Virtually coupled train set control subject to space-time separation: A distributed economic MPC approach with emergency braking configuration

Abstract

The emerging virtual coupling technology aims to operate multiple train units in a Virtually Coupled Train Set (VCTS) at a minimal but safe distance. To guarantee collision avoidance, the safety distance should be calculated using the state-of-the-art space-time separation principle that separates the Emergency Braking (EB) trajectories of two successive units during the whole EB process. In this case, the minimal safety distance is usually numerically calculated without an analytic formulation. Thus, the constrained VCTS control problem is hard to address with space-time separation, which is still a gap in the existing literature. To solve this problem, we propose a Distributed Economic Model Predictive Control (DEMPC) approach with computation efficiency and theoretical guarantee. Specifically, to alleviate the computation burden, we transform implicit safety constraints into explicitly linear ones, such that the optimal control problem in DEMPC is a quadratic programming problem that can be solved efficiently. For theoretical analysis, sufficient conditions are derived to guarantee the recursive feasibility and stability of DEMPC, employing compatibility constraints, tube techniques and terminal ingredient tuning. Moreover, we extend our approach with globally optimal and distributed online EB configuration methods to shorten the minimal distance among VCTS. Finally, experimental results demonstrate the performance and advantages of the proposed approaches.

Keywords

Virtually coupled train set / Space-time separation / Economic model predictive control / Distributed model predictive control / Emergency braking configuration

Declaration of Competing Interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Acknowledgment

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (52372310), the State Key Laboratory of Advanced Rail Autonomous Operation (RAO2023ZZ001), the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (2022JBQY001) and Beijing Laboratory of Urban Rail Transit.

References

[1] J. Felez, M.A. Vaquero-Serrano. Virtual coupling in railways: a comprehensive review. Machines, 11 (2023), p. 521.

[2] Q. Wu, X. Ge, Q.L. Han, et al., Railway virtual coupling: a survey of emerging control techniques. IEEE Trans. Intell. Veh. (2023), pp. 1-17.

[3] J. Xun, Y. Li, R. Liu, et al., A survey on control methods for virtual coupling in railway operation. IEEE Open J. Intell. Transp. Syst., 3 (2022), pp. 838-855.

[4] X. Luo, H. Liu, J. Wang, et al., Arrival time difference in virtually coupled train set: Cause and solution. In: IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics (SMC) (2022), pp. 474-479.

[5] E. Quaglietta, M. Wang, R. Goverde. A multi-state train-following model for the analysis of virtual coupling railway operations. J. Rail Transp. Plan. Manag., 15 (2020) 100195.

[6] J. Aoun, E. Quaglietta, R.M. Goverde, et al., A hybrid delphi-ahp multi-criteria analysis of moving block and virtual coupling railway signalling. Transp. Res. Part C Emerg. Technol., 129 (2021) 103250.

[7] J. Park, B.H. Lee, Y. Eun. Virtual coupling of railway vehicles: gap reference for merge and separation, robust control, and position measurement. IEEE Trans. Intell. Transp. Syst., 23 (2022), pp. 1085-1096.

[8] E. Quaglietta, P. Spartalis, M. Wang, et al., Modelling and analysis of virtual coupling with dynamic safety margin considering risk factors in railway operations. J. Rail Transp. Plan. Manag., 22 (2022) 100313.

[9] M. Chai, H. Wang, T. Tang, et al., A relative operation-based separation model for safe distances of virtually coupled trains. IEEE Trans. Intell. Veh., 9 (2024), pp. 2031-2045.

[10] Y. Zhao, P. Ioannou. Positive train control with dynamic headway based on an active communication system. IEEE Trans. Intell. Transp. Syst., 16 (2015), pp. 3095-3103.

[11] Q. Zhou, C. Zhang, F. Bao, et al., The safety braking protection model of virtually coupled train platoon in subway. 2020 10th IEEE Conference on Cyber Technology in Automation, Control, and Intelligent Systems (CYBER) (2020), pp. 401-406.

[12] H. Liu, X. Luo, T. Tang, et al., A hierarchical control approach for virtual coupling in metro trains. Comput. Aided Civ. Infrastruct. Eng. (2023), pp. 1318-1336.

[13] X. Luo, T. Tang, K. Li, et al., Computation-efficient distributed mpc for dynamic coupling of virtually coupled train set. Control Eng. Pract., 145 (2024), pp. 105846.

[14] J. Felez, Y. Kim, F. Borrelli. A model predictive control approach for virtual coupling in railways. IEEE Trans. Intell. Transp. Syst., 20 (2019), pp. 2728-2739.

[15] Y. Liu, R. Liu, C. Wei, et al., Distributed model predictive control strategy for constrained high-speed virtually coupled train set. IEEE Trans. Veh. Technol., 71 (2022), pp. 171-183.

[16] J. Felez, M.A. Vaquero-Serrano, J. de Dios Sanz. A robust model predictive control for virtual coupling in train sets. Actuators, 11 (2022), pp. 372.

[17] M.A. Vaquero-Serrano, J. Felez. A decentralized robust control approach for virtually coupled train sets. Comput. Aided Civ. Infrastruct. Eng. (2023), pp. 1896-1915.

[18] Y. Liu, Y. Zhou, S. Su, et al., Control strategy for stable formation of high-speed virtually coupled trains with disturbances and delays. Comput. Aided Civ. Infrastruct. Eng. (2022), pp. 621-639.

[19] X. Luo, T. Tang, X.S. Lu, et al., Robust constraint satisfaction and stability of virtually coupled train set with uncertain dynamics: a dual-mode robust mpc approach. Transp. Res. Part C Emerg. Technol., 156 (2023) 104356.

[20] X. Luo, T. Tang, M. Chai, et al., A hierarchical mpc approach for arriving-phase operation of virtually coupled train set. IEEE Trans. Intell. Transp. Syst. (2024), pp. 1-13.

[21] X. Luo, T. Tang, H. Liu, et al., An adaptive model predictive control system for virtual coupling in metros. Actuators, 10 (2021), p. 178.

[22] S. Su, J. She, K. Li, et al., A nonlinear safety equilibrium spacing-based model predictive control for virtually coupled train set over gradient terrains. IEEE Trans. Transp. Electrification, 8 (2022), pp. 2810-2824.

[23] X. Luo, H. Liu, L. Zhang, et al., A model predictive control based inter-station driving strategy for virtual coupling trains in railway system. In: 2021 IEEE International Intelligent Transportation Systems Conference (ITSC) (2021), pp. 3927-3932.

[24] Y. Bian, C. Du, M. Hu, et al., Fuel economy optimization for platooning vehicle swarms via distributed economic model predictive control. IEEE Trans. Autom. Sci. Eng., 19 (2022), pp. 2711-2723.

[25] J. Luo, D. He, W. Zhu, et al., Multiobjective platooning of connected and automated vehicles using distributed economic model predictive control. IEEE Trans. Intell. Transp. Syst., 23 (2022), pp. 19121-19135.

[26] L. Dai, Z. Qiang, Z. Sun, et al., Distributed economic mpc for dynamically coupled linear systems with uncertainties. IEEE Trans. Cybern., 52 (2022), pp. 5301-5310.

[27] L. Dai, T. Zhou, Z. Qiang, et al., Distributed economic mpc for dynamically coupled linear systems: a lyapunov-based approach. IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. Syst., 53 (2023), pp. 1408-1419.

[28] J. Kohler, F. Allgower. Nonlinear reference tracking: an economic model predictive control perspective. IEEE Trans. Autom. Control, 64 (2019), pp. 254-269.

[29] Shift2Rail, 2020.X2Rail3. Technical Report.

[30] J. Li, D. Tian, J. Zhou, et al., Distributed robust model predictive control for virtual coupling under structural and external uncertainty. IEEE Trans. Intell. Transp. Syst. (2024), pp. 1-19.

[31] Y. Zhang, S. Li, L. Yang. Distributed optimal control to virtual formation of railway trains with dynamic coupling/decoupling: an accelerated projected gradient based decomposition method. IEEE Trans. Veh. Technol., 72 (2023), pp. 15405-15420.

[32] X. Luo, T. Tang, J. Yin, et al., A robust mpc approach with controller tuning for close following operation of virtually coupled train set. Transp. Res. Part C Emerg. Technol., 151 (2023) 104116.

[33] IEEE, 2004.1474.1-2004 - ieee standard for communications-based train control (cbtc) performance and functional requirements. https://doi.org/10.1109/ieeestd.2004.95746.

[34] J. Wang, H. Liu, T. Tang, et al., A space-time interval based protection method for virtual coupling. 2022 China Autom. Congr. (CAC) (2022), pp. 4906-4911.

[35] A. Mironchenko. Uniform weak attractivity and criteria for practical global asymptotic stability. Syst. Control Lett., 105 (2017), pp. 92-99.

[36] YALMIP, (2024). Yalmip.〈https://yalmip.github.io/〉.

[37] M. Herceg, M. Kvasnica, C. Jones, et al., Multi-Parametric Toolbox 3.0. In: Proc. of the European Control Conference, Zürich, Switzerland (2013), pp. 502-512.