Influence of particle size distribution and normal pressure on railway ballast: A DEM approach

Z. Yan , Ali Zaoui , W. Sekkal

High-speed Railway ›› 2025, Vol. 3 ›› Issue (1) : 28 -36.

PDF (7345KB)
High-speed Railway ›› 2025, Vol. 3 ›› Issue (1) : 28 -36. DOI: 10.1016/j.hspr.2024.12.001
Research article
review-article

Influence of particle size distribution and normal pressure on railway ballast: A DEM approach

Author information +
History +
PDF (7345KB)

Abstract

Developing the railway transport sector is a challenging scientific, economic and social research topic starting with ensuring human security. The main topic that should be developed in that sense is the ballast stability and dynamical behaviour under external loading and environmental changes. This paper investigates the effect of particle size distribution and normal pressure on the mechanical response of a ballast bed. Grading curves of ballast layers with different sizes are illustrated to discuss their strength behaviour under various strains to deduce the significant effect on the direct shear performance of the ballast layer. Direct shear tests with different Particle Size Distribution (PSD) were reproduced using the Discrete Element Method (DEM). It is noticed that when the number of small-sized ballast increases, the shear strength and the friction angle increase to varying degrees under different normal pressures, with an average increase of 27 % and 8 %, respectively. When the number of large-sized ballast decreases, the shear strength and the friction angle decrease to varying degrees under different normal pressures, with an average decrease of 6 % and 3 %, respectively.

Keywords

DEM / Ballast / Direct shear test / Particle size distribution

Highlight

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Z. Yan, Ali Zaoui, W. Sekkal. Influence of particle size distribution and normal pressure on railway ballast: A DEM approach. High-speed Railway, 2025, 3(1): 28-36 DOI:10.1016/j.hspr.2024.12.001

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

CRediT authorship contribution statement

Z. Yan: Conceptualization, Methodology, Investigation, Data Curation, Writing, Writing – original draft, Visualization. Ali Zaoui: Conceptualization, Methodology, Investigation, Writing – review & editing, Supervision, Project administration. W. Sekkal: Conceptualization, Methodology, Writing – review & editing.

Declaration of Competing Interest

None.

Acknowledgements

The project LLDé is financially supported by "PSPC Régions n°2" ("Projets Structurants des Pôles de Compétitivité en région"), funded by Conseil Régional Hauts-de-France and BPI. The authors would like to thank French Competitive Cluster "TEAM2", dedicated to circular economy, for its day to day accompaniment.

References

[1]

Y. Qian, S.J. Lee, E. Tutumluer, et al., Simulating ballast shear strength from largescale triaxial tests: Discrete element method. Transp. Res. Rec.: J. Transp. Res. Board, 2374 (2013), pp. 126-135.

[2]

Y. Qian, D. Mishra, E. Tutumluer, et al., Characterization of geogrid reinforced ballast behavior at different levels of degradation through triaxial shear strength test and discrete element modelling. Geotext. Geomembr., 43 (2015), pp. 393-402.

[3]

Y. Qian, E. Tutumluer, Y.M.A. Hashash, et al., Triaxial testing of new and degraded ballast under dry and wet conditions. Transp. Geotech., 34 (2022), p. 100744.

[4]

Y. Qian, S.J. Lee, E. Tutumluer, et al., Role of initial particle arrangement in ballast mechanical behavior. Int. J. Geomech., 18(3)(2018), p. 04017158.

[5]

Y.L. Guo, J. Wang, V. Markine, et al., Ballast mechanical performance with and without under sleeper pads. KSCE J. Civ. Eng., 24 (2020), pp. 3202-3217.

[6]

Y.L. Guo, W. Jia, V. Markine, et al., Rheology study of ballast-sleeper interaction with particle image Velocimetry (PIV) and discrete element modelling (DEM). Constr. Build. Mater., 282 (2021), p. 122710.

[7]

X.C. Bian, W. Li, Y. Qian, et al., Analysing the effect of principal stress rotation on railway track settlement by discrete element method. Géotechnique, 70 (2020), pp. 803-821.

[8]

L. Wang, Z. Zhao, J. Wang, et al., Mechanical characteristics of ballast bed under dynamic stabilization operation based on discrete element and experimental approaches. Shock Vib. (2021), p. 6627612.

[9]

Z. Gao, X. Luo, D. Cai, et al., Cyclic settlement of ballast layer due to train passages at high speed and its reduction by asphalt track bed. Constr. Build. Mater., 318 (2022), p. 125956.

[10]

J. Mortensen, J.F. Faurholt, E. Hovad, et al., Discrete element modelling of track ballast capturing the true shape of ballast stones. Powder Technol., 386 (2021), pp. 144-153.

[11]

X. Zhang, C. Zhao, W. Zhai. Importance of load frequency in applying cyclic loads to investigate ballast deformation under high-speed train loads. Soil Dyn. Earthq. Eng., 120 (2019), pp. 28-38.

[12]

Z.J. Wang, G.Q. Jing, Q.F. Yu, et al., Analysis of ballast direct shear tests by discrete element method under different normal stress. Measurement, 63 (2015), pp. 17-24.

[13]

G.Q. Jing, Y.M. Ji, W.L. Qiang, et al., Experimental and numerical study on ballast flakiness and elongation index by direct shear test. Int. J. Geomech., 20 (2020), p. 10.

[14]

Y.L. Guo, Y.M. Ji, Q. Zhou, et al., Discrete element modelling of rubber-protected ballast performance subjected to direct shear test and cyclic loading. Sustainability, 12 (2020), p. 2836.

[15]

B. Suhr, K. Six. Parametrisation of a DEM model for railway ballast under different load cases. Granul. Matter, 19 (2017), p. 64.

[16]

B. Suhr, S. Marschnig, K. Six. Comparison of two different types of railway ballast in compression and direct shear tests: Experimental results and DEM model validation. Granul. Matter, 20 (2018), p. 70.

[17]

B. Suhr, K. Six. Efficient DEM simulations of railway ballast using simple particle shapes. Granul. Matter, 24 (2022), p. 114.

[18]

J. Harkness, A. Zervos, L. Le Pen, et al., Discrete element simulation of railway ballast: Modelling cell pressure effects in triaxial tests. Granul. Matter, 18 (2016), p. 65.

[19]

R.D. Mindlin. Compliance of elastic bodies in contact. J. Appl. Mech., 16(3)(1949), pp. 259-268.

[20]

R.D. Mindlin, H. Deresiewicz. Elastic spheres in contact under varying oblique force. J. Appl. Mech., 20(3)(1953), pp. 327-344.

[21]

B. Indraratna, N.T. Ngo, C. Rujikiatkamjorn, et al., Behavior of fresh and fouled railway ballast subjected to direct shear testing: Discrete element simulation. Int. J. Geomech., 14 (2012), p. 1.

[22]

J.X. Liu, M. Sysyn, Z.Y. Liu, et al., Studying the strengthening effect of railway ballast in the direct shear test due to insertion of middle-size ballast particles. J. Appl. Comput. Mech., 8(4)(2022), pp. 1387-1397.

[23]

D. Mishra, S.N. Mahmud. Effect of particle size and shape characteristics on ballast shear strength: A numerical study using the direct shear test. Proceedings of the ASME/IEEE Joint Rail Conference, American Society of Mechanical Engineers (2017).

[24]

M. Esmaeili, A. Pourrashnoo. Experimental investigation of shear strength parameters of ballast encased with geogrid. Constr. Build. Mater., 335 (2022), p. 127491.

[25]

Y. Qian, E. Tutumluer, Y. Hashash, et al., Effects of ballast degradation on shear strength behavior from large-scale triaxial tests. Jt. Rail Conf., 2014 (2014).

[26]

V. Angelidakis, S. Nadimi, M. Otsubo, et al., A code library to generate universal multi-sphere particles. SoftwareX, 15 (2021), p. 100735.

[27]

Y.L. Guo, J.L. Xie, Z. Fan, et al., Railway ballast material selection and evaluation: A review. Constr. Build. Mater., 344 (2022), p. 128218.

[28]

Y.L. Guo, C.F. Zhao, V. Markine, et al., Calibration for discrete element modelling of railway ballast: A review. Transp. Geotech., 23 (2020), p. 100341.

[29]

N.V. Brilliantov, F. Spahn, J.M. Hertzsch, et al., Model for collisions in granular gases. Phys. Rev. E, 53 (1996), pp. 5382-5392.

[30]

L.E. Silbert, D. Ertaş, G.S. Grest, et al., Granular flow down an inclined plane: Bagnold scaling and rheology. Phys. Rev. E, 64 (2001) 051302.

[31]

H.P. Zhang, H.A. Makse. Jamming transition in emulsions and granular materials. Phys. Rev. E, 72 (2005) 011301.

AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF (7345KB)

43

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

AI思维导图

/