Assessment of UNESCO Global Geoparks websites for a public geocommunication

Abstract

This study proposed a semi-quantitative methodology for assessing the quality of the UNESCO Global Geopark (UGGp) websites. The study was based on mixed indicators (binary and ordinal) which were grouped into five dimensions (presentation, content, interactivity, usability, and special UNESCO information) and combined with multivariate assessment using Principal Component Analysis and the application of the focus group technique using Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities, and Threats (SWOT) analysis to propose geocommunication strategies. The evaluation matrix, comprising 36 indicators, defined three levels of development (“high”, “moderate”, and “emergent”) and was useful for monitoring website quality and enhancing its territorial value for geotourism, geoconservation, and geoeducation. The results from 156 websites showed a predominance of “moderate development” scores (52.56%) and highlighted positive indicators, such as contact information, geotourism details, mobile compatibility, news, and the UGGp logo. This study also presented the potential of immersive technologies, such as virtual reality and 3D tours, for disseminating geoeducational content. However, there was room for the improvement in interaction and information standardization on UGGp web platforms to ensure effective communication that enriches the user experience.

Keywords

dissemination / geotourism / geoeducation / geosites / geoheritage

References

[1] Abdul-Halim S. A., & Ishak N. A. (2017). Examining community engagement in heritage conservation through geopark experiences from the Asia Pacific region. Kajian Malaysia, 35(Supp.1), 11-38. https://doi.org/10.21315/km2017.35.Supp.1.2.

[2] Aguilar-Aguilar M., Jaya-Montalvo M., Loor-Oporto O., Andrade-Ríos H., Morante-Carballo F., & Carrión-Mero P. (2023). Application of geomechanical classification systems in a tourist mine for establishing strategies within 3G’s model. Heritage, 6(6), 4618-4639. https://doi.org/10.3390/heritage6060245.

[3] Brilha J. (2009). A importância dos Geoparques no ensino e divulgação das geociências [The importance of geoparks for the geosciences teaching and interpretation]. Geologia USP. Publicação Especial, 5, 27-33. https://doi.org/10.11606/issn.2316-9087.v5i0p27-33.

[4] Bütün S., & Önçel S. (2019). Comparative content analysis of the websites of gastronomy cities rewardes by UNESCO Creative Cities Network. Geojournal of Tourism and Geosites, 26(3), 831-848. https://doi.org/10.30892/gtg.26313-401.

[5] Calaforra J. M., & Fernández-Cortés Á. (2006). Geotourism in Spain:Resources and environmental management. In R. K.Dowling, & D.Newsome (Eds.), Geotourism (pp. 199-220). Amsterdam: Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-7506-6215-4.50019-1.

[6] Catana M. M., & Brilha J. B. (2020). The role of UNESCO Global Geoparks in promoting geosciences education for sustainability. Geoheritage, 12(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12371-020-00440-z.

[7] Cayla N. (2014). An overview of new technologies applied to the management of geoheritage. Geoheritage, 6(2), 91-102. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12371-014-0113-0.

[8] Chiou W. -C., Lin C. -C., & Perng C. (2010). A strategic framework for website evaluation based on a review of the literature from 1995-2006. Information & Management, 47(5-6), 282-290. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2010.06.002.

[9] Ciobanu C., & Andrăşanu A. (2020). The role of volunteer management programs in geotourism development. In B. N.Sadry (Ed.), The geotourism industry in the 21st century. Apple Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1201/9780429292798.

[10] Conversano C., Contu G., & Mola F. (2019). Online promotion of UNESCO Heritage Sites in Southern Europe: Website information content and managerial implica-tions. Electronic Journal of Applied Statistical Analysis, 12(1), 108-139. https://doi.org/10.1285/I20705948V12N1P108.

[11] De Jong M. D. T., & Wu Y. (2018). Functional complexity and web site design. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 32(3), 347-372. https://doi.org/10.1177/1050651918762029.

[12] Déise Design (2023). Tankardstown 3D Tours. Retrieved from https://coppercoastgeopark.com/tankardstown-3d-tours/.

[13] Diputación Provincial de Granada (2023). Geoparque de Granada|Actividades|Exposición virtual [Geopark of Granada|Activities|Virtual Exhibition]. Retrieved from https://www.geoparquedegranada.com/exposicion-virtual/.

[14] English Riviera Geopark (2023). Volunteering|Education|English Riviera Global Geopark. Retrieved from http://www.englishrivierageopark.org.uk/section_sub.cfm? section=14&sub=210.

[15] Farsani N. T., Coelho C., & Costa C. (2011). Geotourism and geoparks as novel strategies for socio-economic development in rural areas. International Journal of Tourism Research, 13(1), 68-81. https://doi.org/10.1002/jtr.800.

[16] Farsani N. T., Coelho C. O. A., Costa C. M. M., & Amrikazemi A. (2014). Geo-knowledge management and geoconservation via geoparks and geotourism. Geoheritage, 6 (3), 185-192. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12371-014-0099-7.

[17] Fassoulas C., Nikolakakis E., & Staridas S. (2022). Digital tools to serve geotourism and sustainable development at Psiloritis UNESCO Global Geopark in COVID times and beyond. Geosciences, 12(2), 78. https://doi.org/10.3390/geosciences12020078.

[18] Gao C., Zeng J., Lyu M. R., & King I. (2018). Online app review analysis for identifying emerging issues. In Associationfor Computing Machinery (Ed.), Proceedings of the 40th International Conference on Software Engineering (pp. 48-58). New York: Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/3180155.3180218.

[19] Gebauer J., Tang Y., & Baimai C. (2008). User requirements of mobile technology: Results from a content analysis of user reviews. Information Systems and e-Business Management, 6(4), 361-384. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10257-007-0074-9.

[20] Hashim N. H., Murphy J., & Law R. (2007). A review of hospitality website design frameworks. In M.Sigala, L.Mich, & J.Murphy (Information and communication technologies in tourism 2007 (pp.Eds.),219-230). Vienna: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-211-69566-1_21.

[21] Henriques M. H., Canales M. L., García-Frank A., & Gomez-Heras M. (2019). Accessible geoparks in Iberia: A ghallenge to promote geotourism and education for sus-tainable development. Geoheritage, 11(2), 471-484. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12371-018-0300-5.

[22] Herrera-Franco G., Carrión-Mero P., Montalván-Burbano N., Caicedo-Potosí J., & Berrezueta E. (2022). Geoheritage and geosites: A bibliometric analysis and literature review. Geosciences, 12(4), 169. https://doi.org/10.3390/geosciences12040169.

[23] Herrera-Franco G., Erazo K., Mora-Frank C., Carrión-Mero P., & Berrezueta E. (2021). Evaluation of a paleontological museum as geosite and base for geotourism: A case study. Heritage, 4(3), 1208-1227. https://doi.org/10.3390/heritage4030067.

[24] Hong Kong UNESCO Global Geopark (2023). Education programmes. Retrieved from https://www.geopark.gov.hk/en/education/educational_activity.

[25] Jainari M. H., Baharum A., Deris F. D., Mat Noor N. A., Ismail R., & Mat Zain N. H. (2022). A standard content for university websites using heuristic evaluation. In K.Arai (Ed.), Intelligent computing (pp. 278-292). Cham: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-10461-9_19.

[26] Ji C., & Xu G. (2023). Digital development of cultural and creative industries under the security of 5G mobile and communication. Wireless Personal Communications. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11277-023-10498-x (In press).

[27] Jones C. (2008). History of geoparks. Geological Society, London, Special Publications, 300(1), 273-277. https://doi.org/10.1144/SP300.21.

[28] Justice S. C. (2018). UNESCO Global Geoparks, geotourism and communication of the earth sciences: A case study in the Chablais UNESCO Global Geopark, France. Geosciences, 8(5), 149. https://doi.org/10.3390/geosciences8050149.

[29] Kamoun F., & Almourad M. B. (2014). Accessibility as an integral factor in e-government web site evaluation. Information Technology & People, 27(2), 208-228. https://doi.org/10.1108/ITP-07-2013-0130.

[30] Kitzinger J. (1994). The methodology of focus groups: The importance of interaction between research participants. Sociology of Health & Illness, 16(1), 103-121. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9566.ep11347023.

[31] Kohmoto D. (2014). Characteristics of map information on the websites of global geoparks and Japanese geoparks. International Journal of Geoheritage, 2, 100-108. Law, R., Qi, S., & Buhalis, D. (2010). Progress in tourism management: A review of website evaluation in tourism research. Tourism Management, 31(3), 297-313. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2009.11.007.

[32] Lee Y., & Jayakumar R. (2021). Economic impact of UNESCO Global Geoparks on local communities: Comparative analysis of three UNESCO Global Geoparks in Asia. International Journal of Geoheritage and Parks, 9(2), 189-198. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijgeop.2021.02.002.

[33] Leigh D. (2010). SWOT analysis. Handbook of improving performance in the workplace. (Vol. 2, pp.115-140). John Wiley & Sons, Inc. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470592663.ch24.

[34] Li J., Whitlow M., Bitsura-Meszaros K., Leung Y. -F., & Barbieri C. (2016). A preliminary evaluation of world heritage tourism promotion: Comparing websites from Australia, China, and Mexico. Tourism Planning & Development, 13(3), 370-376. https://doi.org/10.1080/21568316.2015.1101393.

[35] Maamar Z., Faci N., Wives L., Badr Y., Santos P. B., & de Oliveira J. P. M. (2011). Using social networks for web services discovery. IEEE Internet Computing, 15(4), 48-54. https://doi.org/10.1109/MIC.2011.27.

[36] Maiellaro N., Varasano A., & Capotorto S. (2019). Digital data, virtual tours, and 3D models integration using an open-source platform. In M.Duguleană, M.Carrozzino, M.Gams, & I.Tanea (Communications in computer and information science Eds.), (pp. 148-164). Cham: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-05819-7_12.

[37] Mammadova A. (2021). Integrating Japanese local government and communities into the educational curriculum on regional sustainability inside the UNESCO’s bio-sphere reserves and geoparks. Sustainability, 13(5), 2497. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13052497.

[38] McLean G., & Wilson A. (2016). Evolving the online customer experience … is there a role for online customer support? Computers in Human Behavior, 60, 602-610. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.02.084.

[39] Molokáč M., Kornecká E., Pavolová H., Bakalár T., & Jesenský M. (2023). Online marketing of European geoparks as a landscape promotion tool. Land, 12(4), 803. https://doi.org/10.3390/land12040803.

[40] Nielsen J. (1994). Enhancing the explanatory power of usability heuristics. Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems (pp. 152-158). Boston: ACM Press. https://doi.org/10.1145/191666.191729.

[41] Orion N. (2019). The future challenge of earth science education research. Disciplinary and Interdisciplinary Science Education Research, 1(1), 3. https://doi.org/10.1186/s43031-019-0003-z.

[42] Pásková M., Zelenka J., Ogasawara T., Zavala B., & Astete I. (2021). The ABC concept—Value added to the earth heritage interpretation? Geoheritage, 13(2), 38. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12371-021-00558-8.

[43] Pásková M. (2018). Can indigenous knowledge contribute to the sustainability management of the Aspiring Rio Coco Geopark, Nicaragua? Geosciences, 8(8), 277. https://doi.org/10.3390/geosciences8080277.

[44] Pencarelli T. (2020). The digital revolution in the travel and tourism industry. Information Technology & Tourism, 22(3), 455-476. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40558-019-00160-3.

[45] Pereira D. I., Ramos I., & Medina W. (2011). Are geoparks webpages attractive to potential tourists? Some results of an evaluation procedure. Retrieved from https://repositorium.sdum.uminho.pt/bitstream/1822/15202/1/Are%20Geoparks%20webpages%20attractive%20to%20potential%20tourists%20Some%20results%20of% 20an%20evaluation%20procedure.pdf.

[46] Pijet-Migoń E., & Migoń P. (2021). Linking wine culture and geoheritage: Missing opportunities at European UNESCO World Heritage Sites and in UNESCO Global Geoparks? A survey of web-based resources. Geoheritage, 13(3), 71. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12371-021-00594-4.

[47] Piranha J. M., Aparecida Del Lama E., & de La Corte Bacci D. (2011). Geoparks in Brazil: Strategy of geoconservation and development. Geoheritage, 3(4), 289-298. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12371-011-0043-z.

[48] Poslončec-Petrić V., Cibilić I., Protega A., & Frangeš S. (2023). Experience KRKA-interactive 3D tourist map of the KRKA National Park. In N.Ademović, E.Mujčić, M.Mulić, J.Kevrić, & Z.Akšamija (Advanced technologies, systems, and applications VII (Eds.), pp.674-681). Cham: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-17697-5_51.

[49] Prosser C. D., Bridgland D. R., Brown E. J., & Larwood J. G. (2011). Geoconservation for science and society: Challenges and opportunities. Proceedings of the Geologists’ Association, 122(3), 337-342. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pgeola.2011.01.007.

[50] Rodrigues J., Neto de Carvalho C., Ramos M., Ramos R., Vinagre A., & Vinagre H. (2021). Geoproducts—innovative development strategies in UNESCO Geoparks: Con-cept, implementation methodology, and case studies from Naturtejo Global Geopark, Portugal. International Journal of Geoheritage and Parks, 9(1), 108-128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijgeop.2020.12.003.

[51] Ruban D. A., & Yashalova N. N. (2018). Geodiversity meanings in global geoparks: An empirical study. Environmental Earth Sciences, 77(22), 771. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-018-7962-9.

[52] Silva E., & Sá A. A. (2018). Educational challenges in the Portuguese UNESCO Global Geoparks: Contributing for the implementation of the SDG 4. International Journal of Geoheritage and Parks, 6(1), 95-106. https://doi.org/10.17149/ijg.j.issn.2210.3382.2018.01.007.

[53] Stewart I. S., & Hurth V. (2021). Selling planet Earth: Re-purposing geoscience communications. Geological Society, London, Special Publications, 508(1), 265-283. https://doi.org/10.1144/SP508-2020-101.

[54] Stewart I. S., & Lewis D. (2017). Communicating contested geoscience to the public: Moving from ‘matters of fact’ to ‘matters of concern’. Earth-Science Reviews, 174, 122-133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earscirev.2017.09.003.

[55] Štrba Ľ. (2019). Analysis of criteria affecting geosite visits by general public: A case of Slovak (geo)tourists. Geoheritage, 11(2), 291-300. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12371-018-0283-2.

[56] Štrba Ľ., Kršák B., & Sidor C. (2017). Scientific vs. visitor based criteria for assessment of geotourism potential as a supportive tool for destination’s performance en-hancement. In J.Fialová (Ed.), Public recreation and landscape protection—with nature hand in hand? (pp.333-338). Brno: Mendel University.

[57] UNESCO (2015). Statutes of the International Geoscience and Geoparks Programme (IGGP) ( 38C/14). Paris: Author Retrieved from https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000234539.

[58] UNESCO (2022). Checklist explanatory notes to define an aspiring UNESCO Global Geopark (aUGGp). Retrieved from https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000383838?posInSet=5&queryId=1089fbd9-d638-4ec2-bc62-91a8ad5fb88b.

[59] UNESCO (2023). UNESCO Global Geoparks (UGGp). Retrieved from https://en.unesco.org/global-geoparks/focus. UNESCO (2024). List of geoparks & regional networks. Retrieved from https://en.unesco.org/global-geoparks/list. United Nations (2023). The 17 goals. Retrieved from https://sdgs.un.org/goals.

[60] Vohland K., Land-Zandstra A., Ceccaroni L., Lemmens R., Perelló J., Ponti M., Samson R., & Wagenknecht K. (2021). The science of citizen science. Cham: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-58278-4.

[61] Werthner H., Alzua-Sorzabal A., Cantoni L., Dickinger A., Gretzel U., Jannach D.,... Zanker M. (2015). Future research issues in IT and tourism: A manifesto as a result of the JITT workshop in June 2014, Vienna. Information Technology & Tourism, 15(1), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40558-014-0021-9.

[62] Yoon C. (2010). Antecedents of customer satisfaction with online banking in China: The effects of experience. Computers in Human Behavior, 26(6), 1296-1304. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2010.04.001.

[63] Yung R., & Khoo-Lattimore C. (2019). New realities: A systematic literature review on virtual reality and augmented reality in tourism research. Current Issues in Tourism, 22(17), 2056-2081. https://doi.org/10.1080/13683500.2017.1417359.

[64] Zhang Y., Sun Y., & Xie B. (2015). Quality of health information for consumers on the web: A systematic review of indicators, criteria, tools, and evaluation results. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 66(10), 2071-2084. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.23311.