The landscape of science communication and public engagement in UNESCO Global Geoparks

Abstract

UNESCO Global Geoparks are unique platforms for communicating science and geoscience, es-pecially in the context of contemporary environmental challenges. These territories are out-standing models for promoting environmental stewardship and fostering community engagement. To address a research gap in understanding science communication within geo-parks, this study explored the theoretical framework behind science communication, discussing key principles and strategies. The results revealed a diverse landscape with a wide spectrum of approaches, showing progress and opportunities, yet challenges persisted, including inconsis-tent frameworks and the prevalence of deϕιcit-model thinking. Trends indicated increasing adoption of participatory and community-focused initiatives, although these were unevenly implemented. The study concluded that while geoparks had made signiϕιcant contributions to science communication and sustainability, their impact could be enhanced through more con-sistent and participatory strategies that actively involved communities, strengthening their role as global models for environmental stewardship and public engagement.

Keywords

science communication / public engagement / UNESCO Global Geoparks / environmental stewardship / geological heritage / local sustainable development

References

[1] Adiyaman O., Neirman K., Patzak M., & McKeever P. (2018, September). International Geoscience Programme, in service of the society since 1972. Paper presented at the 8th International Conference on UNESCO Global Geoparks, Madonna di Campiglio, Italy.

[2] Amaro S., Chaves N. B., Henriques C., & Barroco C. (2023). Motivation-based segmentation of visitors to a UNESCO Global Geopark. Geoheritage, 15, 79. doi:10.1007/s12371-023-00848-3.

[3] Amato M., Bove R., & D’Orilia F. (2013, September). Education and scientific divulgation on the management of land-related risks in agriculture and livestock farming in the Cilento Geopark MIdA Integrated Environmental Museum. Paper presented at the 12th European Geoparks Conference, Cilento Vallo di Diano and Alburni Geopark, Italy.

[4] Azman N., Halim S. A., Liu O. P., Saidin S., & Komoo I. (2010). Public education in heritage conservation for geopark community. Procedia -Social and Behavioral Sciences, 7, 504-511. doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.10.068.

[5] Babou I. (2019). Natural heritage, participatory democracy and UNESCO: A structure of disillusionment? In Y. Girault (Ed.), UNESCO Global Geoparks: Tension between territorial development and heritage enhancement (pp. 3-22). John Wiley & Sons. doi:10.1002/9781119681489.ch1.

[6] Backer T. E. (1991). Knowledge utilization: The third wave. Science Communication, 12(3), 225-240. doi:10.1177/107554709101200303.

[7] Bauer M. W., Allum N., & Miller S. (2007). What can we learn from 25 years of PUS survey research? Liberating and expanding the agenda. Public Understanding of Science, 16(1), 79-95. doi:10.1177/0963662506071287.

[8] Bollati I. M., Rossi D., & Viani C. (2023). Outdoor river activities: Relations with geological background and extreme events in the perspective of geoeducation. Geosciences, 13(4), 122. doi:10.3390/geosciences13040122.

[9] Brilha J. (2014). Geoconservation, history of. In G.Tiess, T.Majumder, & P.Cameron (Eds.), Encyclopedia of mineral and energy policy. Berlin:Springer. doi:10.1007/978-3-642-40871-7_3-1.

[10] Brilha J. (2018). Geoheritage and geoparks. In E.Reynard, & J.Brilha (Geoheritage:Eds.), Assessment, protection and management (pp.323-335). Amsterdam: Elsevier. doi:10.1016/B978-0-12-809531-7.00018-6.

[11] Bucchi M., & Neresini F. (2008). Science and public participation. In E.J. HackettO. AmsterdamskaM. & J. Eds.), Lynch, Wajcman (The handbook of science and tech-nology studies (pp. 449-473). Cambridge: MIT Press.

[12] Bucchi M., & Trench B. (2016). Science communication and science in society: A conceptual review in ten keywords. Tecnoscienza, 7(2), 151-168. Retrieved from http://www.tecnoscienza.net/index.php/tsj/article/view/277/181.

[13] Bucchi M., & Trench B. (2021). Rethinking science communication as the social conversation around science. Journal of Science Communication, 20(3), Y01. doi:10.22323/2.20030401.

[14] Buhay D. N., & Best L. A. (2015). Informal learning at Stonehammer and English Riviera geoparks. Geoheritage, 7(2), 165-175. doi:10.1007/s12371-014-0125-9.

[15] Burns T., O’Connor J., & Stocklmayer S. (2003). Science communication: A contemporary definition. Public Understanding of Science, 12(2), 183-202. doi:10.1177/09636625030122004.

[16] Carrión-Mero P., Dueñas-Tovar J., Jaya-Montalvo M., Herrera-Franco G., Berrezueta E., & Morante-Carballo F. (2024). Assessment of UNESCO Global Geoparks websites for a public geocommunication. International Journal of Geoheritage and Parks, 12(2), 223-240. doi:10.1016/j.ijgeop.2024.04.001.

[17] Catana M. M., & Brilha J. B. (2020). The role of UNESCO Global Geoparks in promoting geosciences education for sustainability. Geoheritage, 12, 1. doi:10.1007/s12371-020-00440-z.

[18] Chen A. Z., Lu Y., & Ng Y. (2015). The principles of geotourism. Berlin: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-3-662-46697-1.

[19] Chen A. Z., Ng Y., Zhang E. K., & Tian M. Z. (Eds.). (2020). Dictionary of geotourism. Singapore: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-981-13-2538-0_873.

[20] Cheung L. T. O. (2016). The effect of geopark visitors’ travel motivations on their willingness to pay for accredited geo-guided tours. Geoheritage, 8(3), 201-209. doi:10.1007/s12371-015-0154-z.

[21] Ciobanu C. (2016). Space and time perception and the geopark’s communities. From mythical geography to heritage interpretation. International Review of Social Research, 6(2), 98-106. doi:10.1515/irsr-2016-0013.

[22] Ciobanu C., & Andrăşanu A. (2020). The role of volunteer management programs in geotourism development. In B.N.Sadry (Ed.), The geotourism industry in the 21st century (pp. 375-386). New York: Apple Academic Press. doi:10.1201/9780429292798.

[23] Commission of the European Communities (2000). A memorandum on lifelong learning. Retrieved from https://www.uil.unesco.org/sites/default/files/medias/fichiers/2023/05/european-communities-a-memorandum-on-lifelong-learning.pdf.

[24] Davies S. R. (2021). An empirical and conceptual note on science communication’s role in society. Science Communication, 43(1), 116-133. doi:10.1177/1075547020971642.

[25] Davies S. R., Franks S., Roche J., Schmidt A. L., Wells R., & Zollo F. (2021). The landscape of European science communication. Journal of Science Communication, 20(03), A01. doi:10.22323/2.20030201.

[26] Digne Declaration (1991). Declaration of the rights of the memory of the Earth. Retrieved from http://www.progeo.ngo/downloads/DIGNE_DECLARATION.pdf. Dowling, R., & Newsome, D. (2006). Geotourism. Oxford: Elsevier.

[27] Drifting Apart (2018). Drifting Apart: Inspiring interpretation on an international scale. Good practice guidelines for the interpretation of geological heritage. Interreg North-ern Periphery and Arctic Programme. Retrieved from https://driftingapart-2014-20.interreg-npa.eu/subsites/driftingapart/WP3_-_Best_Practice_Interpretation_Guidelines_Toolkit.pdf.

[28] Du Y., & Girault Y. (2018). A genealogy of UNESCO Global Geopark: Emergence and evolution. International Journal of Geoheritage and Parks, 6(2), 1-17. doi:10.17149/ijgp.j.issn.2577.4441.2018.02.001.

[29] Eder F. W., & Patzak M. (2004). Geoparks—Geological attractions: A tool for public education, recreation and sustainable economic development. Episodes, 27(3), 162-164. doi:10.18814/epiiugs/2004/v27i3/001.

[30] Escorihuela J. (2017). Ineffectiveness in natural resource management in modern society: Geoparks proposed as possible tools for increasing awareness in the short to medium term. Episodes, 40(1), 57-62. doi:10.18814/epiiugs/2017/v40i1/017008.

[31] European Geoparks Network (2024). EGN magazine. Retrieved from https://www.europeangeoparks.org/?page_id=395.

[32] Farsani N. T., Coelho C. O. A.,Costa C. M. M., & Amrikazemi A. (2024). Geo-knowledge management and geoconservation via geoparks and geotourism. Geoheritage, 6, 185-192. doi:10.1007/s12371-014-0099-7.

[33] Fassoulas C., Nikolakakis E., & Staridas S. (2022). Digital tools to serve geotourism and sustainable development at Psiloritis UNESCO Global Geopark in COVID times and beyond. Geosciences, 12(2), 78. doi:10.3390/geosciences12020078.

[34] Fauzi N. S. M., & Misni A. (2016). Geoheritage cnservation: Indicators affecting the condition and sustainability of geopark -A conceptual review. Procedia -Social and Behavioral Sciences, 222, 676-684. doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2016.05.224.

[35] Fernandes G., Castro E., Tracana R., & Fernandes M. (2023). Educational pathways, tourism and geoconservation. The network of trails of the Estrela Geopark in the dissemination of science, heritage and tourism sustainability. Egitania Sciencia, 32, 91-106.

[36] Fernández Álvarez R. (2020). Geoparks and education: UNESCO Global Geopark Villuercas-Ibores-Jara as a case study in Spain. Geosciences, 10(1), 27. doi:10.3390/geosciences10010027.

[37] Francisco F., & Gonçalves-Sá J. (2019). A little knowledge is a dangerous thing: Excess confidence explains negative attitudes towards science. doi:10.2139/ssrn.33607340. Retrieved from https://arxiv.org/pdf/1903.11193v1.

[38] Frey M. L. (2012). Vulkaneifel, a role model for the European & Global Geoparks Network. In Royal Flemish Academy of Belgium for Science and the Arts (Ed.), Pro-ceedings of the contact forum geoheritage, geoconservation & geotourism. Brussels Belgium: Royal Flemish Academy of Belgium for Science and the Arts.

[39] Frey M. L. (2016). Geoscience public outreach at Messel Pit World Heritage (WHS, Germany)—Hand in hand of world heritage and global geoparks. Schriftenreihe der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Geowissenschaften, 88, 37-44. doi:10.1127/sdgg/88/2016/37.

[40] Frey M. L. (2021). Geotourism—Examining tools for sustainable development. Geosciences, 11(1), 30. doi:10.3390/geosciences11010030.

[41] Frey M. L., Schmitz P., & Weber J. (2021). Messel Pit UNESCO World Heritage fossil site in the UGGp Bergstraße-Odenwald, Germany—Challenges of geoscience pop-ularization in a complex geoheritage context. Geoconservation Research, 4(2), 524-546. doi:10.30486/gcr.2022.1947342.1100.

[42] Garavelli A. C., Gorgoglione M., & Scozzi B. (2002). Managing knowledge transfer by knowledge technologies. Technovation, 22(5),269-279. doi:10.1016/S0166- 4972 (01)00009-8.

[43] Gascoigne T., Schiele B., Leach J., Riedlinger M., Lewenstein B. V., Massarani L., & Broks P. (2020). Communicating science: A global perspective (1st ed.). Canberra, Australia: ANU Press.

[44] Geraldine C. K., Hashim H. S., & Aziz S. (2011). Introducing networks in planning: An example from Langkawi. Planning Malaysia, 1(1), 159-184. doi:10.21837/pm.v1i1.96.

[45] Gill C., & Bullough F. (2017). Geoscience engagement in global development frameworks. Annals of Geophysics, 60. doi:10.4401/ag-7460FastTrack7.

[46] Global Geoparks Network (2024). Global Geoparks Network: International association on geoparks. Retrieved from https://www.globalgeoparksnetwork.org/.

[47] Gonzalez-Tejada C., Du Y., Read M., & Girault Y. (2017). From nature conservation to geotourism development: Examining ambivalent attitudes towards UNESCO directives with the Global Geopark Network. International Journal of Geoheritage, 5(2), 1-20. doi:10.17149/ijg.j.issn.2210.3382.2017.02.001.

[48] Gou G. R., Fang W., Cheung L. T., Fok L., Chow A. S., & Zhang K. (2024). Understanding the determinants of geologically responsible behaviour among geotourists: A multi-destination analysis. Tourism and Hospitality, 5(1), 1-15. doi:10.3390/tourhosp5010001.

[49] Hagendijk R., & Irwin A. (2006). Public deliberation and governance: Engaging with science and technology in contemporary Europe. Minerva, 44(2), 167-184. doi:10.1007/s11024-006-0012-x.

[50] Halim S. A., & Ishak N. A. (2017). Examining community engagement in heritage conservation through geopark experiences from the Asia Pacific region. Kajian Malaysia, 35(Supp. 1), 11-38. doi:10.21315/km2017.35.Supp.1.2.

[51] Halim S. A., Liu O. P., Yussof N., & Sian L. C. (2011). Participation towards heritage conservation: Case of a fishing community in Langkawi Geopark. Planning Malaysia, 1(1), 185-196. doi:10.21837/pmjournal.v1.i1.97.

[52] Henriques M. H., & Brilha J. B. (2017). UNESCO Global Geoparks: A strategy towards global understanding and sustainability. Episodes, 40(4), 349-355. doi:10.18814/epiiugs/2017/v40i4/017036.

[53] Herrera-Franco G., Montalvan-Burbano N., Carrion-Mero P., Jaya-Montalvo M., & Gurumendi-Noriega M. (2021). Worldwide research on geoparks through biblio-metric analysis. Sustainability, 13(3), 1175. doi:10.3390/su13031175.

[54] Hilgartner S. (1990). The dominant view of popularization: Conceptual problems, political uses. Social Studies of Science, 20(3), 519-539. doi:10.1159/000398072.

[55] Hose T. (1998). Mountains of fire from the present to the past-or effectively communicating the wonder of geology to tourists. Geologica Balcanica, 28, 77-86. Retrieved from https://www.geologica-balcanica.eu/sites/default/files/articles/GB%281998%29_28_3-4_pp.77-85%20%28Hose%29.pdf.

[56] Illingworth S., Redfern J., Millington S., & Gray S. (2015). What’s in a name? Exploring the nomenclature of science communication in the UK. F1000Research, 4, 409. doi:10.12688/f1000research.6858.2.

[57] Jones C. (2008). History of geoparks. London Geological Society, Special Publications No. 300 (pp. 1-5). London: The Geological Society. doi:10.1144/SP300.21.

[58] Justice S. C. (2018). UNESCO Global Geoparks, geotourism and communication of the earth sciences: A case study in the Chablais UNESCO Global Geopark, France. Geosciences, 8(5), 149. doi:10.3390/geosciences8050149.

[59] Justice S. C. (2023). Leveraging Earth science research for effective sustainability policy and territorial management in the Chablais UNESCO Global Geopark (France). In L. Kubalíková P. Coratza, M. Pál, Z. Zwoliński, P. N. Irapta, & B. van Wyk de Vries (Eds.), Visages of geodiversity and geoheritage. London: The Geological Society. doi:10.1144/SP530-2022-125.

[60] Katz-Kimchi M., Martin K., Weber V., & Taylor K. (2011). Gauging public engagement with science and technology issues. Poroi, 7(1), 1-7. doi:10.13008/2151-2957.1085.

[61] Kerner J. F., & Hall K. L. (2009). Research dissemination and diffusion: Translation within science and society. Research on Social Work Practice, 19(5), 519-530. doi:10.1177/1049731509335585.

[62] Korbély B., & Ramsay T. (2020). The European Geoparks Week 2019. European Geoparks Network Magazine, 17, 12-15.

[63] Lee Y., & Jayakumar R. (2021). Economic impact of UNESCO Global Geoparks on local communities: Comparative analysis of three UNESCO Global Geoparks in Asia. International Journal of Geoheritage and Parks, 9(2), 189-198. doi:10.1016/j.ijgeop.2021.02.002.

[64] Lee Y., & Jayakumar R. (2021). Economic impact of UNESCO Global Geoparks on local communities: Comparative analysis of three UNESCO Global Geoparks in Asia. International Journal of Geoheritage and Parks, 9(2), 189-198. doi:10.1016/j.ijgeop.2021.03.002.

[65] Li Q., Tian M. Z., Li X. L., Shi Y. H., & Zhou X. (2015). Toward smartphone applications for geoparks information and interpretation systems in China. Open Geosciences, 7(1), 20150060. doi:10.1515/geo-2015-0060.

[66] Lima E. A., Machado M., & Nunes J. C. (2013). Geotourism development in the Azores archipelago (Portugal) as an environmental awareness tool. Czech Journal of Tourism, 2(2), 126-142. doi:10.2478/cjot-2013-0007.

[67] do Livramento Chaves, D. A., & Alvarez, E. B. (2023). Scientific divulgation before the post-truth and the crisis of credibility of science in the context of digital human-ities. Transinformação, 35, Article e237317. doi:10.1590/2318-0889202335e2377317.

[68] Martínez-Martín J. E., Mariñoso P. E., Rosado-González E. M., & Sá A. A. (2023). UNESCO Global Geoparks vs. education: A 10-year bibliometric analysis. Geoheritage, 15, 34. doi:10.1007/s12371-023-00802-3.

[69] Martini G., Zouros N., Zhang J. P., Jin X. C., Komoo I., Border M.,...A.A. (2022). UNESCO Global Geoparks in the “World after”: A multiple-goals roadmap proposal for future discussion. Episodes, 45(1), 29-35. doi:10.18814/epiiugs/2021/021002.

[70] Mawaddah H., Prasetyo B. D., & Hussein A. S. (2024). Branding activities for Raja Ampat Geopark development in the Pentahelix model perspective. Journal La Sociale, 5(2), 296-308. doi:10.37899/journal-la-sociale.v5i2.1066.

[71] McKeever P. (2010, April). Communicating geoheritage: An essential tool to build a strong geopark brand. Paper presented at the 4th International UNESCO Conference on Geoparks, Langkawi, Malaysia.

[72] McKeever P. (2018, September). UNESCO Global Geoparks and agenda 2030. Paper presented at the 8th International Conference on UESCO Global Geoparks, Madonna di Campiglio, Italy.

[73] McKeever P. J., & Zouros N. (2005). Geoparks: Celebrating Earth heritage, sustaining local communities. Episodes, 28(4), 274. doi:10.18814/epiiugs/2005/v28i4/006.

[74] Miller J. D. (1983). Scientific literacy: A conceptual and empirical review. Daedalus: Journal of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences, 112(12), 29-48. Retrieved from https://www.jstor.org/stable/20024852.

[75] Modrej D., Fajmut Štrucl S., & Hartmann G. (2018). Results of the geointerpretation research in the frame of the Danube GeoTour project. Geologija, 61(1), 101-110. doi:10.5474/geologija.2018.007.

[76] Mohd Yusof M. F., Ismail H. N., & Ahmad G. (2019). Branding Langkawi Island as a geopark destination. International Journal of Built Environment and Sustainability, 6(1-2), 7-14. doi:10.11113/ijbes.v6.n1-2.377.

[77] Moliner L., & Mampel L. (2019). The rock garden “Geologist Juan Paricio” (Alcorisa, Maestrazgo Geopark, Spain): An effective example of geosciences popularization. Geoheritage, 11(4), 1869-1878. doi:10.1007/s12371-019-00398-7.

[78] Molokáč M., Kornecká E., Pavolová H., Bakalár T., & Jesenský M. (2023). Online marketing of European geoparks as a landscape promotion tool. Land, 12(4), 803. doi: 10.3390/land12040803.

[79] Nantakat B., & Vorachart V. (2021). Designing tourism identity communication in Satun UNESCO Global Geopark. GeoJournal of Tourism Geosites, 35(2), 275-281. doi: 10.30892/gtg.35202-648.

[80] O’Loughlin, T., & Lemon, K. (2006, September). Observe everything and communicate well:Some top tips for marketing geological heritage. Paper presented at the 2nd UNESCO International Conference on Geoparks, Belfast, Northern Ireland.

[81] Pamungkas K., Sujatna E. T. S., Darsono H., & Haron R. (2020). Geotourism branding through the names of tourism destinations in UNESCO Global Geopark Batur Bali: Morphological and toponymic studies. Geojournal of Tourism and Geosites, 31(3), 966-971. doi:10.30892/gtg.31305-528.

[82] Pásková M. (2018). Can indigenous knowledge contribute to the sustainability management of the Aspiring Rio Coco Geopark, Nicaragua? Geosciences, 8(8), 277. doi: 10.3390/geosciences8080277.

[83] Patzak M., & Eder W. (1998). “UNESCO GEOPARK”: A new programme—A new UNESCO label. Geologica Balcanica, 28(3-4), 33-35. doi:10.52321/GeolBalc.28.3-4.33.

[84] Patrocínio F., Castro E., Loureiro F., Firmino G., Vieira G., Gomes H., & Fernandes M. (2018, September). Communicating science in UNESCO Global Geoparks. Paper presented at the 8th International Conference on UNESCO Global Geoparks, Madonna di Campiglio, Italy.

[85] Portuguese National Commission for UNESCO (2020). Portuguese National Commission for UNESCO 2014 study on the economic value of the connection to UNESCO net-works in Portugal: World heritage sites, biosphere reserves, geoparks and UNESCO chairs. Gland: UNESCO.

[86] Quinzacara-Vicencio K. (2023). Geoscience communication tools in geoconservation: Geological storytelling of Spanish geoparks. (Master’s thesis)Portugal: University of Minho. Retrieved from http://www.dct.uminho.pt/mest/pgg/docs/tese_kevin.pdf.

[87] Rodrigues J., Castro C., Costa e Silva E., & Pereira D. I. (2023b). Geoscientists’ views about science communication: predicting willingness to communicate geoscience. Geoscience Communication, 6(1), 15-25. doi:10.5194/gc-6-15-2023.

[88] Rodrigues J., Costa e Silva E., & Pereira D. I. (2023a). How can geoscience communication foster public engagement with geoconservation? Geoheritage, 15, 32. doi:10.1007/s12371-023-00800-5.

[89] Rogers S. L., Giles S., Dowey N., Greene S. E., Bhatia R., Van Landeghem K., & King C. (2024). “You just look at rocks, and have beards” Perceptions of geology from the United Kingdom: A qualitative analysis from an online survey. Earth Science, Systems and Society, 4, Article 10078. doi:10.3389/esss.2024.10078.

[90] Sagala S., Rosyidie A., Sasongko M. A., & Syahbid M. M. (2018). Who gets the benefits of geopark establishment? A study of Batur Geopark area, Bali Province, Indonesia. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 158, Article 012034. doi:10.1088/1755-1315/158/1/012034.

[91] Sanchez-Cortez J. L., Jaque-Bonilla D., Simbaña-Tasiguano M., Astudillo-Bravo D., & Cabascango-Chiliquinga E. (2022). Participatory strategies applied for the geocon-servation of speleological heritage at the Napo Sumaco Geopark (Ecuador). Episodes, 45(4), 417-429. doi:10.18814/epiiugs/2022/022001.

[92] Santagati S., Ortolano G., Palermiti A. S., Tralongo S., Parisi C., & Cirrincione R. (2019, September). Aspromonte geopark project: Communication and scientific divulgation of a unique geological heritage. Paper presented at the 15th European Geoparks Conference, Sevilla, Spain.

[93] Santangelo N., Amato V., Ascione A., Russo Ermolli E., & Valente E. (2020). Geotourism as a tool for learning: A geoitinerary in the Cilento, Vallo di Diano and Alburni geopark (Southern Italy). Resources, 9(6), 67. doi:10.3390/resources9060067.

[94] Scheufele D. A., Krause N. M., Freiling I., & Brossard D. (2021). What we know about effective public engagement on CRISPR and beyond. PNAS, 118(22), Article e2004835117. doi:10.1073/pnas.2004835117.

[95] Schiele B., Gascoigne T., & Schiele A. (2021). Communicating science:Heterogeneous, multiform and polysemic. In B.Schiele, X.Liu, & M. W.Bauer (Science cultures in a diverse world: Knowing, sharing, caring Eds.), (pp. 3-45). Singapore: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-981-16-5379-7_1.

[96] Septiana A. R., Samodra H., & Lamatenggo Y. N. (2023). Geopark as a participatory collaborative management concept to manage the Raja Ampat Archipelago. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 1163(1), Article 012021. doi:10.1088/1755-1315/1163/1/012021.

[97] Simis M. J., Madden H., Cacciatore M. A., & Yeo S. K. (2016). The lure of rationality: Why does the deficit model persist in science communication? Public Understanding of Science, 25(4), 400-414. doi:10.1177/0963662516629749.

[98] Staples L. H. (1990). Powerful ideas about empowerment. Administration in Social Work, 14(2), 29-42. doi:10.1300/J147v14n02_03.

[99] Stewart I. S. (2024). Advancing disaster risk communications. Earth-Science Reviews, 249, Article 104677. doi:10.1016/j.earscirev.2024.104677.

[100] Stewart I. S., & Lewis D. (2017). Communicating contested geoscience to the public: Moving from ‘matters of fact’ to ‘matters of concern’. Earth-Science Reviews, 174, 122-133. doi:10.1016/j.earscirev.2017.09.003.

[101] Stoffelen A. (2019). Where is the community in geoparks? A systematic literature review and call for attention to the societal embedding of geoparks. Area, 52(1), 97-104. doi:10.1111/area.12549.

[102] Stolz J., & Megerle H. E. (2022). Geotrails as a medium for education and geotourism: Recommendations for quality improvement based on the results of a research project in the Swabian Alb UNESCO Global Geopark. Land, 11(9), 1422. doi:10.3390/land11091422.

[103] Sujatna E. T. S., Pamungkas K., & Sugianto L. P. M. (2022). ‘Let’s take a look…’: Textual meaning of the UNESCO Global Geoparks slogans. Academic Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies, 11(3), 162-178. doi:10.36941/ajis-2022-0075.

[104] Tilden, F. (S. Eds.), 1957). Interpreting our heritage. Chapel Hill, NC:University of North Carolina Press. Trench, B. (2008). Towards an analytical framework of science communication models. In D. Cheng, M. Claessens, T. Gascoigne, J. Metcalfe, B. Schiele, & Shi (Communicating science in social contexts (pp. 119-135). Dordrecht: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-1-4020-8598-7_7.

[105] UK National Commission for UNESCO (2020). The national value of UNESCO designations to the United Kingdom. Retrieved from https://unesco.org.uk/national-value/.

[106] UNESCO (1999). UNESCO geoparks programme: A new initiative to promote a global network of geoparks safeguarding and developing selected areas having signif-icant geological features. Retrieved from https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000115177.

[107] UNESCO (2015). Statutes of the International Geoscience and Geoparks Programme and operational guidelines for UNESCO Global Geoparks. Retrieved from http://www.globalgeopark.org/uploadfiles/2012_9_6/iggp_en_statutes_and_guidelines.pdf.

[108] UNESCO (2016a). UNESCO Global Geoparks: Celebrating earth heritage, sustaining local communities. Retrieved from https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000243650.

[109] UNESCO (2016b). UNESCO Global Geoparks contributing to the sustainable development goals -celebrating earth heritage, sustaining local communities. Retrieved from https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000247741.

[110] UNESCO (2018). 39C/5 Approved programme and budget 2018-2019: First biennium of the 2018-2021 quadrennium. Retrieved from https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000261648.

[111] UNESCO (2024). Global geoparks evaluation document A—Self evaluation. Retrieved from https://www.unesco.org/en/articles/unesco-global-geoparks-review-process-self-evaluation-form.

[112] Vafadari K., & Cooper M. J. M. (2020). Community engagement in Japanese geoparks. In B. N.Sadry (Ed.), The geotourism industry in the 21st century: The origin, prin-ciples, and futuristic approach (pp. 357-373). New York: Century Apple Academic Press.

[113] Van Geert F. (2019). The uses and challenges of the geopark label as a place branding tool. The case of the geopark of the Tremp Basin-Montsec (Catalonia-Spain). International Journal of Geoheritage and Parks, 7(2), 72-84. doi:10.1016/j.ijgeop.2019.03.005.

[114] Van Geert F. (2022). The exhibition of geoheritage in geoparks and geological museums. Museologia e Patrimônio, 15(1), 164-183. doi:10.52192/1984-3917.2022v15n1p164-183.

[115] Xu K. J., & Lei L. (2010, December). Research on the designing of the interpretation panel of geoparks. Paper presented at the 2nd International Conference on Information Science and Engineering, Hangzhou, China. doi:10.1109/ICISE.2010.5689341.

[116] Yang G., Chen Z., Wu F., Tian M., & Li Y. (2013). Fuzzy multiattribute assessment of geoscience popularization in the Global Geoparks of China. Episodes, 36(4), 263-269. doi:10.18814/epiiugs/2013/v36i4/003.

[117] Zouros N. (2004). The European Geoparks Network: Geological heritage protection and local development. Episodes, 27(3), 165-171. doi:10.18814/epiiugs/2004/v27i3/002.

[118] Zouros N. (2016). Global Geoparks Network and the new UNESCO Global Geoparks Programme. Bulletin of the Geological Society of Greece, 50(1), 284-292. doi:10.12681/bgsg.11729.

[119] Zouros N., Pavlides S., Soulakellis N., Chatzipetros A., Vasileiadou K., Valiakos I., & Mpentana K. (2011). Using active fault studies for raising public awareness and sensitisation on seismic hazard: A case study from Lesvos Petrified Forest Geopark, NE Aegean Sea, Greece. Geoheritage, 3, 317-327. doi:10.1007/s12371-011-0044-y.