Patient-oriented and clinical considerations supporting the single-incision subepithelial connective tissue harvest

Abstract

The subepithelial connective tissue graft (SCTG) has become the gold standard for treating gingival recession. In addition, SCTG is a reliable technique for augmenting the dimensions of attached gingiva and peri-implant mucosa, thereby supporting periodontal and peri-implant health and stability. Various autogenous soft-tissue harvesting techniques have been developed for use in periodontal plastic surgery, each with its own set of advantages and limitations. Over the past 5 years, updated reviews of human palatal anatomy have influenced clinical decision-making regarding SCTG harvesting, expanding the safety zone for palatal SCTG procedures. New histological and molecular findings have provided insights into the underlying mechanisms that may explain the observed differences in clinical outcomes based on the harvesting method and graft type. The purpose of this paper is to recommend a preferred SCTG harvesting technique applicable to most cases and to identify specific clinical scenarios where available evidence may support the use of alternative methods.

Keywords

Clinical protocols / Esthetics / Palate / Hard / Patient satisfaction / Tissue transplantation / Treatment outcome

Funding

The research was entirely funded by the Defense Health Agency (United States), with no extramural funding provided to the authors.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

References

[1] Chambrone L, Ortega MA, Sukekava F, et al. Root coverage procedures for treating single and multiple recession‐type defects: An updated Cochrane systematic review. J Periodontol. 2019; 90(12):1399-1422. doi: 10.1002/JPER.19-0079

[2] Chambrone L, Tatakis DN. Periodontal soft tissue root coverage procedures: A systematic review from the AAP regeneration workshop. J Periodontol. 2015;86(Suppl):S8-S51. doi: 10.1902/jop.2015.130674.

[3] Cairo F, Nieri M, Pagliaro U. Efficacy of periodontal plastic surgery procedures in the treatment of localized facial gingival recessions. A systematic review. J Clin Periodontol. 2014; 41(Suppl 15):S44-S62. doi: 10.1111/jcpe.12182

[4] Wessel JR, Tatakis DN. Patient outcomes following subepithelial connective tissue graft and free gingival graft procedures. J Periodontol. 2008; 79(3):425-430. doi: 10.1902/jop.2008.070325

[5] Berridge JP, Johnson TM, Cheng AW, Swenson DT, Miller PD Jr. Focus on epithelialized palatal grafts. Part 3: Methods to enhance patient comfort at palatal donor sites. Clin Adv Periodontics. 2019; 9(4):177-184. doi: 10.1002/cap.10066

[6] Tavelli L, Barootchi S, Stefanini M, Zucchelli G, Giannobile WV, Wang HL. Wound healing dynamics, morbidity, and complications of palatal soft-tissue harvesting. Periodontol 2000. 2023; 92(1):90-119. doi: 10.1111/prd.12466

[7] Tavelli L, Barootchi S, Di Gianfilippo R, et al. Patient experience of autogenous soft tissue grafting has an implication for future treatment: A 10- to 15-year cross-sectional study. J Periodontol. 2021;92(5): 637-647. doi: 10.1002/JPER.20-0350

[8] Harris RJ. The connective tissue and partial thickness double pedicle graft: A predictable method of obtaining root coverage. J Periodontol. 1992; 63(5):477-486. doi: 10.1902/jop.1992.63.5.477

[9] Hürzeler MB, Weng D. A single-incision technique to harvest subepithelial connective tissue grafts from the palate. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 1999; 19(3):279-287.

[10] Studer SP, Allen EP, Rees TC, Kouba A. The thickness of masticatory mucosa in the human hard palate and tuberosity as potential donor sites for ridge augmentation procedures. J Periodontol. 1997; 68(2):145-151. doi: 10.1902/jop.1997.68.2.145

[11] Monnet-Corti V, Santini A, Glise JM, et al. Connective tissue graft for gingival recession treatment: Assessment of the maximum graft dimensions at the palatal vault as a donor site. J Periodontol. 2006; 77(5):899-902. doi: 10.1902/jop.2006.050047

[12] Tavelli L, Barootchi S, Ravidà A, Oh TJ, Wang HL. What is the safety zone for palatal soft tissue graft harvesting based on the locations of the greater palatine artery and foramen? A systematic review. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2019; 77(2):271e1-271e6. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2018.10.002

[13] Martin-Cabezas R, Deschamps-Lenhardt S, Huck O. Optimization of connective tissue graft length by graft splitting: A case series. Clin Adv Periodontics. 2021; 11(3):165-170. doi: 10.1002/cap.10175

[14] Glossary of Periodontal Terms. American Academy of Periodontology; 2017. Available from: https://members.perio.org/libraries/glossary?ssopc=1 [Last accessed on 2024 Nov 18].

[15] Zucchelli G, Mele M, Stefanini M, et al. Patient morbidity and root coverage outcome after subepithelial connective tissue and de‐epithelialized grafts: A comparative randomized‐controlled clinical trial. J Clin Periodontol. 2010; 37(8):728-738. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-051X.2010.01550.x

[16] Lorenzana ER, Allen EP. The single-incision palatal harvest technique: A strategy for esthetics and patient comfort. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2000; 20(3):297-305.

[17] Edel A. Clinical evaluation of free connective tissue grafts used to increase the width of keratinised gingiva. J Clin Periodontol. 1974; 1(4):185-196. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-051x.1974.tb01257.x

[18] Langer B, Langer L. Subepithelial connective tissue graft technique for root coverage. J Periodontol. 1985; 56(12):715-720. doi: 10.1902/jop.1985.56.12.715

[19] Tavelli L, Barootchi S, Greenwell H, Wang HL. Is a soft tissue graft harvested from the maxillary tuberosity the approach of choice in an isolated site? J Periodontol. 2019; 90(8):821-825. doi: 10.1002/JPER.18-0615

[20] Bertl K, Pifl M, Hirtler L, et al. Relative composition of fibrous connective and fatty/glandular tissue in connective tissue grafts depends on the harvesting technique but not the donor site of the hard palate. J Periodontol. 2015; 86(12):1331-1339. doi: 10.1902/jop.2015.150346

[21] Zucchelli G, Tavelli L, McGuire MK, et al. Autogenous soft tissue grafting for periodontal and peri-implant plastic surgical reconstruction. J Periodontol. 2020; 91(1):9-16. doi: 10.1002/JPER.19-0350

[22] Wara‐aswapati N, Pitiphat W, Chandrapho N, Rattanayatikul C, Karimbux N. Thickness of palatal masticatory mucosa associated with age. J Periodontol. 2001; 72(10):1407-1412. doi: 10.1902/jop.2001.72.10.1407

[23] Fickl S, Fischer KR, Jockel-Schneider Y, Stappert CF, Schlagenhauf U, Kebschull M. Early wound healing and patient morbidity after single-incision vs. trap-door graft harvesting from the palate--a clinical study. Clin Oral Investig. 2014; 18(9):2213-2219. doi: 10.1007/s00784-014-1204-7

[24] Grzech-Leśniak K, Matys J, Jurczyszyn K, et al. Histological and thermometric examination of soft tissue de-epithelialization using digitally controlled Er: YAG laser handpiece: An ex vivo study. Photomed Laser Surg. 2018; 36(6):313-319. doi: 10.1089/pho.2017.4413

[25] Marques de Mattos P, Papalexiou V, Tramontina VA, et al. Evaluation of 2 techniques of epithelial removal in subepithelial connective tissue graft surgery: A comparative histological study. J Periodontal Implant Sci. 2019; 50(1):2-13. doi: 10.5051/jpis.2020.50.1.2

[26] Cohen MS, Shorr N. Eyelid reconstruction with hard palate mucosa grafts. Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg. 1992; 8(3):183-195. doi: 10.1097/00002341-199209000-00005

[27] Soehren SE, Allen AL, Cutright DE, Seibert JS. Clinical and histologic studies of donor tissues utilized for free grafts of masticatory mucosa. J Periodontol. 1973; 44(12):727-741. doi: 10.1902/jop.1973.44.12.727

[28] Tavelli L, Ravidà A, Lin GH, Del Amo FS, Tattan M, Wang HL. Comparison between subepithelial connective tissue graft and de-epithelialized gingival graft: A systematic review and a meta-analysis. J Int Acad Periodontol. 2019; 21(2):82-96.

[29] Bakhishov H, Isler SC, Bozyel B, Yıldırım B, Tekindal MA, Ozdemir B. De-epithelialized gingival graft versus subepithelial connective tissue graft in the treatment of multiple adjacent gingival recessions using the tunnel technique: 1-year results of a randomized clinical trial. J Clin Periodontol. 2021;48(7): 970-983. doi: 10.1111/jcpe.13452

[30] Zangrando MSR, Eustachio RR, De Rezende MLR, Sant’ana ACP, Damante CA, Greghi SLA. Clinical and patient-centered outcomes using two types of subepithelial connective tissue grafts: A split-mouth randomized clinical trial. J Periodontol. 2021; 92(6):814-822. doi: 10.1002/JPER.19-0646

[31] Beymouri A, Yaghobee S, Khorsand A, Safi Y. Comparison of morbidity at the donor site and clinical efficacy at the recipient site between two different connective tissue graft harvesting techniques from the palate: A randomized clinical trial. J Adv Periodontol Implant Dent. 2023; 15(2):108-116. doi: 10.34172/japid.2023.016

[32] Cardoso MV, Lara VS, Sant’Ana ACP, Damante CA, Zangrando MSR. Late complications after root coverage with two types of subepithelial connective tissue grafts, clinical and histopathological evaluation: A prospective cohort study. J Clin Periodontol. 2021; 48(3):431-440. doi: 10.1111/jcpe.13413

[33] Breault LG, Billman MA, Lewis DM. Report of a gingival “surgical cyst” developing secondarily to a subepithelial connective tissue graft. J Periodontol. 1997; 68(4):392-395. doi: 10.1902/jop.1997.68.4.392

[34] Parashis AO, Tatakis DN. Subepithelial connective tissue graft for root coverage: A case report of an unusual late complication of epithelial origin. J Periodontol. 2007; 78(10):2051-2056. doi: 10.1902/jop.2007.070099

[35] Wang YS, Bissonnette C, Brett C, McNamara KK, Tatakis DN. Multiple epithelial origin complications following subepithelial connective tissue graft for root coverage. Clin Adv Periodontics. 2021; 11(3):140-144. doi: 10.1002/cap.10146

[36] Harris RJ. Histologic evaluation of connective tissue grafts in humans. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2003; 23(6):575-583.

[37] Romano F, Perotto S, Cricenti L, Gotti S, Aimetti M. Epithelial inclusions following a bilaminar root coverage procedure with a subepithelial connective tissue graft: A histologic and clinical study. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2017; 37(5):e245-e252. doi: 10.11607/prd.3189

[38] Jung UW, Um YJ, Choi SH. Histologic observation of soft tissue acquired from maxillary tuberosity area for root coverage. J Periodontol. 2008; 79(5):934-940. doi: 10.1902/jop.2008.070445

[39] Dellavia C, Ricci G, Pettinari L, Allievi C, Grizzi F, Gagliano N. Human palatal and tuberosity mucosa as donor sites for ridge augmentation. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2014; 34(2):179-186. doi: 10.11607/prd.1929

[40] Sanz-Martín I, Rojo E, Maldonado E, Stroppa G, Nart J, Sanz M. Structural and histological differences between connective tissue grafts harvested from the lateral palatal mucosa or from the tuberosity area. Clin Oral Investig. 2019; 23(2):957-964. doi: 10.1007/s00784-018-2516-9

[41] Pornprasertsuk S, Duarte WR, Mochida Y, Yamauchi M. Overexpression of lysyl hydroxylase-2b leads to defective collagen fibrillogenesis and matrix mineralization. J Bone Miner Res. 2005; 20(1):81-87. doi: 10.1359/JBMR.041026

[42] Amin PN, Bissada NF, Ricchetti PA, Silva APB, Demko CA. Tuberosity versus palatal donor sites for soft tissue grafting: A split-mouth clinical study. Quintessence Int. 2018; 49(7):589-598. doi: 10.3290/j.qi.a40510

[43] Barootchi S, Tavelli L, Zucchelli G, Giannobile WV, Wang HL. Gingival phenotype modification therapies on natural teeth: A network meta-analysis. J Periodontol. 2020; 91(11):1386-1399. doi: 10.1002/JPER.19-0715

[44] Harris RJ, Miller R, Miller LH, Harris C. Complications with surgical procedures utilizing connective tissue grafts: A follow-up of 500 consecutively treated cases. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2005; 25(5):449-459.

[45] Buff LR, Bürklin T, Eickholz P, Mönting JS, Ratka-Krüger P. oes harvesting connective tissue grafts from the palate cause persistent sensory dysfunction? A pilot study. Quintessence Int. 2009;40(6):479-89.

[46] Malpartida-Carrillo V, Tinedo-Lopez PL, Guerrero ME, Huamani-Echaccaya JL, Özcan M, Rösing CK. Outcome measurements following palatal soft tissue graft harvesting: A review. J Clin Exp Dent. 2021; 13(5):e527-e535. doi: 10.4317/jced.57625

[47] Basma HS, Saleh MHA, Abou-Arraj RV, et al. Patient-reported outcomes of palatal donor site healing using four different wound dressing modalities following free epithelialized mucosal grafts: A four-arm randomized controlled clinical trial. J Periodontol. 2023; 94(1):88-97. doi: 10.1002/JPER.22-0172

[48] Zuhr O, Bäumer D, Hürzeler M. The addition of soft tissue replacement grafts in plastic periodontal and implant surgery: Critical elements in design and execution. J Clin Periodontol. 2014; 41(Suppl 15):S123-S142. doi: 10.1111/jcpe.12185