Genetic architecture of cherry leaf spot (Blumeriella jaapii) resistance in sour cherry (Prunus cerasus L.) uncovered by QTL analyses in a biparental population genotyped with the 6 + 9 K SNP array

Ofere Francis Emeriewen , Thomas Wolfgang Wöhner , Vincent Braun , Susan Schröpfer , Mirko Schuster , Andreas Peil , Henryk Flachowsky

Horticulture Research ›› 2025, Vol. 12 ›› Issue (5) : 35

PDF (1272KB)
Horticulture Research ›› 2025, Vol. 12 ›› Issue (5) :35 DOI: 10.1093/hr/uhaf035
Article
research-article
Genetic architecture of cherry leaf spot (Blumeriella jaapii) resistance in sour cherry (Prunus cerasus L.) uncovered by QTL analyses in a biparental population genotyped with the 6 + 9 K SNP array
Author information +
History +
PDF (1272KB)

Abstract

Sour cherry (Prunus cerasus L.) is an economically significant species in the Rosaceae family. Hitherto, there had been limited genetic and genomic resources to elucidate important horticultural traits in this species mainly because of the complex polyploid nature of its genome, a hybrid between Prunus avium and Prunus fruticosa. An important trait that has not been well studied in sour cherry is resistance to cherry leaf spot (CLS), caused by the fungus Blumeriella jaapii. This work took advantage of the RosBREED 6 + 9 K SNP array to study the genetic basis of CLS resistance and inheritance in sour cherry. We established an F1 segregating population by crossing two cultivars, ‘Schattenmorelle’ and ‘Pc 2’ and genotyped both parents and the progeny with the cherry 6 + 9 K SNP array and SSR markers. We evaluated both parents and progeny for resistance and susceptibility to CLS under field conditions. The applied marker systems facilitated the development of parental genetic maps, and the identification of two stable QTLs associated with CLS resistance, CLSR_1f in ‘Pc 2’ and susceptibility, CLSS_1f, in ‘Schattenmorelle’ explaining 40.9% and 21.5%, respectively, of the phenotypic variation within the population. The mechanism of resistance in sour cherry appears to be independent of the CLS resistance QTL, CLSR_G4, previously identified in P. canescens, as the CLSR_G4-QTL and associated allele were not identified. Based on our findings, we propose a two-gene model for CLS resistance in sour cherry involving a susceptibility QTL, which might explain why some CLSR_G4-resistant plants in previous studies were susceptible.

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Ofere Francis Emeriewen, Thomas Wolfgang Wöhner, Vincent Braun, Susan Schröpfer, Mirko Schuster, Andreas Peil, Henryk Flachowsky. Genetic architecture of cherry leaf spot (Blumeriella jaapii) resistance in sour cherry (Prunus cerasus L.) uncovered by QTL analyses in a biparental population genotyped with the 6 + 9 K SNP array. Horticulture Research, 2025, 12(5): 35 DOI:10.1093/hr/uhaf035

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

Acknowledgements

We thank Ines Hiller and all the staff from the experimental field from the JKI in Dresden-Pillnitz for their technical assistance.

Author contributions

Conception: T.W.W., O.F.E., M.S., A.P., H.F. SNP marker analyses: O.F.E., A.P., T.W.W. SSR sourcing, genotyping, and analyses: A.P., V.B., O.F.E., T.W.W. Mapping analyses: O.F.E., A.P., T.W.W. Phenotyping and analyses: T.W.W., M.S. CLS marker: S.S. Manuscript drafting: O.F.E., T.W.W. Manuscript review and editing: All authors read and approved the final version of the manuscript.

Data availability

The data underlying this article are available in the article and online supplementary material. The resistance donor, ‘Pc 2’, is available on request to the corresponding authors or on request at https://www.deutsche-genbank-obst.de/einfuehrung/zugangsbedingungen.

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare none.

Supplementary Data

Supplementary data are available at Horticulture Research online.

References

[1]

Quero-García J, Iezzoni A, López-Ortega G. et al. Advances and challenges in cherry breeding. In: Lang G. (ed.) Achieving Sustain-able Cultivation of Temperate Zone Tree Fruits and Berries. London: Burleigh Dodds Science Publishing, 2019,55-88

[2]

Wöhner TW, Emeriewen OF, Wittenberg AH. et al. The structure of the tetraploid sour cherry ‘Schattenmorelle’(Prunus cerasus L.) genome reveals insights into its segmental allopolyploid nature. Frontiers. Plant Sci. 2023;14:1284478

[3]

Goeckeritz CZ, Rhoades KE, Childs KL. et al. Genome of tetraploid sour cherry (Prunus cerasus L.) ‘Montmorency’ identi-fies three distinct ancestral Prunus genomes. Hortic Res. 2023;10: uhad097

[4]

Kobel F. Zytologische Untersuchungen an Prunoideen und Pomoideen. Institut Orell Füssli. 1927:1-84

[5]

Oldén EJ, Nybom N. On the origin of PRUNUS CERASUS l. Hered-itas. 1968;59:327-45

[6]

Shirasawa K, Isuzugawa K, Ikenaga M. et al. The genome sequence of sweet cherry (Prunus avium) for use in genomics-assisted breeding. DNA Res. 2017;24:499-508

[7]

Wöhner TW, Emeriewen OF, Wittenberg AHJ. et al. The draft chromosome-level genome assembly of tetraploid ground cherry (Prunus fruticosa pall.) from long reads. Genomics. 2021; 113:4173-83

[8]

Calle A, Cai L, Iezzoni A. et al. Genetic dissection of bloom time in low chilling sweet cherry (Prunus avium L.) using a multi-family QTL approach. Front Plant Sci. 2020;10:1647

[9]

Klagges C, Campoy JA, Quero-García J. et al. Construction and comparative analyses of highly dense linkage maps of two sweet cherry intra-specific progenies of commercial cultivars. PLoS One. 2013;8:e54743

[10]

Peace C, Bassil N, Main D. et al. Development and evaluation of a genome-wide 6K SNP array for diploid sweet cherry and tetraploid sour cherry. PLoS One. 2012;7:e48305

[11]

Vanderzande S, Howard NP, Cai L. et al. High-quality, genome-wide SNP genotypic data for pedigreed germplasm of the diploid outbreeding species apple, peach, and sweet cherry through a common workflow. PLoS One. 2019;14:e0210928

[12]

Vanderzande S, Zheng P, Cai L. et al. The cherry 6+ 9K SNP array: a cost-effective improvement to the cherry 6K SNP array for genetic studies. Sci Rep. 2020;10:7613

[13]

Dirlewanger E, Cosson P, Tavaud M. et al. Development of microsatellite markers in peach [Prunus persica (L.) Batsch] and their use in genetic diversity analysis in peach and sweet cherry (Prunus avium L.). Theor Appl Genet. 2002;105:127-38

[14]

Guajardo V, Solís S, Sagredo B. et al. Construction of high density sweet cherry (Prunus avium L.) linkage maps using microsatellite markers and SNPs detected by genotyping-by-sequencing (GBS). PLoS One. 2015;10:e0127750

[15]

Wang D, Karle R, Iezzoni AF. QTL analysis of flower and fruit traits in sour cherry. Theor Appl Genet. 2000;100:535-44

[16]

Wang D, Karle R, Brettin TS. et al. Genetic linkage map in sour cherry using RFLP markers. Theor Appl Genet. 1998;97:1217-24

[17]

Stegmeir T, Schuster M, Sebolt A. et al. Cherry leaf spot resis-tance in cherry (Prunus) is associated with a quantitative trait locus on linkage group 4 inherited from P. Canescens. Mol Breed. 2014;34:927-35

[18]

Joshua J, Mmbaga MT. Perpetuation of cherry leaf spot disease in ornamental cherry. J Phytopathol. 2015;163:194-201

[19]

Sjulin TM, Jones AL, Andersen RL. Expression of partial resis-tance to cherry leaf spot in cultivars of sweet, sour, duke, and European ground cherry. Plant Dis. 1989;73:56-61

[20]

Wharton PS, Iezzoni A, Jones AL. Screening cherry germ plasm for resistance to leaf spot. Plant Dis. 2003;87:471-7

[21]

Andersen KL, Sebolt AM, Sundin GW. et al. Assessment of the inheritance of resistance and tolerance in cherry (Prunus sp.) to Blumeriella jaapii, the causal agent of cherry leaf spot. Plant Pathol. 2018;67:682-91

[22]

Calle A, Serradilla MJ, Wünsch A. QTL mapping of phenolic compounds and fruit colour in sweet cherry using a 6+ 9K SNP array genetic map. Sci Hortic. 2021;280:109900

[23]

Mnejja M, Garcia-Mas J, Audergon J-M. et al. Prunus microsatel-lite marker transferability across rosaceous crops. Tree Genet Genomes. 2010;6:689-700

[24]

Canli FA. Progress in genetic mapping of Prunus species. Erciyes Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü Dergisi. 2008;24:414-24

[25]

Schuster M, Tobutt KR. Screening of cherries for resistance to leaf spot, Blumeriella jaapii. Acta Hortic. 2003;663:239-44

[26]

Hammer Ø, Harper DA.Past: paleontological statistics soft-ware package for educaton and data anlysis. Palaeontol Electron. 2001;4:1

[27]

Beaver JA, Iezzoni AF. Allozyme inheritance in tetraploid sour cherry (Prunus cerasus L.). J Am Soc Hortic Sci. 1993;118:873-7

[28]

Cipriani G, Lot G, Huang W-G. et al. AC/GT and AG/CT microsatel-lite repeats in peach [Prunus persica (L) Batsch]: isolation, charac-terisation and cross-species amplification in Prunus. Theor Appl Genet. 1999;99:65-72

[29]

Clarke JB, Tobutt KR. Development and characterization of poly-morphic microsatellites from Prunus avium’Napoleon’. Mol Ecol Notes. 2003;3:578-80

[30]

Mnejja M, Garcia-Mas J, Howad W. et al. Simple-sequence repeat (SSR) markers of Japanese plum (Prunus salicina Lindl.) are highly polymorphic and transferable to peach and almond. Mol Ecol Notes. 2004;4:163-6

[31]

Sosinski B, Gannavarapu M, Hager LD. et al. Characterization of microsatellite markers in peach [Prunus persica (L.) Batsch]. Theor Appl Genet. 2000;101:421-8

[32]

Struss D, Ahmad R, Southwick SM. et al. Analysis of sweet cherry (Prunus avium L.) cultivars using SSR and AFLP markers. J Amer Soc Hort Sci. 2003;128:904-9

[33]

Testolin R, Marrazzo T, Cipriani G. et al. Microsatellite DNA in peach (Prunus persica L. Batsch) and its use in fingerprinting and testing the genetic origin of cultivars. Genome. 2000;43:512-20

[34]

Van Ooijen JW. JoinMap®5: Software for the Calculation of Genetic Linkage Maps in Experimental Populations of Diploid Species. Wageningen, Netherlands: Kyazma B.V; 2018

[35]

Voorrips RE. MapChart: software for the graphical presentation of linkage maps and QTLs. J Hered. 2002;93:77-8

[36]

Van Ooijen JW, Jansen J. Genetic Mapping in Experimental Popula-tions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2013

[37]

Wöhner TW, Emeriewen OF. A landscape of resistance gene analogs in sour cherry (Prunus cerasus L.). BMC Res Notes. 2024, 2024;17:292

PDF (1272KB)

828

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/