Measuring degradation risk levels of resources in sustainable geotourism development: A multi-criteria decision making (MCDM) approach under spherical fuzzy environments

Abstract

Natural and anthropogenic processes may deteriorate the integrity of geotourism resources. Thus, one of the top concerns in developing geoconservation measures is determining how risky geosites are for degradation. Although studies have made significant contributions to the literature, they also introduce a fundamental problem of objectivity. In particular, evaluators continue to discuss the objectivity problem caused by hesitant, uncertain, and ambiguous information while evaluating geosites. This study quantifies the risk of degradation of geosites using multi-criteria decision making (MCDM) techniques integrated into fuzzy environments. For this purpose, we used multi attributive ideal-real comparative analysis (MAIRCA) methods based on spherical fuzzy environments in addition to the level based weight assessment (LBWA) technique. We tested this proposed methodology as a case study on twenty geosites selected from the Kula-Salihli UNESCO Global Geopark (KSUGGp) in Türkiye. According to the analysis, we observed significant differences between traditional geosite evaluation approaches and the proposed approach in weighting the criteria and ranking the risk levels of geosites. We expect the proposed approach to make a methodological contribution that can form the basis for the geosite evaluation literature.

Keywords

sustainability / geotourism / spherical fuzzy sets / multi-criteria decision making / UNESCO Geopark / Türkiye

References

[1] M. Akbulut, Ö. Sümer, C. Akal, H. İnaner. Evaluating geological heritage around UNESCO World Heritage assets: A study from the Dikili and Madra Mountain (Western Anatolia, İzmir, Türkiye). Geoheritage, 15 (2) (2022), p. 59, 10.1007/s12371-023-00821-0

[2] B. Ayan, S. Abacıoğlu, M.P. Basilio. Comprehensive review of the novel weighting methods for multi-criteria decision-making. Information, 14 (5) (2023), p. 285, 10.3390/info14050285

[3] A.S. Aytaç, T. Demir, D. Maddy, D. Bridgland. The Kula-Salihli UNESCO Geopark: Spectacular records of Quaternary volcanism, fluvial and landscape evolution and Quaternary environmental change. Proceedings of the Geologists’ Association, 134 (4) (2023), pp. 416-431, 10.1016/j.pgeola.2022.06.008

[4] I.M. Bollati, B.C. Lenz, V. Caironi. A multidisciplinary approach for physical landscape analysis: Scientific value and risk of degradation of outstanding landforms in the glacial plateau of the Loana Valley (Central-Western Italian Alps). Italian Journal of Geosciences, 139 (2) (2020), pp. 233-251, 10.3301/IJG.2020.01

[5] D. Božanić, D. Jurišić, D. Erkić. LBWA-Z-MAIRCA model supporting decision making in the army. Operational Research in Engineering Sciences: Theory and Applications, 3 (2) (2020), pp. 87-110, 10.31181/oresta2003087b

[6] D. Božanić, D. Pamucar, I. Badi, D. Tešić. A decision support tool for oil spill response strategy selection: Application of LBWA and Z MABAC methods. OPSEARCH, 60 (1) (2023), pp. 24-58, 10.1007/s12597-022-00605-0

[7] J. Brilha. Inventory and quantitative assessment of geosites and geodiversity sites: A review. Geoheritage, 8 (2) (2016), pp. 119-134, 10.1007/s12371-014-0139-3

[8] J. Brilha. Geoheritage: Inventories and evaluation. E. Reynard, J. Brilha (Eds.), Geoheritage: Assessment, protection and management, Elsevier, Amsterdam (2018), pp. 69-86

[9] V.M. Bruschi, A. Cendrero. Geosite evaluation; can we measure intangible values?. Alpine and Mediterranean Quaternary, 18 (1) (2005), pp. 293-306

[10] V.M. Bruschi, P. Coratza. Geoheritage and environmental impact assessment (EIA). E. Reynard, J. Brilha (Eds.), Geoheritage: protection, and management, Assessment, Elsevier, Amsterdam (2018)

[11] C. Burek. The role of LGAPs (local geodiversity action plans) and welsh RIGS as local drivers for geoconservation within geotourism in Wales. Geoheritage, 4 (2012), pp. 45-63, 10.1007/s12371-012-0054-4

[12] E. Cameron. Objectivity in geosites inventorying and assessment methods. Geoheritage, 16 (2024), p. 30 doi: 10.1007/s12371-024-00938-w

[13] O. Cheablam, P. Tansakul, B. Nantakat, S. Pantaruk. Correction to: Assessment of the geotourism resource potential of the Satun UNESCO Global Geopark, Thailand. Geoheritage, 13 (2021), p. 102, 10.1007/s12371-021-00638-9

[14] R. Crofts, J.E. Gordon, J. Brilha, M. Gray, J. Gunn, J. Larwood, … G.L. Worboys. Guidelines for geoconservation in protected and conserved areas. Best Practice Protected Area Guidelines Series, Vol. 31, IUCN, Gland, Switzerland (2020)

[15] M. Deveci, E. Özcan, R. John, C.-F. Covrig, D. Pamučar.A study on offshore wind farm siting criteria using a novel interval-valued fuzzy-rough based Delphi method. Journal of Environmental Management, 270 (2020), Article 110916, 10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.110916

[16] R. Dowling. Geotourism’s contribution to sustainable tourism. M. Hughes D. Weaver C. Pforr (Eds.), Thepractice of sustainable tourism, Routledge, London (2015), pp. 207-227

[17] R.K. Dowling. Global geotourism—An emerging form of sustainable tourism. Czech Journal of Tourism, 2 (2) (2013), pp. 59-79, 10.2478/cjot-2013-0004

[18] F. Ecer.An extended MAIRCA method using intuitionistic fuzzy sets for coronavirus vaccine selection in the age of COVID-19. Neural Computing and Applications, 34 (7) (2022), pp. 5603-5623, 10.1007/s00521-021-06728-7

[19] F. Ecer, D. Pamucar, A. Mardani, M. Alrasheedi. Assessment of renewable energy resources using new interval rough number extension of the level based weight assessment and combinative distance-based assessment. Renewable Energy, 170 (2021), pp. 1156-1177, 10.1016/j.renene.2021.02.004

[20] İ. Ege. The determination of the erosion effect on the geomorphological characteristics and formation of Kula (Kula/Manisa) fairy chimneys by Rusle method. The Journal of Academic Social Science Studies, 74 (2019), pp. 455-479, 10.9761/JASSS7961

[21] M. Erdoğan. Assessing farmers’ perception to agriculture 4.0 technologies: A new interval-valued spherical fuzzy sets based approach. International Journal of Intelligence Systems, 37 (2) (2022), pp. 1751-1801

[22] N. Farsani, C. Coelho, C. Costa. Geotourism and geoparks as novel strategies for socio-economic development in rural areas. International Journal of Tourism Research, 13 (1) (2011), pp. 68-81, 10.1002/jtr.800

[23] N. Ferrer, J. Vegas, I. Galindo, G. Lozano. A geoheritage valuation to prevent environmental degradation of a new volcanic landscape in the Canary Islands. Land Degradation & Development, 34 (9) (2023), pp. 2494-2507, 10.1002/ldr.4623

[24] A. Gamal, M. Abdel-Basset, I.M. Hezam, K.M. Sallam, A.M. Alshamrani, I.A. Hameed. A computational sustainable approach for energy storage systems performance evaluation based on spherical-fuzzy MCDM with considering uncertainty. Energy Reports, 11 (2024), pp. 1319-1341, 10.1016/j.egyr.2023.12.058

[25] E. García-Ortiz, I. Fuertes-Gutiérrez, E. Fernández-Martínez. Concepts and terminology for the risk of degradation of geological heritage sites: Fragility and natural vulnerability, a case study. Proceedings of the Geologists' Association, 125 (4) (2014), pp. 463-479, 10.1016/j.pgeola.2014.06.003

[26] Geopark Municipalities Union (2023). Fossil footprints. Retrieved from https://jeoparkbelediyelerbirligi.com/s82_prehistorik-fosil-insan-ayak-izleri.aspx. (In Turkish)

[27] J.E. Gordon. Geoheritage, geotourism and the cultural landscape: Enhancing the visitor experience and promoting geoconservation. Geosciences, 8 (4) (2018), p. 136, 10.3390/geosciences8040136

[28] J.E. Gordon, R.M.L. Wignall, V. Brazier, R. Crofts, D. Tormey. Planning for climate change impacts on geoheritage interests in protected and conserved areas. Geoheritage, 14 (4) (2022), p. 126, 10.1007/s12371-022-00753-1

[29] W. Guo, S. Chung. Using tourism carrying capacity to strengthen UNESCO Global Geopark management in Hong Kong. Geoheritage, 11 (1) (2019), pp. 193-205, 10.1007/s12371-017-0262-z

[30] T.A. Hose. Selling the story of Britain’s stone. Environmental Interpretation, 10 (2) (1995), pp. 16-17

[31] N. Kazancı. Geological background and three vulnerable geosites of the Kızılcahamam-Çamlıdere Geopark project in Ankara, Turkey. Geoheritage, 4 (4) (2012), pp. 249-261, 10.1007/s12371-012-0064-2

[32] L. Kubalíková. Assessing geotourism resources on a local level: A case study from southern Moravia (Czech Republic). Resources, 8 (3) (2019), p. 150, 10.3390/resources8030150

[33] L. Kubalíková, A. Bajer, Balkov’a M., Kirchner K., Machar I.. Geodiversity action plans as a tool for developing sustainable tourism and environmental education. Sustainability, 14 (10) (2022), p. 6043, 10.3390/su14106043

[34] L. Kubalíková, E. Drápela, K. Kirchner, A. Bajer, M. Balková, F. Kuda. Urban geotourism development and geoconservation: Is it possible to find a balance?. Environmental Science and Policy, 121 (2021), pp. 1-10, 10.1016/j.envsci.2021.03.016

[35] Kula-Salihli UNESCO Global Geopark (2023). Geosites. Retrieved from https://kulasalihligeopark.com/jeositlerimiz. (In Turkish)

[36] F. Kutlu Gündoğdu, C. Kahraman. A novel spherical fuzzy analytic hierarchy process and its renewable energy application. Soft Computing, 24 (6) (2020), pp. 4607-4621, 10.1007/s00500-019-04222-w

[37] A.A. Kutty, M. Kuçukvar, N.C. Onat, B. Ayvaz, G.M. Abdella. Measuring sustainability, resilience and livability performance of European smart cities: A novel fuzzy expert-based multi-criteria decision support model. Cities, 137 (2023), Article 104293, 10.1016/j.cities.2023.104293

[38] A. Lima, J.C. Nunes, J. Brilha. Monitoring of the visitors impact at “Ponta da Ferraria e Pico das Camarinhas” geosite (São Miguel Island, Azores UNESCO Global Geopark, Portugal). Geoheritage, 9 (4) (2017), pp. 495-503, 10.1007/s12371-016-0203-2

[39] F.F. de Lima, J.B. Brilha, E. Salamuni. Inventorying geological heritage in large territories: A methodological proposal applied to Brazil. Geoheritage, 2 (3) (2010), pp. 91-99, 10.1007/s12371-010-0014-9

[40] G.M. Marrosu, T. Balvis. Environmental impact assessment in climbing activities: A new method to develop a sustainable tourism in geological and nature reserves. Geoheritage, 12 (1) (2020), p. 11, 10.1007/s12371-020-00427-w

[41] A. Menekşe, H. Camgöz Akdağ.Medical waste disposal planning for healthcare units using spherical fuzzy CRITIC-WASPAS. Applied Soft Computing, 144 (2023), Article 110480, 10.1016/j.asoc.2023.110480

[42] V.C. Mucivuna, M.G.M. Garcia, E. Reynard, P.A.S. Rosa. Integrating geoheritage into the management of protected areas: A case study of the Itatiaia National Park, Brazil. International Journal of Geoheritage and Parks, 10 (2) (2022), pp. 252-272, 10.1016/j.ijgeop.2022.04.004

[43] M.N. Naimi, A. Cherif. Inventory and assessment of significant scientific Algerian geoheritage: Case of remarkable geosites from Orania (Western Algeria). International Journal of Geoheritage and Parks, 9 (1) (2021), pp. 13-29, 10.1016/j.ijgeop.2020.09.001

[44] E. Navarrete, F. Morante-Carballo, J. Dueñas-Tovar, P. Carrión-Mero, M. Jaya-Montalvo, E. Berrezueta. Assessment of geosites within a natural protected area: A case study of Cajas National Park. Sustainability, 14 (5) (2022), p. 3120, 10.3390/su14053120

[45] D. Newsome, R. Dowling. Geoheritage and geotourism. E. Reynard, J. Brilha (Eds.), Geoheritage: protection, and management, Assessment, Elsevier, Amsterdam (2018), pp. 305-321

[46] A.R.F. Nunes, M.H. Henriques, J.M. Dias, R.D. Janeiro. Raising awareness about geoheritage at risk in Portugal: The GeoXplora as a case study. Geoheritage, 14 (2) (2022), p. 59, 10.1007/s12371-022-00699-4

[47] D. Pamučar, M. Behzad, D. Božanić, M. Behzad. Decision making to support sustainable energy policies corresponding to agriculture sector: Case study in Iran’s Caspian Sea coastline. Journal of Cleaner Production, 292 (2021), Article 125302, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.125302

[48] D. Pamučar, G.Ö. Faruk.Evaluation of the European container ports using a new hybrid fuzzy LBWA-CoCoSo’B techniques. Expert Systems with Applications, 203 (2022), Article 117463, 10.1016/j.eswa.2022.117463

[49] D. Pamučar, M. Mihajlović, R. Obradović, P. Atanasković. Novel approach to group multi-criteria decision making based on interval rough numbers: Hybrid DEMATEL-ANP-MAIRCA model. Expert Systems with Applications, 88 (2017), pp. 58-80, 10.1016/j.eswa.2017.06.037

[50] D. Pamučar, S.P. Tarle, T. Parezanovic. New hybrid multi-criteria decision-making DEMATELMAIRCA model: Sustainable selection of a location for the development of multimodal logistics Centre. Economic Research-Ekonomska Istrazivanja, 31 (1) (2018), pp. 1641-1665, 10.1080/1331677X.2018.1506706

[51] D. Pamučar, L. Vasin, L. Lukovac. Selection of railway level crossings for investing in security equipment using hybrid DEMATEL-MARICA model. Paper presented at the 16th international scientific-expert conference on railway, Railcon (2014), 10.13140/2.1.2707.6807

[52] D.C. Papp. Geological heritage in the northern Apuseni Mountains (Romania): Degradation risk assessment of selected geosites. International Journal of Geoheritage and Parks, 11 (4) (2023), pp. 574-591, 10.1016/j.ijgeop.2023.10.001

[53] M. Pásková, J. Zelenka, T. Ogasawara, B. Zavala, I. Astete. The ABC concept-value added to the Earth heritage interpretation?. Geoheritage, 13 (2) (2021), p. 38, 10.1007/s12371-021-00558-8

[54] C.D. Prosser. Geoconservation, quarrying and mining: Opportunities and challenges illustrated through working in partnership with the mineral extraction industry in England. Geoheritage, 10 (2) (2018), pp. 259-270, 10.1007/s12371-016-0206-z

[55] T.O. Rabelo, M.T.M. Diniz, I.G.D. de Araújo, M.L. de Oliveira Terto, L.S. Queiroz, P.V.N. Araújo, P. Pereira. Risk of degradation and coastal flooding hazard on geoheritage in protected areas of the semi-arid coast of Brazil. Water, 15 (14) (2023), p. 2564, 10.3390/w15142564

[56] D.S. Santos, E. Reynard, K.L. Mansur, J.C.S. Seoane. The specificities of geomorphosites and their influence on assessment procedures: A methodological comparison. Geoheritage, 11 (4) (2019), pp. 2045-2064, 10.1007/s12371-019-00411-z

[57] L. Selmi, T.S. Canesin, R. Gauci, P. Pereira, P. Coratza. Degradation risk assessment: Understanding the impacts of climate change on geoheritage. Sustainability, 14 (7) (2022), p. 4262, 10.3390/su14074262

[58] C. Sharples. Concepts and principles of geoconservation. Tasmanian Parks & Wildlife Service, Hobart (2002)

[59] S. Sremac, Ž. Stević, D. Pamučar, M. Arsić, B. Matić. Evaluation of a third-party logistics (3PL) provider using a rough SWARA-WASPAS model based on a new rough dombi aggregator. Symmetry, 10 (8) (2018), p. 305, 10.3390/sym10080305

[60] A. Sunkar, A.P. Lakspriyanti, E. Haryono, M. Brahmi, P. Setiawan, A.F. Jaya. Geotourism hazards and carrying capacity in geosites of Sangkulirang- Mangkalihat karst, Indonesia. Sustainability, 14 (3) (2022), p. 1704, 10.3390/su14031704

[61] S. Tepe, S. Eti. Evaluation of qualifications of emergency assembly areas in Istanbul using the spherical fuzzy MAIRCA process. İDEALKENT, 16 (44) (2024), pp. 1014-1036, 10.31198/idealkent.1431280

[62] G.A. Tessema, J. van Der Borg, A.S. Minale, A. Van Rompaey, E. Adgo, J. Nyssen, … J. Poesen. Inventory and assessment of geosites for geotourism development in the eastern and southeastern Lake Tana region, Ethiopia. Geoheritage, 13 (2) (2021), p. 43, 10.1007/s12371-021-00560-0

[63] A.E. Torkayesh, D. Pamucar, F. Ecer, P. Chatterjee.An integrated BWM-LBWA-CoCoSo framework for evaluation of healthcare sectors in Eastern Europe. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, 78 (2021), Article 101052, 10.1016/j.seps.2021.101052

[64] İ. Ulusoy, M.A. Sarıkaya, A.K. Schmitt, E. Şen, M. Danišík, E. Gümüş. Volcanic eruption eye-witnessed and recorded by prehistoric humans. Quaternary Science Reviews, 212 (2019), pp. 187-198, 10.1016/j.quascirev.2019.03.030

[65] C.K. Wu, C.-N. Wang, T.K.T. Le, N.-L. Nhieu. Sustainable agritourism location investigation in Vietnam by a spherical fuzzy extension of integrated decision-making approach. Sustainability, 14 (17) (2022), p. 10555, 10.3390/su141710555

[66] M. Žižović, D. Pamučar. New model for determining criteria weights: Level-based weight assessment (LBWA) model. Decision Making: Applications in Management and Engineering, 2 (2) (2019), pp. 126-137, 10.31181/dmame1902102z

[67] K. Zorlu, V. Dede. The geomorphosite assessment by trapezoidal bipolar fuzzy information-based CRITIC-MABAC method. Geoheritage, 15 (3) (2023), p. 94, 10.1007/s12371023-00859-0

[68] K. Zorlu, V. Dede, B.Ş. Zorlu, S. Serin.Quantitative assessment of geoheritage with the GAM and MEREC-based PROMETHEE-GAIA method. Resources Policy, 84 (2023), Article 103796, 10.1016/j.resourpol.2023.103796

[69] K. Zorlu, S. Polat, A. Yılmaz, V. Dede. An integrated fuzzy-rough multi-criteria group decision-making model for quantitative assessment of geoheritage resources.Resources Policy, 90 (2024), Article 104773, 10.1016/j.resourpol.2024.104773

[70] K. Zorlu, M. Tuncer, A. Yılmaz. Assessment of resources for geotourism development: Integrated SWARA-COBRA approach under spherical fuzzy environments. Geoheritage, 16 (3) (2024), p. 89, 10.1007/s12371-024-00993-3