Geodiversity assessment of Jodhpur region of Western Rajasthan, India: A remote sensing and GIS-based quantitative approach

Saurabh Mathur , Shiv Signh Rathore , Ishfaqul Haque , Suresh Chandra Mathur

International Journal of Geoheritage and Parks ›› 2025, Vol. 13 ›› Issue (3) : 412 -423.

PDF
International Journal of Geoheritage and Parks ›› 2025, Vol. 13 ›› Issue (3) :412 -423. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijgeop.2025.05.003
Original article
research-article

Geodiversity assessment of Jodhpur region of Western Rajasthan, India: A remote sensing and GIS-based quantitative approach

Author information +
History +
PDF

Abstract

Geodiversity concept implies the diversity of natural and physical components of geology, geomorphology, hydrogeology, and soil, including their characters, assemblage, interpretation, relationship, and systems. This concept serves as an effective tool for land-use planning, integrating the physical environment in which both biodiversity and human societies coexist. This contribution presents a quantitative approach for mapping geodiversity indices at a landscape scale in the Jodhpur region of western Rajasthan, India, utilizing various spatial techniques and procedures. The selected method under the present study is based on the overlay of a grid over different maps to calculate the sum of four partial indices. The partial indices represent the main components of geodiversity in the created maps including geology (stratigraphy, lithology, minerals, and structures), geomorphology (relief and landforms), hydrogeology (hydrography and water bodies), and soil. All the partial indices are integrated to create final geodiversity index (GI) map showing the richness of elements of geodiversity and their distribution throughout the territory. The resultant GI maps can be used as a tool in land management and can also be used for recognizing the rich geodiversity areas for their geoconservation and protection. Since geodiversity is the foundation of geoheritage, two geodiversity-rich hotspots have been identified, especially for geopark and geotourism initiatives for environmental conservation, social, and economic benefits in the Jodhpur region.

Keywords

geodiversity assessment indices / quantitative mapping / land management / geodiversity hot spots / geopark / geotourism / sustainability / India

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Saurabh Mathur, Shiv Signh Rathore, Ishfaqul Haque, Suresh Chandra Mathur. Geodiversity assessment of Jodhpur region of Western Rajasthan, India: A remote sensing and GIS-based quantitative approach. International Journal of Geoheritage and Parks, 2025, 13(3): 412-423 DOI:10.1016/j.ijgeop.2025.05.003

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

References

[1]

A.M. Araujo, D.Í. Pereira. A new methodological contribution for the geodiversity assessment: Applicability to Ceará State (Brazil). Geoheritage, 10 (2018), pp. 591-605, 10.1007/s12371-017-0250-3

[2]

Australian Heritage Commission. Australian Natural Heritage Charter: For the conservation of places of natural heritage significance. (2nd ed.), Canberra Australian Heritage Commission in association with the Australian Committee for the International Union for the Conservation of Nature (ACIUCN) (2002), p. 26

[3]

V. Bajala, M.S. Rishi, L. Kaur, G. Sharma. Assessment of geodiversity of Parbati River basin in NW Himalayan region, India. Geocarto International, 37 (26) (2022), pp. 13797-13811, 10.1080/10106049.2022.2082557

[4]

P.C. Bakliwal, S.M. Ramasamy. Lineament fabric of Rajasthan and Gujarat, India. Reprinted from Records of Geological Survey of India (Jaipur), 113 (7) (1987), pp. 54-64

[5]

K. Beg, B.K. Bhadra, J.R. Sharma, M.P. Punia, R. Chaurey. Seismic data analysis for disaster management in Jodhpur District of Rajasthan using GIS, GPS and remote sensing techniques. Journal of Indian Geological Congress, 5 (1) (2013), pp. 167-181

[6]

A. Benito-Calvo, A. Pérez-González, O. Magri, P. Meza. Assessing regional geodiversity: The Iberian Peninsula. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms, 34 (10) (2009), pp. 1433-1445, 10.1002/esp.1840

[7]

F. Betard, J.P. Peulvast. Geodiversity hotspots: Concept, method and cartographic application for geo-conservation purposes at a regional scale. Environmental Management, 63 (6) (2019), pp. 822-834, 10.1007/s00267-019-01168-5

[8]

J. Brilha. Geoheritage: Inventories and evaluation. E. Reynard, J. Brilha (Eds.), Geoheritage: Assessment, protection and management, Elsevier, Amsterdam (2018), pp. 69-85, 10.1016/B978-0-12-809531-7.00004-6

[9]

J. Brilha, M. Gray, D.I. Pereira, P. Pereira. Geodiversity: An integrative review as a contribution to the sustainable management of the whole of nature. Environmental Science & Policy, 86 (2018), pp. 19-28, 10.1016/j.envsci.2018.05.001

[10]

T.M. Brooks, R.A. Mittermeier, G.A.B. da Fonseca, J. Gerlach, M. Hoffman, J.F. Lamoreux, … A.S.L. Rodrigues. Global biodiversity conservation priorities. Science, 313 (5783) (2006), pp. 58-61, 10.1126/science.1127609

[11]

L. Carcavilla, J.J. Durán, M. López. Relation to geological heritage. Geo-Temas, 10 (2008), pp. 1299-1303 Proceedings of the VI Geological Congress of Spain, Las Palmas de Gran Canaria

[12]

Central Ground Water Board (CGWB), Ganga Rejuvenation,Ministry of Jal Shakti. Government of India. Ground water year book of Rajasthan (2020-2021), Author, New Delhi (2022)

[13]

D.S. Chauhan, B. Ram, N. Ram. Jodhpur sandstone: A gift of ancient beaches to western Rajasthan. Journal of the Geological Society of India, 64 (2004), pp. 265-276

[14]

P. Coratza, V. Vandelli, L. Fiorentini, G. Paliaga, F. Faccini. Bridging terrestrial and marine geoheritage: Assessing geosites in Portofino Natural Park (Italy). Water, 11 (10) (2019), p. 2112, 10.3390/w11102112

[15]

G. Dixon, I. Houshold, M. Pemberton, C. Sharples. Geoconservation in Tasmania: Wizards of oz!. Earth Heritage, 8 (1997), pp. 14-15

[16]

Gological Survey of India (GSI). National geological monuments, Jodhpur group-Malani igneous suite contact. Memoirs - Geological Survey of India, 27 (2001), pp. 65-67

[17]

Gological Survey of India (GSI). Monuments of stratigraphic signifcance, Malani volcanism overlain by Jodhpur sandstone. Memoirs - Geological Survey of India, 27 (2001), pp. 68-69

[18]

J. Goncalves, K. Mansur, D. Santos, R. Henriques, P. Pereira. A discussion on the quantification and classification indices based on GIS methodological tests. Geoheritage, 12 (8) (2020), Article 38, 10.1007/s12371-020-00458-3

[19]

J.E. Gordon, H.F. Barron, J.D. Hansom, M.F. Thomas. Engaging with geodiversity—Why it matters. Proceedings of the Geologists' Association, 123 (1) (2012), pp. 1-6, 10.1016/j.pgeola.2011.08.002

[20]

J.E. Gordon, C.C.J. MacFadyen. Earth heritage conservation in Scotland: State, pressures and issues. J.E. Gordon, K.F. Leys (Eds.), Earth science and the natural heritage, Stationary Office Books, Edinburg (2001), pp. 130-144

[21]

M. Gray. Geodiversity: Valuing and conserving abiotic nature. (1st ed.), John Wiley & Sons, West Sussex (2004), p. 409

[22]

M. Gray. Geodiversity: Developing the paradigm. Proceedings of the Geologists' Association, 119 (3-4) (2008), pp. 287-298, 10.1016/S0016-7878(08)80307-0

[23]

M. Gray. Geodiversity: Valuing and conserving abiotic nature. (2nd ed.), Wiley-Blackwel, London (2013)

[24]

M. Gray, J.E. Gordon, E.J. Brown. Geodiversity and ecosystem approach: The contribution of geosciences in delivering integrated environmental management. Proceedings of the Geologists’ Association, 124 (4) (2013), pp. 659-673, 10.1016/j.pgeola.2013.01.003

[25]

L.C. Gregory, J.G. Meert, B. Bingen, M.K. Pandit, T.H. Torsvik. Paleomagnetism and geochronology of the Malani igneous suite, Northwest India: Implications for the configuration of Rodinia and the assembly of Gondwana. Precambrian Research, 170 (1-2) (2009), pp. 13-26, 10.1016/j.precamres.2008.11.004

[26]

J. Hjort, M. Luoto. Geodiversity of high-latitude landscapes in northern Finland. Geomorphology, 115 (1-2) (2010), pp. 109-116, 10.1016/j.geomorph.2009.09.039

[27]

J. Hjort, A.C. Seijmonsbergen, J. Kemppinen, H. Tukiainen, T. Maliniemi, J.E. Gordon, … M. Gray. Towards a taxonomy of geodiversity. Philosophical Transactions. Series A, Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 382 (2269) (2024), Article 20230060, 10.1098/rsta.2023.0060

[28]

Jodhpur Development Authority (JDA).Jodhpur development authority-Act-2 (schedule-I). Jaipur: Government of Rajasthan (2009)

[29]

O.M. Karna, J. Heino, T. Laamanen, J. Jyrkankallio-Mikkola, V. Pajunen, J. Soininen, K.T. Tolonen, H. Tukiainen, J. Hjort. Does catchment geodiversity foster stream biodiversity. Landscape Ecology, 34 (10) (2019), pp. 2469-2485, 10.1007/s10980-019-00901-z

[30]

G. Kaur, A. Ahuja, S.N. Thakur, M.K. Pandit, R. Duraiswami, A. Singh, … S. Garg. Jodhpur sandstone: An architectonic heritage stone from India. Geoheritage, 12 (2020), Article 16, 10.1007/s12371-020-00441-y

[31]

S. Kozlowski. Geodiversity. The concept and scope of geodiversity. Przegląd Geologiczny, 52 (2004), pp. 833-837

[32]

L. Kubalikova, P.N. Irapta, M. Pal, Z. Zwoliński, P. Coratza, B. Van Wyk de Vries. Visages of geodiversity and geoheritage: A multidisciplinary approach to valuing, conserving and managing abiotic nature. Geological Society, London, Special Publications, 530 (2023), pp. 1-12, 10.1144/SP530-2022-321

[33]

C. Lopes, Z. Teixeira, D.I. Pereira, P. Pereira. Identifying optimal cell size for geodiversity quantitative assessment with richness, diversity and evenness indices. Resources, 12 (6) (2023), 10.3390/resources12060065

[34]

F. Manosso, M.T. de Nóbrega. Calculation of geodiversity from landscape units of the Cadeado range region in Paraná Brazil. Geoheritage, 8 (3) (2016), pp. 189-199, 10.1007/s12371-015-0152-1

[35]

S. Mathur, S.S.K. Sudhanshu, S.C. Mathur. Ediacaran Fauna of the Jodhpur group (Marwar supergroup) in Jodhpur city, Western Rajasthan, India: Implication for potential geoheritage sites. Estudios Geológicos, 75 (2) (2019), Article e105, 10.3989/egeol.43595.560

[36]

S. Mathur. Geological and remote sensing investigation of significant igneous and sedimentary type georesources of Jodhpur, western Rajasthan, India: Implication for fossil park and geopark for socioeconomic development through geotourism (Unpublished Ph. D Thesis) Suresh Gyan Vihar University, Jaipur, India (2021)

[37]

S. Mathur, S. Sharma, S. Singh, S.C. Mathur. Qualitative assessment of geoheritage for geotourism promotion: A case study from Mehrangarh ridge in Jodhpur city, western Rajasthan, India. Geoheritage, 13 (2021), Article 80, 10.1007/s12371-021-00604-5

[38]

S. Mathur, S. Sharma, S.K. Singh, M.G. Thakkar, G. Chauhan, S.S. Rathore, S.C. Mathur. Assessment and threat to significant geoheritage of Soorsagar formation of Jodhpur Group of Marwar Supergroup, western Rajasthan, India: A geological and remote sensing approach. Geoheritage, 15 (2023), Article 127, 10.1007/s12371-023-00896-9

[39]

Micic Ponjiger, T. Lukic A. Vasiljevic, T.A. Hose, B. Basarin, S.B. Markovic, M.M. Milanovic, A. Valjarevic, M.D. Vujicic, Stankov. Quantitative geodiversity assessment of the Fruska Gora Mt. (North Serbia) by using the geodiversity index. Geoheritage, 13 (3) (2021), pp. 1-12, 10.1007/s12371-021-00572-w

[40]

B. Németh, K. Németh, J.N. Procter. Visitation rate analysis of geoheritage features from earth science education perspective using automated landform classification and crowdsourcing: A geoeducation capacity map of the Auckland volcanic field, New Zealand. Geosciences, 11 (11) (2021), p. 480, 10.3390/geosciences11110480

[41]

L.M. Nieto. Geodiversidad: Propuesta de una definition integradora [Geodiversity: Proposal of an integrative definition]. Boletín Geológico y Minero, 112 (2) (2001), pp. 3-12 (In Spanish)

[42]

M. Panizza. Geomorphosites: Concepts, methods and examples of geomorphological survey. Chinese Science Bulletin, 46 (Suppl. 1) (2001), pp. 4-5, 10.1007/BF03187227

[43]

H.S. Pareek. The quaternary geology and mineral resources of north-western Rajasthan. Memoirs - Geological Survey of India, 115 (1984), pp. 1-99

[44]

K.E. Parks, M. Mulligan. On the relationship between a resource based measure of geodiversity and broad scale biodiversity patterns. Biodiversity and Conservation, 19 (2010), pp. 2751-2766, 10.1007/s10531-010-9876-z

[45]

R. Pellitero, M.J. González-Amuchastegui, P. Ruiz-Flaño, E. Serrano. Geodiversity and geomorphosite assessment applied to a natural protected area: The Ebro and Rudron Gorges Natural Park (Spain). Geoheritage, 3 (2011), pp. 163-174, 10.1007/s12371-010-0022-9

[46]

D.I. Pereira, P. Pereira, J. Brilha, L. Santos. Geodiversity assessment of Parana State (Brazil): An innovative approach. Environmental Management, 52 (2013), pp. 541-552, 10.1007/s00267-013-0100-2

[47]

S.S. Rathore, S. Mathur, S.C. Mathur. Step wells of Jodhpur, western Rajasthan, India: Implication for hydro-geosites and hydro-geotourism. Geoheritage, 16 (2024), Article 37, 10.1007/s12371-024-00919-z

[48]

E. Reynard, J. Brilha. Geoheritage:Assessment, protection, and management. Amsterdam: Elsevier (2018), 10.1016/C2015-0-04543-9

[49]

J. Rojas-López. The challenges of studying geodiversity. Venezuelan Geographic Magazine, 46 (1) (2005), pp. 143-152

[50]

D.S. Santos, K.L. Mansur, J.B. Gonçalves, E.R. Arruda, F.C. Manosso. Quantitative assessment of geodiversity and urban growth impacts in Armação dos Búzios, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. Applied Geography, 85 (2017), pp. 184-195, 10.1016/j.apgeog.2017.03.009

[51]

V.L. Santucci. Historical perspectives on biodiversity and geodiversity. Geodiversity & Geoconservation, 22 (3) (2005), pp. 29-34

[52]

E. Serrano, P. Ruiz-Flano. Geodiversity. A theoretical and applied concept. Geographica Helvetica, 62 (3) (2007), pp. 140-147, 10.5194/gh-62-140-2007

[53]

K.K. Sharma. Malani magmatism: An extensional lithospheric tectonic origin. G.R. Foulger, J.H. Natland, D.C. Presnall, D.L. Anderson (Eds.), Plates, plumes and paradigms, Geological Society of America, Boulder, CO (2005), 10.1130/0-8137-2388-4.463

[54]

C. Sharples. Geoconservation in forest management principles and procedures. Tasforest, 7 (1995), pp. 37-50

[55]

C.R. Silva. Geodiversity of Brazil: Knowing the past, to understand the present and predict the future. Geological Survey of Brazil, Rio de Janeiro (2008)

[56]

J. Silva, C. Rodrigues, D. Pereira. Mapping and analysis of geodiversity indices in the Xingu River basin, Amazonia, Brazil. Geoheritage, 7 (4) (2015), pp. 337-350, 10.1007/s12371-014-0134-8

[57]

J.P. Silva, D.I. Pereira, A.M. Aguiar, C. Rodrigues. Geodiversity assessment of the Xingu drainage basin. Journal of Maps, 9 (2) (2013), pp. 254-262, 10.1080/17445647.2013.775085

[58]

S. Singh. Investigation of hydrogeological aspects of important ancient natural and traditional water impounding structures of the Rajasthan, India: Implication for hydro-geotourism and as potential World Heritage Sites (Unpublished doctoral dissertation) J. N.V. University, Jodhpur, India (2022)

[59]

S. Singh, S.C. Mathur. Journey of Jodhpur city since its foundation through water impounding structures. K.L. Shrivastava, P.K. Shrivastva (Eds.), Frontiersof earth science, Scientifc Publisher, Jodhpur (2014), pp. 527-550

[60]

S. Sinha-Roy, S. Sen Gupta. Precambrian deformed granites of possible basement in the Himalayas. Precambrian Research, 31 (3) (1986), pp. 209-235, 10.1016/0301-9268(86)90074-4

[61]

U. Stepišnik, A. Trenchovska. A proposal of quantitative geodiversity evaluation model on the example of upper Pivka karst, Slovenia. Razprave, 46 (2016), pp. 53-65, 10.4312/dela.46.2.41-65

[62]

Z. Zwolinski. The routine of landform geodiversity map design for the polish Carpathian Mts. Landform Analysis, 11 (2009), pp. 77-85

[63]

Z. Zwoliński, A. Najwer, M. Giardino. Methods for assessing geodiversity. E. Reynard, J. Brilha (Eds.), Geoheritage: protection, and management, Assessment, Elsevier, Amsterdam (2018), pp. 27-52, 10.1016/B978-0-12-809531-7.00002

PDF

366

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/