Federated data acquisition market: Architecture and a mean-field based data pricing strategy

Jiejun Hu-Bolz , Martin Reed , Kai Zhang , Zelei Liu , Juncheng Hu

High-Confidence Computing ›› 2025, Vol. 5 ›› Issue (1) : 100232

PDF (875KB)
High-Confidence Computing ›› 2025, Vol. 5 ›› Issue (1) : 100232 DOI: 10.1016/j.hcc.2024.100232
Research Articles
research-article

Federated data acquisition market: Architecture and a mean-field based data pricing strategy

Author information +
History +
PDF (875KB)

Abstract

With the increasing global mobile data traffic and daily user engagement, technologies, such as mobile crowdsensing, benefit hugely from the constant data flows from smartphone and IoT owners. However, the device users, as data owners, urgently require a secure and fair marketplace to negotiate with the data consumers. In this paper, we introduce a novel federated data acquisition market that consists of a group of local data aggregators (LDAs); a number of data owners; and, one data union to coordinate the data trade with the data consumers. Data consumers offer each data owner an individual price to stimulate participation. The mobile data owners naturally cooperate to gossip about individual prices with each other, which also leads to price fluctuation. It is challenging to analyse the interactions among the data owners and the data consumers using traditional game theory due to the complex price dynamics in a large-scale heterogeneous data acquisition scenario. Hence, we propose a data pricing strategy based on mean-field game (MFG) theory to model the data owners’ cost considering the price dynamics. We then investigate the interactions among the LDAs by using the distribution of price, namely the mean-field term. A numerical method is used to solve the proposed pricing strategy. The evaluations demonstrate that the proposed pricing strategy efficiently allows the data owners from multiple LDAs to reach an equilibrium on data quantity to sell regarding the current individual price scheme. The result further demonstrates that the influential LDAs determine the final price distribution. Last but not least, it shows that cooperation among mobile data owners leads to optimal social welfare even with the additional cost of information exchange.

Keywords

Federated data acquisition market / Pricing strategy / Data trading

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Jiejun Hu-Bolz, Martin Reed, Kai Zhang, Zelei Liu, Juncheng Hu. Federated data acquisition market: Architecture and a mean-field based data pricing strategy. High-Confidence Computing, 2025, 5(1): 100232 DOI:10.1016/j.hcc.2024.100232

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

CRediT authorship contribution statement

Jiejun Hu-Bolz: Conceptualization, Methodology, Formal anal- ysis, Writing - original draft, Funding acquisition. Martin Reed: Conceptualization, Writing - original draft, Writing - review & editing, Supervision. Kai Zhang: Methodology, Validation, Formal analysis. Zelei Liu: Writing - review & editing, Visualization. Juncheng Hu: Validation, Writing - review & editing.

Declaration of competing interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Acknowledgements

This work was supported within the project TRACE-V2X, which has received funding from the European Union’s HORIZON-MSCA- 2022-SE-01-01 under grant agreement (101131204).

References

[1]

J. Hu, K. Yang, K. Wang, K. Zhang, A blockchain-based reward mechanism for mobile crowdsensing, IEEE Trans. Comput. Soc. Syst. 7 (1) (2020) 178-191.

[2]

Z. Xiong, Z. Cai, D. Takabi, W. Li, Privacy threat and defense for federated learning with non-i. i.d. Data in aIoT, IEEE Trans. Ind. Inform. 18 (2) (2022) 1310-1321, http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/TII.2021.3073925.

[3]

J.-M. Lasry, P.-L. Lions, Mean field games, Japanese J. Math. 2 (1) (2007) 229-260.

[4]

M.J. Osborne, et al., An introduction to game theory, vol. 3, (3) Oxford university press New York, 2004.

[5]

D. Niyato, D.T. Hoang, N.C. Luong, P. Wang, D.I. Kim, Z. Han, Smart data pricing models for the internet of things: a bundling strategy approach, IEEE Netw. 30 (2) (2016) 18-25.

[6]

Z. Xiong, D. Niyato, P. Wang, Z. Han, Y. Zhang, Dynamic pricing for revenue maximization in mobile social data market with network effects, IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun. 19 (3) (2020) 1722-1737.

[7]

Z. Zheng, Y. Peng, F. Wu, S. Tang, G. Chen, Trading data in the crowd: Profit-driven data acquisition for mobile crowdsensing, IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun. 35 (2) (2017) 486-501.

[8]

H. Oh, S. Park, G.M. Lee, H. Heo, J.K. Choi, Personal data trading scheme for data brokers in IoT data marketplaces, IEEE Access 7 (2019) 40120-40132.

[9]

M. Zhang, L. Yang, X. Gong, J. Zhang,Privacy-preserving crowdsensing: Privacy valuation, network effect, and profit maximization, in: 2016 IEEE Global Communications Conference, GLOBECOM, IEEE, 2016, pp. 1-6.

[10]

H. Jin, L. Su, H. Xiao, K. Nahrstedt, Incentive mechanism for privacy-aware data aggregation in mobile crowd sensing systems, IEEE/ACM Trans. Netw. 26 (5) (2018) 2019-2032.

[11]

H. Yu, Z. Liu, Y. Liu, T. Chen, M. Cong, X. Weng, D. Niyato, Q. Yang, A fairness-aware incentive scheme for federated learning, in:Proceedings of the AAAI/ACM Conference on AI, Ethics, and Society, 2020, pp. 393-399.

[12]

X. Xu, Z. Wu, C.-S. Foo, B.K.H. Low, Validation free and replication robust volume-based data valuation, Proc. NeurIPS ( 2021).

[13]

J. Yoon, S. Arik, T. Pfister, Data valuation using reinforcement learning, in:International Conference on Machine Learning, PMLR, 2020, pp. 10842-10851.

[14]

X. Wang, L. Duan, Dynamic pricing and mean field analysis for controlling age of information, IEEE/ACM Trans. Netw. (2022) 1-13, http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/TNET.2022.3174114.

[15]

B. Shi, Z. Song, J. Xu, Trading and pricing sensor data in competing edge servers with double auction markets, J. Sens. 2021 (2021).

[16]

J. Pang, Y. Huang, Z. Xie, J. Li, Z. Cai,Collaborative city digital twin for the COVID-19 pandemic: A federated learning solution, Tsinghua Sci. Technol. 26 (5) (2021) 759-771, http://dx.doi.org/10.26599/TST.2021.9010026.

[17]

M. Csörgő, Brownian motion—Wiener process, Canad. Math. Bull. 22 (3) (1979) 257-279.

[18]

R.W. Shephard, R. Färe, The law of diminishing returns, in: Production Theory, Springer, 1974, pp. 287-318.

[19]

D. Tabak, B.C. Kuo, Optimal control by mathematical programming, SRL Publishing Company, 1971.

[20]

M. Reed, J. Hu, N. Thomos, M. Al-Naday, K. Yang, A dynamic service trading in a DLT-assisted industrial IoT marketplace, IEEE Trans. Netw. Serv. Manag. (2022).

[21]

H. Risken, Fokker-planck equation, in: The Fokker-Planck Equation, Springer, 1996, pp. 63-95.

[22]

S. Peng, A generalized dynamic programming principle and Hamilton-Jacobi-Bellman equation, Stochastics 38 (2) (1992) 119-134.

[23]

J. Kiusalaas, Numerical methods in engineering with Python 3, Cambridge University Press, 2013.

[24]

W.F. Ames, Numerical methods for partial differential equations, Academic Press, 2014.

[25]

R. Courant, K. Friedrichs, H. Lewy, On the partial difference equations of mathematical physics, IBM J. Res. Dev. 11 (2) (1967) 215-234.

[26]

A. Acquisti, L. Brandimarte, G. Loewenstein, Privacy and human behavior in the age of information, Science 347 (6221) (2015) 509-514.

[27]

Z. Cai, X. Zheng, J. Wang, Z. He, Private data trading towards range counting queries in internet of things, IEEE Trans. Mob. Comput. 22 (8) (2023) 4881-4897, http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/TMC.2022.3164325.

[28]

J. Hu, M. Reed, N. Thomos, M.F. Al-Naday, K. Yang, A dynamic service trading in a DLT-assisted industrial IoT marketplace, IEEE Trans. Netw. Serv. Manag. (2022).

[29]

A. Pentland, A. Lipton, T. Hardjono, Building the new economy:Data as capital, MIT Press, 2021.

AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF (875KB)

265

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

AI思维导图

/