Dynamic accessibility of geosites: Evidence from long-term observations in the Belaya River valley (western Greater Caucasus)

Anna V. Mikhailenko , Dmitry A. Ruban

International Journal of Geoheritage and Parks ›› 2025, Vol. 13 ›› Issue (2) : 306 -318.

PDF
International Journal of Geoheritage and Parks ›› 2025, Vol. 13 ›› Issue (2) :306 -318. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijgeop.2025.02.006
Original article
research-article

Dynamic accessibility of geosites: Evidence from long-term observations in the Belaya River valley (western Greater Caucasus)

Author information +
History +
PDF

Abstract

Accessibility is an important property of geosites that is essential to their conservation and exploitation. Although many previous researchers took it into account, its full complexity is yet to be realized. Three large geosites in the valley of the Belaya River in the western Greater Caucasus were visited regularly for about a quarter of a century. In this study, the outer and inner accessibility of each considered geosite was assessed semi-quantitatively for five time slices of the 2001-2024 time span. The outer accessibility was examined for each entrance to the geosites, and the inner accessibility was examined for each principal functional zone of the geosites. The results revealed differences of the outer accessibility between the entrances of the same geosites and the inner accessibility between the functional zones of the same geosites. Moreover, it was found that the outer and inner accessibility could increase and decrease through time, and the above-mentioned spatial differences within geosites could also change. A proximity to settlements and tourism growth were among the main factors of the reported spatiotemporal dynamics. The outcomes of this study stressed the need for a much deeper understanding of such geosite properties as accessibility.

Keywords

geoconservation / geoheritage properties / geosite changes / tourism infrastructure / Western Caucasus

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Anna V. Mikhailenko, Dmitry A. Ruban. Dynamic accessibility of geosites: Evidence from long-term observations in the Belaya River valley (western Greater Caucasus). International Journal of Geoheritage and Parks, 2025, 13(2): 306-318 DOI:10.1016/j.ijgeop.2025.02.006

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

References

[1]

A.E. Alekseeva, A.V. Ershov, D.N. Linev. Numerical modeling of uplift and erosion at the Western Caucasus orogen in the Neogene-Quaternary. Moscow University Geology Bulletin, 69 (4) (2014), pp. 213-218, 10.3103/S0145875214040024

[2]

W. Andrews, R.M. Clary. Geoheritage: Geology of the community, for the community, by the community. GSA Today, 31 (8) (2021), pp. 16-17, 10.1130/GSATG111GH.1

[3]

V. Armiero, P. Petrosino, L. Lirer, I. Alberico. The GeoCaF project: Proposal of a geosites network at Campi Flegrei (Southern Italy). Geoheritage, 3 (3) (2011), pp. 195-219, 10.1007/s12371-011-0033-1

[4]

M.K. Bedanokov, S.K. Chich, D.Y. Chetyz, S.A. Trepet, S.A. Lebedev, A.G. Kostianoy. Physicogeographical characteristics of the Republic of Adygea. M.K. Bedanokov, S.A. Lebedev, A.G. Kostianoy (Eds.), TheRepublic of Adygea environment, Springer, Cham (2020), pp. 19-55, 10.1007/698_2020_637

[5]

S. Bilgiç, E. Karadeniz, S. Er. Enhancing geosite accessibility assessment: A new MCDM model. Geoheritage, 16 (2) (2024), p. 62, 10.1007/s12371-024-00965-7

[6]

J. Brilha. Inventory and quantitative assessment of geosites and geodiversity sites: A review. Geoheritage, 8 (2) (2016), pp. 119-134, 10.1007/s12371-014-0139-3

[7]

M.A. Camino, K. Halpern, M.J. , F.R. Meroi Arcerito. Sierra Bachicha: Proposal for a new site of geological interest in the Balcarce district, province of Buenos Aires. Serie Correlacion Geologica, 34 (1) (2018), pp. 5-14

[8]

C.J. Cleal, B.A. Thomas, R.E. Bevins, W.A.P. Wimbledon. GEOSITES—An international geoconservation initiative. Geology Today, 15 (2) (1999), pp. 64-68, 10.1046/j.1365-2451.1999.1502006.x

[9]

C.I.P. Dim. Creating a geosite inventory for some classic outcrops in Nigeria’s southeastern province. Geoheritage, 16 (2) (2024), p. 59, 10.1007/s12371-024-00967-5

[10]

V.F. Dos Santos. Museu Nacional de História Natural e da Ciência: One hundred years of dinosaur ichnology in Portugal. Bollettino della Societa Paleontologica Italiana, 56 (2) (2017), pp. 97-107, 10.4435/BSPI.2017.25

[11]

A. Elkaichi, E. Errami, N. Patel. Canyons as potential geotourism attractions of Central High Atlas, Morocco: Comparative analysis of Aït Bouguemaz Valley and Zaouiat Ahnsal-Taghia Valley by using GAM model. International Journal of Geoheritage and Parks, 12 (1) (2024), pp. 20-36, 10.1016/j.ijgeop.2024.01.001

[12]

Y.A. Fedorov, A.V. Mikhailenko, D.A. Ruban. Large-scale accessibility as a new perspective for geoheritage assessment. Geosciences, 12 (11) (2022), p. 414, 10.3390/geosciences12110414

[13]

A.R.R. Ferreira, H.A.S. Lobo, J.A. de Jesus Perinotto. Inventory and quantification of geosites in the State Tourist Park of Alto Ribeira (PETAR, São Paulo State, Brazil). Geoheritage, 11 (3) (2019), pp. 783-792, 10.1007/s12371-018-0331-y

[14]

M.-L. Frey. Geotourism—Examining tools for sustainable development. Geosciences, 11 (1) (2021), p. 30, 10.3390/geosciences11010030

[15]

I. Fuertes-Gutiérrez, E. García-Ortiz, E. Fernández-Martínez. Anthropic threats to geological heritage: Characterization and management: A case study in the dinosaur tracksites of La Rioja (Spain). Geoheritage, 8 (2) (2016), pp. 135-153, 10.1007/s12371-015-0142-3

[16]

M.D.G. Garcia, M.A.L.D. Nascimento, K.L. Mansur, R.G.F.D.A. Pereira. Geoconservation strategies framework in Brazil: Current status from the analysis of representative case studies. Environmental Science and Policy, 128 (2022), pp. 194-207, 10.1016/j.envsci.2021.11.006

[17]

A. Goy, S. Ureta, F. García-Joral, J.J. Gomez, C. Herrero, G. Martínez. Conservation management of the Aalenian stage GSSP in Fuentelsaz (Castilla-La Mancha, Spain). Rivista Italiana di Paleontologia e Stratigrafia, 110 (1) (2004), pp. 393-397

[18]

L. Guo, S.J. Vincent, V. Lavrishchev. Upper Jurassic reefs from the Russian Western Caucasus: Implications for the Eastern Black Sea. Turkish Journal of Earth Sciences, 20 (5) (2011), pp. 629-653, 10.3906/yer-1012-5

[19]

J.C. Gutiérrez-Marco, D.K. Loydell, P. Štorch. The Silurian section of the Valle syncline (Sierra Norte de Sevilla UNESCO Global Geopark, Spain) as an international standard for graptolite biostratigraphy. Geoconservation Research, 4 (1) (2021), pp. 131-135, 10.30486/gcr.2020.1908691.1032

[20]

A. Jarzyna, M. Bąbel, D. Ługowski, F. Vladi. Anhydrite weathering zone with hydration caves at Dingwall (Nova Scotia, SE Canada) as a potential geosite and geodiversity site. Geoheritage, 15 (2) (2023), p. 42, 10.1007/s12371-023-00797-x

[21]

S.Y. Kolodyazhny, N.B. Kuznetsov, E.A. Shalaeva, E.I. Makhinya, K.I. Dantsova, T.V. Romanyuk, M.P. Antipov, S.F. Khafizov, G.E. Parfenov. Structure of the western segments of the Caucasus and adjacent Рrecaucasus basin in the light of new ideas about the time of the beginning of the uplift of the Caucasian orogen. Neftyanoe Khozyaystvo-Oil Industry, 5 (2024), pp. 42-47, 10.24887/0028-2448-2024-5-42-47

[22]

S. Kozłowski, Z.M. Migaszewski, A. Gałuszka. Geodiversity conservation—Conserving our geological heritage. Polish Geological Institute Special Papers, 13 (2004), pp. 13-20

[23]

E.A. Lima, M. Machado, J. Ponte. Geological heritage management: Monitoring the Azores Geopark geosites. Comunicacoes Geologicas, 101 (2014), pp. 1295-1298

[24]

P. Migoń, E. Pijet-Migoń. Overlooked geomorphological component of volcanic geoheritage—Diversity and perspectives for tourism industry, Pogórze Kaczawskie region, SW Poland. Geoheritage, 8 (4) (2016), pp. 333-350, 10.1007/s12371-015-0166-8

[25]

A.V. Mikhailenko, D.A. Ruban, V.A. Ermolaev. Accessibility of geoheritage sites—A methodological proposal. Heritage, 4 (3) (2021), pp. 1080-1091, 10.3390/heritage4030060

[26]

D. Muslim, Z. Zakaria, H. Rachmat, P. Iqbal, G.O. Muslim, M.S. Sadewo, F.N. Muslim. Identification of geodiversity and geosite assessment around Geohazard area of Suoh Aspiring Geopark in West Lampung, Sumatra, Indonesia. Resources, 11 (11) (2022), p. 104, 10.3390/resources11110104

[27]

E. Pescatore, M. Bentivenga, S.I. Giano. Geoheritage and geoconservation: Some remarks and considerations. Sustainability, 15 (7) (2023), p. 5823, 10.3390/su15075823

[28]

I.A. Pidek, A. Orłowska. Conception of the “Unique Ferdynandovian flora” geosite in the Łuków plain. Polish Journal of Natural Sciences, 32 (3) (2017), pp. 573-585

[29]

S.U. Pratomo, I.P. Haty, D. Ulhaq, R.D. Martasari.Comparison of geosite and geomorphosite quantitative analysis for geotourism purposes in Baturraden (Purwokerto) and Guci (Tegal) hot springs tourism area, Central Java. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 1339 (1) (2024), Article 012031, 10.1088/1755-1315/1339/1/012031

[30]

C. Prosser, M. Murphy, J. Larwood. Geological conservation: A guide to good practice (p. 145). English Nature, Peterborough (2006)

[31]

K.O. Rostovtsev, V.B. Agajev, N.R. Azarjan, R.G. Babajev, N.V. Beznosov, N.A. Gasanov, … T.V. Schevtchenko. The Jurassic of the Caucasus (p. 192). Nauka, Sankt-Peterburg (1992) (In Russian)

[32]

D.A. Ruban, A.V. Mikhailenko, N.N. Yashalova.Valuable geoheritage resources: Potential versus exploitation. Resources Policy, 77 (2022), Article 102665, 10.1016/j.resourpol.2022.102665

[33]

D.A. Ruban, A.V. Mikhalenko, V.A. Ermolaev. Temporal outline of geological heritage sites in the Western Caucasus. International Journal of Geoheritage and Parks, 12 (2) (2024), pp. 295-310, 10.1016/j.ijgeop.2024.05.001

[34]

J. Rypl, M. Havlíček, I. Dostál. Geotourism potential assessment: A case study of the Czech-Austrian cross-border area. Geoheritage, 13 (1) (2021), p. 1, 10.1007/s12371-020-00522-y

[35]

V.T. Schirov. Descriptions of the geology of Mountainous Adygeya (p. 230) Rostov-on-Don: Fond Nauki i Obrazovaniya (2014) (In Russian)

[36]

F.B. Serrato, A.R. Díaz, G.A.B. Pelegrín. The arid landscapes of the Badlands as a tourist resource. Investigaciones Turisticas, 17 (2019), pp. 213-238, 10.14198/INTURI2019.17.10

[37]

R. Shajahan, B. van Wyk de Vries, E. Zanella, A. Harris. Creating a sense of intangible science: Making it understandable to a broad public via geoheritage. International Journal of Geoheritage and Parks, 12 (3) (2024), pp. 396-415, 10.1016/j.ijgeop.2024.07.007

[38]

Ľ. Štrba, A. Vravcová, M. Podoláková, L. Varcholová, B. Kršák. Linking geoheritage or geosite assessment results with geotourism potential and development: A literature review. Sustainability, 15 (12) (2023), p. 9539, 10.3390/su15129539

[39]

L. Tamang, U.K. Mandal, M. Karmakar, M. Banerjee, D. Ghosh. Geomorphosite evaluation for geotourism development using geosite assessment model (GAM): A study from a Proterozoic terrain in Eastern India. International Journal of Geoheritage and Parks, 11 (1) (2023), pp. 82-99, 10.1016/j.ijgeop.2022.12.001

[40]

D. Tormey. New approaches to communication and education through geoheritage. International Journal of Geoheritage and Parks, 7 (4) (2019), pp. 192-198, 10.1016/j.ijgeop.2020.01.001

[41]

D.J.J. Van Hinsbergen, T.H. Torsvik, S.M. Schmid, L.C. Matenco, M. Maffione, R.L.M. Vissers, D. Gürer, W. Spakman. Orogenic architecture of the Mediterranean region and kinematic reconstruction of its tectonic evolution since the Triassic. Gondwana Research, 81 (2020), pp. 79-229, 10.1016/j.gr.2019.07.009

[42]

I.G. Volkodav. Geology of Adygeya. Adygeyan State University, Maykop (2007), p. 251 (In Russian)

[43]

V.J. Vuks. STRATI Lower and Middle Jurassic stratigraphic scheme of the Western Caucasus: Problems of correlation and division. R. Rocha, J. Pais, J. Kullberg, S. Finney (Eds.), 2013, Springer, Cham (2013), pp. 609-618, 10.1007/978-3-319-04364-7_117

[44]

S. Wakass, A. Ezaidi, M. El Youssi, I. Mansouri, H. Achiban, S. Chellik, M. El Azzouzi. Geosites of High Atlas of Marrakech (Morocco): Geological characterization, accessibility, and potential interests for sustainable tourism. Geoheritage, 15 (3) (2023), p. 107, 10.1007/s12371-023-00872-3

[45]

M.J. Whiteley, M.A.E. Browne. Local geoconservation groups—Past achievements and future challenges. Proceedings of the Geologists' Association, 124 (4) (2013), pp. 674-680, 10.1016/j.pgeola.2012.07.004

[46]

R.M.L. Wignall, M. Dempster, R. Roberts, H.C. Townley.Geosite condition monitoring in the UK 1999-2019. Proceedings of the Geologists' Association, 134 (1) (2023), pp. 25-40, 10.1016/j.pgeola.2022.08.002

[47]

R.M.L. Wignall, J.E. Gordon, V. Brazier, C.C.J. MacFadyen, N.S. Everett.A qualitative risk assessment for the impacts of climate change on nationally and internationally important geoheritage sites in Scotland. Proceedings of the Geologists' Association, 129 (2) (2018), pp. 120-134, 10.1016/j.pgeola.2017.11.003

[48]

A. Yazdi, R. Dabiri, H. Mollai. Protection of geological heritage by a new phenomenon in Earth Sciences: Geoconservation. Journal of Mining and Environment, 15 (1) (2024), pp. 365-379, 10.22044/jme.2023.13434.2478

PDF

214

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/