Benefits of geopark from the perspective of local communities: A case study of Kinabalu UNESCO Global Geopark, Malaysia

Aelisa Awing Louis , Hamimah Talib , Jennifer Kim Lian Chan , Kamlisa Uni Kamlun

International Journal of Geoheritage and Parks ›› 2025, Vol. 13 ›› Issue (4) : 534 -546.

PDF
International Journal of Geoheritage and Parks ›› 2025, Vol. 13 ›› Issue (4) :534 -546. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijgeop.2025.10.001
Original article
research-article

Benefits of geopark from the perspective of local communities: A case study of Kinabalu UNESCO Global Geopark, Malaysia

Author information +
History +
PDF

Abstract

Geoparks represent a dynamic nexus between geological heritage, ecological preservation, and sustainable development. Within this framework, the Kinabalu UNESCO Global Geopark (KUGGp) in Malaysia was officially designated as a UNESCO Global Geopark on 26th May 2023. It stands as a paragon of geotourism, uniting local communities, cultural legacy, and nat-ural wonders under the broader agenda of sustainable tourism. However, the extent to which these benefits are recognized by local communities, particularly in Kota Belud, remains inade-quately explored. Understanding these perspectives is crucial for aligning geotourism initiatives with community aspirations and fostering sustainable development. This study investigates the perceived benefits of geoparks among the Kota Belud community using a mixed-methods ap-proach. A total of 225 respondents from the community of Kota Belud participated in this study. The quantitative data were triangulated with the data from in-depth interviews with eight community representatives. Using a five-point Likert scale, the survey consists of 31 items constructed based on the UNWTO conceptual framework of the three pillars of tourism sustainable development: economy, social, and environment. Complementary in-depth inter-views with eight representatives provided qualitative insights, enhancing the robustness of findings. Survey results indicate strong agreement on the benefits of geoparks in enhancing local economies (mean = 4.36), fostering social cohesion (mean = 4.28), and promoting envi-ronmental conservation (mean = 4.24). Thematic analysis further highlights the dimensions such as income generation, cultural preservation, and environmental stewardship. This study underscores the transformative potential of geoparks and offers practical insights for policy-makers and stakeholders to enhance geotourism strategies aligned with sustainable develop-ment goals.

Keywords

community perspectives / geotourism / Kinabalu UNESCO Global Geopark / Kota Belud / Sustainable Development Goals

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Aelisa Awing Louis, Hamimah Talib, Jennifer Kim Lian Chan, Kamlisa Uni Kamlun. Benefits of geopark from the perspective of local communities: A case study of Kinabalu UNESCO Global Geopark, Malaysia. International Journal of Geoheritage and Parks, 2025, 13(4): 534-546 DOI:10.1016/j.ijgeop.2025.10.001

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

References

[1]

Adam A. A., Othman N., & Halim A. A. (2021). Indigenous knowledge transfer among Dusuns and Bajaus in Kota Belud, Sabah, Malaysia: approaches and challenges. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 11(11), 1722-1734. https://doi.org/10.6007/ijarbss/v11-i11/11656.

[2]

Al-Saad S., Al-Orainat L., Al-Badarneh M., & Al-Makhadmeh A. (2018). Residents' perceptions towards tourism and its impacts on their quality of life in Aqaba city. Dirasat: Human and Social Sciences., 45(1), 229-244. https://doi.org/10.35516/0103-045-001-019.

[3]

Ansori C., Warmada I. W., Setiawan N. I., Jogaswara H., & Fariji M. A. (2024). The linkage of geological parameters to cultural diversity at Karangsambung-Karangbolong Geopark and surrounding area, Kebumen, Indonesia. International Journal of Geoheritage and Parks, 12(1), 168-179. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijgeop.2024.02.002.

[4]

Anuar A. N. A., Ahmad H., Jusoh H., Hussain M. Y., & Nasir R. A. (2015). Developing of tourist friendly destination concept: A quantitative study. Journal of Tourism and Hospitality, 4(1), 141. https://doi.org/10.4172/2167-0269.1000141.

[5]

Arcos-Pumarola J., Paquin A. G., & Sitges M. H. (2023). The use of intangible heritage and creative industries as a tourism asset in the UNESCO creative cities network. Heliyon, 9(1), Article e13106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e13106.

[6]

Azman N., Halim S. A., Liu O. P., & Komoo I. (2011). The Langkawi Global Geopark: Local community’s perspectives on public education. International Journal of Heritage Studies, 17(3), 261-279. https://doi.org/10.1080/13527258.2011.557863.

[7]

Castillo Canalejo A. M., Núñez Tabales J. M., & Sánchez Cañizares S. M. (2016). Local community ́perceptions on tourist impacts and associated development: A case study on SAL and Boa Vista islands. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, 7(1), 383-394. https://doi.org/10.5901/mjss.2016.v7n1s1p383.

[8]

CEIC (2022). Malaysia domestic tourism: Number of visitors: Sabah. Retrieved from https://www.ceicdata.com/en/malaysia/domestic-tourism/domestic-tourism-number-of-visitors-sabah.

[9]

Chan E. S. W., Hon A. H. Y., Chan W., & Okumuş F. (2014). What drives employees’ intentions to implement green practices in hotels? The role of knowledge, aware-ness, concern and ecological behaviour. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 40,20-28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhm.2014.03.001.

[10]

Chan J. K. L., & Talib H. (2023, August). Community participation and geo-resources in the Kinabalu National Geopark. Paper presented at International Heritage and Cul-tural Conservation Conference-InHERIT 2023, Sibu, Sarawak. Retrieved from https://easychair.org/publications/preprint/HFZr.

[11]

Chee S. Y., Firth L. B., Then A. Y. H., Yee J. C., Mujahid A., Affendi Y. A.,... McQuatters-Gollop A. (2021). Enhancing uptake of nature-based solutions for informing coastal sustainable development policy and planning: A Malaysia case study. Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution, 9, Article 708507. https://doi.org/10.3389/fevo.2021.708507.

[12]

Chua Y.P.(2011). Research methods and statistics: Research methods (2nd ed.). Shah Alam: McGraw Hill.

[13]

Creswell J. W., & Plano Clark V. L. (2011). Designing and conducting mixed methods tesearch (2nd ed.). Los Angeles: Sage Publications.

[14]

Feng Y. C., Pitafi A. H., & Zhang C. C. (2023). Support for tourism development in Pakistan: A study of road and transportation infrastructure development. Heliyon, 9(7), Article e18014. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e18014.

[15]

Galey M. L., Van Der Ent A., Iqbal M. C. M., & Rajakaruna N. (2017). Ultramafic geoecology of South and Southeast Asia. Botanical Studies, 58(1), 18. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40529-017-0167-9.

[16]

Halim S. A., & Ishak N. A. (2017). Examining community engagement in heritage conservation through geopark experiences from the Asia Pacific region. Kajian Malaysia, 35(Supp.1), 11-38. https://doi.org/10.21315/km2017.35.supp.1.2.

[17]

Khan F., Khan M. A., & Rahman H. U. (2024). Perusing sustainable development through education: Evidence from Malaysia. Indonesia and Pakistan: Environment, Development and Sustainability. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-024-05441-4.

[18]

Khizar H. M. U., Younas A., Kumar S., Akbar A., & Poulova P. (2023). The progression of sustainable development goals in tourism: A systematic literature review of past achievements and future promises. Journal of Innovation & Knowledge, 8(4), Article 100442. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jik.2023.100442.

[19]

Kornecká E., Molokáč M., Gregorová B., Cech V., Hronček P., & Javorská M. (2024). Structure of sustainable management of geoparks through multi-criteria methods. Sustainability, 16(3), 983. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16030983.

[20]

Kumar S., Hasija N., Kumar V., & Sageena G. (2023). Ecotourism: A holistic assessment of environmental and socioeconomic effects towards sustainable development. Current World Environment: An International Research Journal of Environmental Sciences, 18(2), 589-607. https://doi.org/10.12944/CWE.18.2.14.

[21]

Kunjuraman V. (2024). The development of sustainable livelihood framework for community-based ecotourism in developing countries. Tourism and Hospitality Research, 24(1), 48-65. https://doi.org/10.1177/14673584221135540.

[22]

Lee Y., & Jayakumar R. (2021). Economic impact of UNESCO global Geoparks on local communities: Comparative analysis of three UNESCO Global GeoparksinAsia. International Journal of Geoheritage and Parks, 9(2), 189-198. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijgeop.2021.02.002.

[23]

Li J. Y., Stoffelen A., Meijles E., & Vanclay F. (2023). Local people’s sense of place in heavily touristified protected areas: Contested place meanings around the Wulingyuan World Heritage Site, China. Landscape and Urban Planning, 237, Article 104792. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2023.104792.

[24]

Liu J. J., Nijkamp P., & Lin D. (2017). Urban-rural imbalance and tourism-led growth in China. Annals of Tourism Research, 64,24-36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annals.2017.02.005.

[25]

Mammadova A. (2021). Integrating Japanese local government and communities into the educational curriculum on regional sustainability inside theUNESCO’Sbio-sphere reserves and geoparks. Sustainability, 13(5), 2497. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13052497.

[26]

Misni A., Mohamad K. A. A., & Ahmad C. B. (2022). Local community’s involvement in appreciating heritage value of Kinta Valley geosites. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 1067(1), Article 012004. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/1067/1/012004.

[27]

Mohammadi M. (2010). Local people perceptions toward social,economic and environmental impacts of tourism in Kermanshah (Iran). Asian Social Science, 6(11), 220-225. https://doi.org/10.5539/ass.v6n11p220.

[28]

Moon M. D. (2019). Triangulation: a method to increase validity, reliability, and legitimation in clinical research. Journal of Emergency Nursing, 45(1), 103-105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jen.2018.11.004.

[29]

Moran M. (2021, August 3). Cronbach’s alpha. Retrieved from https://www.statisticssolutions.com/cronbachs-alpha/.

[30]

Mosbah A., & Abd Al Khuja M. S. (2014). A review of tourism development in Malaysia. European Journal of Business and Management, 6(5), 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1177/0047287514563167.

[31]

Nguyen H. T., Costanzo L. A., & Karatas-Özkan M. (2023). Stakeholders’ perceptions of sustainable entrepreneurship within the context of a developing economy. Journal of Small Business Management, 61(2), 441-480. https://doi.org/10.1080/00472778.2020.1796465.

[32]

Sabah Parks (2022, June 1). Kinabalu UNESCO Global Geopark. Retrieved from https://kinabalugeopark.sabahparks.org.my/aspiring-kinabalu.

[33]

Sanz J., Zamalloa T., Maguregi G., Fernandez L., & Echevarría I. (2020). Educational potential assessment of geodiversity sites: A proposal and a case study in the Basque Country (Spain). Geoheritage, 12(1), 23. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12371-020-00432-z.

[34]

Sharma A. (2015). Educational tourism: Strategy for sustainable tourism development with reference of Hadauti and Shekhawati regions of Rajasthan, India. Journal of Business Economics and Information Technology, 2(4), 1-12.

[35]

Sinaga F. A., Ginting N., & Marpaung B. O. Y. (2020). Education aspect of the community participation on developing geotourism Bakara Village. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 452(1), Article 012011. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/452/1/012011.

[36]

Štrba Ľ., & Palgutová S. (2024). Geoheritage interpretation panels in UNESCO Global Geoparks: Recommendations and assessment. Geoheritage, 16(4), 96. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12371-024-01012-1.

[37]

Tukiainen H., Toivanen M., & Maliniemi T. (2022). Geodiversity and biodiversity. Geological Society, London, Special Publications, 530(1), 31-47. https://doi.org/10.1144/sp530-2022-107.

[38]

UNESCO (2023). UNESCO Global Geoparks. Retrieved from https://www.unesco.org/en/iggp/geoparks/about.

[39]

United Nations World Tourism Organization (2013). Sustainable tourism for development guidebook: Enhancing capacities for sustainable tourism for development in de-veloping countries. Madrid: Author. https://doi.org/10.18111/9789284415496.

[40]

Wijesinghe S. N. R. (2022). Neoliberalism, Covid-19 and hope for transformation in tourism: The case of Malaysia. Current Issues in Tourism, 25(7), 1106-1120. https://doi.org/10.1080/13683500.2021.2012431.

[41]

Zhu Y. H., Chen C., Zhang G. D., Lin Z. M., Meshram S. G., & Alvandi E. (2023). Investigation of west lake ecotourism capabilities using SWOT and TOPSIS decision-making methods. Sustainability, 15(3), 2464. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15032464.

PDF

539

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/