Temporal dynamics and tissue-specific variations of the blueberry phyllosphere mycobiome

Shay Lychen Szymanski , Timothy David Miles

Horticulture Research ›› 2025, Vol. 12 ›› Issue (5) : 42

PDF (1679KB)
Horticulture Research ›› 2025, Vol. 12 ›› Issue (5) :42 DOI: 10.1093/hr/uhaf042
Article
research-article
Temporal dynamics and tissue-specific variations of the blueberry phyllosphere mycobiome
Author information +
History +
PDF (1679KB)

Abstract

Highbush blueberry (Vaccinium corymbosum) is an economically important fruit-bearing woody perennial. Despite the importance of microbial communities to plant health, the aboveground (phyllosphere) microbiome of blueberry is understudied. The phyllosphere is exposed to varying conditions throughout a growing season. The fruit undergoes extensive physiological change across a season from bud to fruit. This study aimed to provide a temporal characterization of the blueberry phyllosphere across a growing season and a characterization of specific tissues and phenological stages. Blueberry branches were harvested every other week across 2 years and two locations during the development process of the blueberry fruits. The internal transcribed spacer regions were amplified from DNA extracts and sequenced to perform amplicon-based characterization of the fungal microbiome across time and plant tissue. Fungal communities showed changes in α-diversity depending on the week of harvest and tissue type. Early in the season, α-diversity was high, but it decreased in midseason when flowers developed into fruit. Later in the season, as the fruit ripened, α-diversity increased again. The β-diversity of the community changed across time and tissue types during plant development. Notable members of the identified core microbiome were members of the genus Alternaria, Peltaster, and Taphrina, as well as the pathogenic taxa Aureobasidium pullulans and Botrytis cinerea. This research provides background for future experimentation of understanding the microbial composition in the blueberry phyllosphere in relation to the infection court of pathogens (e.g. Colletotrichum fioriniae and B. cinerea) and the temporal components of blueberry plant health and management.

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Shay Lychen Szymanski, Timothy David Miles. Temporal dynamics and tissue-specific variations of the blueberry phyllosphere mycobiome. Horticulture Research, 2025, 12(5): 42 DOI:10.1093/hr/uhaf042

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank the Michigan blueberry growers and the Michigan Blueberry Commission who have supported this project. We also thank our program’s field manager Roger Sysak for collecting field samples throughout the duration of this project, as well as Dr. Greg Bonito for providing primers. For funding, we would also like to thank the USDA-SCRI project titled: ‘BLUE-DYNAMO: an interactive platform to deliver blueberry disease and horticultural management strategies for fruit rots’ Project number MICL20054. We also acknowledge funding from Michigan State University’s Project GREEEN. This project is also supported by USDA Hatch project MICL02617. Michigan State University and the plant pathology farms sampled in this study occupy Anishinaabe lands ceded in the 1819 Treaty of Saginaw. The Southwest Michigan Research and Extension Center occupies Anishinaabe lands ceded in the 1821 Treaty of Chicago.

Author contributions

S.L.S. performed sample collection, sample processing, data analysis and interpretation, and manuscript preparation. T.D.M. and S.L.S. both participated in manuscript editing and study design. T.D.M. participated in project management in support of this research.

Data availability

Raw sequencing data generated for this study can be found in the NCBI SRA archive as Bioproject PRJNA1161654. Code is available at https://github.com/szymanskishay/blueberrytimecourse/

Conflict of interest statement

The authors report no conflicts of interest.

Supplementary data

Supplementary data is available at Horticulture Research online.

References

[1]

Leach JE, Triplett LR, Argueso CT. et al. Communication in the phytobiome. Cell. 2017;169:587-96

[2]

Liu H, Brettell LE, Singh B. Linking the phyllosphere microbiome to plant health. Trends Plant Sci. 2020;25:841-4

[3]

Kandel SL, Henry PM, Goldman PH. et al. Composition of the microbiomes from spinach seeds infested or noninfested with Peronospora effusa or Verticillium dahliae. Phytobiomes J. 2022;6: 169-80

[4]

Stengel A, Drijber RA, Carr E. et al. Rethinking the roles of pathogens and mutualists: exploring the continuum of symbio-sis in the context of microbial ecology and evolution. Phytobiomes J. 2022;6:108-82

[5]

Vorhalt JA. Microbial life in the phyllosphere. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2012;10:828-40

[6]

Gdanetz K, Trail F. The wheat microbiome under four man-agement strategies, and potential for endophytes in disease protection. Phytobiomes J. 2017;1:158-68

[7]

Grady KL, Sorensen JW, Stopnisek N. Assembly and seasonality of core phyllosphere microbiota on perennial biofuel crops. Nat Commun. 2019;10:4135

[8]

Zhu YG, Xiong C, Wei Z. et al. Impacts of global change on the phyllosphere microbiome. New Phytol. 2021;234:1977-86

[9]

Vannette RL. The floral microbiome: plant, pollinator, and microbial perspectives. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst. 2020;51:363-86

[10]

Szymanski S, Longley R, Hatlen RJ. et al. The blueberry fruit mycobiome varies by tissue type and fungicide treatment. Phy-tobiomes J. 2023;7:208-19

[11]

International Blueberry Organization (IBO). Global State of the Blueberry Industry Report. 2023. https://www.internationalblueberry.org/2023-report/. (16 April 2023, last accessed). Cali-fornia, USA:IBO

[12]

Yurgel SN, Douglas GM, Dusault A. et al. Dissecting community structure in wild blueberry root and soil microbiome. Front Microbiol. 2018;9:1187

[13]

Zhang Y, Wang W, Shen Z. et al. Comparison and interpretation of characteristics of rhizosphere microbiomes of three blueberry varieties. BMC Microbiol. 2021;21:30

[14]

Polashock JJ, Caruso FL, Averill AL. et al. Compendium of Blueberry, Cranberry, and Lingonberry Diseases and Pests. Second ed. St. Paul: The American Phytopathological Society; 2017:

[15]

Shade A, McManus PS, Handelsman J. Unexpected diversity during community succession in the apple flower microbiome. MBio. 2013;4:1-12

[16]

Zheng J, Allard S, Reynolds S. et al. Colonization and internaliza-tion of Salmonella enterica in tomato plants. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2013;79:2494-502

[17]

Waller TJ, Vaiciunas J, Constantelos C. et al. Evidence that blueberry floral extracts influence secondary coniditation and appressorial formation of Colletotrichum fioriniae. Phytopathology. 2018;108:561-7

[18]

Osario AKA, Miles LA, Miles TD. Mummy berry of blueberry caused by Monilinia vaccinii-corymbosi: a diagnostic guide. Plant Health Prog. 2022;23:362-8

[19]

Miles T, Schilder A. Michigan Blueberry Facts: Anthracnose Fruit Rot (Ripe Rot). 2008. https://www.canr.msu.edu/resources/michigan_blueberry_facts_anthrancnose_fruit_rot_ripe_rot_e3039. (12 August 2024, last accessed). Michigan, USA: Michigan State University Extension

[20]

Miles TD, Hancock JF. Inheritance of resistance to anthracnose fruit rot caused by Colletotrichum fioriniae in highbush blueberry. Int J Fruit Sci. 2022;22:160-9

[21]

Heck A, Issacs R. Blueberry Pollinator Stewardship Guide. 2021. https://www.canr.msu.edu/pollination/uploads/files/Blueberry%20Pollinator%20Stewardship%20Guide%202021-04-10.pdf.(4 September 2024, last accessed). Michigan, USA: Michigan State University Extension

[22]

Abbey JA, Alzohairy SA, Neugebauer KA. et al. Fungicide resis-tance in Botrytis cinerea and identification of Botrytis species associated with blueberry in Michigan. Front Microbiol. 2024;15: 1425392

[23]

Wang F, Saito S, Michailides TJ. et al. Fungicide resistance in Alternaria alternata from blueberry in California and its impact on control of Alternaria rot. Plant Dis. 2022;106:1446-53

[24]

Mondello V, Songy A, Battiston E. et al. Grapevine trunk diseases: a review of fifteen years of trials for their control with chemicals and biocontrol agents. Plant Dis. 2018;102:1189-217

[25]

Ehau-Taumaunu H, Hockett KL. Passaging phyllosphere micro-bial communities develop suppression towards bacterial speck disease in tomato. Phytobiomes J. 2023;7:233-43

[26]

Michigan State University Extension. Blueberry Growth Stages.

[27]

Zhu XQ, Xiao CL. Phylogenetic, morphological, and pathogenic characterization of Alternaria species associated with fruit rot of blueberry in California. Phytopathology. 2015;105: 1555-67

[28]

Haelewaters D, Urbina H, Brown S. et al. Isolation and molecu-lar characterization of the romaine lettuce phylloplane myco-biome. J Fungi. 2021;7:277

[29]

Filonow AB, Vishniac HS, Anderson JA. et al. Biological control of Botrytis cinerea in apple by yeasts from various habitats and their putative mechanisms of antagonism. Biol Control. 1996;7:212-20

[30]

Rodrigues MG, Fonseca A. Molecular systematics of the dimor-phic ascomycete genus Taphrina. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2003;53: 607-16

[31]

Daghino S, Martino E, Voyron S. et al. Metabarcoding of fungal assemblages in Vaccinium myrtillus endosphere suggests colo-nization of above-ground organs by some ericoid mycorrhizal and DSE fungi. Sci Rep. 2022;12:11013

[32]

Inacio J, Rodrigues MG, Sobral P. et al. Characterisation and classification of phylloplane yeasts from Portugal related to the genus Taphrina and description of five novel Lalaria species. FEMS Yeast Res. 2004;4:541-55

[33]

Fonseca A, Inacio J. Moore emend. Chapter 93-Lalaria R. T. Moore emend. A. Fonseca (2004). In: Kurtzman CP, Fell JW, Boekhout T, eds. The Yeasts. 5th ed. Elsevier Science:: London, 2011,1291-8

[34]

Wei N, Whyle RL, Ashman TL. et al. Genotypic variation in floral volatiles influences floral microbiome more strongly than interactions with herbivores and mycorrhizae in strawberries. Hortic Res. 2022;9:uhab005

[35]

Andrews JH, Kenerley CM. Microbial populations associated with buds and young leaves on apple. Can J Bot. 1980;58:847-55

[36]

DeMarsay A. Anthracnose Fruit Rot of Highbush Blueberry: Biology and Epidemiology. PhD. thesis, Rutgers, The State Univer-sity of New Jersey Department of Plant Biology, New Jersey, USA, 2005

[37]

Adam E, Groenenboom AE, Kurm V. et al. Controlling the microbiome: microhabitat adjustments for successful biocon-trol strategies in soil and human gut. Front Microbiol. 2016;7:1079

[38]

Freimoser FM, Rueda-Mejia MP, Tilocca B. et al. Biocontrol yeasts: mechanisms and applications. World J Microbiol Biotechnol. 2019;35:154

[39]

Vadkertiova R, Slavikova E. Killer activity of yeasts isolated from the water environment. Can J Microbiol. 1995;41:759-66

[40]

Windus ND, Shutak VG, Gough RE. CO2 and C2H4 evolution by highbush blueberry fruit. HortScience. 1976;11:515-7

[41]

Chung SW, Yu DJ, Oh HD. et al. Transcriptional regulation of abscisic acid biosynthesis and signal transduction, and antho-cyanin biosynthesis in ’Bluecrop’ highbush blueberry fruit dur-ing ripening. PLoS One. 2019;14:e0220015

[42]

Miles TD, Vandervoort C, Nair MG. et al. Characterization and biological activity of flavonoids from ripe fruit of an anthracnose-resistant blueberry cultivar. Physiol Mol Plant Pathol. 2013;83:8-16

[43]

Shi J, Xiao Y, Jia C. et al. Physiological and biochemical changes during fruit maturation and ripening in highbush blueberry (Vaccinium corymbosum L.). Food Chem. 2023;410:135299

[44]

Miles TD, Hancock JF, Callow P. et al. Evaluation of screening methods and fruit composition in relation to anthracnose fruit rot resistance in blueberries. Plant Pathol. 2012;61:555-66

[45]

Lopes LD, Wang P, Futrell SL. et al. Sugars and jasmonic acid con-centration in root exudates affect maize rhizosphere bacterial communities. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2022;88:e0097122

[46]

Xie Y, Nian L, Zeng Y. et al. Dynamic variation of endogenous flora in kiwifruit and its association with ripening metabolism in response to ethylene micro-environment. Postharvest Biol Technol. 2021;182:111695

[47]

Smets W, Chock MK, Walsh CM. et al. Leaf side determines the relative importance of dispersal versus host filtering in the phyllosphere microbiome. MBio. 2023;14:e01111-23

[48]

Grammen A, Van Campenhout J, Geeraerd A. et al. Susceptibility of apple fruits (Malus x domestica Borkh.) to the postharvest pathogen Colletotrichum fioriniae: cultivar differences and cor-relation with fruit ripening characteristics. Eur J Plant Pathol. 2019;155:801-16

[49]

Li Y. Botrytis Blight of Blueberry. 2023. https://portal.ct.gov/-/media/caes/pdio/fact-sheets/botrytis-blight-of-blueberry.pdf.(4 September 2024, last accessed). Connecticut, USA: The Connecticut Agricultural Experiment Station

[50]

Guathier N, Smigell C. Blueberry Cankers and Twig Blights. 2022. https://plantpathology.ca.uky.edu/files/ppfs-fr-s-10.pdf.(4 September 2024, last accessed). Kentucky, USA: Kentucky Cooperative Extension Service

[51]

Wharton PS, Schilder AC. Novel infection strategies of Col-letotrichum acutatum on ripe blueberry fruit. Plant Pathol. 2008;57: 122-34

[52]

Gleason ML, Zhang R, Batzer JC. et al. Stealth pathogens: the sooty blotch and flyspeck fungal complex. Annu Rev Phytopathol. 2019;57:135-64

[53]

Agler MT, Ruhe J, Kroll S. et al. Microbial hub taxa link host and abiotic factors to plant microbiome variation. PLoS Biol. 2016;14:e1002352

[54]

Sapkota R, Jorgsen LN, Nicolaisen M. Spatiotemporal variation and networks in the mycobiome of the wheat canopy. Front Plant Sci. 2017;8:1357

[55]

Kot AM, Kieliszek M, Piwowarek K. et al. Sporobolomyces and Sporidiobolus- non-conventional yeasts for use in industries. Fun-gal Biol Rev. 2021;37:41-58

[56]

Miles TD, Gillett JM, Jarosz AM. et al. The effect of environmental factors on infection of blueberry fruit by Colletotrichum acutatum. Plant Pathol. 2013;62:8-16

[57]

Great Lakes Integrated Sciences and Assessments Climate Adaptation Partnership. Great Lakes Climatologies Interactive Climatology Map. https://glisa.umich.edu/climate-data/great-lakes-climatologies/. (10 January 2025, last accessed). Michigan, USA: Great Lakes Integrated Sciences and Assessments

[58]

United States Department of Agriculture. 2023 USDA Plant Hardi-ness Zone Map. https://planthardiness.ars.usda.gov/pages/map-downloads. (10 January 2025, last accessed). Washington DC, USA: USDA

[59]

Soil Survey Staff, Web Soil Survey. Natural Resources Conservation Service, United States Department of Agriculture. https://websoilsurvey.nrcs.usda.gov/app/WebSoilSurvey.aspx.(10 January 2025, last accessed). Washington DC, USA: USDA

[60]

Longley R, Noel ZA, Benucci GMN. et al. Crop management impacts the soybean (Glycine max) microbiome. Front Microbiol. 2020;11:1116

[61]

Gardes M, Bruns TD. ITS primers with enhanced specificity for basidiomycetes - application to the identification of myc-orrhizae and rusts. Mol Ecol. 1993;2:113-8

[62]

White TJ, Bruns TD, Lee SB. et al. Amplification and direct sequencing of fungal ribosomal RNA genes for phylogenetics. In: Innis MA, Gelfand DH, Sninsky JJ, White TJ, eds. A Guide to Methods and Applications. Academic Press: New York, 1990,315-22

[63]

Taerum SJ, Steven B, Gage DJ. et al. Validation of a PNA clamping method for reducing host DNA amplification and increasing eukaryotic diversity in rhizosphere microbiome studies. Phytobiomes. 2020;4:291-302

[64]

Benucci GMN. Cecilia. https://github.com/Gian77/Cecilia (25 June 2024, Last Accessed)

[65]

Andrews S. FastQC: A Quality Control Tool for High Through-put Sequence Data. 2010. Available online at: http://www.bio informatics.babraham.ac.uk/projects/fastqc/.Cambridge,UK: Babraham Institute

[66]

Martin M. Cutadapt removes adapter sequences from high-throughput sequencing reads. EMBnetjournal. 2011;17:10-2

[67]

Edgar RC. Search and clustering orders of magnitude faster than BLAST. Bioinformatics. 2010;26:2460-1

[68]

Edgar RC. UPARSE: highly accurate OTU sequences from micro-bial amplicon reads. Nat Methods. 2013;10:996-8

[69]

Liber JA, Bonito G, Benucci GMN. CONSTAX2: improved taxo-nomic classification of environmental DNA markers. Bioinfor-matics. 2021;37:3941-3

[70]

Polme S, Abarenkov K, Nilsson RH. et al. FungalTraits: a user-friendly traits database of fungi and fungus-like stramenopiles. Fungal Divers. 2021;105:1-16

[71]

RCoreTeam. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Comput-ing. https://www.R-project.org/, 2023. Vienna, Austria: R Founda-tion for Statistical Computing

[72]

McKnight DT, Huerlimann R, Bower DS. et al. microDecon: a highly accurate read-subtraction tool for the post-sequencing removal of contamination in metabarcoding studies. Environ DNA. 2019;1:14-25

[73]

Oksanen J, Simpson G, Blanchet F. et al. Vegan: Community Ecology Package. R package version 2.6-4, https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=vegan, 2022. Vienna, Austria: Comprehensive R Archive Network

[74]

De Mendiburu F. Agricolae: Statistical Procedures for Agricultural Research. R package. Version 1.3-7, https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/agricolae/, 2023. Vienna, Austria: Comprehensive R Archive Network

[75]

Paulson JN, Olson ND, Braccia DJ. metagenomeSeq: Statistical Analysis for Sparse High-Throughput Sequencing. Bioconductor package. http://www.cbcb.umd.edu/software/metagenomeSeq, 2013. Maryland, USA: University of Maryland Center for Bioin-formatics and Computational Biology

[76]

McMurdie PJ, Holmes S. Phyloseq: an R package for reproducible interactive analysis and graphics of microbiome census data. PLoS One. 2013;8:e61217

[77]

Shade A, Stopnisek N. Abundance-occupancy distributions to prioritize plant core microbiome membership. Curr Opin Micro-biol. 2019;49:50-8

[78]

Kurtz Z, Mueller C, Miraldi E. et al. Sparse and compositionally robust inference of microbial ecological networks. PLoS Comput Biol. 2015;11:e1004226

[79]

Shannon P, Markiel A, Ozier O. et al. Cytoscape: a software environment for integrated models of biomolecular interaction networks. Genome Res. 2003;13:2498-504

[80]

Doncheva NT, Assenov Y, Domingues FS. Topological analysis and interactive visualization of biological networks and protein structures. Nat Protoc. 2012;7:670-85

[81]

Xia J, Lu Y, Pang Z. et al. MicrobiomeAnalystR: MicrobiomeAn-alystR - A Comprehensive R Package for Statistical, Visual, and Functional Analysis of the Microbiome. R package version 2.0 https://github.com/xia-lab/MicrobiomeAnalystR, 2024. Quebec, Canada: McGill University

[82]

Wickham H. ggplot2: Elegant Graphics for Data Analysis. R package. New York: Springer, 2016

PDF (1679KB)

1222

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/