Enhancing Streamflow Forecasting in Major West African Rivers by Utilizing Meta-Heuristic Algorithms and Climate Data Time Lag Analysis

Al-Amin Danladi Bello , Bamaiyi Usman Aliyu , Abdulrazaq Salaudeen , Bashir Tanimu , Khalid Sulaiman , Aliyu Ishaq

Hydroecol. Eng. ›› 2025, Vol. 2 ›› Issue (2) : 10006

PDF (1239KB)
Hydroecol. Eng. ›› 2025, Vol. 2 ›› Issue (2) :10006 DOI: 10.70322/hee.2025.10006
Article
research-article
Enhancing Streamflow Forecasting in Major West African Rivers by Utilizing Meta-Heuristic Algorithms and Climate Data Time Lag Analysis
Author information +
History +
PDF (1239KB)

Abstract

Accurate streamflow prediction is essential for irrigation planning, water allocation, and flood risk management, particularly in water-scarce regions like the Niger River Basin. However, the complexity of hydrological processes and data limitations make reliable predictions challenging. This study optimizes Support Vector Machine (SVM) hyperparameters for daily streamflow prediction using time-lagged climate data and four metaheuristic algorithms—Binary Slime Mould Algorithm (BSMA), African Vulture Optimisation Algorithm (AVOA), Archery Algorithm (AA), and Intelligent Ice Fishing Algorithm (IIFA). Model performance was assessed using eight evaluation metrics, with results showing that AA and IIFA consistently outperform the others, achieving Nash-Sutcliffe Efficiency (NSE) values between 0.986-0.999 and 0.893-0.999, respectively. AVOA and BSMA show less consistent performance, with NSE ranges of 0.524-0.999 and 0.863-0.965, respectively. The study highlights the novel integration of multiple metaheuristic algorithms for optimizing machine learning models, offering insights into their effectiveness for hydrological prediction. By demonstrating the superior performance of AA and IIFA, this research provides a robust framework for enhancing long-term streamflow forecasting. These findings support improved water resource management in West Africa, helping policymakers address climate variability, water scarcity, and hydrological uncertainty.

Keywords

West Africa / Streamflow prediction / Machine learning / Support vector machine / Regional river flow

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Al-Amin Danladi Bello, Bamaiyi Usman Aliyu, Abdulrazaq Salaudeen, Bashir Tanimu, Khalid Sulaiman, Aliyu Ishaq. Enhancing Streamflow Forecasting in Major West African Rivers by Utilizing Meta-Heuristic Algorithms and Climate Data Time Lag Analysis. Hydroecol. Eng., 2025, 2(2): 10006 DOI:10.70322/hee.2025.10006

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

Acknowledgments

The authors acknowledge support from the Department of Water Resources and Environmental Engineering, Ahmadu Bello University, Zaria, Nigeria.

Author Contributions

A.-A.D.B.: Conceptualization, Methodology, software, writing—original draft; B.U.A. Writing—validation, review, and editing; A.S: Visualization and editing; B.T.: writing—Data curation and editing; K.S: writing—review and editing; A.I.: writing—review and editing. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Ethics Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Original data and code are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Declaration of Competing Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

[1]

Papa F, Crétaux JF, Grippa M, Robert E, Trigg M, Tshimanga RM, et al. Water resources in Africa under global change: monitoring surface waters from space. Surv. Geophys. 2023, 44, 43-93.

[2]

Tarpanelli A, Paris A, Sichangi AW, OLoughlin F, Papa F. Water resources in Africa: The role of earth observation data and hydrodynamic modeling to derive river discharge. Surv. Geophys. 2023, 44, 97-122.

[3]

Nkiaka E, Taylor A, Dougill AJ, Antwi-Agyei P, Adefisan EA, Ahiataku MA, et al. Exploring the need for developing impact-based forecasting in West Africa. Front. Clim. 2020, 2, 565500.

[4]

Awotwi A, Annor T, Anornu GK, Quaye-Ballard JA, Agyekum J, Ampadu B, et al. Climate change impact on streamflow in a tropical basin of Ghana, West Africa. J. Hydrol. Reg. Stud. 2021, 34, 100805.

[5]

Larbi I, Nyamekye C, Dotse S-Q, Danso DK, Annor T, Bessah E, et al. Rainfall and temperature projections and the implications on streamflow and evapotranspiration in the near future at the Tano River Basin of Ghana. Sci. Afr. 2022, 15, e01071.

[6]

Namugize JN, Jewitt G, Graham M. Effects of land use and land cover changes on water quality in the uMngeni river catchment, South Africa. Phys. Chem. Earth Parts a/b/c 2018, 105, 247-264.

[7]

Djan’na Koubodana H, Adounkpe JG, Atchonouglo K, Djaman K, Larbi I, Lombo Y, et al. Modelling of streamflow before and after dam construction in the Mono River Basin in Togo-Benin, West Africa. Int. J. River Basin Manag. 2023, 21, 265-281.

[8]

Obahoundje S, Diedhiou A, Kouassi KL, Ta MY, Mortey EM, Roudier P, et al. Analysis of hydroclimatic trends and variability and their impacts on hydropower generation in two river basins in Côte d’Ivoire (West Africa) during 1981-2017. Environ. Res. Commun. 2022, 4, 065001.

[9]

Chun KP, Dieppois B, He Q, Sidibe M, Eden J, Paturel J-E, et al. Identifying drivers of streamflow extremes in West Africa to inform a nonstationary prediction model. Weather. Clim. Extrem. 2021, 33, 100346.

[10]

Bjornlund V, Bjornlund H, Van Rooyen AF. Why agricultural production in sub-Saharan Africa remains low compared to the rest of the world-a historical perspective. Int. J. Water Resour. Dev. 2020, 36, S20-S53.

[11]

Huang Z, Liu X, Sun S, Tang Y, Yuan X, Tang Q. Global assessment of future sectoral water scarcity under adaptive inner-basin water allocation measures. Sci. Total Environ. 2021, 783, 146973.

[12]

Arsenault R, Côté P. Analysis of the effects of biases in ensemble streamflow prediction (ESP) forecasts on electricity production in hydropower reservoir management. Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. 2019, 23, 2735-2750.

[13]

Zhang X, Peng Y, Xu W, Wang B. An optimal operation model for hydropower stations considering inflow forecasts with different lead-times. Water Resour. Manag. 2019, 33, 173-188.

[14]

Ward PJ, de Ruiter MC, Mård J, Schröter K, Van Loon A, Veldkamp T, et al. The need to integrate flood and drought disaster risk reduction strategies. Water Secur. 2020, 11, 100070.

[15]

Fahad S, Nguyen-Thi-Lan H, Nguyen-Manh D, Tran-Duc H, To-The N. Analyzing the status of multidimensional poverty of rural households by using sustainable livelihood framework: Policy implications for economic growth. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2023, 30, 16106-16119.

[16]

Nouaceur Z, Murarescu O. Rainfall variability and trend analysis of rainfall in West Africa (Senegal, Mauritania, Burkina Faso). Water 2020, 12, 1754.

[17]

Adnan RM, Mostafa RR, Kisi O, Yaseen ZM, Shahid S, Zounemat-Kermani M. Improving streamflow prediction using a new hybrid ELM model combined with hybrid particle swarm optimization and grey wolf optimization. Knowl. -Based Syst. 2021, 230, 107379.

[18]

Rajwar K, Deep K, Das S. An exhaustive review of the metaheuristic algorithms for search and optimization: taxonomy, applications, and open challenges. Artif. Intell. Rev. 2023, 56, 13187-13257.

[19]

Ibrahim KS, Huang YF, Ahmed AN, Koo CH, El-Shafie A. A review of the hybrid artificial intelligence and optimization modelling of hydrological streamflow forecasting. Alex. Eng. J. 2022, 61, 279-303.

[20]

Khosravi K, Golkarian A, Tiefenbacher JP. Using optimized deep learning to predict daily streamflow: A comparison to common machine learning algorithms. Water Resour. Manag. 2022, 36, 699-716.

[21]

Kumar V, Kedam N, Sharma KV, Mehta DJ, Caloiero T. Advanced machine learning techniques to improve hydrological prediction: A comparative analysis of streamflow prediction models. Water 2023, 15, 2572.

[22]

Ferreira RG, da Silva DD, Elesbon AAA, Fernandes-Filho EI, Veloso GV, de Souza Fraga M, et al. Machine learning models for streamflow regionalization in a tropical watershed. J. Environ. Manag. 2021, 280, 111713.

[23]

Gharib A, Davies EG. A workflow to address pitfalls and challenges in applying machine learning models to hydrology. Adv. Water Resour. 2021, 152, 103920.

[24]

Janga Reddy M, Kumar DN. Evolutionary algorithms, swarm intelligence methods, and their applications in water resources engineering: A state-of-the-art review. h2oj 2020, 3, 135-188.

[25]

Tao H, Abba SI, Al-Areeq AM, Tangang F, Samantaray S, Sahoo A, et al. Hybridized artificial intelligence models with nature-inspired algorithms for river flow modeling: A comprehensive review, assessment, and possible future research directions. Eng. Appl. Artif. Intell. 2024, 129, 107559.

[26]

Tian D, Li B, Liu J, Liu C, Yuan L, Shi Z. Adaptive Multi-Updating Strategy Based Particle Swarm Optimization. Intell. Autom. Soft Comput. 2023, 37, 2783.

[27]

Vie A, Kleinnijenhuis AM, Farmer DJ. Qualities, challenges and future of genetic algorithms: A literature review. arXiv 2020, arXiv:2011.05277.

[28]

Faris H, Aljarah I, Al-Betar MA, Mirjalili S. Grey wolf optimizer: a review of recent variants and applications. Neural Comput. Appl. 2018, 30, 413-435.

[29]

Gontara E, Chebana F. Mixture copula parameter estimation with metaheuristic algorithms, comparative study under hydrological context. Stoch. Environ. Res. Risk Assess. 2025, 1-20. doi:10.1007/s00477-025-02914-4.

[30]

Rahimzad M, Nia AM, Zolfonoon H, Soltani J, Mehr AD, Kwon H-H. Performance comparison of an LSTM-based deep learning model versus conventional machine learning algorithms for streamflow forecasting. Water Resour. Manag. 2021, 35, 4167-4187.

[31]

Adnan RM, Mirboluki A, Mehraein M, Malik A, Heddam S, Kisi O. Improved prediction of monthly streamflow in a mountainous region by Metaheuristic-Enhanced deep learning and machine learning models using hydroclimatic data. Theor. Appl. Climatol. 2023, 155, 205-228.

[32]

Bahramifar A, Afshin H, Tabrizi ME. Optimized simulation of river flow rate using regression-based models. Acta Geophys. 2023, 71, 2481-2496.

[33]

Xu Y, Zomer S, Brereton RG. Support vector machines: A recent method for classification in chemometrics. Crit. Rev. Anal. Chem. 2006, 36, 177-188.

[34]

Rieck K, Sonnenburg S, Mika S, Schäfer C, Laskov P, Tax D, et al. Support vector machines. In Handbook of Computational Statistics; Springer: New York, USA, 2012; pp. 883-926.

[35]

Montesinos López OA, López AM, Crossa J. Support vector machines and support vector regression. In Multivariate Statistical Machine Learning Methods for Genomic Prediction; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 2022; pp. 337-378.

[36]

Musa RM, Taha Z, Majeed APA, Abdullah MR. Machine Learning in Sports: Identifying Potential Archers; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 2019.

[37]

Sasmal B, Das A, Dhal KG, Saha R. A Comprehensive Survey on African Vulture Optimization Algorithm. Arch. Comput. Methods Eng. 2023, 31, 1659-1700.

[38]

Abdollahzadeh B, Gharehchopogh FS, Mirjalili S. African vultures optimization algorithm: A new nature-inspired metaheuristic algorithm for global optimization problems. Comput. Ind. Eng. 2021, 158, 107408.

[39]

Abdel-Basset M, Mohamed R, Chakrabortty RK, Ryan MJ, Mirjalili S. An efficient binary slime mould algorithm integrated with a novel attacking-feeding strategy for feature selection. Comput. Ind. Eng. 2021, 153, 107078.

[40]

Li S, Chen H, Wang M, Heidari AA, Mirjalili S. Slime mould algorithm: A new method for stochastic optimization. Future Gener. Comput. Syst. 2020, 111, 300-323.

[41]

Karpenko A, Kuzmina I. Meta-heuristic algorithm for the global optimization:Intelligent ice fishing algorithm. In Inventive Systems and Control:Proceedings of ICISC 2021; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 2021; pp. 147-160.

[42]

Farnum NR. Improving the relative error of estimation. Am. Stat. 1990, 44, 288-289.

[43]

Liu X, Liu H, Zhao X, Han Z, Cui Y, Yu M. A novel neural network and grey correlation analysis method for computation of the heat transfer limit of a loop heat pipe (LHP). Energy 2022, 259, 124830.

[44]

Bank W. Global Economic Prospects, June 2019: Heightened Tensions, Subdued Investment; The World Bank: Washington, DC, USA, 2019.

[45]

Zhou L, Wu T, Pu L, Meadows M, Jiang G, Zhang J, et al. Spatially heterogeneous relationships of PM2.5 concentrations with natural and land use factors in the Niger River Watershed, West Africa. J. Clean. Prod. 2023, 394, 136406.

[46]

Dos Santos MRW. Water cooperation within West Africa’s major transboundary river basins. Reg. Cohes. 2023, 13, 25-52.

[47]

Marshall BR, Nguyen NH, Visaltanachoti N. Time series momentum and moving average trading rules. Quant. Financ. 2017, 17, 405-421.

[48]

Weiß CH, Aleksandrov B, Faymonville M, Jentsch C. Partial autocorrelation diagnostics for count time series. Entropy 2023, 25, 105.

[49]

Sharma P, Raju S. Metaheuristic optimization algorithms: A comprehensive overview and classification of benchmark test functions. Soft Comput. 2024, 28, 3123-3186.

[50]

Pham BT, Bui K-TT, Prakash I, Ly H-B. Hybrid artificial intelligence models based on adaptive neuro fuzzy inference system and metaheuristic optimization algorithms for prediction of daily rainfall. Phys. Chem. Earth Parts A/B/C 2024, 134, 103563.

[51]

Bennis F, Bhattacharjya RK. Nature-Inspired Methods for Metaheuristics Optimization: Algorithms and Applications in Science and Engineering; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 2020.

[52]

Gaspar A, Oliva D, Cuevas E, Zaldívar D, Pérez M, Pajares G. Hyperparameter Optimization in a Convolutional Neural Network Using Metaheuristic Algorithms. In Metaheuristics in Machine Learning:Theory and Applications; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 2021; pp. 37-59.

[53]

Apriyadi MR, Rini DP. Hyperparameter Optimization of Support Vector Regression Algorithm using Metaheuristic Algorithm for Student Performance Prediction. Int. J. Adv. Comput. Sci. Appl. 2023, 14. doi:10.14569/IJACSA.2023.0140218.

[54]

Ali YA, Awwad EM, Al-Razgan M, Maarouf A. Hyperparameter search for machine learning algorithms for optimizing the computational complexity. Processes 2023, 11, 349.

[55]

Bischl B, Binder M, Lang M, Pielok T, Richter J, Coors S, et al. Hyperparameter optimization: Foundations, algorithms, best practices, and open challenges. Wiley Interdiscip. Rev. Data Min. Knowl. Discov. 2023, 13, e1484.

[56]

Hutter F, Lücke J, Schmidt-Thieme L. Beyond manual tuning of hyperparameters. KI-Künstliche Intell. 2015, 29, 329-337.

[57]

Rhein F, Hibbe L, Nirschl H. Hybrid modeling of hetero-agglomeration processes: a framework for model selection and arrangement. Eng. Comput. 2024, 40, 583-604.

[58]

Salaudeen A, Shahid S, Ismail A, Adeogun BK, Ajibike MA, Bello A-AD, et al. Adaptation measures under the impacts of climate and land-use/land-cover changes using HSPF model simulation: Application to Gongola river basin, Nigeria. Sci. Total Environ. 2023, 858, 159874.

[59]

Houénafa SE, Johnson O, Ronoh EK, Moore SE. Hybridization of Stochastic Hydrological Models and Machine Learning Methods for Improving Rainfall-Runoff Modelling. Results Eng. 2025, 25, 104079.

[60]

Mehta HD, Mangrulkar R. Multi-Objective Optimization of Traditional Feature Selection Methods. In Innovations in Optimization and Machine Learning; IGI Global Scientific Publishing: Hershey, PA, USA, 2025; pp. 125-158.

[61]

Chandran V, Mohapatra P. A boosted African vultures optimization algorithm combined with logarithmic weight inspired novel dynamic chaotic opposite learning strategy. Expert Syst. Appl. 2025, 271, 126532.

[62]

Ishaq M, Zahir S, Iftikhar L, Bulbul MF, Rho S, Lee MY. Machine Learning Based Missing Data Imputation in Categorical Datasets; IEEE Access: New York, NY, USA, 2024. doi:10.1109/ACCESS.2024.3411817.

[63]

Magyari-Sáska Z, Haidu I, Magyari-Sáska A. Experimental Comparative Study on Self-Imputation Methods and Their Quality Assessment for Monthly River Flow Data with Gaps: Case Study to Mures River. Appl. Sci. 2025, 15, 1242.

[64]

Ogle K, Reich E, Samuels-Crow K, Litvak M, Bradford JB, Schlaepfer DR, et al. Filling the Gaps: A Bayesian Mixture Model for Imputing Missing Soil Water Content Data. Ecohydrology 2025, 18, e70004.

[65]

Fawkes J, Fishman N, Andrews M, Lipton Z. The Fragility of Fairness: Causal Sensitivity Analysis for Fair Machine Learning. Adv. Neural Inf. Process. Syst. 2025, 37, 137105-137134.

[66]

Baig F, Ali L, Faiz MA, Chen H, Sherif M. How accurate are the machine learning models in improving monthly rainfall prediction in hyper arid environment? J. Hydrol. 2024, 633, 131040.

[67]

Long J, Wang L, Chen D, Li N, Zhou J, Li X, et al. Hydrological projections in the Third Pole using artificial intelligence and an observation-constrained cryosphere-hydrology model. Earth’s Future 2024, 12, e2023EF004222.

[68]

Shu L, Chen H, Meng X, Chang Y, Hu L, Wang W, et al. A review of integrated surface-subsurface numerical hydrological models. Sci. China Earth Sci. 2024, 67, 1459-1479.

[69]

Talha M, Nejadhashemi AP, Moller K. Soft computing paradigm for climate change adaptation and mitigation in Iran, Pakistan, and Turkey: A systematic review. Heliyon 2025, 11, e41974.

[70]

Badr A, Li Z, El-Dakhakhni W. Probabilistic dynamic resilience quantification for infrastructure systems in multi-hazard environments. Int. J. Crit. Infrastruct. Prot. 2024, 46, 100698.

[71]

Abbas M, Zhao L, Wang Y. Perspective impact on water environment and hydrological regime owing to climate change: A review. Hydrology 2022, 9, 203.

[72]

Wang Y, Meili N, Fatichi S. Evidence and controls of the acceleration of the hydrological cycle over land. Water Resour. Res. 2023, 59, e2022WR033970.

PDF (1239KB)

0

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/