Structural evolution drives functional activation of oil shale semicoke as natural organic/inorganic nanocomposites
Feng Zhao , Bin Mu , Dandan Wang , Li Zong , Aiqin Wang
Green and Smart Mining Engineering ›› 2026, Vol. 3 ›› Issue (2) : 156 -165.
Oil shale semicoke (OSSC) is a naturally occurring organic/inorganic nanocomposite with potential for sustainable functional applications, yet its high-value utilization is limited by an insufficient understanding of component occurrence and structural evolution. Herein, hydrothermal-assisted nitric acid treatment was employed to regulate the full-component evolution of OSSC by coupling acid etching with oxidative reconstruction. Various characterizations revealed that pristine OSSC consisted mainly of organic matter, quartz, kaolinite, magnetite, and amorphous components, in which mineral phases were closely covered or encapsulated by organics, and trace heteroatoms contributed to lattice defects. Under low nitric acid concentration, partial dissolution of metal ions and oxidation of organic matter generated a more developed pore structure, oxidized functional groups, and amorphous ferric sulfate, while the kaolinite framework was partially preserved due to organic-mediated protection. At higher concentration of nitric acid, extensive oxidation decomposed most organics and promoted the transformation of ferric sulfate species into ordered jarosite crystals. However, acid treatment alone caused secondary passivation of active sites by metal–organic complexation and positively charged mineral species. Subsequent alkali impregnation released these blocked sites and markedly enhanced adsorption activity. The optimized OSSC exhibited removal ratios of 97% for methylene blue and 54% for tetracycline, far exceeding those of raw OSSC. This work clarifies the occurrence–evolution–function relationship of OSSC and provides a mechanistic basis for converting mineral-rich solid waste into functional materials.
Oil shale semicoke / Mineral-rich solid waste / Structural evolution / Functional activation / Structure–activity relationship
| [1] |
|
| [2] |
|
| [3] |
|
| [4] |
|
| [5] |
|
| [6] |
|
| [7] |
|
| [8] |
|
| [9] |
|
| [10] |
|
| [11] |
|
| [12] |
|
| [13] |
|
| [14] |
|
| [15] |
|
| [16] |
|
| [17] |
|
| [18] |
|
| [19] |
|
| [20] |
|
| [21] |
|
| [22] |
|
| [23] |
|
| [24] |
|
| [25] |
|
| [26] |
|
| [27] |
|
| [28] |
|
| [29] |
|
| [30] |
|
| [31] |
|
| [32] |
|
| [33] |
|
| [34] |
|
| [35] |
|
| [36] |
|
| [37] |
|
| [38] |
|
| [39] |
|
| [40] |
|
| [41] |
|
| [42] |
|
| [43] |
|
| [44] |
|
| [45] |
|
| [46] |
|
| [47] |
|
| [48] |
|
| [49] |
|
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |