Assessment of educational potential in Arouca and Estrela UNESCO Global Geoparks (Portugal) for multi-level students and teachers

Abstract

The current trend in education is to adopt a direct and efficient system that adapts to the needs of students at all levels. This approach emphasizes the importance of creating an accessible and enjoyable learning environment that integrates with the social context. The main purpose of this study is to gain a comprehensive understanding of the educational contribution of UGGps, irrespective of their level, origin, or purpose of visit, beyond the acquisssition of knowledge. The UNESCO Global Geoparks (UGGps) are recognized as educational models in the field of geosciences and sustainability due to their territorial management plan and purpose. This study examines the activities carried out in the Arouca and Estrela UGGps in Portugal, using validated questionnaires to gather feedback from students and teachers. The analysis aims to identify the strengths, challenges, and overall effectiveness of these UGGps as an alternative approach to multidisciplinary education. With a total sample of 325 students and 167 teachers, the results, from the students and teachers perspective, show a positive and valid environment for multilevel education reflected on a positive answer rate of 86% among students and 88% among teachers. As it is shown in the results, UGGps are valid territories for multilevel teaching of Earth Sciences and many other subjects. This conclusions represent a great opportunity to promote heritage protection and sustainable development education from these territories, something that, in fact, is extremely relevant in the social context in which we find ourselves.

Keywords

education / UNESCO Global Geoparks / geosciences / Arouca / Estrela

References

[1] D. Anderson, J. Kisiel, M. Storksdieck. Understanding teachers' perspectives on field trips: Discovering common ground in three countries. Curator, 49 (3) (2006), pp. 365-386, 10.1111/j.2151-6952.2006.tb00229.x

[2] P. Azevedo, E. Castro, F. Loureiro, M. Fernandes. The geological heritage of Estrela Geopark and the development of a geotourism strategy: Challenges and opportunities. Paper presented at the 10th International Conference on Geomorphology, Coimbra, Portugal (2022, September), 10.5194/icg2022-586

[3] M. Behrendt, T. Franklin. A review of research on school field trips and their value in education. International Journal of Environmental & Science Education, 9 (3) (2014), pp. 235-245, 10.12973/ijese.2014.213a

[4] J. Cabero, C.M.C. del Llorentes. Entornos Personales de Aprendizaje (PLE): Valoración Educativa a través de Expertos [Personal learning environments (PLE): Educational assessment through experts]. Areté Revista Digital del Doctorado en Educación de la Universidad Central de Venezuela, 1 (1) (2015), pp. 7-19

[5] M.M. Catana, J.B. Brilha. The role of UNESCO Global Geoparks in promoting geosciences education for sustainability. Geoheritage, 12 (1) (2020), p. 1, 10.1007/s12371-020-00440-z

[6] L.T.O. Cheung. The effect of geopark visitors’ travel motivations on their willingness to pay for accredited geo-guided tours. Geoheritage, 8 (3) (2016), pp. 201-209, 10.1007/s12371-015-0154-z

[7] L.T.O. Cheung, L. Fok, W. Fang. Understanding geopark visitors’ preferences and willingness to pay for global geopark management and conservation. Journal of Ecotourism, 13 (1) (2014), pp. 35-51, 10.1080/14724049.2014.941848

[8] L. Colucci-Gray, A. Perazzone, M. Dodman, E. Camino. Science education for sustainability, epistemological reflections and educational practices: From natural sciences to trans-disciplinarity. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 8 (1) (2013), pp. 127-183, 10.1007/s11422-012-9405-3

[9] L. Comănescu, A. Nedelea. Geoheritage and geodiversity education in Romania: Formal and non-formal analysis based on questionnaires. Sustainability, 12 (21) (2020), p. 9180, 10.3390/su12219180

[10] E. Drápela, A. Boháč, H. Böhm, K. Zágoršek. Motivation and preferences of visitors in the Bohemian Paradise UNESCO Global Geopark. Geosciences, 11 (3) (2021), p. 116, 10.3390/geosciences11030116

[11] F.W. Eder, M. Patzak. Geoparks geological attractions: A tool for public education, recreation and sustainable economic development. Episodes, 27 (3) (2004), pp. 162-164, 10.18814/epiiugs/2004/v27i3/001

[12] R. Fernández Álvarez. Geoparks and education: UNESCO Global Geopark Villuercas-Ibores-Jara as a case study in Spain. Geosciences, 10 (1) (2020), p. 27, 10.3390/geosciences10010027

[13] D.R. Ferreira, J. Valdati. Geoparks and sustainable development: Systematic review. Geoheritage, 15 (1) (2023), p. 6, 10.1007/s12371-022-00775-9

[14] C.M. Frantz, F.S. Mayer. The importance of connection to nature in assessing environmental education programs. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 41 (2014), pp. 85-89, 10.1016/j.stueduc.2013.10.001

[15] J.C. Gill. Geology and the sustainable development goals. Episodes, 40 (1) (2017), pp. 70-76, 10.18814/epiiugs/2017/v40i1/017010

[16] M.B. Goldwater, L. Schalk. Relational categories as a bridge between cognitive and educational research. Psychological Bulletin, 142 (7) (2016), p. 729, 10.1037/bul0000043

[17] M.H. Henriques, J. Brilha. UNESCO Global Geoparks: A strategy towards global understanding and sustainability. Episodes: Journal of International Geoscience, 40 (4) (2017), pp. 349-355, 10.18814/epiiugs/2017/v40i4/017036

[18] M.H. Henriques, M.L. Canales, A. García-Frank, M. Gomez-Heras. Accessible geoparks in Iberia: A challenge to promote geotourism and education for sustainable development. Geoheritage, 11 (2) (2020), pp. 471-484, 10.1007/s12371-018-0300-5

[19] M.H. Henriques, C. Tomaz, A.A. Sá. The Arouca Geopark (Portugal) as an educational resource: A case study. Episodes: Journal of International Geoscience, 35 (4) (2012), pp. 481-488, 10.18814/epiiugs/2012/v35i4/004

[20] R. Hernández Sampieri, C. Fernández Collado, P. Baptista Lucio.Metodología de la investigación [Research methodology]. Vol. 4, McGraw-Hill Interamericana, México (2018), pp. 310-386

[21] M. Jaafar, A.O.S. Nordin, S. Abdullah, A. Marzuki. Geopark ecotourism product development: A study on tourist differences. Asian Social Science, 10 (11) (2014), p. 42, 10.5539/ass.v10n11p42

[22] R.M. Jaeger. Survey methods in educational research. R.M. Jaeger (Ed.), Complementary methods for research in education, American Educational Research Association, Washington, DC (1988)

[23] H.F. Kaiser. An index of factorial simplicity. Psychometrika, 39 (1) (1974), pp. 31-36, 10.1007/BF02291575

[24] D.A. Kurniawan, A. Astalini, D. Darmaji, R. Melsayanti. Students' attitude towards natural sciences. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education, 8 (3) (2019), pp. 455-460, 10.11591/ijere.v8i3.16395

[25] R. Likert. A technique for the measurement of attitudes. Archives of Psychology, 140 (1932), pp. 1-55

[26] A. Lima, C. Vasconcelos, N. Félix, J. Barros, A. Mendonça. Field trip activity in an ancient gold mine: Scientific literacy in informal education. Public Understanding of Science, 19 (3) (2010), pp. 322-334, 10.1177/0963662509104725

[27] J.E. Martínez-Martín, P.E. Mariñoso, E.M. Rosado-González,A.A. Sá. UNESCO Global Geoparks vs. education: A 10-year bibliometric analysis. Geoheritage, 15 (1) (2023), p. 34, 10.1007/s12371-023-00802-3

[28] J. Maskall, A. Stokes.Designing effective fieldwork for the environmental and natural sciences (2008) Retrieved from: https://n9.cl/q1q3c

[29] S. Matsuki, M. Kuri, Y. Isoda. Questionnaire survey on tourist needs for geopark/geotourism. Proceedings of the General Meeting of the Association of Japanese Geographers, 2016 (2016), p. 100277, 10.14866/ajg.2016s.0_100277 (Spring)

[30] N. Orion, A. Hofstein. The measurement of students' attitudes towards scientific field trips. Science Education, 75 (5) (1991), pp. 513-523, 10.1002/sce.3730750503

[31] M.E. Pérez-Romero, J. Álvarez-García, M.B. Flores-Romero, D. Jiménez-Islas. UNESCO Global Geoparks 22 years after their creation: Analysis of scientific production. Land, 12 (3) (2023), p. 671, 10.3390/land1203067

[32] J. Robinson. Likert scale. A.C. Michalos (Ed.), Encyclopedia of quality of life and well-being research, Springer, Dordrecht (2014), 10.1007/978-94-007-0753-5_1654

[33] E.M. Rosado-González, A.A. Sá, J.L. Palacio-Prieto. UNESCO Global Geoparks in Latin America and the Caribbean, and their contribution to agenda 2030 sustainable development goals. Geoheritage, 12 (2) (2020), p. 36, 10.1007/s12371-020-00459-2

[34] E.M.R.da Silva. The contribution of the European UNESCO Global Geoparks for the Agenda 2030 for sustainable development—A study based on several data sources (2021) Retrieved from: https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/395729215.pdf

[35] L. Sütő, Z. Ésik, R. Nagy, E. Homoki, T.J. Novák, J. Szepesi. Promoting geoheritage through a field based geo-education event: A case study of the Hungarian geotope day in the Bükk Region Geopark. Geoconservation Research, 3 (2) (2020), pp. 81-96, 10.30486/gcr.2020.1906171.1029

[36] M. Wang, K. Tan, Y. Li, Y. Xie, W. Xiao, Y. Xu, Y. Tian. Study on the sustainable development of popular science tourism based on the SWOT analysis for the Xiangxi UNESCO Global Geopark. Sustainability, 15 (1) (2023), p. 122, 10.3390/su150101

[37] S. Zecha, A. Regelous. Promoting geodiversity education by using earthcaching in National Geoparks. Geoheritage, 10 (4) (2018), pp. 637-643, 10.1007/s12371-018-0280-5