geoheritage / Geotrails / Sustainable tourism / Free-choice learning / Geoparks / Qualitative analysis

CRediT authorship contribution statement

Michele Guerini: Writing - review & editing, Writing - original draft, Visualization, Validation, Resources, Methodology, Investigation, Formal analysis, Data curation, Conceptualization. Fabien Hoblea: Writing - review & editing, Visualization, Validation, Supervision, Resources, Project administration, Methodology, Conceptualization. Marco Giardino: Supervision. Ludovic Ravanel: Writing - review & editing, Visualization, Validation, Supervision, Resources, Methodology, Conceptualization.

Ethical statement

Ethical approval for this study was obtained from the Ethics Committee of the University of Turin (Protocol Number 0657301, 15 November 2024). Verbal informed consent was obtained from all participants before the study.

Declaration of competing interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Acknowledgements

This project is a part of Michele Guerini's PhD project. This thesis was funded by Ministero dell'Università e della Ricerca (MUR) through the program "PON Ricerca e Innovazione 2014-2020" (CCI2014IT16M2OP005), sources FSE REACT-EU, Action IV.5 “Dottorati su tematiche Green”. The authors express their gratitude to all the experts who agreed to participate in the interviews. The authors thank the staff of the Bauges Massif Regional Park, ONF and CCVCMB for their support. The authors thank the editor and the reviewers who improved this article with their suggestions.

Data availability

Data available via the Nakala Digital Repository https://nakala.fr/10.34847/nkl.2adf5nc3

References

[1] Abdul Halim S., Komoo I., Salleh H., & Omar M. (2011). The geopark as a potential tool for alleviating community marginality: A case study of Langkawi Geopark, Malaysia. The International Journal of Research into Island Cultures, 5(1), 94-113.

[2] Abdul Halim S., Puay Liu O., Yussof N., & Choun Sian L. (2011). Participation towards heritage conservation: Case of a fishing community in Langkawi Geopark. Planning Malesia Journal, 1(1), 185-196. https://doi.org/10.21837/pm.v1i1.97.

[3] Alberico I., Alessio G., Fagnano M., & Petrosino P. (2023). The effectiveness of geotrails to support sustainable development in the Campi Flegrei active volcanic area. Geoheritage, 15(1), 15. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12371-022-00778-6.

[4] Al-Tarawneh M. H. (2016). The effectiveness of educational games on scientific concepts acquisition in first grade students in science. Journal of Education and Practice, 7(3), 31-37.

[5] Babou I. (2019). Natural heritage, participatory democracy and UNESCO:A structure of disillusionment? In Y. Girauld (Ed.), UNESCO Global Geoparks:Tension between territorial development and heritage enhancement. London: ISTE Ltd and John Wiley & Sons. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119681489.ch1.

[6] Bétard F., Rouget I., Hobléa F., Aubron I., Billet P., Egoroff G., & Portal C. (2023). Geoconservation in France: History, key policies, and current tools. Geoheritage, 15 (2), 52. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12371-023-00824-x.

[7] Biot V., & Pélissié T. (2021, November). Karstic trails: A tool for discovering geological heritage as practiced by the Causses du Quercy. A paper presented at the 7th Edition of The Earth Sciences Meeting. Geological Society of France (SGF); National Center for Scientific Research (CNRS); Lyon Geology Laboratory. (In French).

[8] Bollati I. M., Masseroli A., Al Kindi M., Cezar L., Chrobak-Žuffová A., Dongre A., & Zucali M. (2024). The IGCP 714 project “3GEO—Geoclimbing & Geotrekking in Ge-oparks”—Selection of geodiversity sites equipped for climbing for combining outdoor and multimedia activities. Geoheritage, 16(3), 79. https://doi.org/10.1007/S12371-024-00976-4.

[9] Boyer M. (2000). Histoire de l’invention du tourisme : XVIe-XIXe siècles [The history of the invention of tourism: 16th-19th centuries]. Paris: Éditions de l’Aube.

[10] Brailas A., Tragou E., & Papachristopoulos K. (2023). Introduction to qualitative data analysis and coding with QualCoder. American Journal of Qualitative Research, 7 (3), 19-31. https://doi.org/10.29333/ajqr/13230.

[11] Bruno B. C., & Wallace A. (2019). Interpretive panels for geoheritage sites: Guidelines for design and evaluation. Geoheritage, 11(4), 1315-1323. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12371-019-00375-0.

[12] Bussy F., & von Raumer J. (1994). U-Pb geochronology of Palezoic magmatic events in the Mont-blanc crystalline massif, Western Alps. Swiss Bulletin of Mineralogy and Petrology, 74,514-515.

[13] Canesin T. S., Brilha J., & Díaz-Martínez E. (2020). Best practices and constraints in geopark management: Comparative analysis of two Spanish UNESCO Global Ge-oparks. Geoheritage, 12(1), 14. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12371-020-00435-w.

[14] Cashman K. V., & Cronin S. J. (2008). Welcoming a monster to the world: Myths, oral tradition, and modern societal response to volcanic disasters. Journal of Volcanology and Geothermal Research, 176(3), 407-418. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvolgeores.2008.01.040.

[15] Cayla N., Hobléa F., & Reynard E. (2014). New digital technologies applied to the management of geoheritage. Geoheritage, 6(2), 89-90. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12371-014-0118-8.

[16] Chaumier S., & Jacobi D. (2008). Nouveaux regards sur l’interprétation et les centres d’interprétation [New perspectives on interpretation and interpretation centers.]. La Lettre de l’OCIM. Musées, Patrimoine et Culture Scientifiques et Techniques, 119,4-11. https://doi.org/10.4000/ocim.348.

[17] Chen A., Lu Y., & Ng Y. C. Y. (2015). The principles of geotourism. Berlin; Heidelberg: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-46697-1.

[18] Coratza P., Vandelli V., & Ghinoi A. (2023). Increasing geoheritage awareness through non-formal learning. Sustainability, 15(1), 868. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15010868.

[19] De Wever P., & Rouget I. (2023). Historical overview of geoheritage in France. Geosciences, 13(3), 69. https://doi.org/10.3390/geosciences13030069.

[20] Deline P., & Ravanel L. (2014). On the foof of Europe:High-altitude morphodynamics in the Mont Blanc massif. In M. Fort, & M.-F. André (Landscapes and land-forms of France (Eds.), pp.171-181). Dordrecht: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-7022-5_17.

[21] Desbois J.-L., & Costabloz V. (2013). Garins’ landslide: From a geohazard to a touristic and pedagogical geosite. Rendiconti Online Società Geologica Italiana, 28, 41-44.

[22] Dong Y. (2023). Descriptive statistics and its applications. Highlights in Science, Engineering and Technology, 47,16-23. https://doi.org/10.54097/hset.V47I.8159.

[23] Drápela E. (2023). Using a geotrail for teaching geography: An example of the virtual educational trail “The Story of Liberec Granite.”. Land, 12(4), 828. https://doi.org/10.3390/land12040828.

[24] Duarte A., Braga V., Marques C., & Sá A. A. (2020). Geotourism and territorial development: A systematic literature review and research agenda. Geoheritage, 12(3), 65. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12371-020-00478-z.

[25] Fepuleai A., Németh K., & Muliaina T. (2021). Geopark impact for the resilience of communities in Samoa, SW Pacific. Geoheritage, 13(3), 1-23. https://doi.org/10.1007/S12371-021-00578-4.

[26] Fepuleai A., Weber E., Németh K., Muliaina T., & Iese V. (2017). Eruption styles of Samoan volcanoes represented in tattooing, language and cultural activities of the indigenous people. Geoheritage, 9(3), 395-411. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12371-016-0204-1.

[27] Fernández-Llamazares Á., & Cabeza M. (2018). Rediscovering the potential of indigenous storytelling for conservation practice. Conservation Letters, 11(3), Article e12398. https://doi.org/10.1111/conl.12398.

[28] Ferraro F. X., Schilling M. E., Baeza S., Oms O., & Sá A. A. (2020). Bottom-up strategy for the use of geological heritage by local communities: Approach in the “Litoral del Biobío” Mining Geopark project (Chile). Proceedings of the Geologists’ Association, 131(5), 500-510. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pgeola.2020.06.001.

[29] Ferrero E., Giardino M., Lozar F., Giordano E., Belluso E., & Perotti L. (2012). Geodiversity action plans for the enhancement of geoheritage in the Piemonte region (North-Western Italy). Annals of Geophysics, 55(3), 487-495. https://doi.org/10.4401/ag-5527.

[30] Frey M. L. (2021). Geotourism—Examining tools for sustainable development. Geosciences, 11(1), 30. https://doi.org/10.3390/geosciences11010030.

[31] Galletta A. (2013). Mastering the semi-structured interview and beyond:From research design to analysis and publication. New York: New York University Press. https://doi.org/10.18574/nyu/9780814732939.001.0001.

[32] Gambino F., Borghi A., D’Atri A., Gallo L. M., Ghiraldi L., Giardino M., & Macadam J. (2019). TOURinSTONES: A free mobile application for promoting geological her-itage in the city of Torino (NW Italy). Geoheritage, 11(1), 3-17. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12371-017-0277-5.

[33] Gidon M. (2022). Aperçu géologique d’ensemble sur le Massif des BAUGES [General geological survey of the Bauges massif]. Retrieved from http://www.geol-alp.com/bauges/_general_bauges/0_general_bauges.html.

[34] Gordon J. E. (2018). Geoheritage, geotourism and the cultural landscape: Enhancing the visitor experience and promoting geoconservation. Geosciences, 8(4), 136. doi: 10.3390/geosciences8040136.

[35] Gray M. (2019). Geodiversity, geoheritage and geoconservation for society. International Journal of Geoheritage and Parks, 7(4), 226-236. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijgeop.2019.11.001.

[36] Grobbelaar L., Bouwer S., & Hermann U. P. (2019). An exploratory investigation of visitor motivations to the Barberton-Makhonjwa geotrail, South Africa. Geojournal of Tourism and Geosites, 25(2), 283-292. https://doi.org/10.30892/gtg.25101-359.

[37] Guerini M., Hobléa F., & Ravanel L. (2024). Qulitative data from French Alpine Interpreted landscapes (Version 1) [Data set]. NAKALA (Huma-Num-CNRS). https://doi.org/10.34847/NKL.2ADF5NC3.

[38] Hobléa F. (2014). In the folds of the earth:French prealpine geomorphological landscapes. In M. Fort, & M.-F. André (Landscapes and landforms of France.Eds.), Dor-drecht: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-7022-5_18.

[39] Hoblea F., Cadilhac L., Nicoud G., Dodelin C., & Lasserre D. (2008). Hydrogéologie karstique du massif des Bauges : état des connaissances et contributions de Michel Lepiller aux recherches fondamentales et appliquées [Karst hydrogeology of the Bauges massif: State of knowledge and contributions of Michel Lepiller to funda-mental and applied research]. Journée Technique Du Comité Français de l’Association Internationale Des Hydrogéologues (pp.71-81) [Conference session] Orléans, France.

[40] Hoblea F., Cayla N., & Renau P. (2011). The concept of “hybrid research” applied to the geoheritage of the Bauges massif (French Alps): When the promotion of the geoheritage helps geosciences and vice versa. Geojournal of Tourism and Geosites, 8(2), 206-211.

[41] Hoblea F., Delannoy J. J., Jaillet S., Ployon E., & Sadier B. (2014). Digital tools for managing and promoting karst geosites in Southeast France. Geoheritage, 6(2), 113-127. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12371-014-0112-1.

[42] Hose T. A. (1995). Selling the story of Britain’sstone. Environmental Interpretation, 10(2), 16-17.

[43] Hose T. A. (2016). Geoheritage and geotourism:A European perspective. Newcastle: Boydell Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvc16kj7.

[44] Hose T. A. (2020). Geotrails. In B. Nekouie Sadry (Ed.), The geotourism industry in the 21st century: The origin, principles, and futuristic approach. New York: Apple Ac-ademic Press. https://doi.org/10.1201/9780429292798-13.

[45] Hsieh H.-F., & Shannon S. E. (2005). Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qualitative Health Research, 15(9), 1277-1288. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732305276687.

[46] Hu M., Suh J., & Pedro C. (2023). An integrated framework for preservation of Hawaii indigenous culture: Learning from vernacular knowledge. Buildings, 13(5), 1190. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings13051190.

[47] Hu M., Świerzawski J., Kleszcz J., & Kmiecik P. (2023). What are the concerns with New European Bauhaus initiative? Vernacular knowledge as the primary driver toward a sustainable future. Next Sustainability, 1, Article 100004. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nxsust.2023.100004.

[48] Janeczko E., Wojtan R., Korcz N., & Woźnicka M. (2021). Interpretative signs as a tool supporting informal environmental education on the example of Warsaw’s urban forests. Forests, 12(8), 1091. https://doi.org/10.3390/F12081091.

[49] Jeon Y., Koh J. G., & Southcott D. (2023). A case study of geopark activation through geobranding and geotrails at the Jeju Island UNESCO Global Geopark, Republic of Korea. Episodes Journal of International Geoscience, 46(2), 211-227. https://doi.org/10.18814/epiiugs/2022/022024.

[50] Joyce B. (2007). Geotourism, geosites and geoparks: Working together in Australia. Australian Geologist, 144,26-29.

[51] Kanyamuna V., & Zulu K. (2022). Participatory research methods: Importance and limitations of participation in development practice. World Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 8(1), 9-13. https://doi.org/10.12691/wjssh-8-1-2.

[52] Kim H., Sefcik J. S., & Bradway C. (2017). Characteristics of qualitative descriptive studies: A systematic review. Research in Nursing & Health, 40(1), 23-42. https://doi. org/10.1002/nur.21768.

[53] Lee Y., & Jayakumar R. (2021). Economic impact of UNESCO global Geoparks on local communities: Comparative analysis of three UNESCO Global GeoparksinAsia. International Journal of Geoheritage and Parks, 9(2), 189-198. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijgeop.2021.02.002.

[54] Lewis I. D. (2020). Linking geoheritage sites: Geotourism and a prospective geotrail in the Flinders ranges world heritage nomination area, South Australia. Australian Journal of Earth Sciences, 67(8), 1195-1210. https://doi.org/10.1080/08120099.2020.1817147.

[55] Lewis I. D. (2023). Evolution of geotourism in Australia from Kanawinka Global Geopark and Australian national kandscapes to georegions and geotrails: A review and lessons learned. Land, 12(6), 1190. https://doi.org/10.3390/land12061190.

[56] Li J., Krishnamurthy S., Pereira Roders A., & van Wesemael P. (2020). Community participation in cultural heritage management: A systematic literature review com-paring Chinese and international practices. Cities, 96, Article 102476. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2019.102476.

[57] Lidal E. M., Natali M., Patel D., Hauser H., & Viola I. (2013). Geological storytelling. Computers & Graphics, 37(5), 445-459. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cag.2013.01.010.

[58] Magagna A., Ferrero E., Giardino M., Lozar F., & Perotti L. (2013). A selection of geological tours for promoting the Italian geological heritage in the secondary schools. Geoheritage, 5(4), 265-273. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12371-013-0087-3.

[59] Matias A., Carrasco A. R., Ramos A. A., & Borges R. (2020). Engaging children in geosciences through storytelling and creative dance. Geoscience Communication, 3(2), 167-177. https://doi.org/10.5194/gc-3-167-2020.

[60] Modrej D., Fajmut Štrucl S., & Hartmann G. (2018). Results of the geointerpretation research in the frame of the Danube GeoTour project. Geologija, 61(1), 101-110. https://doi.org/10.5474/geologija.2018.007.

[61] Moreira J. C. (2012). Interpretative panels about the geological heritage—A case study at the Iguassu Falls National Park (Brazil). Geoheritage, 4(1-2), 127-137. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12371-012-0053-5.

[62] Mubita A., Libati M., & Mulonda M. (2017). The importance and limitations of participation in development projects and programmes. European Scientific Journal, 13 (5), 238-251. https://doi.org/10.19044/esj.2017.v13n5p238.

[63] Munandar A., Chotim E. E., & Pramanti A. (2020, March). Local community participation in support of the existence and sustainability of ecotourism development Geopark Ciletuh-Palabuhanratu. Paper presented at the 12the annual international conference on industrial engineering and operations management. Istanbul, Türkiye. https://ieomsociety.org/proceedings/2022istanbul/894.pdf.

[64] Newsome D., & Dowling R. (2010). Setting an agenda for geotourism. In D. Newsome, & R. Dowling (Eds.), Geotourism. The tourism of geology and landscape. Oxford: Goodfellow Publishers. https://doi.org/10.23912/978-1-906884-09-3-1056.

[65] Newsome D., & Dowling R. (2018). Geoheritage and geotourism. In E. Reynard, & J. Brilha (Geoheritage:Eds.), Assessment, protection, and management. Amsterdam: Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-809531-7.00017-4.

[66] Norrish L., Sanders D., & Dowling R. (2014). Geotourism product development and stakeholder perceptions: A case study of a proposed geotrail in Perth, Western Australia. Journal of Ecotourism, 13(1), 52-63. https://doi.org/10.1080/14724049.2014.938654.

[67] Ólafsdóttir R. (2019). Geotourism. Geosciences, 9(1), 48. https://doi.org/10.3390/geosciences9010048.

[68] Ólafsdóttir R., & Tverijonaite E. (2018). Geotourism: A systematic literature review. Geosciences, 8(7), 234. https://doi.org/10.3390/geosciences8070234.

[69] Palacio Prieto J. L., de Martínez G. F. C., & González E. M. R. (2019). Geosenderos en el geoparque mundial UNESCO Mixteca Alta, Oaxaca, México [Geotrails in the Mixteca Alta UNESCO Global Geopark, Oaxaca, Mexico]. Cuadernos Geográficos, 58(2), 111-125. https://doi.org/10.30827/cuadgeo.v58i2.7055.

[70] Palacio-Prieto J. L., Rosado-González E., Ramírez-Miguel X., Oropeza-Orozco O., Cram-Heydrich S., Ortiz-Pérez M. A., & de Castro-Martínez G. F. (2016). Erosion, cul-ture and geoheritage; the case of Santo Domingo Yanhuitlán, Oaxaca, México. Geoheritage, 8(4), 359-369. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12371-016-0175-2.

[71] Parc Naturel Massif des Bauges (2024). Liste des géosites [List of geosites]. Retrieved from https://geoparc.parcdesbauges.com/les-geosites/liste-des-geosites/.

[72] Pásková M. (2017). Local and indigenous knowledge regarding the land use and use of other natural resources in the aspiring Rio Coco Geopark. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 95(5), Article 052018. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/95/5/052018.

[73] Pásková M. (2018). Can indigenous knowledge contribute to the sustainability management of the aspiring Rio coco Geopark, Nicaragua? Geosciences, 8(8), 277. https://doi.org/10.3390/geosciences8080277.

[74] Pasquaré Mariotto F., Bonali F. L., Tibaldi A., De Beni E., Corti N., Russo E., & Neri M. (2022). A new way to explore volcanic areas: QR-code-based virtual geotrail at Mt. Etna volcano, Italy. Land, 11(3), 377. https://doi.org/10.3390/land11030377.

[75] Pasquaré Mariotto F., Corti N., & Drymoni K. (2023). Advanced technologies for geosite visualization and valorization: A review. Applied Sciences, 13(9), 5598. https://doi.org/10.3390//app13095598.

[76] Pasquaré Mariotto F., & Venturini C. (2017). Strategies and tools for improving earth science education and popularization in museums. Geoheritage, 9(2), 187-194. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12371-016-0194-z.

[77] Patton M. Q. (2002). Two decades of developments in qualitative inquiry: A personal, experiential perspective. Qualitative Social Work, 1(3), 261-283. https://doi.org/10.1177/1473325002001003636.

[78] Pera R. (2017). Empowering the new traveller: Storytelling as a co-creative behaviour in tourism. Current Issues in Tourism, 20(4), 331-338. https://doi.org/10.1080/13683500.2014.982520.

[79] Perotti L., Bollati I. M., Viani C., Zanoletti E., Caironi V., Pelfini M., & Giardino M. (2020). Fieldtrips and virtual Tours as geotourism resources: Examples from the Sesia Val Grande UNESCO Global Geopark (NW Italy). Resources, 9(6), 63. https://doi.org/10.3390/resources9060063.

[80] Perrin-Malterre C. (2016). Processus de diversification touristique autour des sports de nature dans une station de moyenne montagne [Tourist diversification process around outdoor sports in low mountain station]. Mondes Du Tourisme, 11,1012. https://doi.org/10.4000/tourisme.1012.

[81] Phillips J. (2012). Storytelling in Earth sciences: The eight basic plots. Earth-Science Reviews, 115(3), 153-162. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earscirev.2012.09.005.

[82] Pralong J.-P. (2005). Géotourisme et utilisation de sites naturels d’intérêt pour les sciences de la Terre : Les régions de Crans-Montana-Sierre (Valais, Alpes suisses) et Chamonix-Mont-Blanc (Haute-Savoie, Alpes françaises) [Geotourism and utilization of natural sites of interest for Earth Sciences: The regions of Crans-Montana-Sierre (Valais, Swiss Alps) and Chamonix-Mont-Blanc (Haute-Savoie, French Alps)] (Doctoral dissertation). Université de Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.

[83] Price A. M., Monahan J. C., & Bergren R. (2018). Can interpretive graphics influence visitor behavior in an exhibit space? Journal of Interpretation Research, 23(1), 47-56. https://doi.org/10.1177/109258721802300104.

[84] Rapprich V., Lisec M., Fiferna P., & Závada P. (2017). Application of modern technologies in popularization of the Czech volcanic geoheritage. Geoheritage, 9(3), 413-420. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12371-016-0208-x.

[85] Rosado-González E. M., Lourenço J. M. M., Palacio-Prieto J. L., & Sá A. A. (2023). Collaborative mapping on sustainable development goals in Latin America UNESCO Global Geopark: A methodological discussion. International Journal of Geoheritage and Parks, 11(2), 203-220. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijgeop.2023.02.002.

[86] Roué M., & Nakashima D. (2002). Knowledge and foresight: The predictive capacity of traditional knowledge applied to environmental assessment. International Social Science Journal, 54(173), 337-347. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2451.00386.

[87] Ruban D. A., Mikhailenko A. V., Yashalova N. N., & Scherbina A. V. (2023). Global geoparks: Opportunity for developing or “toy” for developed? International Journal of Geoheritage and Parks, 11(1), 54-63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijgeop.2022.11.003.

[88] Salim E., Ravanel L., Bourdeau P., & Deline P. (2021). Glacier tourism and climate change: Effects, adaptations, and perspectives in the Alps. Regional Environmental Change, 21(4), 120. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10113-021-01849-0.

[89] Salim E., Ravanel L., & Gauchon C. (2021). Aesthetic perceptions of the landscape of a shrinking glacier: Evidence from the Mont Blanc massif. Journal of Outdoor Recreation and Tourism, 35, Article 100411. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jort.2021.100411.

[90] Sanchez-Cortez J. L., Jaque-Bonilla D., Simbaña-Tasiguano M., Astudillo-Bravo D., & Cabascango-Chiliquinga E. (2022). Participatory strategies applied for the geocon-servation of speleological heritage at the Napo Sumaco Geopark (Ecuador). Episodes, 45(4), 417-429. https://doi.org/10.18814/epiiugs/2022/022001.

[91] Sapoetra N. D., Ridwan R., Sahide M. A. K., & Masuda K. (2019). Local community’s perception, attitude, and participation towards different level management of geopark:A comparison Geosite case study, between Muroto Cape and Rammang-rammang geosite. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 343 (1), Article 012044. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/343/1/012044.

[92] Serrat O. (2017). Storytelling. Knowledge solutions:Tools, methods, and approaches to drive organizational performance (pp.839-842). Singapore: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-0983-9_91.

[93] Skjott Linneberg M., & Korsgaard S. (2019). Coding qualitative data: A synthesis guiding the novice. Qualitative Research Journal, 19(3), 259-270. https://doi.org/10.1108/qrj-12-2018-0012.

[94] Steck A., Epard J.-L., Escher A., Gouffon Y., & Masson H. (2001). Carte tectonique des Alpes de Suisse occidentale et des régions avoisinantes 1 :100′000 [Tectonic map of the western Swiss Alps and adjacent regions 1:100,000]. Notice Explicative de La Carte Géologique Spéciale [Explanatory booklet of the special geological map].Berne: Office Fédéral des Eaux et de la Géologie.

[95] Stoffelen A. (2020). Where is the community in geoparks? A systematic literature review and call for attention to the societal embedding of geoparks. Area, 52(1), 97-104. https://doi.org/10.1111/area.12549.

[96] Stokes A. M., Cook S. D., & Drew D. (2003). Geotourism:The new trend in travel. Washington DC: Travel Industry Association of America.

[97] Stolz J., & Megerle H. E. (2022). Geotrails as a medium for education and geotourism: Recommendations for quality improvement based on the results of a research project in the Swabian Alb UNESCO Global Geopark. Land, 11(9), 1422. https://doi.org/10.3390/LAND11091422.

[98] UNESCO (2024). UNESCO Global Geoparks. Retrieved from https://www.unesco.org/en/iggp/geoparks/about.

[99] Valk Ü., & Bowman M. (2022). Vernacular knowledge:Contesting authority, expressing beliefs. Sheffield: Equinox Publishing.

[100] Villamor G. B., Palomo I., Santiago C. A. L., Oteros-Rozas E., & Hill J. (2014). Assessing stakeholders’ perceptions and values towards social-ecological systems using participatory methods. Ecological Processes, 3(1), 22. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13717-014-0022-9.

[101] Wrede V., & Mügge-Bartolović V. (2012). GeoRoute Ruhr—A network of geotrails in the Ruhr Area National GeoPark, Germany. Geoheritage, 4(1), 109-114. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12371-012-0057-1.