The geodiversity site of Geopark Ranah Minang Silokek, Indonesia: Promoting geo-education and geotourism through geosite assessment

Ratna Savira Adrianda , Rina Sahara , Ugi Kurnia Gusti

International Journal of Geoheritage and Parks ›› 2025, Vol. 13 ›› Issue (2) : 239 -249.

PDF
International Journal of Geoheritage and Parks ›› 2025, Vol. 13 ›› Issue (2) :239 -249. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijgeop.2024.11.012
Original article
research-article

The geodiversity site of Geopark Ranah Minang Silokek, Indonesia: Promoting geo-education and geotourism through geosite assessment

Author information +
History +
PDF

Abstract

Geopark Ranah Minang Silokek holds unique and diverse geodiversity, encompassing geomorphology, sedimentology, stratigraphy, paleontology, tectonic, structural geology, and complex geological history. This area promises potential to be recognized as a UNESCO Global Geopark, with a geological rock spanning Pre-Tertiary and Neogene epochs. The study focused on assessing 14 prominent geosites to quantitatively evaluate their geological significance, potential educational value, touristic value, degradation risks, and intrinsic values. The study's main goal was to globally promote the area's rich geoheritage among the public and geoscientists. Results from this assessment categorized Geopark Ranah Minang Silokek within the moderate-high value range, with the Silokek Karst Complex and Granit of Sangkiamo identified as high-value geosites. Our study identified that there were 5 geological phases that could be studied and observed in the Geopark Ranah Minang Silokek. The findings underscored the geopark's potential for educational and tourism purposes, highlighting its suitability as a pioneering geo-education site and earth science field laboratory in Sumatra, Indonesia. This study also highlighted future initiatives which would include designing geotourism activities and educational programs within Geopark Ranah Minang Silokek and beyond.

Keywords

geosite / geosite assessment / Geopark Ranah Minang Silokek / geotourism / geo-education / geoheritage / geodiversity

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Ratna Savira Adrianda, Rina Sahara, Ugi Kurnia Gusti. The geodiversity site of Geopark Ranah Minang Silokek, Indonesia: Promoting geo-education and geotourism through geosite assessment. International Journal of Geoheritage and Parks, 2025, 13(2): 239-249 DOI:10.1016/j.ijgeop.2024.11.012

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

References

[1]

N. Akhlidej, Z. Bejjaji, M.A. Zerdeb, S. Chakiri, S. Mehdioui, A. Labriki, … S. Ben Ali. Inventory and quantitative assessment of Devonian geosites in the Azrou-Khenifra Basin (eastern band of the central Hercynian massif, Morocco). International Journal of Geoheritage and Parks, 12 (1) (2024), pp. 113-134, 10.1016/j.ijgeop.2024.01.002

[2]

C. Ansori.Geosite identification in Karangbolong High to support the development of Karangsambung-Karangbolong Geopark candidate, Central Java. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 118 (1) (2018), Article 012014, 10.1088/1755-1315/118/1/012014

[3]

C. Ansori, N.I. Setiawan, I.W. Warmada, H. Yogaswara. Identification of geodiversity and evaluation of geosites to determine geopark themes of the Karangsambung-Karangbolong National Geopark, Kebumen, Indonesia. International Journal of Geoheritage and Parks, 10 (1) (2022), pp. 1-15, 10.1016/j.ijgeop.2022.01.001

[4]

C. Ansori, I.W. Warmada, N.I. Setiawan, H. Yogaswara. Geomorphosite assessment at north Karangsambung-Karangbolong Geopark Kebumen, as tools of Geotourism development. Journal of Geoscience, Engineering, Environment, and Technology, 6 (3) (2021), pp. 164-171, 10.25299/jgeet.2021.6.3.6753

[5]

A. Briggs, D. Newsome, R. Dowling. A proposed governance model for the adoption of geoparks in Australia. International Journal of Geoheritage and Parks, 10 (1) (2021), pp. 160-172, 10.1016/j.ijgeop.2021.12.001

[6]

J. Brilha. Inventory and quantitative assessment of geosites and geodiversity sites: A review. Geoheritage, 8 (2) (2016), pp. 119-134, 10.1007/s12371-014-0139-3

[7]

J. Brilha. Geoheritage and geoparks. E. Reynard J. Brilha (Eds.), Geoheritage: protection, and management, Assessment, Elsevier, Amsterdam (2018), pp. 323-335, 10.1016/B978-0-12-809531-7.00018-6

[8]

M. El Hamidy, E. Errami, N. Orion. Proposed geo-educational activities at the Sidi Bouzid geosite, Safi Province, Marrakech-Safi region, Morocco. International Journal of Geoheritage and Parks, 12 (2) (2024), pp. 209-222, 10.1016/j.ijgeop.2024.03.003

[9]

M. Frey, K. Schäfer, G. Büchel, P. Patzak, R.K. Dowling. Geoparks—A regional, European and global policy. D. Newsome (Ed.), Geotourism: Sustainability, imapacts and management, Elsevier, Amsterdam (2006), pp. 95-117, 10.1016/B978-0-7506-6215-4.50014-2

[10]

G. Gajek, W. Zgłobicki, R. Kołodyńska-Gawrysiak. Geo-educational value of quarries located within the Małopolska Vistula River Gap (E Poland). Geoheritage, 11 (4) (2019), pp. 1335-1351, 10.1007/s12371-019-00395-w

[11]

M. Gray. Geodiversity: Developing the paradigm. Proceedings of the Geologists’ Association, 119 (3-4) (2008), pp. 287-298, 10.1016/S0016-7878(08)80307-0

[12]

M. Gray. Geodiversity: The backbone of geoheritage and geoconservation. E. Reynard, J. Brilha (Eds.), Geoheritage: protection, and management, Assessment, Elsevier, Amsterdam (2018), pp. 13-25, 10.1016/B978-0-12-809531-7.00001-0

[13]

M. Guerini, A. Mantovani, R.B. Khoso, M. Giardino. Exploring the correlation between geoheritage and geodiversity through comprehensive mapping: A study within the Sesia Val Grande UNESCO Global Geopark (NW Italy). Geomorphology, 461 (2024), Article 109298, 10.1016/j.geomorph.2024.109298

[14]

M.S.D. Hadian, B.R. Suganda. Geodiversity, geoheritage and geoparks. Unpad Press, Bandung (2023) (In Indonesian)

[15]

S.W. Hastuti. Kendali tektonik terhadap perkembangan cekungan ekonomi tersier Ombilin [Tectonic control on the development of the Ombilin tertiary economic basin] Universitas Gadjah Mada, Sumatera Barat (1999)

[16]

T.A. Hose. Geotourism and interpretation. D. Newsome R.K. Dowling (Eds.), Geotourism: Sustainability, imapacts and management, Elsevier, Amsterdam (2006), pp. 221-241, 10.1016/B978-0-7506-6215-4.50020-8

[17]

R.F. Kempa, N. Orion. Students’ perception of co-operative learning in earth science fieldwork. Research in Science & Technological Education, 14 (1) (1996), pp. 33-41, 10.1080/0263514960140103

[18]

R.P. Koesoemadinata, T. Matasak. Stratigraphy and sedimentation ombilin basin Central Sumatra (West Sumatra province). IPA, 2006-10 th annual convention proceedings, 1981, May 1981 (1981), pp. 49-82, 10.1007/978-1-4020-4694-0_3

[19]

I.K. Mastika, S.S. Harsono, W. Khristianto, P. Oktawirani, P.S. Hutama. Creative strategies of local resources in managing geotourism in the Ijen Geopark Bondowoso, East Java, Indonesia. International Journal of Geoheritage and Parks, 11 (1) (2023), pp. 149-168, 10.1016/j.ijgeop.2023.01.002

[20]

V.C. Mucivuna, M.D.G. Motta Garcia, E. Reynard.Comparing quantitative methods on the evaluation of scientific value in geosites: Analysis from the Itatiaia National Park, Brazil. Geomorphology, 396 (2022), Article 107988, 10.1016/j.geomorph.2021.107988

[21]

B. Mulyana. Tektonostratigrafi Cekungan Ombilin Sumatera Barat. Bulletin of Scientific Contribution, 3 (2005), pp. 92-102

[22]

M.N. Naimi, A. Cherif. Inventory and assessment of significant scientific Algerian geoheritage: Remarkable geosites from Orania (Western Algeria). International Journal of Geoheritage and Parks, 9 (1) (2021), pp. 13-29, 10.1016/j.ijgeop.2020.09.001

[23]

D. Newsome, R. Dowling. Geoheritage and geotourism. E. Reynard, J. Brilha (Eds.), Geoheritage: protection, and management, Assessment, Elsevier, Amsterdam (2018), pp. 305-321, 10.1016/B978-0-12-809531-7.00017-4

[24]

K.P.M. Nur, C. Chairul. Analisis Vegetasi Tumbuhan Bawah di Kawasan Geopark Silokek Kabupaten Sijunjung [Vegetation analysis of understory plants in the Silokek Geopark area, Sijunjung regency]. Bioscientist: Jurnal Ilmiah Biologi, 11 (1) (2023), pp. 421-432, 10.33394/bioscientist.v11i1.7631 (In Indonesian)

[25]

S. Permanadewi, H. Samodra, R. Irzon, A. Prabowo, C. Ansori. Quantitative assessment for geosites of the Ijen Geopark in Banyuwangi regency, East Java, Indonesia. International Journal of Geoheritage and Parks, 12 (1) (2024), pp. 63-74, 10.1016/j.ijgeop.2024.01.003

[26]

C.D. Prosser, E. Díaz-Martínez, J.G. Larwood. The conservation of geosites: Principles and practice. E. Reynard, J. Brilha (Eds.), Geoheritage: protection, and management, Assessment, Elsevier, Amsterdam (2018), pp. 193-212, 10.1016/B978-0-12-809531-7.000113

[27]

A. Pulunggono, N.R. Cameron. Sumatran microplates, their characteristics and their role in the evolution of the central and south Sumatra basins. (1984)

[28]

M.P. Ram, K.K. Ajay, A. Gopinathan Nair. Geoscience curriculum: Approach through learning taxonomy and outcome based education. Higher Education for the Future, 7 (1) (2020), pp. 22-44, 10.1177/2347631119886403

[29]

H. Reinhart, M.R. Rafida, T. Sofie, R.D. Putra, M.C.R. Matoka, N.S. Maulita, M. Baiquni. Assessment of geodiversity, geosites, and geotourism potential at Menoreh Mountain for designation of geopark area. International Journal of Geoheritage and Parks, 11 (3) (2023), pp. 385-406, 10.1016/j.ijgeop.2023.05.005

[30]

E. Reynard. Geomorphosites and landscapes. Geomorphology: Landforms, processes. Environment, 11 (3) (2005), pp. 181-188, 10.4000/geomorphology.338

[31]

F. Russo, C. Rindone. Aggregate models for planning nautical tourism: Basic, trend and seasonal demand. Case Studies on Transport Policy, 10 (4) (2022), pp. 1980-1987, 10.1016/j.cstp.2022.08.008

[32]

R. Sahara, B. Setiawa. Assessment of geosite and geomorphosite at South Solok Aspiring Geopark area. Journal of Geoscience, Engineering, Environment, and Technology, 7 (3) (2022), pp. 3-9, 10.25299/jgeet.2022.7.3.9520

[33]

P.H. Silitonga, D. Kastowo. Geological map of the Solok Quadrangle (5/VIII), Sumatra, scale 1: 250,000. Geological Survey of Indonesia, Ministry of Mines, Bandung (1975)

[34]

M. Simbaña-Tasiguano, E. Cabascango-Chiliquinga, J.L. Sánchez-Cortez, A. García-Frank, H. Grefa-Shiguango. Geoeducation strategies in the Amazon, Napo Sumaco aspiring UNESCO Global Geopark. International Journal of Geoheritage and Parks, 12 (3) (2024), pp. 465-484, 10.1016/j.ijgeop.2024.07.008

[35]

B.V.R. Singh, A. Sen, L.M. Verma, R. Mishra, V. Kumar. Assessment of potential and limitation of Jhamarkotra area: A perspective of geoheritage, geo park and geotourism. International Journal of Geoheritage and Parks, 9 (2) (2021), pp. 157-171, 10.1016/j.ijgeop.2021.04.001

[36]

E. Spyrou, H. Maroukian, G. Saitis, N. Evelpidou, A. Karkani. Promoting geo-education and geotourism through geosite assessment: A case study from Acheron-Parga, Epirus, Greece. International Journal of Geoheritage and Parks, 12 (2) (2024), pp. 256-277, 10.1016/j.ijgeop.2024.04.003

[37]

F.A.H. Surbakti, M. Fadhli, A. Maulidita, U.K. Gusti. Comprehensive evaluation for Ranah Minang Silokek Geopark to UNESCO Global Geopark (UGG), West Sumatra. M.A. Yusuf, W.T. Koesmawardani, A.S.W. Andisa (Eds.), Proceedings of the Bandung Joint Convention Jakarta Selatan (2021, Ikatan Ahli Teknik Perminyakan Indonesia (IATMI), 2021)

[38]

W. Zgłobicki, B. Baran-Zgłobicka. Geomorphological heritage as a tourist attraction. A case study in Lubelskie povince, SE Poland. Geoheritage, 5 (2) (2013), pp. 137-149, 10.1007/s12371-013-0076-6

PDF

272

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/