Efficacy of functional electrical stimulation for hemiplegic shoulder pain: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Chunyu Wang , Xiao Qiu , Yulong Bai

Healthcare and Rehabilitation ›› 2025, Vol. 1 ›› Issue (2) : 100025

PDF (3949KB)
Healthcare and Rehabilitation ›› 2025, Vol. 1 ›› Issue (2) : 100025 DOI: 10.1016/j.hcr.2025.100025
Review article

Efficacy of functional electrical stimulation for hemiplegic shoulder pain: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Author information +
History +
PDF (3949KB)

Abstract

Background:Hemiplegic shoulder pain is a common issue after stroke and affects many stroke survivors. Emerging studies have shown the positive effects of functional electrical stimulation in the management of hemiplegic shoulder pain. However, a systematic review evaluating its efficacy is lacking.

Objective:To systematically review the effects of functional electrical stimulation for hemiplegic shoulder pain in patients who experienced stroke.

Study design:A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Methods:A systematic review of Embase, PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, Cumulative Index to Nursing Information and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), Wan Fang Database, and China Science and Technology Journal Database (VIP) from the establishment of the databases to July 1, 2024, was carried out. Two researchers independently searched, screened, and extracted data from each database according to the search strategy and resolved any disagreements through negotiation.

Results:Of the 560 articles identified, 7 were included in the final synthesis. We analyzed data from 457 stroke survivors, the results showed that the functional electrical stimulation group had a better performance in relieving shoulder pain (standardized mean difference [SMD] = −1.66; 95 % confidence interval [CI]: −2.58 to −0.74; P = 0.0004), but there was no statistical significance in Fugl-Meyer assessment scores (SMD = 0.32; 95 % CI: −1.00 to 1.63; P = 0.64).

Conclusion:Functional electrical stimulation may be an effective management method to relieve pain for hemiplegic shoulder pain patients. However, these results should be interpreted with caution because of the limited number of studies and potential bias. More rigorous, reasonably designed randomized controlled trial with large sample sizes and long-term follow-up are needed in the future.

Keywords

Shoulder pain / Stroke / Functional electrical stimulation / Randomized controlled trial / Systematic review / Meta-analysis

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Chunyu Wang, Xiao Qiu, Yulong Bai. Efficacy of functional electrical stimulation for hemiplegic shoulder pain: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Healthcare and Rehabilitation, 2025, 1(2): 100025 DOI:10.1016/j.hcr.2025.100025

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

Ethics approval

Not applicable.

Funding

This study was supported by the Science and Technology Innovation Plan of the Shanghai Science and Technology Commission (22YF1405400); and Young Talent Project of Shanghai Municipal Health Commission (No.2022YQ055).

CRediT authorship contribution statement

Qiu Xiao: Writing - review & editing, Funding acquisition, Formal analysis, Data curation. Bai Yulong: Writing - review & editing, Visualization, Validation, Supervision. Wang Chunyu: Writing - original draft, Methodology, Investigation, Formal analysis, Data curation, Conceptualization.

Data availability

The datasets of the study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Declaration of Competing Interest

The authors declared no conflict of interest.

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank the Science and Technology Innovation Plan of the Shanghai Science and Technology Commission and Young Talent Project of Shanghai Municipal Health Commission.

Appendix A. Supplementary material

Supplementary data associated with this article can be found in the online version at doi:10.1016/j.hcr.2025.100025.

References

[1]

Hay SI, Abajobir AA, Abate KH, et al. Global, regional, and national disability-adjusted life-years (DALYs) for 333 diseases and injuries and healthy life expectancy (HALE) for 195 countries and territories, 1990-2016: a systematic analysis for the global burden of disease study 2016. Lancet. 2017; 390(10100):1260-1344. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(17)32130-X

[2]

Collins TC, Petersen NJ, Menke TJ, Souchek J, Foster W, Ashton CM. Short-term, intermediate-term, and long-term mortality in patients hospitalized for stroke. J Clin Epidemiol. 2003; 56(1):81-87. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0895-4356(02)00570-X

[3]

Mukundan G, Seidenwurm DJ. Economic and societal aspects of stroke management. Neuroimaging Clin N Am. 2018; 28(4):683-689. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nic.2018.06.009

[4]

Adey-Wakeling Z, Arima H, Crotty M, et al. Incidence and associations of hemiplegic shoulder pain poststroke: prospective population-based study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2015; 96(2):241-247.e1. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2014.09.007

[5]

Kalichman L, Ratmansky M. Underlying pathology and associated factors of hemiplegicshoulder pain. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2011; 90(9):768-780. https://doi.org/10.1097/PHM.0b013e318214e976

[6]

Ward AB. Hemiplegic shoulder pain. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2007; 78(8):789. https://doi.org/10.1136/jnnp.2006.108803

[7]

Murie-Fernández M, Carmona Iragui M, Gnanakumar V, Meyer M, Foley N, Teasell R. Painful hemiplegic shoulder in stroke patients: causes and management. Neurolojia. 2012; 27(4):234-244. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nrl.2011.02.010

[8]

Vasudevan JM, Browne BJ. Hemiplegic shoulder pain: an approach to diagnosis and management. Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am. 2014; 25(2):411-437. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmr.2014.01.010

[9]

Noor MB, Rashid M, Younas U, Rathore FA. Recent advances in the management of hemiplegic shoulder pain. J Pak Med Assoc. 2022; 72(9):1882-1884. https://doi.org/10.47391/JPMA.22-97

[10]

Borroni P, Baldissera F. Activation of motor pathways during observation and executionof hand movements. Soc Neurosci. 2008; 3(3-4):276-288. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470910701515269

[11]

Basmajian JV, Bazant FJ. Factors preventing downward dislocation of the adducted shoulder joint. An electromyographic and morphological study. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1959;41-A:1182-1186.

[12]

Shefffer LR, Chae J. Neuromuscular electrical stimulation in neurorehabilitation. Muscle Nerve. 2007; 35(5):562-590. https://doi.org/10.1002/mus.20758

[13]

Moe JH, Post HW. Functional electrical stimulation for ambulation in hemiplegia. J Lancet. 1962;82:285-288.

[14]

Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM, et al. The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ. 2021; 372:n71. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71

[15]

Carlsson AM. Assessment of chronic pain. I. Aspects of the reliability and validity of the visual analogue scale. Pain. 1983; 16(1):87-101. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-3959(83)90088-X

[16]

Kim YH, Jung SJ, Yang EJ, Paik NJ. Clinical and sonographic risk factors for hemiplegic shoulder pain: a longitudinal observational study. J Rehabil Med. 2014; 46(1):81-87. https://doi.org/10.2340/16501977-1238

[17]

Gladstone DJ, Danells CJ, Black SE. The fugl-meyer assessment of motor recovery after stroke: a critical review of its measurement properties. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2002; 16(3):232-240. https://doi.org/10.1177/154596802401105171

[18]

Shah S, Vanclay F, Cooper B. Improving the sensitivity of the barthel index for stroke rehabilitation. J Clin Epidemiol. 1989; 42(8):703-709. https://doi.org/10.1016/0895-4356(89)90065-6

[19]

Leung SOC, Chan CCH, Shah S. Development of a Chinese version of the modiffed barthel index- validity and reliability. Clin Rehabil. 2007; 21(10):912-922. https://doi.org/10.1177/0269215507077286

[20]

Higgins JPT, Thomas J, Chandler J, Cumpston M, Li T, Page MJ, Welch VA, editors. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. 2nd Edition Chichester (UK): John Wiley & Sons; 2019.

[21]

Higgins JPT, Thompson SG, Deeks JJ, Altman DG. Measuring inconsistency in metaanalyses. BMJ. 2003; 327(7414):557-560. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.327.7414.557

[22]

Hunter JE, Schmidt FL. Fixed effects vs. random effects meta‐analysis models: implications for cumulative research knowledge. Int J Sel Assess. 2000; 8(4):275-292. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2389.00156

[23]

Chen S, Chen Y, Su M. Observation of the effects of functional electrical stimulation combined with low-frequency magnetic therapy on upper limb motor function and sleep quality in patients with shoulder pain after stroke. World J Sleep Med. 2023; 10(11):2540-2543. https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.2095-7130.2023.11.012

[24]

Thakre PI, Qureshi MI, Naqvi WM. Neuro developmental techniques with functional electrical stimulation reduces shoulder dysfunction in young stroke population: A Quasi-experimental novel rehabilitative approach. Int J Res Pharm Sci. 2020; 11(special 4):1650-1656. https://doi.org/10.26452/ijrps.v11iSPL4.4352

[25]

Karaahmet OZ, Gurcay E, Unal ZK, Cankurtaran D, Cakci A. Effects of functional electrical stimulation-cycling on shoulder pain and subluxation in patients with acute-subacute stroke: a pilot study. Int J Rehabil Res. 2019; 42(1):36-40. https://doi.org/10.1097/MRR.0000000000000319

[26]

Zhen Y. Analysis of the effect of functional electrical stimulation combined with lowfrequency magnetotherapy on post-stroke shoulder pain. Chin Community Doctors. 2019; 35(6):167,169.

[27]

Sun Y, He X, Wang J. Clinical study on treatment of post-stroke shoulder pain using functional electrical stimulation combined with rehabilitation training. Med Inf. 2015; 41:423-424. https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2015.41.649

[28]

Fu M. The curative effect obervation of functional electrical stimulation for the shoulder pain after stroke in the early time. [Master’s thesis]. Chengdu: Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine; 2013.

[29]

Koyuncu E, Nakipoğlu-Yüzer GF, Doğan A, Ozgirgin N. The effectiveness of functionalelectrical stimulation for the treatment of shoulder subluxation and shoulder pain in hemiplegic patients: a randomized controlled trial. Disabil Rehabil. 2010; 32(7):560-566. https://doi.org/10.3109/09638280903183811

[30]

Wilson RD, Gunzler DD, Bennett ME, Chae J. Peripheral nerve stimulation compared with usual care for pain relief of hemiplegic shoulder pain: a randomized controlled trial. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2014; 93(1):17-28. https://doi.org/10.1097/PHM.0000000000000011

[31]

Broeks JG, Lankhorst GJ, Rumping K, Prevo AJ. The long-term outcome of arm function after stroke: results of a follow-up study. Disabil Rehabil. 1999; 21(8):357-364. https://doi.org/10.1080/096382899297459

[32]

Xu J. Low frequency electrotherapy. In: Yan T, ed. Physical Therapy. 3rd ed. . Beijing, China: People's Medical Publishing House; 2018:380-391.

[33]

Qiu H, Li J, Zhou T, Wang H, Li J. Electrical stimulation in the treatment of hemiplegic shoulder pain: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2019; 98(4):280-286. https://doi.org/10.1097/PHM.0000000000001067

[34]

Marquez-Chin C, Popovic MR. Functional electrical stimulation therapy for restoration of motor function after spinal cord injury and stroke: a review. Biomed Eng Online. 2020; 19(1):34. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12938-020-00773-4

[35]

Eraifej J, Clark W, France B, Desando S, Moore D. Effectiveness of upper limb functional electrical stimulation after stroke for the improvement of activities of daily living and motor function: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Syst Rev. 2017; 6(1):40. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-017-0435-5

[36]

Howlett OA, Lannin NA, Ada L, McKinstry C. Functional electrical stimulation improvesactivity after stroke: a systematic review with meta-analysis. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2015; 96(5):934-943. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2015.01.013

AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF (3949KB)

508

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

AI思维导图

/