Interspecific hybridization history of Vaccinium berry crops and potential in wild relatives

Abstract

Wild species have been extensively used as a reservoir of genetic variability in plant breeding. Both blueberries and cranberries are crops from the highly diverse Vaccinium genus that have benefited from interspecific hybridizations throughout their domestication history. In this review, we compiled all documented interspecific hybridizations performed for blueberry and cranberry aiming to guide future breeding efforts. We report the traits of interest, success and failure of crosses, and give the taxonomic sections of the species involved. Out of the 500 species listed in Vaccinium, only 42 have been tested for hybridization so far. Successful crosses with fertile progenies have been reported across distantly related sections. Considering the polyphyletic nature of Vaccinium, the definition of crop wild relatives for these crops could be expanded to incorporate other genera. This review highlights the enormous potential of the wild gene pools for breeding of Vaccinium berry crops, and the need to characterize these species and establish germplasm collections to face the agricultural challenges ahead.

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the University of Florida royalty fund procured through licensing of blueberry cultivars from the Blueberry Breeding and Genomics Lab. Special thanks to Dr P. Fritsch and Dr A. Becker for sharing their invaluable knowledge of Vaccinium taxonomy and nomenclature.

Author contributions

P.R.M. conceived the topic of the review. A.M.K. planned and conducted the literature search to compile the dataset. A.M.K. designed the paper outline, generated figures, and produced the first draft. J.B. provided feedback, expanded some sections, and helped with figure design. P.R.M. and J.B. supervised the project execution. P.R.M. and P.M.L. critically reviewed the second draft and made final improvements. All authors read and approved the final version.

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Supplementary data

Supplementary data is available at Horticulture Research online.

References

[1] Becker AL, Crowl AA, Luteyn JL. et al. A global blue-berry phylogeny: evolution, diversification, and biogeogra-phy of Vaccinieae (Ericaceae). Mol Phylogenet Evol. 2024; 201: 108202

[2] Zhidkin R. R., & Matveeva T. V. (2022). Phylogeny problems of the genus Vaccinium L. and ways to solve them. Ecol Genet. 2022;20:Article 2

[3] Lobos GA, Hancock JF. Breeding blueberries for a changing global environment: a review. Front Plant Sci. 2015; 6:782

[4] Vorsa N, Zalapa J. Domestication, genetics, and genomics of the American cranberry. In: Goldman I,ed. Plant Breeding Reviews. 1st ed. Wiley, 2019,279-315

[5] Sharpe RH. Horticultural Development of Florida Blueberries. Proc. Fla. State Hort. Soc. 1953;188-190

[6] Sharpe RH, Darrow GM. Breeding Blueberries for the Florida Climate. Proc. Fla. State Hort. Soc. 1959;308-311

[7] Sharpe RH, Sherman WB. Breeding blueberries for low-chilling requirement. HortScience. 1971; 6:145-7

[8] Edger PP, Iorizzo M, Bassil N. et al. There and back again. histori-cal perspective and future directions for Vaccinium breeding and research studies. Hortic Res. 2022;9:uhac083

[9] Kron KA, Powell EA, Luteyn JL. Phylogenetic relationships within the blueberry tribe (Vaccinieae, Ericaceae) based on sequence data from MATK and nuclear ribosomal ITS regions, with comments on the placement of Satyria. Am J Bot. 2002; 89: 327-36

[10] Lyrene P, Ballington J. Wide hybridization in Vaccinium. Hortscience. 1986; 21:52-7

[11] Ballington JR. The role of interspecific hybridization in blueberry improvement. Acta Hortic. 2009; 810:49-60

[12] Song G-Q, Hancock JF. Vaccinium. In: Kole C,ed. Wild Crop Rel-atives: Genomic and Breeding Resources:Temperate Fruits. Springer: Berlin, Heidelberg, 2011,197-221

[13] Chavez DJ, Lyrene PM. Interspecific crosses and backcrosses between diploid Vaccinium darrowii and tetraploid southern high-bush blueberry. J Am Soc Hortic Sci. 2009; 134:273-80

[14] Wenslaff TF, Lyrene PM. Chromosome homology in tetraploid southern highbush × Vaccinium elliottii hybrids. HortScience. 2003; 38:263-5

[15] Chavez DJ, Lyrene PM. Production and identification of colchicine-derived tetraploid Vaccinium darrowii and its use in breeding. J Am Soc Hortic Sci. 2009; 134:356-63

[16] Lyrene PM. Phenotype and fertility of intersectional hybrids between tetraploid highbush blueberry and colchicine-treated Vaccinium stamineum. Hortscience. 2016; 51:15-22

[17] Chu Y, Lyrene PM. Artificial induction of polyploidy in blueberry breeding: a review. Hortscience. 2025; 60:100-10

[18] Miyashita C, Inoue E, Yamada T. et al. Hybridization of highbush blueberry (Vaccinium corymbosum) in section Cyanococcus with two Vaccinium section Bracteata species native to subtropical Asia. Sci Hortic. 2018; 241:225-30

[19] Hancock JF, Lyrene P, Finn CE. et al. Blueberries and cranberries. In: Hancock JF,ed. Temperate Fruit Crop Breeding:Germplasm to Genomics. Springer: Dordrecht, 2008,115-50

[20] Crowl AA, Fritsch PW, Tiley GP. et al. A first complete phy-logenomic hypothesis for diploid blueberries (Vaccinium section Cyanococcus). Am J Bot. 2022; 109:1596-606

[21] Camp WH. On the structure of populations in the genus Vac-cinium. Brittonia. 1942; 4:189-204

[22] Darrow GM, Camp WH. Vaccinium hybrids and the development of new horticultural material. Bull Torrey Bot Club. 1945; 72:1

[23] Coville FV. Improving the wild blueberry. In: USDA Yearbook of Agriculture. 1937,559-74

[24] Mainland CM. Frederick V. Coville and the history of North American highbush blueberry culture. IntJFruitSci. 2012; 12:4-13

[25] Wang J. How fruit moves: crop systems, culture, and the making of the commercial blueberry, 1870-1930. Plants People Planet. 2024; 6:1080-93

[26] Ballington J. Collection, utilization, and preservation of genetic resources in Vaccinium. Hortscience. 2001; 36:213-20

[27] Fritsch PW, Crowl AA, Manos PS. Vaccinium virgatum (Ericaceae): a species to be recognized. J Bot Res Institute Texas. 2024;18:

[28] Lyrene P. The use of Vaccinium elliottii Chapmn. in breeding highbush blueberry. Rutgers University Press. 2014.

[29] Megalos B, Ballington J. Unreduced pollen frequencies ver-sus hybrid production in diploid-tetraploid Vaccinium crosses. Euphytica. 1988; 39:271-8

[30] Dweikat I. M., & Lyrene P. M. (1991). Induced Tetraploidy in a Vaccinium elliottii Facilitates Crossing with Cultivated High-bush Blueberry. Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science, 116(6), 1063-1066

[31] Cabezas D., de Bem Oliveira I., Acker M., Lyrene P., & Munoz P. R. (2021). Evaluating Wild Germplasm Introgression into Autote-traploid Blueberry. Agronomy. 11(4), 614

[32] Vander Kloet SP. The Genus Vaccinium in North America. Research Branch, Agriculture Canada. 1988. https://books.google.com/books?id=pLCXzQEACAAJ

[33] POWO (2025). "Plants of the World Online. Facilitated by the Royal Botanic Gardens. Kew. Published on the Internet. https://powo.science.kew.org/Retrieved 26 April 2025."

[34] Smith TW, Walinga C, Wang S. et al. Evaluating the relationship between diploid and tetraploid Vaccinium oxycoccos (Ericaceae) in eastern Canada. Botany. 2015; 93:623-36

[35] Christ E. Crossbreedings between cranberries (Vaccinium macro-carpon ait.) and cowberries (Vaccinium vitis-idaea L.). Acta Hortic. 1977; 61:285-94

[36] Vorsa N, Polashock JJ. Alteration of anthocyanin glycosylation in cranberry through interspecific hybridization. J Am Soc Hortic Sci. 2005; 130:711-5

[37] Schultz JH. Some Cytotaxonomic and Germination Studies in the Genus Vaccinium. Washington State University; 1944:

[38] Qi X, Ogden EL, Bostan H. et al. High-density linkage map con-struction and QTL identification in a diploid blueberry mapping population. Front Plant Sci. 2021; 12:692628

[39] Wu C, Deng C, Hilario E. et al. A chromosome-scale assem-bly of the bilberry genome identifies a complex locus control-ling berry anthocyanin composition. Mol Ecol Resour. 2022; 22: 345-60

[40] Shigyou M, Gushiken A, Katsuragawa A. et al. Evaluation of F1 progenies derived from intersectional crossing of Vaccinium ulig-inosum L., a wild species native to Japan, and highbush blueberry ‘Bluecrop’ (V. corymbosum L.). Hortic Res. 2014; 13:97-106

[41] Ehlenfeldt MK, Polashock JJ, Vorsa N. et al. Fertile intersec-tional F1 hybrids of 4x Andean blueberry (Vaccinium meridionale) and 4x American cranberry (Vaccinium macrocarpon). Hortscience. 2023; 58:234-9

[42] Alix K, Gérard PR, Schwarzacher T. et al. Polyploidy and inter-specific hybridization: partners for adaptation, speciation and evolution in plants. Ann Bot. 2017; 120:183-94

[43] Ehlenfeldt MK, Ogden E, Rowland LJ. Asymmetric reciprocal crossing behavior of an Andean blueberry (V. meridionale) × lingonberry (V. vitis-idaea). Hybrid Plants. 2022;11:Article 22

[44] Huang J, Yang L, Yang L. et al. Stigma receptors control intraspecies and interspecies barriers in Brassicaceae. Nature. 2023; 614:303-8

[45] Chase CD. Cytoplasmic male sterility: a window to the world of plant mitochondrial-nuclear interactions. Trends Genet. 2007; 23: 81-90

[46] Bomblies K, Weigel D. Hybrid necrosis: autoimmunity as a potential gene-flow barrier in plant species. Nat Rev Genet. 2007; 8:382-93

[47] Ma J, Hancock WG, Nifong JM. et al. Identification and editing of a hybrid lethality gene expands the range of interspecific hybridization potential in Nicotiana. Theor Appl Genet. 2020; 133: 2915-25

[48] Schmidt N, Sielemann K, Breitenbach S. et al. Repeat turnover meets stable chromosomes: repetitive DNA sequences mark speciation and gene pool boundaries in sugar beet and wild beets. Plant J. 2024; 118:171-90

[49] Runemark A, Moore EC, Larson EL. Hybridization and gene expression: beyond differentially expressed genes. Mol Ecol. 2024; 34:e17303

[50] Rousi A. Hybridization between Vaccinium uliginosum and culti-vated blueberry. Ann Agric Fenn. 1963; 2:12-8

[51] Hiirsalmi H, Lehmushovi A. A Finnish highbush blueberry vari-ety ‘Aron.’. Ann Agric Fenn. 1982; 21:151-4

[52] Czesnik E, Madry W. Inheritance of some characters of the F1 generation of interspecific hybrids Vaccinium corymbo-sum L. × Vaccinium uliginosum L. Acta Horticulturae. 1989; 241: 50-5

[53] Erst AA, Gorbunov AB, Asbaganov SV. et al. Applying biotech-nology in the propagation and further selection of Vaccinium uliginosum × (V. corymbosum × V. angustifolium) hybrids. Plants (Basel). 2021; 10:1831

[54] Gorbunov AB. Introduction and breeding of Vacciniaceae in Siberia. Acta Hortic. 1993; 346:103-6

[55] Hiirsalmi H. Inheritance of characters in hybrids of Vaccinium uliginosum and highbush blueberries. Ann Agric Fenn. 1977; 16: 7-18

[56] Ballington J. Crossability between subgenus Cyanococcus (gray) Klotzsch and subgenus Polycodium (raf) Sleumer in Vaccinium. Hortscience. 1980; 15:419-9

[57] Ehlenfeldt MK, Ballington JR. Vaccinium species of section Hemimyrtillus: their value to cultivated blueberry and approaches to utilization. Botany. 2012; 90:347-53

[58] Lyrene PM. Breeding cultivars from blueberry × deerberry hybrids: progress and prospects. Hortscience. 2021; 56:439-46

[59] Ballington JR, Ballinger WE, Mainland CM. et al. Ripening period of Vaccinium species in southeastern North Carolina. JAmSoc Hortic Sci. 1984; 109:392-6

[60] Lyrene P. Fertile derivatives from sparkleberry × blueberry crosses. J Am Soc Hortic Sci. 1991; 116:899-902

[61] Chavez DJ, Lyrene PM. Hybridization of two diploid Vaccinium section Cyanococcus species with diploid Vaccinium arboreum in section Batodendron. Euphytica. 2010; 171:263-72

[62] Lyrene PM. First report of Vaccinium arboreum hybrids with culti-vated highbush blueberry. Hortscience. 2011; 46:563-6

[63] Lyrene PM, Olmstead JW. The use of inter-sectional hybrids in blueberry breeding. IntJFruitSci. 2012; 12:269-75

[64] Wenslaff TF, Lyrene PM. Unilateral cross compatibility in Vac-cinium elliottii × V. arboreum, an intersectional blueberry hybrid. Euphytica. 2003; 131:255-8

[65] Olmstead JW, Armenta HPR, Lyrene PM. Using sparkleberry as a genetic source for machine harvest traits for southern highbush blueberry. HortTechnology. 2013; 23:419-24

[66] Ehlenfeldt MK, Ballington JR. Prolific triploid production in intersectional crosses of 4× Vaccinium corymbodendron Dunal (section Pyxothamnus)by2× section Cyanococcus species. Euphyt-ica. 2017; 213:238

[67] Ehlenfeldt MK, Luteyn JL. Fertile intersectional F1 hybrids of 4× Vaccinium meridionale (section Pyxothamnus) and highbush blue-berry, V. Corymbosum (section Cyanococcus). Hortscience. 2021; 56: 318-23

[68] Ehlenfeldt MK, Polashock JJ, Ballington JR. Vaccinium corymboden-dron Dunal as a bridge between taxonomic sections and ploi-dies in Vaccinium: a work in progress. North American Blueberry Research and Extension Workers Conference. 2018;18

[69] Tsuda H., Kunitake H., Yamasaki M., Komatsu H., & Yosh-ioka K. (2013). Production of Intersectional Hybrids between Colchicine-induced Tetraploid Shashanbo (Vaccinium bractea-tum) and Highbush Blueberry ‘Spartan’. Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science, 138(4), 317-324

[70] Miyashita C. (2017). Genetic classification in Vaccinium including blueberries and Japanese wild species, and application of their interspecific hybrids for breeding. dongjingduchen 東京都農林総合研究センター研究報告 (12),1-51

[71] Brazelton C, Fain C, Ogg M, Ilyas S. Global State of the Blueberry Industry. International Blueberry Organization. 2024. https://www.internationalblueberry.org/2024-report/

[72] Može Š, Polak T, Gašperlin L. et al. Phenolics in Slovenian bilber-ries (Vaccinium myrtillus L.) and blueberries (Vaccinium corymbo-sum L.). J Agric Food Chem. 2011; 59:6998-7004

[73] Podwyszynska M, Mynett K, Markiewicz M. et al. Chromosome doubling in genetically diverse bilberry (Vaccinium myrtillus L.) accessions and evaluation of tetraploids in terms of phenotype and ability to cross with highbush blueberry (V. corymbosum L.). Agronomy (Basel). 2021; 11:2584

[74] Redpath L. E., Aryal R., Lynch N., Spencer J. A., Hulse-Kemp A. M., Ballington J. R., Green J., Bassil N., Hummer K., Ranney T., & Ashrafi H. (2022). Nuclear DNA contents and ploidy levels of North American Vaccinium species and interspecific hybrids. Scientia Horticulturae. 297, 110955

[75] Ehlenfeldt M, Luteyn JL, de la Torre F. et al. Triploid hybrids of 2× lingonberry (Vaccinium vitis-idaea)by2× black highbush blueberry (V. fuscatum) and 2× Elliott’s blueberry (V. elliottii)as evidence of a genome balance requirement for hybridization success. Horticulturae. 2023;9:Article 12

[76] Ahokas H. Artificial, reciprocal hybrids between Vaccinium-microcarpum and Vaccinium-vitis-idaea. Ann Agric Fenn. 1979; 16: 3-6

[77] Zeldin EL, McCown BH. Intersectional hybrids of lingonberry (Vaccinium vitis-idaea, section Vitis-idea) and (cranberry V. macro-carpon, section Oxycoccus) to Vaccinium reticulatum (section Macropelma). Acta Hortic. 1997; 446:235-8

[78] Vorsa N., Johnson-Cicalese J., & Polashock J. (2009). A blueberry by cranberry hybrid derived from a Vaccinium darrowii × (V. macrocarpon × V. oxycoccos) intersectional cross. Acta Horticul-turae. 810, 187-190

[79] USDA Agricultural Research Service, U. S. D. O. A. Germplasm Resources Information Network (GRIN) [Dataset]. National Agricul-tural Library—ARS—USDA; 2015

[80] Tang D, Jia Y, Zhang J. et al. Genome evolution and diversity of wild and cultivated potatoes. Nature. 2022; 606:535-41

[81] Zsögön A, čermák T, Naves ER. et al. De novo domestication of wild tomato using genome editing. Nat Biotechnol. 2018; 36:1211-6

[82] Brevis PA, Bassil NV, Ballington JR. et al. Impact of wide hybridization on highbush blueberry breeding. JAmSoc Hortic Sci. 2008; 133:427-37

[83] Nishiyama S, Fujikawa M, Yamane H. et al. Genomic insight into the developmental history of southern highbush blueberry populations. Heredity. 2021; 126:194-205

[84] Wang Z, Zhang W, Zhou Y. et al. Genetic and epigenetic signa-tures for improved breeding of cultivated blueberry. Hortic Res. 2024;11:uhae138

[85] Bian Y, Ballington J, Raja A. et al. Patterns of simple sequence repeats in cultivated blueberries (Vaccinium section Cyanococcus spp.) and their use in revealing genetic diversity and population structure. Mol Breed. 2014; 34:675-89

[86] Polashock J, Zelzion E, Fajardo D. et al. The American cranberry: first insights into the whole genome of a species adapted to bog habitat. BMC Plant Biol. 2014; 14:165

[87] Colle M, Leisner CP, Wai CM. et al. Haplotype-phased genome and evolution of phytonutrient pathways of tetraploid blueberry. GigaScience. 2019;8:giz012

[88] Diaz-Garcia L, Garcia-Ortega LF, González-Rodríguez M. et al. Chromosome-level genome assembly of the American cran-berry (Vaccinium macrocarpon Ait.) and its wild relative Vaccinium microcarpum. Front Plant Sci. 2021;12:

[89] Cui F, Ye X, Li X. et al. Chromosome-level genome assembly of the diploid blueberry Vaccinium darrowii provides insights into its subtropical adaptation and cuticle synthesis. Plant Commun. 2022; 3:100307

[90] Yu J, Hulse-Kemp AM, Babiker E. et al. High-quality reference genome and annotation aids understanding of berry develop-ment for evergreen blueberry (Vaccinium darrowii). Hortic Res. 2021; 8:228

[91] Mengist MF, Bostan H, De Paola D. et al. Autopolyploid inheri-tance and a heterozygous reciprocal translocation shape chro-mosome genetic behavior in tetraploid blueberry (Vaccinium corymbosum). New Phytol. 2023; 237:1024-39

[92] Kawash J, Colt K, Hartwick NT. et al. Contrasting a ref-erence cranberry genome to a crop wild relative provides insights into adaptation, domestication, and breeding. PLoS One. 2022; 17:e0264966

[93] Hirabayashi K, Debnath SC, Owens GL. Unveiling the evolu-tionary history of lingonberry (Vaccinium vitis-idaea L.) through genome sequencing and assembly of European and North Amer-ican subspecies. G3 (Bethesda). 2024;14:jkad294

[94] Yang L, Li M, Shen M. et al. Chromosome-level genome assembly and annotation of the native Chinese wild blueberry Vaccinium bracteatum. Fruit Res. 2022; 2:1-14

[95] Zeng T, He Z, He J. et al. The telomere-to-telomere gap-free reference genome of wild blueberry (Vaccinium duclouxii)provides its high soluble sugar and anthocyanin accumulation. Hortic Res. 2023;10:uhad209

[96] Albuja-Quintana M, Pozo G, Gordillo-Romero M. et al. Genome report: first reference genome of Vaccinium floribundum Kunth, an emblematic Andean species. G3 (Bethesda). 2024;14:jkae136

[97] Yocca AE, Platts A, Alger E. et al. Blueberry and cranberry pangenomes as a resource for future genetic studies and breed-ing efforts. Hortic Res. 2023;10:uhad202

[98] Khan AW, Garg V, Roorkiwal M. et al. Super-pangenome by integrating the wild side of a species for accel-erated crop improvement. Trends Plant Sci. 2020; 25: 148-58

[99] Campos M. (2024). Peru Remains Top Blueberry Exporter despite Drop in 2023. Produce Blue Book.https://www.bluebookservices.com/peru-remains-top-blueberry-exporter-despite-drop-in-2023/Retrieved 10 February 2025