Urban amusement parks of Midnapore (West Bengal, India): Utility, accessibility and structural diversity

Abstract

Urban parks significantly enhance the urban residents' quality of life, offering spaces for recreation that positively impact physical and mental well-being. This comprehensive study, involving 400 diverse respondents, delves into urban park usage, visitor preferences, and attributes, shedding light on their crucial role in urban planning and community welfare. Demographic factors such as age, gender, religion, education, and health were analyzed, underscoring the importance of inclusive park design. Most participants frequented parks, favoring walking, biking, and motorbikes for transportation. While accessibility generally received positive feedback, some respondents faced challenges due to long travel times, hinting at potential distribution disparities. The study also explored willingness to pay for park access, revealing varying pricing opinions and aiding in sustainable park management decisions. Satisfaction levels varied across parks, with higher scores associated with diverse green spaces, well-maintained facilities, and safety measures. Preferences were influenced by factors like distance and cost. Structural diversity analysis highlighted varying degrees of diversity among parks, emphasizing the importance of diverse amenities, accessible design, and sustainable management practices. These insights offer valuable guidance for urban planners and park authorities to address community needs and foster well-being and community connection in urban spaces.

Keywords

urban parks / park usage patterns / park accessibility / park amenities / perceived benefits / structural diversity / park preferences

References

[1] J. Aasetre, V. Gundersen, O.I. Vistad, E.J. Holtrop. Recreational preferences along a naturalness-development continuum: Results from surveys in two unequal urban forests in Europe. Journal of Outdoor Recreation and Tourism, 16 (2016), pp. 58-68, 10.1016/j.jort.2016.09.006

[2] M. Abkar, M. Kamal, M. Mariapan, S. Maulan, M. Sheybanic. The role of urban green spaces in mood change. Australian Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences, 4 (10) (2010), pp. 5352-5361

[3] A. Addas. Exploring the pattern of use and accessibility of urban green spaces: Evidence from a coastal desert megacity in Saudi Arabia. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 29 (37) (2022), pp. 55757-55774, 10.1007/s11356-022-19639-4

[4] D. Alfakhri, D. Harness, J. Nicholson, T. Harness. The role of aesthetics and design in hotelscape: A phenomenological investigation of cosmopolitan consumers. Journal of Business Research, 85 (2018), pp. 523-531, 10.1016/j.jbusres.2017.10.031

[5] T. Alizadeh. Global trends of smart cities: A comparative analysis of geography, city size, governance, and urban planning. Elsevier, Amsterdam (2021), 10.1016/B978-0-12-819886-5.01001-X

[6] S.S. Andaleeb, M. Haq, R.I. Ahmed. Reforming innercity bus transportation in a developing country: A passenger-driven model. Journal of Public Transportation, 10 (1) (2007), pp. 1-25, 10.5038/2375-0901.10.1.1

[7] R. Arendt. Putting greenways first. Planning, 77 (7) (2011), pp. 28-33

[8] G. Barbiero, R. Berto. Biophilia as evolutionary adaptation: An onto-and phylogenetic framework for biophilic design. Frontiers in Psychology, 12 (2021), Article 700709, 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.700709

[9] S. Basu, H. Nagendra.Perceptions of park visitors on access to urban parks and benefits of green spaces. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 57 (2021), Article 126959, 10.1016/j.ufug.2020.126959

[10] A.L. Bedimo-Rung, A.J. Mowen, D.A. Cohen.The significance of parks to physical activity and public health: A conceptual model. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 28 (2 SUPPL. 2) (2005), pp. 159-168, 10.1016/j.amepre.2004.10.024

[11] P. Bolund, S. Hunhammar. Ecosystem services in urban areas. Ecological Economics, 29 (2) (1999), pp. 293-301, 10.1016/S0921-8009(99)00013-0

[12] P. Brindley, R.W. Cameron, E. Ersoy, A. Jorgensen, R. Maheswaran. Is more always better? Exploring field survey and social media indicators of quality of urban greenspace, in relation to health. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 39 (2019), pp. 45-54, 10.1016/j.ufug.2019.01.015

[13] M.A. Camilleri. The tourism industry: An overview. M.A. Camilleri (Ed.), Travel marketing, tourism economics and the airline product, Springer, Cham (2018), pp. 3-27, 10.1007/978-3-319-49849-2_1

[14] H.-S. Chang, C.-H. Liao. Exploring an integrated method for measuring the relative spatial equity in public facilities in the context of urban parks. Cities, 28 (5) (2011), pp. 361-371, 10.1016/j.cities.2011.04.002

[15] S. Chen, O. Sleipness, Y. Xu, K. Park, K. Christensen.A systematic review of alternative protocols for evaluating non-spatial dimensions of urban parks. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 53 (2020), Article 126718, 10.1016/j.ufug.2020.126718

[16] A. Chiesura. The role of urban parks for the sustainable city. Landscape and Urban Planning, 68 (1) (2004), pp. 129-138, 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2003.08.003

[17] O. Chikuta, E. du Plessis, M. Saayman. Universal accessibility of national parks in South Africa and Zimbabwe: Park management perceptions. Tourism Planning & Development, 20 (3) (2023), pp. 377-396, 10.1080/21568316.2021.1910556

[18] P. Cohen, O. Potchter, I. Schnell. A methodological approach to the environmental quantitative assessment of urban parks. Applied Geography, 48 (2014), pp. 87-101, 10.1016/j.apgeog.2014.01.006

[19] J. Colding, S. Barthel. Exploring the social-ecological systems discourse 20 years later. Ecology and Society, 24 (1) (2019), p. 2, 10.5751/ES-10598-240102

[20] A. Comber, C. Brunsdon, E. Green. Using a GIS-based network analysis to determine urban greenspace accessibility for different ethnic and religious groups. Landscape and Urban Planning, 86 (1) (2008), pp. 103-114, 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2008.01.002

[21] L. Cong, Y. Zhang, C.-H. Su, M.-H. Chen, J. Wang. Understanding tourists’ willingness-to-pay for rural landscape improvement and preference heterogeneity. Sustainability, 11 (24) (2019), p. 7001, 10.3390/su11247001

[22] F.M. Conteh, D. Oktay. Measuring liveability by exploring urban qualities of kissy street, Freetown, Sierra Leone. Open House International, 41 (2) (2016), pp. 23-30

[23] J. Cornelis, M. Hermy. Biodiversity relationships in urban and suburban parks in Flanders. Landscape and Urban Planning, 69 (4) (2004), pp. 385-401, 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2003.10.038

[24] W. Dai, S. Yuan, Y. Liu, D. Peng, S. Niu. Measuring equality in access to urban parks: A big data analysis from Chengdu. Frontiers in Public Health, 10 (2022), p. 1022666, 10.3389/fpubh.2022.1022666

[25] F. De la Barrera, S. Reyes-Paecke, J. Harris, D. Bascuñán, J.M. Farías. People’s perception influences on the use of green spaces in socio-economically differentiated neighborhoods. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 20 (2016), pp. 254-264, 10.1016/j.ufug.2016.09.007

[26] D.A. Dillman. Procedures for conducting government-sponsored establishment surveys: Comparisons of the total design method (TDM), a traditional cost-compensation model, and tailored design. American Statistical Association (Ed.), Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Establishment Surveys: Survey methods for businesses, farms, and institutions, American Statistical Association, Buffalo (2000), pp. 343-352

[27] S. Dinda, S. Ghosh. Perceived benefits, aesthetic preferences and willingness to pay for visiting urban parks: A case study in Kolkata, India. International Journal of Geoheritage and Parks, 9 (1) (2021), pp. 36-50, 10.1016/j.ijgeop.2020.12.007

[28] N. Dunnett, C. Swanwick, H. Woolley. Improving urban parks, play areas and green spaces. Department for Transport, Local Government and the Regions, London (2002)

[29] D. Ellis, R. Schwartz. The roles of an urban parks system. World Urban Parks, Tokyo (2016)

[30] F. Enssle, N. Kabisch. Urban green spaces for the social interaction, health and well-being of older people—An integrated view of urban ecosystem services and socio-environmental justice. Environmental Science & Policy, 109 (2020), pp. 36-44, 10.1016/j.envsci.2020.04.008

[31] B.E. Evans, A.C. Huizink, K. Greaves-Lord, J.H.M. Tulen, K. Roelofs, J. van der Ende. Urbanicity, biological stress system functioning and mental health in adolescents. PLoS One, 15 (3) (2020), Article e0228659, 10.1371/journal.pone.0228659

[32] P. Farinha-Marques, J.M. Lameiras, C. Fernandes, S. Silva, F. Guilherme. Urban biodiversity: A review of current concepts and contributions to multidisciplinary approaches. Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research, 24 (3) (2011), pp. 247-271, 10.1080/13511610.2011.592062

[33] O. Finaeva.Role of green spaces in favorable microclimate creating in urban environment (exemplified by Italian cities). IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 262 (1) (2017, November), 10.1088/1757-899X/262/1/012141

[34] C. Folke. Resilience: The emergence of a perspective for social-ecological systems analyses. Global Environmental Change, 16 (3) (2006), pp. 253-267, 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2006.04.002

[35] C. Folke, J. Colding, F. Berkes. Synthesis: Building resilience and adaptive capacity in social-ecological systems. F. Berkes, J. Colding, C. Folke (Eds.), Navigating social-ecological systems: Building resilience for complexity and change, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2003), 10.1017/CBO9780511541957.020

[36] X. Fu, C. Baker, W. Zhang, R. Zhang. Theme park storytelling: Deconstructing immersion in Chinese theme parks. Journal of Travel Research, 62 (4) (2023), pp. 893-906, 10.1177/00472875221098933

[37] T. Gentil. Parks and amenities. N. Borrett (Ed.), Leisure services UK:An introduction to leisure, entertainment and tourism services, Palgrave, London (1991), 10.1007/978-1-349-11621-8_5

[38] Y. Gholami, S.H. Taghvaei, S. Norouzian-Maleki, R. Mansouri Sepehr. Evaluating the legibility of urban parks based on neuroscience and the FVFL model. Archnet-IJAR: International Journal of Architectural Research, 16 (2) (2022), pp. 245-259, 10.1108/ARCH-05-2021-0149

[39] G.C. Godbey, L.L. Caldwell, M. Floyd, L.L. Payne. Contributions of leisure studies and recreation and park management research to the active living agenda. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 28 (2 Suppl. 2) (2005), pp. 150-158, 10.1016/j.amepre.2004.10.027

[40] X. Gu, S. Tao, B. Dai. Spatial accessibility of country parks in Shanghai, China. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 27 (2017), pp. 373-382, 10.1016/j.ufug.2017.08.006

[41] R. Gunderson. Erich Fromm’s ecological messianism: The first biophilia hypothesis as humanistic social theory. Humanity and Society, 38 (2) (2014), pp. 182-204

[42] S. Guo, C. Song, T. Pei, Y. Liu, T. Ma, Y. Du, J. Chen, Z. Fan, X. Tang, Y. Peng, Y. Wang.Accessibility to urban parks for elderly residents: Perspectives from mobile phone data. Landscape and Urban Planning, 191 (2019), Article 103642, 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2019.103642

[43] J. Hayward. Urban parks: Research, planning, and social change. I. Altman, E.H. Zube (Eds.), Publicplaces and spaces, Springer, Boston, MA (1989), pp. 193-216, 10.1007/978-1-4684-5601-1_9

[44] M. He, Y. Wang, W.J. Wang, Z. Xie. Therapeutic plant landscape design of urban forest parks based on the five senses theory: A case study of Stanley Park in Canada. International Journal of Geoheritage and Parks, 10 (1) (2022), pp. 97-112, 10.1016/j.ijgeop.2022.02.004

[45] V. Houlden, J.P. de Albuquerque, S. Weich, S. Jarvis.A spatial analysis of proximate green space and mental wellbeing in London. Applied Geography, 109 (2019), Article 102036, 10.1016/j.apgeog.2019.102036

[46] C. Ioja, M. Patroescu, M. Nita, L. Rozylowicz, G. Vanau, A. Ioja, D. Onose. Categories of residential spaces by their accessibility to urban parks-indicator of sustainability in human settlements case study: Bucharest. WSEAS Transactions on Environment and Development, 6 (5) (2010), pp. 307-316

[47] M. Jabbar, M.M. Yusoff, A. Shafie. Assessing the role of urban green spaces for human well-being: A systematic review. GeoJournal, 87 (2021), pp. 4405-4423, 10.1007/s10708-021-10474-7

[48] R.R.J.C. Jayakody, D. Amarathunga, R. Haigh. Integration of disaster management strategies with planning and designing public open spaces. Procedia Engineering, 212 (2018), pp. 954-961, 10.1016/j.proeng.2018.01.123

[49] I.Y. Jian, J. Luo, E.H.W. Chan.Spatial justice in public open space planning: Accessibility and inclusivity. Habitat International, 97 (2020), Article 102122, 10.1016/j.habitatint.2020.102122

[50] K.K. Jou. Evaluating integration between public transportation and pedestrian-oriented urban spaces in two main metro stations of Tehran. Scientific Research and Essays, 6 (13) (2011), pp. 2695-2709

[51] N. Kabisch, D. Haase, M.A. van den Bosch. Adding natural areas to social indicators of intra-urban health inequalities among children: A case study from Berlin, Germany. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 13 (8) (2016), p. 783, 10.3390/ijerph13080783

[52] N. Kabisch, S. Qureshi, D. Haase. Human-environment interactions in urban green spaces—A systematic review of contemporary issues and prospects for future research. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 50 (2015), pp. 25-34, 10.1016/j.eiar.2014.08.007

[53] R. Kaplan, S. Kaplan. Well-being, reasonableness, and the natural environment. Applied Psychology. Health and Well-Being, 3 (3) (2011), pp. 304-321, 10.1111/j.1758-0854.2011.01055.x

[54] S. Kaplan. The restorative benefits of nature: Toward an integrative framework. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 15 (3) (1995), pp. 169-182, 10.1016/0272-4944(95)90001-2

[55] A.D.A.M. Kemperman, H.J.P. Timmermans. Heterogeneity in urban park use of aging visitors: A latent class analysis. Leisure Sciences, 28 (1) (2006), pp. 57-71, 10.1080/01490400500332710

[56] L.E. Keniger, K.J. Gaston, K.N. Irvine, R.A. Fuller. What are the benefits of interacting with nature?. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 10 (3) (2013), pp. 913-935, 10.3390/ijerph10030913

[57] D. Kim, J. Jin. Does happiness data say urban parks are worth it?. Landscape and Urban Planning, 178 (2018), pp. 1-11, 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2018.05.010

[58] A. Kolimenakis, A.D. Solomou, N. Proutsos, E.V. Avramidou, E. Korakaki, G. Karetsos, K. Tsagkari. The socioeconomic welfare of urban green areas and parks; a literature review of available evidence. Sustainability, 13 (14) (2021), p. 7863, 10.3390/su13147863

[59] C.C. Konijnendijk, M. Annerstedt, A.B. Nielsen, S. Maruthaveeran. Benefits of urban parks: A systematic review. A Report for IFPRA, Copenhagen & Alnarp (2013) Retrieved from http://www.worldurbanparks.org/images/Newsletters/IfpraBenefitsOfUrbanParks.pdf

[60] A. Krapez, M. Hughes, D. Newsome. Perceptions of ‘naturalness’ by urban park visitors: Insights from Perth, Western Australia. International Journal of Geoheritage and Parks, 9 (4) (2021), pp. 450-462, 10.1016/j.ijgeop.2021.11.004

[61] M. Kruger, A. Viljoen, M. Saayman. Who visits the Kruger National Park, and why? Identifying target markets. Journal of Travel & Tourism Marketing, 34 (3) (2017), pp. 312-340, 10.1080/10548408.2016.1156618

[62] Kwon O.S. (2020). The improvement of green network for environmental conservation in Metropolitan City: Using circuit theory and API information (Doctoral dissertation). Kyungpook National University, Daegu, South Korea.

[63] Lee D.S. (2014). An assessment of spatial distribution of urban park considering urban characteristic in Suwon City (Master’s thesis). Dankook University, Cheonan, South Korea.

[64] F.Z. Li, F.Y. Li, S.J. Li, Y. Long.Deciphering the recreational use of urban parks: Experiments using multi-source big data for all Chinese cities. Science of the Total Environment, 701 (2020), Article 134896, 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.134896

[65] C.F. Liu, X.M. Li, D. Han. Accessibility analysis of urban parks: Methods and key issues. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 30 (19) (2010), pp. 5381-5390

[66] R. Liu, J. Xiao. Factors affecting users’ satisfaction with urban parks through online comments data: Evidence from Shenzhen, China. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18 (1) (2021), p. 253, 10.3390/ijerph18010253

[67] A. Loukaitou-Sideris, V. Mukhija. Promotores for parks? The potential of a public health model to improve outreach and community engagement in park planning. Leisure Sciences, 45 (3) (2023), pp. 281-303, 10.1080/01490400.2020.1817202

[68] S. Low, D. Taplin, S. Scheld. Rethinking urban parks:Public space and cultural diversity. University of Texas Press, Austin, TX (2005)

[69] G. Lupp, V. Kantelberg, J. Fäth, T. Hirschbeck, C. Käsbauer, A. Ritter, S. Pauleit. Through the eyes of forest visitors—Perception and scenic preferences of Munich’s urban proximate woodlands. Forests, 13 (10) (2022), p. 1584, 10.3390/f13101584

[70] B.K.L. Mak, C.Y. Jim. Linking park users’ socio-demographic characteristics and visit-related preferences to improve urban parks. Cities, 92 (2019), pp. 97-111, 10.1016/j.cities.2019.03.008

[71] R.E. Manning, L.E. Anderson, P.R. Pettengill. Managing outdoor recreation: Case studies in the national parks. (2nd ed.), CABI, Egham (2017)

[72] Z. Mao, W. Wang, Z. Ren, D. Zhang, X. He. Recreational attractiveness of urban parks and implications for their management: A case study in Changchun, China. Chinese Geographical Science, 32 (3) (2022), pp. 456-466, 10.1007/s11769-022-1273-5

[73] C. Mayen Huerta, G. Cafagna. Snapshot of the use of urban green spaces in Mexico City during the COVID-19 pandemic: A qualitative study. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18 (8) (2021), p. 4304, 10.3390/ijerph18084304

[74] G.R. McCormack, M. Rock, K. Swanson, L. Burton, A. Massolo. Physical activity patterns in urban neighbourhood parks: Insights from a multiple case study. BMC Public Health, 14 (1) (2014), p. 962, 10.1186/1471-2458-14-962

[75] T. McPhearson, E. Andersson, T. Elmqvist, N. Frantzeskaki. Resilience of and through urban ecosystem services. Ecosystem Services, 12 (2015), pp. 152-156, 10.1016/j.ecoser.2014.07.012

[76] N. Müller, M. Ignatieva, C.H. Nilon, P. Werner, W.C. Zipperer. Patterns and trends in urban biodiversity and landscape design. T. Elmqvist, M. Fragkias, J. Goodness, B. Güneralp, P.J. Marcotullio, R.I. McDonald, ..., C. Wilkinson (Eds.), Urbanization, biodiversity and ecosystem services: Challenges and opportunities: A global assessment, Springer, Dordrecht (2013), 10.1007/978-94-007-7088-1_10

[77] D. Ostergren, F.I. Solop, K.K. Hagen. National Park service fees: Value for the money or a barrier to visitation?. Journal of Park and Recreation Administration, 23 (1) (2005), pp. 18-36

[78] H. Özgüner, A.D. Kendle. Public attitudes towards naturalistic versus designed landscapes in the city of Sheffield (UK). Landscape and Urban Planning, 7 (2) (2006), pp. 139-157, 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2004.10.003

[79] M. Padeiro, J. de Sao Jose, C. Amado, L. Sousa, C. Roma Oliveira, A. Esteves, J. McGarrigle. Neighborhood attributes and well-being among older adults in urban areas: A mixed-methods systematic review. Research on Aging, 44 (5-6) (2022), pp. 351-368, 10.1177/0164027521999980

[80] S. Pei. A study of assessment of landscape perception of urban parks based on SD technique: A case study on Jiangxinzhou Park in Xuancheng City, Anhui Province. Paper presented at the 2021 2nd International Conference on Urban Engineering and Management Science (ICUEMS), Sanya, China (2021, January), 10.1109/ICUEMS52408.2021.00066

[81] D. Pfeiffer, S. Cloutier. Planning for happy neighborhoods. Journal of the American Planning Association, 82 (3) (2016), pp. 267-279, 10.1080/01944363.2016.1166347

[82] S.L. Powers, K.J. Lee, N.A. Pitas, A.R. Graefe, A.J. Mowen. Understanding access and use of municipal parks and recreation through an intersectionality perspective. Journal of Leisure Research, 51 (4) (2020), pp. 377-396, 10.1080/00222216.2019.1701965

[83] J. Priess, L.V. Pinto, I. Misiune, J. Palliwoda. Ecosystem service use and the motivations for use in central parks in three European cities. Land, 10 (2) (2021), p. 154, 10.3390/land10020154

[84] Y. Rao, Y. Zhong, Q. He, J. Dai. Assessing the equity of accessibility to urban green space: A study of 254 cities in China. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19 (8) (2022), p. 4855, 10.3390/ijerph19084855

[85] R. Reyes-Riveros, A. Altamirano, F. De La Barrera, D. Rozas-Vásquez, L. Vieli, P. Meli.Linking public urban green spaces and human well-being: A systematic review. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 61 (2021), Article 127105, 10.1016/j.ufug.2021.127105

[86] A. Rigolon, M.H.E.M. Browning, K. Lee, S. Shin. Access to urban green space in cities of the Global South: A systematic literature review. Urban Science, 2 (3) (2018), p. 67, 10.3390/urbansci2030067

[87] A. Rigolon, E. Yañez, M.J. Aboelata, R. Bennett. “A park is not just a park”: Toward counter-narratives to advance equitable green space policy in the United States. Cities, 128 (2022), Article 103792, 10.1016/j.cities.2022.103792

[88] M.M. Sadeghian, Z. Vardanyan. The benefits of urban parks, a review of urban research. Journal of Novel Applied Sciences, 2 (8) (2013), pp. 231-237

[89] J.P.L. Savard, P. Clergeau, G. Mennechez. Biodiversity concepts and urban ecosystems. Landscape and Urban Planning, 48 (3-4) (2000), pp. 131-142, 10.1016/S0169-2046(00)00037-2

[90] H. Setälä, G. Francini, J.A. Allen, A. Jumpponen, N. Hui, D.J. Kotze. Urban parks provide ecosystem services by retaining metals and nutrients in soils. Environmental Pollution, 231 (2017), pp. 451-461, 10.1016/j.envpol.2017.08.010

[91] Y. Shi, Y. Cheng. Nonprofit-as-supplement: Examining the link between nonprofit financial support and public service quality. Voluntas: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 32 (1) (2021), pp. 28-44, 10.1007/s11266-020-00302-w

[92] N. Sirina, A. Hua, J. Gobert. What factors influence the value of an urban park within a medium-sized French conurbation?. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 24 (2017), pp. 45-54, 10.1016/j.ufug.2017.03.021

[93] M. Sreetheran, C.C.K. Van Den Bosch. A socio-ecological exploration of fear of crime in urban green spaces—A systematic review. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 13 (1) (2014), pp. 1-18, 10.1016/j.ufug.2013.11.006

[94] M. Stodolska, K.J. Shinew, J.C. Acevedo, D. Izenstark. Perceptions of urban parks as havens and contested terrains by Mexican-Americans in Chicago neighborhoods. Leisure Sciences, 33 (2) (2011), pp. 103-126, 10.1080/01490400.2011.550220

[95] E.P. Sundevall, M. Jansson. Inclusive parks across ages: Multifunction and urban open space management for children, adolescents, and the elderly. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17 (24) (2020), p. 9357, 10.3390/ijerph17249357

[96] M.S.H. Swapan, M.S. Iftekhar, X. Li. Factors influencing use-diversity of urban parks: A cross-cultural study between Chengdu (China) and Perth (Australia). Environment and Urbanization ASIA, 13 (2) (2022), pp. 203-217, 10.1177/09754253221120616

[97] M.L. Talal, M.V. Santelmann. Plant community composition and biodiversity patterns in urban parks of Portland, Oregon. Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution, 7 (2019), p. 201, 10.3389/fevo.2019.00201

[98] M.L. Talal, M.V. Santelmann.Visitor access, use, and desired improvements in urban parks. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 63 (2021), Article 127216, 10.1016/j.ufug.2021.127216

[99] R.L. Thayer, B.G. Atwood. Plants, complexity, and pleasure in urban and suburban environments. Environmental Psychology and Nonverbal Behavior, 3 (2) (1978), pp. 67-76, 10.1007/BF01135604

[100] L. Tozer, K. Hörschelmann, I. Anguelovski, H. Bulkeley, Y. Lazova. Whose city? Whose nature? Towards inclusive nature-based solution governance. Cities, 107 (2020), Article 102892, 10.1016/j.cities.2020.102892

[101] İ. Türtseven Doğrusoy, R. Zeynel. Analysis of perceived safety in urban parks: A field study in Büyükpark and Hasanağa Park. Journal of the Faculty of Architecture, 34 (1) (2017), pp. 63-84, 10.4305/metu.jfa.2017.1.7

[102] United Nations-Department of Economic and Social Affairs (UN-DESA). World population prospects: The 2012 revision. Author, New York, YN (2013)

[103] K. Vierikko, P. Gonçalves, D. Haase, B. Elands, C. Ioja, M. Jaatsi, V. Yli-Pelkonen.Biocultural diversity (BCD) in European cities-interactions between motivations, experiences and environment in public parks. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 48 (2020), Article 126501, 10.1016/j.ufug.2019.126501

[104] A. Voigt, N. Kabisch, D. Wurster, D. Haase, J. Breuste. Structural diversity: A multi-dimensional approach to assess recreational services in urban parks. Ambio, 43 (4) (2014), pp. 480-491, 10.1007/s13280-014-0508-9

[105] S. Völker, J. Matros, T. Claßen. Determining urban open spaces for health-related appropriations: A qualitative analysis on the significance of blue space. Environmental Earth Sciences, 75 (2016), p. 1067, 10.1007/s12665-016-5839-3

[106] C. Wan, G.Q. Shen, S. Choi.Effects of physical and psychological factors on users’ attitudes, use patterns, and perceived benefits toward urban parks. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 51 (2020), Article 126691, 10.1016/j.ufug.2020.126691

[107] Y.K.P. Wan, S.H.J. Chan. Factors that affect the levels of tourists’ satisfaction and loyalty towards food festivals: A case study of Macau. International Journal of Tourism Research, 15 (3) (2013), pp. 226-240, 10.1002/jtr.1863

[108] M. Wang, L. Mu. Spatial disparities of Uber accessibility: An exploratory analysis in Atlanta, USA. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 67 (2018), pp. 169-175, 10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2017.09.003

[109] P. Wang, B. Zhou, L. Han, R. Mei.The motivation and factors influencing visits to small urban parks in Shanghai, China. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 60 (2021), Article 127086, 10.1016/j.ufug.2021.127086

[110] S. Wang, M. Wang, Y. Liu. Access to urban parks: Comparing spatial accessibility measures using three GIS-based approaches. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 90 (2021), Article 101713, 10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2021.101713

[111] C. Ward Thompson, P.A. Aspinall. Natural environments and their impact on activity, health and quality of life. Applied Psychology. Health and Well-Being, 3 (3) (2011), pp. 230-260, 10.1111/j.1758-0854.2011.01053.x

[112] E.O. Wilson. Biophilia. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA (1984)

[113] J.R. Wolch, J. Byrne, J.P. Newell. Urban green space, public health, and environmental justice: The challenge of making cities ‘just green enough’. Landscape and Urban Planning, 125 (2014), pp. 234-244, 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2014.01.017

[114] H. Wüstemann, D. Kalisch, J. Kolbe. Access to urban green space and environmental inequalities in Germany. Landscape and Urban Planning, 164 (2017), pp. 124-131, 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2017.04.002

[115] C. Xin, L.Y. Li, U. Pieter. Taking “social relations” as a cultural ecosystem service: A triangulation approach. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 55 (2020), Article 126790, 10.1016/j.ufug.2020.126790

[116] G. Zabelskyte, N. Kabisch, Z. Stasiskiene. Patterns of urban green space use applying social media data: A systematic literature review. Land, 11 (2) (2022), p. 238, 10.3390/land11020238

[117] Q. Zhang, Q. Kong, M. Zhang, H. Huang.New-type urbanization and ecological well-being performance: A coupling coordination analysis in the middle reaches of the Yangtze River urban agglomerations, China. Ecological Indicators, 159 (2024), Article 111678, 10.1016/j.ecolind.2024.111678

[118] J. Zhu, H. Lu, T. Zheng, Y. Rong, C. Wang, W. Zhang, L. Tang. Vitality of urban parks and its influencing factors from the perspective of recreational service supply, demand, and spatial links. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17 (5) (2020), p. 1615, 10.3390/ijerph17051615