Tidal Freshwater Forest Restoration at the European Elbe Estuary: Initial Establishment Success of Salix Species
Heike Markus-Michalczyk
Hydroecol. Eng. ›› 2026, Vol. 3 ›› Issue (3) : 10011
Restoration of tidal freshwater forest is required according to European legislation for biodiversity conservation and compensation for human impact on estuaries. A large-scale project was set up to compensate for channel deepening at the port of Hamburg, the third largest port in Europe. The relief was modelled to allow tidal dynamics, and 2680 willows (genus Salix) were planted for a tidal freshwater forest in autumn 2022. Six characteristic Salix species were planted in different habitats at the restoration site. After one year, 75% of the individuals were established, whereas S. viminalis showed the highest establishment percentage (85.7), followed by S. rubens (72.6), S. triandra (70.7), S. alba (60.3), S. purpurea (51.3), and S. fragilis (37.7). The species diversity in the different habitats (stream valley meadow, reed stands, wet sinks, bar ground, in small bays, at tidal creeks) was preserved. The species differed in growth parameters and planting habitats: Salix alba and S. purpurea showed drought damage, but S. alba responded with resprouting; S. alba was least affected, whereas S. viminalis was most affected by browsing but similarly responded with strong resprouting. Salix triandra showed browsing damage but did resprout less. Salix fragilis and S. rubens behaved intermediary. The study demonstrates the initial establishment success of the Salixspecies one year after plantation with important implications for initial restoration management of tidal freshwater forest in European estuaries.
Restoration / Floodplain forest / Salix / Estuaries
| [1] |
|
| [2] |
|
| [3] |
|
| [4] |
Integrated Management Plan for the Elbe Estuary. 2012. Available online: http://www.natura2000-unterelbe.de/links-Gesamtplan.php (accessed on 27 September 2024). |
| [5] |
|
| [6] |
|
| [7] |
|
| [8] |
|
| [9] |
|
| [10] |
|
| [11] |
|
| [12] |
|
| [13] |
|
| [14] |
|
| [15] |
|
| [16] |
|
| [17] |
|
| [18] |
|
| [19] |
|
| [20] |
|
| [21] |
|
| [22] |
|
| [23] |
|
| [24] |
|
| [25] |
Directive 2007/60/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 October 2007 on the Assessment and Management of Flood Risks. Available online: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/DE/TXT/HTML/?uri=CELEX:32007L0060 (accessed on 20 June 2026). |
| [26] |
Council Directive 92/43/EEC of 21 May 1992 on the Conservation of Natural Habitats and of Wild Fauna and Flora. Available online: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/DE/TXT/?uri=CELEX:01992L0043-20130701 (accessed on 20 June 2026). |
| [27] |
Directive 2009/147/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 30 November 2009 on the Conservation of Wild Birds. Available online: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/DE/TXT/?uri=CELEX:32009L0147 (accessed on 20 June 2026). |
| [28] |
|
| [29] |
|
| [30] |
|
| [31] |
|
| [32] |
Matthews JW, |
| [33] |
Kevey B. Floodplain Forests. In The Drava River ; Lóczy D, Ed.; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2019. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-92816-6_18 |
| [34] |
DWD. Available online: https://www.dwd.de/DE/presse/pressemitteilungen/DE/2023/20230530_deutschlandwetter_mai2023_news.html (accessed on 20 June 206). |
| [35] |
Köhler A, Förster N, Zander M, |
| [36] |
|
| [37] |
|
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |