Walnut genome editing: an optimized CRISPR/Cas9 platform with superior genotypes and endogenous promoters

Abstract

Walnut (Juglans regia L.) is an economically valuable tree species globally, renowned for its nutritious nuts and quality timber. However, walnut breeding is significantly constrained by inherent biological factors, and an efficient and reliable genome-editing system has yet to be established. In this study, we developed an optimized walnut genome-editing platform by systematically selecting superior receptor from 30 walnut cultivars using genotype-dependent direct somatic embryogenesis and regeneration systems. Walnut cultivar HT-14 exhibited the highest embryogenic induction (53.33%) and regeneration efficiency (85.33%), and 35S: RUBY was effectively expressed in somatic embryos of the HT-14 genotype, proving it ideal receptor material for genetic transformation. Additionally, 12 walnut-specific endogenous Pol III promoters (JrU3 and JrU6) were cloned and validated for their ability to significantly enhance CRISPR/Cas9-editing efficiency by targeting the walnut phytoene desaturase gene (JrPDS). Compared to commonly used exogenous promoters (AtU6-26 and BpU6-6), these native promoters, the JrU3-chr3 promoter achieving an editing efficiency of 58.82%, significantly increased mutation efficiencies in walnut. Furthermore, endogenous promoters promoted higher frequencies of homozygous and biallelic mutations and greater mutation diversity. Collectively, this study establishes a robust and efficient genome-editing platform for walnut, providing essential technical support for functional genomics research and accelerating the precision breeding walnut varieties. These findings also offer valuable methodologies and insights into genome-editing applications in other perennial woody plants.

Acknowledgments

We thank H.H., Y.Y., D.W. for providing experimental materials and technology, critical reading of the manuscript. This work was supported by grants from the National Key Research and Development Program of China (no. 2023YFD2200303) and the Key Program of National Natural Science Foundation of China (no. 32330069).

Author contributions

X.B. conceived and designed the research and edited the manuscript. D.P. and Z.M. also contributed to the conception and design of the research. L.S. conducted the laboratory experiments and edited the manuscript. P.Z. participated in the laboratory experiments and statistical analysis. R.X. participated in molecular and tissue culture experiments. B.X. participated in statistical analysis and plant morphology data survey. All authors read and discussed the results and revised the manuscript.

Data availability

All the data generated in this study are included in the published article and its supplementary information.

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Supplementary data

Supplementary data is available at Horticulture Research online.

References

[1] Zhan X, Lu Y, Zhu JK. et al. Genome editing for plant research and crop improvement. J Integr Plant Biol. 2021; 63:3-33

[2] Gao C. Genome engineering for crop improvement and future agriculture. Cell. 2021; 184:1621-35

[3] Pixley KV, Falck-Zepeda JB, Paarlberg RL. et al. Genome-edited crops for improved food security of smallholder farmers. Nat Genet. 2022; 54:364-7

[4] Li S, Zhang C, Li J. et al. Present and future prospects for wheat improvement through genome editing and advanced technolo-gies. Plant Commun. 2021; 2:100211

[5] Lyzenga WJ, Pozniak CJ, Kagale S. Advanced domestication: harnessing the precision of gene editing in crop breeding. Plant Biotechnol J. 2021; 19:660-70

[6] LiuH, ChenW, LiY. et al. CRISPR/Cas9 technology and its utility for crop improvement. Int J Mol Sci. 2022; 23:10442

[7] Doudna JA, Charpentier E. The new frontier of genome engineer-ing with CRISPR-Cas9. Science. 2014; 346:1258096

[8] Gupta D, Bhattacharjee O, Mandal D. et al. CRISPR-Cas9 sys-tem: a new-fangled dawn in gene editing. Life Sci. 2019; 232: 116636

[9] Sha G, Sun P, Kong X. et al. Genome editing of a rice CDP-DAG synthase confers multipathogen resistance. Nature. 2023; 618: 1017-23

[10] Liu S, Wang H, Qin F. Genetic dissection of drought resistance for trait improvement in crops. Crop J. 2023; 11:975-85

[11] Xia X, Cheng X, Li R. et al. Advances in application of genome editing in tomato and recent development of genome editing technology. Theor Appl Genet. 2021; 134:2727-47

[12] Wang JY, Doudna JA. CRISPR technology: a decade of genome editing is only the beginning. Science. 2023;379:eadd8643

[13] Molla KA, Sretenovic S, Bansal KC. et al. Precise plant genome editing using base editors and prime editors. Nat Plants. 2021; 7: 1166-87

[14] Anders C, Hoengenaert L, Boerjan W. Accelerating wood domes-tication in forest trees through genome editing: advances and prospects. Curr Opin Plant Biol. 2023; 71:102329

[15] Nagle M, Déjardin A, Pilate G. et al. Opportunities for innova-tion in genetic transformation of forest trees. Front Plant Sci. 2018; 9:1443

[16] Liu C, Fan H, Zhang J. et al. Combating browning: mechanisms and management strategies in in vitro culture of economic woody plants. For Res. 2024; 4:e032

[17] Petri C, Burgos L. Transformation of fruit trees. Useful breeding tool or continued future prospect? 2005; 14:15-26

[18] Wang X, Chen S, Zhang H. et al. Agrobacterium-mediated genetic transformation of the most widely cultivated superior clone Eucalyptus urophylla× E. Grandis DH32-29 in southern China. Front Plant Sci. 2023; 13:1011245

[19] Cervera M, Juárez J, Navarro L. et al. Genetic transformation of mature citrus plants. Methods Mol Biol. 2005; 286:177-88

[20] Mallett DR, Chang M, Cheng X. et al. Efficient and modular CRISPR-Cas9 vector system for Physcomitrella patens. Plant Direct. 2019; 3:e00168

[21] Niazian M, Belzile F, Torkamaneh D. CRISPR/Cas 9 in planta hairy root transformation: a powerful platform for functional analysis of root traits in soybean. Plants (Basel). 2022; 11:1044

[22] Li X, Bu F, Wang L. et al. Optimization of CRISPR-Cas 9 system in Eustoma grandiflorum. iScience. 2024; 27:109053

[23] Nagy ED, Davis IW, Song S. et al. Computationally derived RNA polymerase III promoters enable maize genome editing. Front Plant Sci. 2025; 16:1540425

[24] Min T, Hwarari D, Li D. et al. CRISPR-based genome editing and its applications in woody plants. Int J Mol Sci. 2022; 23:10175

[25] Cheng D, Liu Y, Wang Y. et al. Establishment of high-efficiency genome editing in white birch (Betula platyphylla Suk.). Plant Biotechnol J. 2023; 22:7-9

[26] Carra A, Wijerathna-Yapa A, Pathirana R. et al. Development and applications of somatic embryogenesis in grapevine (Vitis spp.). Plants (Basel). 2024; 13:3131

[27] Song X, Liu H, Bu D. et al. Rejuvenation remodels transcriptional network to improve rhizogenesis in mature Juglans tree. Tree Physiol. 2021; 41:1938-52

[28] Ji F, Ma Q, Zhang W. et al. A genome variation map provides insights into the genetics of walnut adaptation and agronomic traits. Genome Biol. 2021; 22:1-22

[29] Zheng X, Nie R, Li A. et al. Integrated physio-biochemical and transcriptomic analysis reveals mechanism underlying salt tol-erance in walnut. Plant Growth Regul. 2024; 104:727-43

[30] Liu H, Zhou H, Ye H. et al. Integrated multi-omics analyses provide new insights into genomic variation landscape and regulatory network candidate genes associated with walnut endocarp. Plant J. 2025; 122:e70113

[31] Zhang J, Zhang W, Ji F. et al. A high-quality walnut genome assembly reveals extensive gene expression divergences after whole-genome duplication. Plant Biotechnol J. 2020; 18:1848-50

[32] Chang Y, Song X, Zhang Q. et al. Robust CRISPR/Cas9 mediated gene editing of JrWOX11 manipulated adventitious rooting and vegetative growth in a nut tree species of walnut. Sci Hortic. 2022; 303:111199

[33] Wang F-X, Shang G-D, Wang J-W. Towards a hierarchical gene regulatory network underlying somatic embryogenesis. Trends Plant Sci. 2022; 27:1209-17

[34] Horst NA, Katz A, Pereman I. et al. A single homeobox gene trig-gers phase transition, embryogenesis and asexual reproduction. Nat Plants. 2016; 2:209

[35] Shan S, Soltis PS, Soltis DE. et al. Considerations in adapting CRISPR/Cas9 in nongenetic model plant systems. Appl Plant Sci. 2020; 8:e11314

[36] Ribas AF, Dechamp E, Champion A. et al. Agrobacterium-mediated genetic transformation of Coffea arabica (L.) is greatly enhanced by using established embryogenic callus cultures. BMC Plant Biol. 2011; 11:92

[37] Wang D, Zhong Y, Feng B. et al. The RUBY reporter enables effi-cient haploid identification in maize and tomato. Plant Biotechnol J. 2023; 21:1707-15

[38] Mao Y, Zhang H, Xu N. et al. Application of the CRISPR-Cas system for efficient genome engineering in plants. Mol Plant. 2013; 6:2008-11

[39] Kor SD, Chowdhury N, Keot AK. et al. RNA pol III promoters—key players in precisely targeted plant genome editing. Front Genet. 2023; 13:989199

[40] Long L, Guo DD, Gao W. et al. Optimization of CRISPR/Cas9 genome editing in cotton by improved sgRNA expression. Plant Methods. 2018; 14:85

[41] Ma X, Zhu Q, Chen Y. et al. CRISPR/Cas9 platforms for genome editing in plants: developments and applications. Mol Plant. 2016; 9:961-74

[42] Qin G, Gu H, Ma L. et al. Disruption of phytoene desaturase gene results in albino and dwarf phenotypes in Arabidopsis by impairing chlorophyll, carotenoid, and gibberellin biosynthesis. Cell Res. 2007; 17:471-82

[43] Xu K, Chang Y, Zhang Y. et al. Rorippa indica regeneration via somatic embryogenesis involving frog egg-like bodies efficiently induced by the synergy of salt and drought stresses. Sci Rep. 2016; 6:19811

[44] Singh S, Hazra S. Somatic embryogenesis from the axillary meristems of peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.). Plant Biotechnol Rep. 2009; 3:333-40

[45] Nadaroglu H, Khatri P, Joshee N. Somatic embryogenesis and shoot organogenesis in peanut cv. ‘Georgia-12Y’ and successful transfer to the soil. PLoS One. 2024; 19:e0315060

[46] Zhu X, Xu Z, Wang G. et al. Single-cell resolution analysis reveals the preparation for reprogramming the fate of stem cell niche in cotton lateral meristem. Genome Biol. 2023; 24:194

[47] Kang HI, Lee CB, Kwon SH. et al. Comparative transcriptome analysis during developmental stages of direct somatic embryo-genesis in Tilia amurensis Rupr. Sci Rep. 2021; 11:6359

[48] Garcia C, Furtado de Almeida AA, Costa M. et al. Abnormalities in somatic embryogenesis caused by 2,4-D: an overview. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult. 2019; 137:193-212

[49] Islam SMS, Islam T, Hossain MM. et al. Embryogenic callus induction and efficient plant regeneration in three varieties of soybean (Glycine max). Plant Tissue Cult Biotechnol. 2017; 27: 41-50

[50] ˙Cosi ˙c T, Motyka V, Raspor M. et al. In vitro shoot organogen-esis and comparative analysis of endogenous phytohormones in kohlrabi (Brassica oleracea var. gongylodes): effects of geno-type, explant type and applied cytokinins. Plant Cell Tissue Cult. 2015; 121:741-60

[51] Mestinšek Mubi Š, Kunej U, VogrinčičV. et al. The effect of phytosulfokine alpha on haploid embryogenesis and gene expression of Brassica napus microspore cultures. Front Plant Sci. 2024; 15:1336519

[52] Wang J, Zhang T, Ren L. et al. Establishment of a direct somatic embryogenesis regeneration system using immature cotyle-don explants in Camellia sinensis cv. Shuchazao. IndCropProd. 2024; 210:118076

[53] Wang ZP, Zhang ZB, Zheng DY. et al. Efficient and genotype independent maize transformation using pollen transfected by DNA-coated magnetic nanoparticles. J Integr Plant Biol. 2022; 64: 1145-56

[54] Wang K, Shi L, Liang X. et al. The gene TaWOX5 overcomes geno-type dependency in wheat genetic transformation. Nat Plants. 2022; 8:110-7

[55] Han Y, Jin XL, Wu FB. et al. Genotypic differences in cal-lus induction and plant regeneration from mature embryos of barley (Hordeum vulgare L.). J Zhejiang Univ Sci B. 2011; 12: 399-407

[56] Lacroix B, Citovsky V. The roles of bacterial and host plant factors in agrobacterium-mediated genetic transformation. Int JDev Biol. 2013; 57:467-81

[57] Xia Y, Cao Y, Ren Y. et al. Effect of a suitable treatment period on the genetic transformation efficiency of the plant leaf disc method. Plant Methods. 2023; 19:15

[58] Ruan XM, Xiong X, Li JF. Identification and application of an exocarp-preferential promoter for genetic engineering of tomato fruit. Hortic Res. 2024;11:uhae035

[59] Zhang K, Su J, Xu M. et al. A common wild rice-derived BOC1 allele reduces callus browning in indica rice transformation. Nat Commun. 2020; 11:443

[60] Song Y, Bai X, Dong S. et al. Stable and efficient agrobacterium-mediated genetic transformation of larch using embryogenic callus. Front Plant Sci. 2020; 11:584492

[61] Long X, Zhang J, Wang D. et al. Expression dynamics of WOX homeodomain transcription factors during somatic embryoge-nesis in liriodendron hybrids. For Res (Fayettev). 2023; 3:15

[62] Zhou T, Lin Y, Lin Y. et al. Regeneration and agrobacterium-mediated genetic transformation of twelve eucalyptus species. For Res (Fayettev). 2022; 2:15

[63] Denyer T, Timmermans MCP. Crafting a blueprint for single-cell RNA sequencing. Trends Plant Sci. 2022; 27:92-103

[64] Bhatia S, Bera T. Somatic Embryogenesis and Organogenesis. In: Sharma K, Dahiya R, Amsterdam,eds. Modern Applications of Plant Biotechnol-ogy in Pharmaceutical Sciences. Netherlands: Elsevier, 2015,209-30

[65] Maleki SS, Mohammadi K, Ji KS. Study on factors influencing transformation efficiency in Pinus massoniana using agrobac-terium tumefaciens. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult. 2018; 133:437-45

[66] Kausch AP, Nelson-Vasilchik K, Hague J. et al. Edit at will: geno-type independent plant transformation in the era of advanced genomics and genome editing. Plant Sci. 2019; 281:186-205

[67] Lowe K, la Rota M, Hoerster G. et al. Rapid genotype “indepen-dent” Zea mays L. (maize) transformation via direct somatic embryogenesis. In Vitro Cell Dev Biol - Plant. 2018; 54:240-52

[68] Peng A, Chen S, Lei T. et al. Engineering canker-resistant plants through CRISPR/Cas9-targeted editing of the susceptibility gene CsLOB1 promoter in citrus. Plant Biotechnol J. 2017; 15:1509-19

[69] Tang X, Zhuang Y, Qi G. et al. Poplar PdMYB221 is involved in the direct and indirect regulation of secondary wall biosynthesis during wood formation. Sci Rep. 2015; 5: 12240

[70] Dai Z, Guan J, Miao H. et al. An intronic SNP in the carotenoid cleavage dioxygenase 1 (CsCCD1) controls yellow flesh forma-tion in cucumber fruit (Cucumis sativus L.). Plant Biotechnol J. 2025; 23:2182-93

[71] Zhang S, Wang H, Wang T. et al. MdMYB305-MdbHLH33-MdMYB10 regulates sugar and anthocyanin balance in red-fleshed apple fruits. Plant J. 2023; 113:1062-79

[72] Charrier A, Vergne E, Dousset N. et al. Efficient targeted mutage-nesis in apple and first time edition of pear using the CRISPR-Cas9 system. Front Plant Sci. 2019; 10:40

[73] Jiang W, Zhou H, Bi H. et al. Demonstration of CRISPR/Cas9/sgRNA-mediated targeted gene modification in Arabidopsis, tobacco, sorghum and rice. Nucleic Acids Res. 2013; 41:e188-8

[74] Nishitani C, Hirai N, Komori S. et al. Efficient genome editing in apple using a CRISPR/Cas9 system. Sci Rep. 2016; 6:31481

[75] Manghwar H, Lindsey K, Zhang X. et al. CRISPR/Cas system: recent advances and future prospects for genome editing. Trends Plant Sci. 2019; 24:1102-25

[76] Zhou Y, Shi L, Li X. et al. Genetic engineering of RuBisCO by multiplex CRISPR editing small subunits in rice. Plant Biotechnol J. 2025; 23:731-49

[77] Chang Y, Song X, Li M. et al. Characterization of walnut JrWOX11 and its overexpression provide insights into adventitious root formation and development and abiotic stress tolerance. Front Plant Sci. 2022; 13:951737

[78] Liang Z, Chen K, Zhang Y. et al. Genome editing of bread wheat using biolistic delivery of CRISPR/Cas9 in vitro transcripts or ribonucleoproteins. Nat Protoc. 2018; 13:413-30

[79] Ren C, Liu Y, Guo Y. et al. Optimizing the CRISPR/Cas9 system for genome editing in grape by using grape promoters. Hortic Res. 2021; 8:52

[80] Xing JX, Luo AJ, Wang XH. et al. Identification of U6 promoter and establishment of gene-editing system in Larix kaempferi (lamb.) Carr. Plants (Basel). 2024; 14:45