Geoeducation strategies in the Amazon, Napo Sumaco Aspiring UNESCO Global Geopark

Abstract

The UNESCO Global Geoparks are grounded in three core principles: education, geoconservation, and geotourism. Since 2015, the Napo Sumaco Aspiring UNESCO Global Geopark (NSAUGG) in the Ecuadorian Amazon has concentrated its efforts on enhancing local capabilities through Earth Sciences education, underscoring the safeguarding of natural and cultural heritage and environmental stewardship. A comprehensive educational dissemination model was implemented, incorporating both indoor and outdoor activities, geoscience education training, geodiversity knowledge enhancement, and the creation of content and workshops that integrate classroom and field-based learning and evaluation. The concepts of geodiversity and geoparks were disseminated to adults and youth, primarily members of the native peoples' communities, particularly those employed at the community tourism centers and the geopark guides designated as “Yuyaiwa Pushak Runakuna.” A total of 60 individuals from the NSAUGG populations between Tena and Archidona cantons participated in the educational activities, which involved 19 geoeducators. These initiatives facilitated an appreciation of the geopark's diverse heritages, including its geological, biological, and cultural assets. The geoeducation efforts fostered geotourism, with the Yuyaiwa Pushak Runakuna acquiring greater value through their assimilation of geological and speleological knowledge. This is evident in their use of geological vocabulary and understanding of geological processes and materials in guiding activities for both national and foreign tourists. The most significant achievement is the establishment of “Geoeducation for Sustainability” actions, which promotes collective life through knowledge dialogues based on Minka (voluntary community work) and Turkana (reciprocity and barter). These actions encouraged a deeper connection to the geopark's heritage and strengthened community cohesion.

Keywords

geoeducation / geotourism / geosciences / guides / Amazon

References

[1] P. Baby, M. Rivadeneira, R. Barragan. La cuenca oriente: geologia y petroleo [The eastern basin: Geology and petroleum]. (2004). Retrieved from https://www.documentation.ird.fr/hor/fdi:010036207

[2] W. Balseca, L. Ferrari, G. Pasquare, A. Tibaldi. Structural evolution of the northern sub-Andes of Ecuador: The Napo uplift. (1993). Retrieved from https://www.documentation.ird.fr/hor/fdi:38395

[3] J. Brilha. Inventory and quantitative assessment of geosites and geodiversity sites: A review. Geoheritage, 8 (2) (2016), pp. 119-134, 10.1007/s12371-014-0139-3

[4] J. Brilha, M. Gray, D.I. Pereira, P. Pereira. Geodiversity: An integrative review as a contribution to the sustainable management of the whole of nature. Environmental Science & Policy, 86 (2018), pp. 19-28, 10.1016/j.envsci.2018.05.001

[5] S. Brito. Geología del cuadrángulo 77° 45′ - 78° 00′ de Longitud Oeste y 01° 00′ - 01° 10′ de Latitud Sur, Escala 1:50.000 (área aproximada: 500 Km2), localizada en Puerto Napo, Provincia de Napo [Geology of the quadrangle 77° 45′-78° 00’ West Longitude and 01° 00′-01° 10’ South Latitude, Scale 1:50,000 (approximate area: 500 km²), located in Puerto Napo, Napo Province]. (1985). Retrieved from https://www.dspace.espol.edu.ec/handle/123456789/3442

[6] M. Caballero Guisado, A. Baigorri Agoiz. El Cambio Climático en la ESO. Una aproximación exploratoria en Extremadura [Climate change in secondary education: An exploratory approach in Extremadura]. Revista de La Asociación de Sociología de La Educación, 11 (1) (2018), pp. 89-100, 10.7203/rase.11.1.10618

[7] Cámara Provincial de Napo.Resumen ejecutivo Plan de Desarrollo y Ordenamiento Territorial Napo 2020-2023 [Executive summary of the Napo2020-2023 development and territorial planning]. Retrieved from https://www.napo.gob.ec/website/index.php/transparencia/plan-de-ordenamiento-territorial (2020)

[8] R. Carter, S. Tye, S. Aguilar.Planificación de la adaptación a largo plazo en América Latina y el Caribe [The long-term adaptation planning in Latin America and the Caribbean]. (2022). Retrieved from https://publications.iadb.org/es/planificacion-de-la-adaptacion-largo-plazo-en-america-latina-y-el-caribe

[9] M. Castro.¿Cómo se califica a los estudiantes en Ecuador? [How are students graded in Ecuador?]. (2021, January 5). Retrieved from https://gk.city/2021/01/05/sistema-calificaciones-ecuador/

[10] M.M. Catana, J.B. Brilha. The role of UNESCO Global Geoparks in promoting geosciences education for sustainability. Geoheritage, 12 (1) (2020), p. 1, 10.1007/s12371-020-00440-z

[11] K. Coff, J. Lampert. Mentoring as two-way learning: An Australian first nations/non-indigenous collaboration. Frontiers in Education, 4 (2019), p. 24, 10.3389/feduc.2019.00024

[12] I. DeCoito, M. Estaiteyeh. Transitioning to online teaching during the COVID-19 pandemic: An exploration of STEM teachers’ views, successes, and challenges. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 31 (3) (2022), pp. 340-356, 10.1007/s10956-022-09958-z

[13] C. Delfosse, ACNUR. Los recursos naturales causaron más del 40% de las guerras de los últimos sesenta años [Natural resources caused more than 40% of the wars in the last sixty years]. (2018, October 16). Retrieved from https://news.un.org/es/story/2018/10/1443762

[14] C. Dooley. Teaching as a two-way street: Discontinuities among metaphors, images, and classroom realities. Journal of Teacher Education, 49 (2) (1998), pp. 97-107, 10.1177/0022487198049002003

[15] F.W. Eder, M. Patzak. Geoparks—Geological attractions: A tool for public education, recreation and sustainable economic development. International Union of Geological Sciences, 27 (3) (2004), pp. 162-164, 10.18814/epiiugs/2004/v27i3/001

[16] N.T. Farsani, C.O.A. Coelho, C.M.M. Costa, A. Amrikazemi. Geo-knowledge management and geoconservation via geoparks and geotourism. Geoheritage, 6 (3) (2014), pp. 185-192, 10.1007/s12371-014-0099-7

[17] R. Fernández Álvarez. Geoparks and education: UNESCO Global Geopark Villuercas-Ibores-Jara as a case study in Spain. Geosciences, 10 (1) (2020), p. 27, 10.3390/geosciences10010027

[18] A. Fornaro, A.M. Fernandes. Geoparks: From conception to the teaching of geosciences. Terrae Didatica, 14 (3) (2018), pp. 330-338, 10.20396/td.v14i3.8653533

[19] GAD Municipal Tena. Actualización del plan de desarrollo y ordenamiento territorial y plan de uso y gestión del suelo 2019-2023 [Update of the development and land use planning plan and land use and management plan 2019-2023]. (2021). Retrieved from https://tena.gob.ec/WEB/plan.php

[20] C.R. Gomes, A.F. Rocha, J.A. Ferreira, A. Rola. Field classes for geosciences education:Teachers’ concepts and practices. C. Vasconcelos (Ed.), Geoscience education: Indoor and outdoor, Springer, Cham (2016), pp. 73-84, 10.1007/978-3-319-43319-6_5

[21] J.E. Gordon, R. Crofts, E. Díaz-Martínez, K.S. Woo. Enhancing the role of geoconservation in protected area management and nature conservation. Geoheritage, 10 (2) (2018), pp. 191-203, 10.1007/s12371-017-0240-5

[22] M. Gray. Geodiversity: Developing the paradigm. Proceedings of the Geologists’ Association, 119 (3-4) (2008), pp. 287-298, 10.1016/S0016-7878(08)80307-0

[23] M. Gray. Geodiversity: The backbone of geoheritage and geoconservation. E. Reynard, J. Brilha (Eds.), Geoheritage: protection, and management, Assessment, Elsevier, Amsterdam (2018), pp. 13-25, 10.1016/B978-0-12-809531-7.00001-0

[24] V. Hogan. Ecuador: A megadiverse country (2020). Retrieved from https://www.humansforabundance.com/post/ecuador-a-megadiverse-country

[25] INEC.Resultados del censo 2010 de población y vivienda en el Ecuador [2010 census results of population and housing in Ecuador. Napo Provincial Brochure]. (2017). Retrieved from https://www.ecuadorencifras.gob.ec/fasciculos-provinciales/

[26] INEC.Censo Ecuador [Ecuador census] (2022). Retrieved from https://censoecuador.ecudatanalytics.com/

[27] O. Jadán, B. Torres, D. Selesi, D. Peña, C. Rosales, S. Gunter. Diversidad florística y estructura en cacaotales tradicionales y bosque natural (Sumaco, Ecuador) [Floristic diversity and structure in traditional cocoa plantations and natural forest (Sumaco, Ecuador)]. Colombia Forestal, 19 (2) (2016), pp. 129-142, 10.14483/udistrital.jour.colomb.for.2016.2.a01

[28] A.N. Johnson, R. Sievert, M. Durglo, V. Finley, L. Adams, M.H. Hofmann. Indigenous knowledge and geoscience on the flathead Indian reservation, Northwest Montana: Implications for place-based and culturally congruent education. Journal of Geoscience Education, 62 (2) (2014), pp. 187-202, 10.5408/12-393.1

[29] R.F. Kempa, N. Orion. Students’ perception of co-operative learning in earth science fieldwork. Research in Science & Technological Education, 14 (1) (1996), pp. 33-41, 10.1080/0263514960140103

[30] F. Lara, A. De La Herrán Gascón. Reflexiones sobre la educación del sumak kawsay en Ecuador [Reflections on the right to education of sumak kawsay in Ecuador]. Araucaria, 18 (36) (2016), pp. 41-58, 10.12795/araucaria.2016.i36.03

[31] O. López Cortés. Significados y representaciones de la minga Para el pueblo indígena Pastos de Colombia [The meanings and representations of “minga” for the indigenous Pastos people of Colombia]. Psicoperspectivas, 17 (3) (2018), pp. 101-111, 10.5027/psicoperspectivas/vol17-issue3-fulltext-1353

[32] G. Martini, N. Zouros, J.P. Zhang, X.C. Jin, I. Komoo, M. Border, … A.A. Sá. UNESCO Global Geoparks in the “world after”: A multiple-goals roadmap proposal for future discussion. Episodes, 45 (1) (2022), pp. 29-35, 10.18814/epiiugs/2021/021002

[33] M.G. Maru, C.C. Pikirang, S. Setiawan, E.Z.O. Oroh, N. Pelenkahu. The internet use for autonomous learning during COVID-19 pandemic and its hindrances. International Journal of Interactive Mobile Technologies, 15 (18) (2021), pp. 65-79, 10.3991/ijim.v15i18.24553

[34] J. Morales.Música indígena y patrimonio cultural en Michoacán [Indigenous music and cultural heritage in Michoacán]. (2017). Retrieved from https://www.nacionmulticultural.unam.mx/edespimich/diagnostico-y-perspectivas/diversidad-cultural-y-linguistica/entre-sierras-costa-y-ciudades-michoacan-multicultural/

[35] D. Newsome, R. Dowling. Geoheritage and geotourism. E. Reynard, J. Brilha (Eds.), Geoheritage: protection, and management (Assessment, 2018), pp. 305-321, 10.1016/B978-0-12-809531-7.00017-4

[36] J. Obando. La Minga: Un Instrumento Vivo para el Desarrollo Comunitario [The Minga: A living instrument for community development]. Revista de Sociología, 4 (2015), pp. 1-19

[37] A. Paladines, J. Soto. Geología y yacimientos minerales del Ecuador [Geology and mineral deposits of Ecuador] (Primera). Universidad Técnica Particular de Loja, Loja (2010)

[38] Pan American Health Organization. The knowledge dialogues methodology. Author, Washington, D.C. (2022), 10.37774/9789275124703

[39] M. Pásková, R. Dowling. The usage of local and indigenous knowledge in the management of geotourism destinations. Proceedings of the SGEM Conference, 2 (5) (2014), pp. 805-812, 10.5593/SGEM2014/B52/S20.008

[40] S. Peppoloni, G. Di Capua. The significance of geotourism through the lens of geoethics. M. Allan, R. Dowling (Eds.), Geotourismin the Middle East, Springer, Cham (2023), pp. 41-52, 10.1007/978-3-031-24170-3_3

[41] J. Procter, K. Nemeth.Recognising indigenous peoples values and knowledge systems in geoheritage: Case studies from New Zealand and the South Pacific. Geophysical Research Abstracts, 19 (2017). EGU2017-10979. https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017EGUGA.1910979P/abstract

[42] M.P. Ram, K.K. Ajay, A. Gopinathan Nair. Geoscience curriculum: Approach through learning taxonomy and outcome based education. Higher Education for the Future, 7 (1) (2020), pp. 22-44, 10.1177/2347631119886403

[43] V. Ratten.The post COVID-19 pandemic era: Changes in teaching and learning methods for management educators. The International Journal of Management Education, 21 (2) (2023), Article 100777, 10.1016/j.ijme.2023.100777

[44] A. Rendón-Rivera, A.M. Henao-Arroyave, J.G. Osorio-Cachaya. Inventory of the sites of geological interest, in the southwestern of Antioquia Colombia. Boletín de Ciencias de La Tierra (41) (2017), pp. 66-72, 10.15446/rbct.n41.54841

[45] E.A.C. Rushton, M. Batchelder. Education for sustainable development through extra-curricular or non-curricular contexts. W. Leal Filho, A.M. Azul, L. Brandli, P.G. Özuyar, T. Wall (Eds.), Qualityeducation, Springer, Cham (2020), pp. 249-258, 10.1007/978-3-319-95870-5_19

[46] J.L. Sánchez-Cortez, V. Cárdenas-Pinto, D. Ocampos-Valarezo, D. Jaque-Bonilla, D. Quilumba-Dután, J. Ortiz-Barrionuevo, … N. Toledo-Rojas. Application of methodological process for the geotouristic inventory of natural cavities in Napo Province-Ecuador. Anuário do Instituto de Geociências, 40 (2) (2017), pp. 61-73, 10.11137/2017_2_61_73

[47] J.L. Sánchez-Cortez, D. Jaque-Bonilla, M. Simbaña-Tasiguano, D. Astudillo-Bravo, E. Cabascango-Chiliquinga. Participatory strategies applied for the geoconservation of speleological heritage at the Napo Sumaco Geopark (Ecuador). Episodes, 45 (4) (2022), pp. 417-429, 10.18814/epiiugs/2022/022001

[48] M. Simbaña, C. Campos, E. Cabascango, A. Salgado, J. Campos, D. Astudillo. Sánchez-Cortes (Ed.),Capacitación en escuelas y colegios en áreas de Ciencias de la Tierra y Medio Ambiente en el contexto de Geoparque Napo Sumaco [Training in schools and colleges in earth sciences and environmental areas within the context of the Napo Sumaco Geopark]. J.L. Patrimonio Geológico y Geoparques en el Ecuador. Resumen del II Encuentro de Geoparques en el Ecuador [Geological heritage and geoparks in Ecuador: Summary of the 2nd Geoparks Meeting in Ecuador], Universidad Laica Eloy Alfaro de Manabí Manta (2020), pp. 24-36

[49] V. Singtuen, N. Vivitkul, T. Junjuer. Geoeducational assessments in Khon Kaen National Geopark, Thailand: Implication for geoconservation and geotourism development. Heliyon, 8 (12) (2022), Article e12464, 10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e12464

[50] R. Štěpánková, K. Kristiánová. Top down strategies and bottom up initiatives in geoparks development in Slovakia. International Multidisciplinary Scientific GeoConference Surveying Geology and Mining Ecology Management, 1 (5) (2015), pp. 977-984

[51] UNESCO Institute for Statistics. International standard classification of education:ISCED 2011 (2012). Retrieved from http://uis.unesco.org/sites/default/files/documents/international-standard-classification-of-education-isced-2011-en.pdf

[52] UNESCO Institute for Statistics. International standard classification of education:Fields of education and training 2013 (ISCED-F 2013)—Detailed field descriptions. (2015). Retrieved from https://uis.unesco.org/sites/default/files/documents/international-standard-classification-of-education-fields-of-education-and-training-2013-detailed-field-descriptions-2015-en.pdf

[53] S.F. Uribe Taborda, A. González Serna, E. Tȏrres Aguiar. La gobernación de los Quijos, Sumaco y La Canela Marcos del proceso de producción sociohistórica del territorio en la Alta Amazonía ecuatoriana, siglos XVI-XIX [The gobernance of los Quijos, Sumaco and La Canela. The socio-historical production of the territory in the ecuadorian High Amazon, centuries 16TH-19TH]. Universitas (32) (2020), pp. 55-76, 10.17163/uni.n32.2020.03

[54] D. Vera, M. Simbaña-Tasiguano, O. Guzmán, E. Cabascango, J.L. Sánchez-Cortez, C. Campos, H. Grefa. Quantitative assessment of geodiversity in Ecuadorian Amazon—Case study: Napo Sumaco Aspiring UNESCO Geopark. Geoheritage, 15 (1) (2023), 10.1007/s12371-023-00792-2

[55] V. Zakharovskyi, K. Nemeth, I. Gravis, C. Twemlow. Geoheritage and geodiversity assessment framework for practical application to geoconservation of the Coromandel Peninsula, New Zealand. Geoconservation Research, 5 (1) (2022), pp. 59-88, 10.30486/gcr.2022.1935500.1097