Probabilistic quantification of global drought risk amplification from temperature-enhanced evapotranspiration under climate change

Akinwale T. Ogunrinde , Paul Adigun , Xian Xue , Koji Dairaku , Sabab Ali Shah , Ifeoluwa S. Adawa

Geoscience Frontiers ›› 2026, Vol. 17 ›› Issue (2) : 102235

PDF
Geoscience Frontiers ›› 2026, Vol. 17 ›› Issue (2) :102235 DOI: 10.1016/j.gsf.2025.102235
research-article
Probabilistic quantification of global drought risk amplification from temperature-enhanced evapotranspiration under climate change
Author information +
History +
PDF

Abstract

Droughts pose escalating threats to global water security, agriculture, and socioeconomic stability amid anthropogenic climate change, with projections indicating an increase in frequency, duration, and severity driven by altered precipitation patterns and amplified evaporative demand. This study introduces a probabilistic framework to quantify drought risk amplification, employing the Risk Ratio (RR) methodology integrated with extreme value theory and non-parametric inference. Utilizing multi-model ensemble (MME) from the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 6 (CMIP6) under Shared Socioeconomic Pathways (SSP2-4.5 and SSP5-8.5), we evaluate changes in drought characteristics—duration, frequency, and severity — via the Standardized Precipitation Evapotranspiration Index (SPEI) at 3- and 12-month timescales for near-future (NF) and far-future (FF) periods. Our analyses reveal pervasive global intensification, with over 90% of land grids exhibiting positive severity shifts under SSP5-8.5 in the FF, attributed to atmospheric evaporative demand, which accounts for approximately 44% of the trends in SPEI. Threshold-stratified RR assessments reveal nonlinear escalations at higher percentiles (P90 vs. P75), compressing the return periods of extreme events by 20%-30% under high-emission scenarios. Regional hotspots, including the Amazon basin, sub-Saharan Africa, southwestern North America, and Central Asian drylands, exhibit frequency risks that are 4-fold or more amplified, signaling transitions to chronic water stress and potential ecosystem tipping points. These findings underscore the dominance of thermodynamic drivers in drought dynamics, advocating for emissions mitigation to curtail risks by 15%-25% under moderate pathways. By addressing uncertainties in non-stationary regimes, this framework provides adaptive strategies for resilient water management, offering policymakers critical insights to mitigate cascading impacts on global food security and biodiversity in a warming world.

Keywords

Drought risk amplification / Climate change projections / CMIP6 models / Standardized Precipitation Evapotranspiration Index (SPEI) / Risk Ratio methodology / Atmospheric evaporative demand

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Akinwale T. Ogunrinde, Paul Adigun, Xian Xue, Koji Dairaku, Sabab Ali Shah, Ifeoluwa S. Adawa. Probabilistic quantification of global drought risk amplification from temperature-enhanced evapotranspiration under climate change. Geoscience Frontiers, 2026, 17(2): 102235 DOI:10.1016/j.gsf.2025.102235

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

CRediT authorship contribution statement

Akinwale T. Ogunrinde: Writing - review & editing, Writing - original draft, Visualization, Validation, Resources, Project administration, Methodology, Investigation, Funding acquisition, Conceptualization. Paul Adigun: Writing - review & editing, Visualization, Validation, Data curation. Xian Xue: Writing - review & editing, Supervision, Resources. Koji Dairaku: Writing - review & editing, Supervision, Resources. Sabab Ali Shah: Writing - review & editing, Resources. Ifeoluwa S. Adawa: Writing - review & editing, Resources.

Data availability

The CMIP6 data is available from the Earth System Grid Federation (ESGF) repository (https://esgf-node.llnl.gov/projects/cmip6/). The CRU data is available via https://crudata.uea.ac.uk/cru/data/hrg/cru_ts_4.07/cruts.2304141047.v4.07/.

Declaration of competing interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Acknowledgements

The study was supported by the Northwest Institute of Ecological Environment and Resources, Chinese Academy of Science (grant number: E429020101).

Appendix A. Supplementary data

Supplementary data to this article can be found online at https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gsf.2025.102235.

References

[1]

Almazroui, M., Saeed, F., Saeed, S., Ismail, M., Ehsan, M.A., Islam, M.N., Abid, M.A., O’Brien, E., Kamil, S., Rashid, I.U., Nadeem, I., 2021. Projected changes in climate extremes using CMIP 6 simulations over SREX regions. Earth Syst. Environ. 5 (3), 481-497. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41748-021-00250-5.

[2]

Al-Yaari, A., Zhao, Y., Cheruy, F., Thiery, W., 2023. Heatwave characteristics in the recent climate and at different global warming levels: a multimodel analysis at the global scale. Earth’s Future 11 (9), e2022EF003301. https://doi.org/10.1029/2022EF003301.

[3]

ASCE, 2005. The ASCE Standardized Reference Evapotranspiration Equation. ASCE, Reston, VA, pp. 59. https://doi.org/10.1061/9780784408056.

[4]

Balting, D.F., AghaKouchak, A., Lohmann, G., Ionita, M., 2021. Northern hemisphere drought risk in a warming climate. Npj Clim. Atmos. Sci. 4 (1), 61. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41612-021-00218-2.

[5]

Bathiany, S., Bastiaansen, R., Bastos, A., Blaschke, L., Lever, J., Loriani, S., De Keersmaecker, W., Dorigo, W., Milenković M., Senf, C., Smith, T., 2025. Ecosystem resilience monitoring and early warning using earth observation data: challenges and outlook. Surv. Geophys 46 (2), 265-301. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-024-09833-z.

[6]

Berg, A., Findell, K., Lintner, B., Giannini, A., Seneviratne, S.I., Van Den Hurk, B., Lorenz, R., Pitman, A., Hagemann, S., Meier, A., Cheruy, F., 2016. Land-atmosphere feedbacks amplify aridity increase over land under global warming. Nat. Clim. Change 6 (9), 869-874. https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate3029.

[7]

Bjarke, N.R., Livneh, B., Barsugli, J.J., Pendergrass, A.G., Small, E.E., 2024. Evaluating large-storm dominance in high-resolution GCMs and observations across the western contiguous United States. Earth’s Future 12 (6), e2023EF004289. https://doi.org/10.1029/2023EF004289.

[8]

Bhardwaj, K., Mishra, A., Khedun, C.P., 2025. Global droughts in a warming climate: evaluation of SPI and SPEI under 1.5 ° 2 ° and 3 ° C global warming. J. Hydrol. 659, 133309. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2025.133309.

[9]

Chen, J., Brissette, F.P., Caya, D., 2020. Remaining error sources in bias-corrected climate model outputs. Clim. Change 162 (2), 563-582. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-020-02744-z.

[10]

Chen, J., Brissette, F.P., Chaumont, D., Braun, M., 2013. Finding appropriate bias correction methods in downscaling precipitation for hydrologic impact studies over North America. Water Resour. Res. 49 (7), 4187-4205. https://doi.org/10.1002/wrcr.20331.

[11]

Cook, B.I., Mankin, J.S., Anchukaitis, K.J., 2018. Climate change and drought: from past to future. Curr. Clim. Change Rep. 4 (2), 164-179. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40641-018-0103-9.

[12]

Cook, B.I., Mankin, J.S., Marvel, K., Williams, A.P., Smerdon, J.E., Anchukaitis, K.J., 2020. Twenty-first century drought projections in the CMIP 6 forcing scenarios. Earth’s Future 8 (6), e2019EF001461. https://doi.org/10.1029/2019EF001461.

[13]

Diffenbaugh, N.S., Swain, D.L., Touma, D., Lubchenco, J., 2015. Anthropogenic warming has increased drought risk in California. PNAS 112 (13), 3931-3936. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1422385112.

[14]

Eyring, V., Bony, S., Meehl, G.A., Senior, C.A., Stevens, B., Stouffer, R.J., Taylor, K.E., 2016. Overview of the coupled model intercomparison project phase 6 (CMIP6) experimental design and organization. Geosci. Model Dev. 9 (5), 1937-1958. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-9-1937-2016.

[15]

Eyring, V., Cox, P.M., Flato, G.M., Gleckler, P.J., Abramowitz, G., Caldwell, P., Collins, W.D., Gier, B.K., Hall, A.D., Hoffman, F.M., Hurtt, G.C., 2019. Taking climate model evaluation to the next level. Nat. Clim. Change 9 (2), 102-110. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-018-0355-y.

[16]

Flato, G., Marotzke, J., Abiodun, B., Braconnot, P., Chou, S.C., Collins, W., Cox, P., Driouech, F., Emori, S., Eyring, V., Forest, C., 2014. Evaluation of climate models. Climate Change 2013:the Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (741-866). Cambridge University Press.

[17]

Gebrechorkos, S.H., Sheffield, J., Vicente-Serrano, S.M., Funk, C., Miralles, D.G., Peng, J., Dyer, E., Talib, J., Beck, H.E., Singer, M.B., Dadson, S.J., 2025. Warming accelerates global drought severity. Nature 642, 628-635. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-025-09047-2.

[18]

Giorgi, F., Lionello, P., 2008. Climate change projections for the Mediterranean region. Global Planet. Change 63 (2-3), 90-104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloplacha.2007.09.005.

[19]

Geneva Environment Network, 2025. Desertification, Land Degradation and Drought, and the Role of Geneva.

[20]

Guo, H., Bao, A., Liu, T., Jiapaer, G., Ndayisaba, F., Jiang, L., Kurban, A., De Maeyer, P., 2018. Spatial and temporal characteristics of droughts in Central Asia during 1966-2015. Sci. Total Environ. 624, 1523-1538. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.12.120.

[21]

Gusain, A., Ghosh, S., Karmakar, S., 2020. Added value of CMIP 6 over CMIP5 models in simulating Indian summer monsoon rainfall. Atmos. Res. 232, 104680. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2019.104680.

[22]

Harris, I., Osborn, T.J., Jones, P., Lister, D., 2020. Version 4 of the CRU TS monthly high-resolution gridded multivariate climate dataset. Sci. Data 7 (1), 109. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41597-020-0453-3.

[23]

Huang, W., Chen, F., Feng, S., Chen, J., Zhang, X., 2013. Interannual precipitation variations in the mid-latitude Asia and their association with large-scale atmospheric circulation. Chin. Sci. Bull. 58 (32), 3962-3968. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11434-013-5970-4.

[24]

IPCC, 2021. Climate Change 2021: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA, 2392 pp. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009157896.

[25]

IPCC, 2022. Climate Change 2022: Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability. Contribution of Working Group II to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. https://www.ipcc.ch/report/ar6/wg2/ (accessed 2 November 2025).

[26]

Kim, J.H., Chung, E.S., 2025. Insights into uncertainties in future drought analysis using hydrological simulation model. Egusphere 2025, 1-46. https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-1298.

[27]

Kumar, A., Gosling, S.N., Johnson, M.F., Jones, M.D., Nkwasa, A., Koutroulis, A., Schmied, H.M., Li, H.Y., Kim, H., Hanasaki, N., Kumar, R.,2025. Cascading droughts: exploring global propagation of meteorological to hydrological droughts (1971-2001). Sci. Total Environ. 979, 179486. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2025.179486.

[28]

Lehner, F., Coats, S., Stocker, T.F., Pendergrass, A.G., Sanderson, B.M., Raible, C.C., Smerdon, J.E., 2017. Projected drought risk in 1.5 ° C and 2 ° C warmer climates. Geophys. Res. Lett. 44, 7419-7428. https://doi.org/10.1002/2017GL074117.

[29]

Li, H., Li, Z., Chen, Y., Xiang, Y., Liu, Y., Kayumba, P.M., Li, X., 2021. Drylands face potential threat of robust drought in the CMIP 6 SSPs scenarios. Environ. Res. Lett. 16 (11), 114004. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ac2bce.

[30]

Li, Q., Ye, A., Nath, R., Zhang, Y., Zhou, J., 2025. The global drought-sensitive areas will expand in the future. Ecol. Indic. 178, 113838. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2025.113838.

[31]

Liu, Z., Bollasina, M.A., Wilcox, L.J., 2024. Impact of Asian aerosols on the summer monsoon strongly modulated by regional precipitation biases. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 24 (12), 7227-7252. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-7227-2024.

[32]

Marengo, J.A., Souza Jr, C.M., Thonicke, K., Burton, C., Halladay, K., Betts, R.A., Alves, L.M., Soares, W.R., 2018. Changes in climate and land use over the Amazon region: current and future variability and trends. Front. Earth Sci. 6, 228. https://doi.org/10.3389/feart.2018.00228.

[33]

Mbaye, A.A., Gueye, F., 2024. Climate change and food security in the Sahel: accelerating land degradation and vulnerabilities. Brookings Institution, 12 November. November 2025).

[34]

McKee, T.B., Doesken, N.J., Kleist, J., 1993. The relationship of drought frequency and duration to time scales. In: Proceedings of the 8th Conference on Applied Climatology. American Meteorological Society, pp. 179-184.

[35]

Milly, P.C., Dunne, K.A., 2016. Potential evapotranspiration and continental drying. Nat. Clim. Change 6 (10), 946-949. https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate3046.

[36]

Mishra, A.K., Singh, V.P., 2010. A review of drought concepts. J. Hydrol. 391 (1-2), 202-216. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2010.07.012.

[37]

Mishra, V., Aadhar, S., Mahto, S.S., 2021. Anthropogenic warming and intraseasonal summer monsoon variability amplify the risk of future flash droughts in India. Npj Clim. Atmos. Sci. 4 (1), 1. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41612-020-00158-3.

[38]

Mukherjee, S., Mishra, A.K., 2021. Increase in compound drought and heatwaves in a warming world. Geophys. Res. Lett. 48 (1), e2020GL090617. https://doi.org/10.1029/2020GL090617.

[39]

Na, W., Najafi, M.R., 2024. Rising risks of hydroclimatic swings: a large ensemble study of dry and wet spell transitions in North America. Global Planet. Change 238, 104476. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloplacha.2024.104476.

[40]

Naumann, G., Cammalleri, C., Mentaschi, L., Feyen, L., 2021. Increased economic drought impacts in Europe with anthropogenic warming. Nat. Clim. Change 11 (6), 485-491. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-021-01044-3.

[41]

Nazarenko, L.S., Tausnev, N.L., Elling, M.T., 2025. Temperature and precipitation extremes under SSP emission scenarios with GISS-E2.1 model. Atmosphere 16 (8), 920. https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos16080920.

[42]

Niu, Q., She, D., Xia, J., Zhang, Q., Zhang, Y., Wang, T., 2025. Uncertainty analysis of global meteorological drought in CMIP 6 projections. Clim. Change 178 (4), 1-23. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-025-03919-2.

[43]

Ogunrinde, A.T., Adigun, P., Xian, X., Yu, H., Koji, D., Adebiyi, A., Sabo, A.A., 2024. Multi-scale drought variability over West Africa and the associated large-scale circulation patterns. Geomatics Nat. Hazards Risk 15 (1), 2409199. https://doi.org/10.1080/19475705.2024.2409199.

[44]

Ogunrinde, A.T., Adigun, P., Xue, X., Koji, D., Jing, Q.,2025. Spatiotemporal analysis of drought patterns and trends across Africa: a multi-scale SPEI approach (1960-2018). Int. J. Digit. Earth 18 (1), 2447342. https://doi.org/10.1080/17538947.2025.2447342.

[45]

Otto, F.E.L., Wolski, P., Lehner, F., Tebaldi, C., Van Oldenborgh, G.J., Hogesteeger, S., Singh, R., Holden, P., Fuckar, N.S., Odoulami, R.C., New, M., 2018. Anthropogenic influence on the drivers of the Western Cape drought 2015-2017. Environ. Res. Lett. 13 (12), 124010. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aae9f9.

[46]

Papalexiou, S.M., Rajulapati, C.R., Andreadis, K.M., Foufoula-Georgiou, E., Clark, M.P., Trenberth, K.E., 2021. Probabilistic evaluation of drought in CMIP 6 simulations. Earth’s Future 9 (10), e2021EF002150. https://doi.org/10.1029/2021EF002150.

[47]

Pena-Angulo, D., Vicente-Serrano, S.M., Domínguez-Castro, F., Murphy, C., Reig, F., Tramblay, Y., Trigo, R.M., Luna, M.Y., Turco, M., Noguera, I., Aznarez-Baltasar, M., García-Herrera, R., Tomas-Burguera, M., El Kenawy, A., 2020. Long-term precipitation in southwestern Europe reveals no clear trend attributable to anthropogenic forcing. Environ. Res. Lett. 15 (9), 094070. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ab9c4f.

[48]

Qin, N., Lu, Q., Fu, G., Wang, J., Fei, K., Gao, L., 2023. Assessing the drought impact on sugarcane yield based on crop water requirements and standardized precipitation evapotranspiration index. Agric. Water Manage. 275, 108037. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2022.108037.

[49]

Riahi, K., Van Vuuren, D.P., Kriegler, E., Edmonds, J., O’neill, B.C., Fujimori, S., Bauer, N., Calvin, K., Dellink, R., Fricko, O., Lutz, W., 2017. The shared socioeconomic pathways and their energy, land use, and greenhouse gas emissions implications: an overview. Global Environ. Change 42, 153-168. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2016.05.009.

[50]

Richardson, D., Black, A.S., Irving, D., Matear, R.J., Monselesan, D.P., Risbey, J.S., Squire, D.T., Tozer, C.R., 2022. Global increase in wildfire potential from compound fire weather and drought. Npj Clim. Atmos. Sci. 5 (1), 23. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41612-022-00248-4.

[51]

Ridder, N.N., Pitman, A.J., Ukkola, A.M., 2021. Do CMIP 6 climate models simulate global or regional compound events skillfully? Geophys. Res. Lett. 48 (2), e2020GL091152. https://doi.org/10.1029/2020GL091152.

[52]

Rivera, J.A., Arnould, G.,2020. Evaluation of the ability of CMIP6 models to simulate precipitation over Southwestern South America: climatic features and long-term trends (1901-2014). Atmos. Res. 241, 104953. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2020.104953.

[53]

Seneviratne, S.I., Hauser, M., 2020. Regional climate sensitivity of climate extremes in CMIP 6 versus CMIP5 multimodel ensembles. Earth’s Future 8 (9), e2019EF001474. https://doi.org/10.1029/2019EF001474.

[54]

Shiogama, H., Fujimori, S., Hasegawa, T., Hayashi, M., Hirabayashi, Y., Ogura, T., Iizumi, T., Takahashi, K., Takemura, T., 2023. Important distinctiveness of SSP3-7. 0 for use in impact assessments. Nat. Clim. Change 13 (12), 1276-1278. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-023-01883-2.

[55]

Singh, P.K., Singh, S., Manzoor, U., Dubey, A., 2025. Enhancing crop sustainability through climate-resilient agronomic practices. Int. J. Environ. Clim. Change 15 (6), 75-85. https://doi.org/10.9734/ijecc/2025/v15i64517.

[56]

Smith, A.B., Matthews, J.L., 2015. Quantifying uncertainty and variable sensitivity within the US billion-dollar weather and climate disaster cost estimates. Nat. Hazards 77 (3), 1829-1851. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-015-1678-x.

[57]

Spinoni, J., Barbosa, P., Bucchignani, E., Cassano, J., Cavazos, T., Cescatti, A., Christensen, J.H., Christensen, O.B., Coppola, E., Evans, J.P., Forzieri, G., Geyer, B., Giorgi, F., Jacob, D., Katzfey, J., Koenigk, T., Laprise, R., Lennard, C.J., Kurnaz, M. L., Dosio, A., 2021. Global exposure of population and land-use to meteorological droughts under different warming levels and SSPs: a CORDEX-based study. Int. J. Climatol. 41 (15), 6825-6853. https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.7302.

[58]

Spinoni, J., Barbosa, P., De Jager, A., McCormick, N., Naumann, G., Vogt; J.V., Magni, D., Masante, D., Mazzeschi, M., 2019. A new global database of meteorological drought events from 1951 to 2016. J. Hydrol. Reg. Stud. 22, 100593. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrh.2019.100593.

[59]

Spinoni, J., Vogt; J.V., Naumann, G., Barbosa, P., Dosio, A., 2018. Will drought events become more frequent and severe in Europe? Int. J. Climatol. 38 (4), 1718-1736. https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.5291.

[60]

Stagge, J.H., Tallaksen, L.M., Gudmundsson, L., Van Loon, A.F., Stahl, K., 2015. Candidate distributions for climatological drought indices (SPI and SPEI). Int. J. Climatol. 35 (13), 4027-4040. https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.4267.

[61]

Swann, A.L.S., Hoffman, F.M., Koven, C.D., Randerson, J.T., 2016. Plant responses to increasing CO2 reduce estimates of climate impacts on drought severity. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 113 (36), 10019-10024. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1604581113.

[62]

Ukkola, A.M., De Kauwe, M.G., Roderick, M.L., Abramowitz, G., Pitman, A.J., 2020. Robust future changes in meteorological drought in CMIP 6 projections despite uncertainty in precipitation. Geophys. Res. Lett. 47 (11), e2020GL087820. https://doi.org/10.1029/2020GL087820.

[63]

Ukkola, A.M., Pitman, A.J., De Kauwe, M.G., Abramowitz, G., Herger, N., Evans, J.P., Decker, M., 2018. Evaluating CMIP 5 model agreement for multiple drought metrics. J. Hydrometeorol. 19 (6), 969-988. https://doi.org/10.1175/JHM-D-17-0099.1.

[64]

UNCCD, 2022. Drought in Numbers 2022: Restoration for readiness and resilience. Bonn: United Nations Convention to Combat Desertification. November 2025).

[65]

Vicente-Serrano, S.M., Beguería, S., Lopez-Moreno, J.I., 2010. A multiscalar drought index sensitive to global warming: the standardized precipitation evapotranspiration index. J. Clim. 23 (7), 1696-1718. https://doi.org/10.1175/2009JCLI2909.1.

[66]

Vicente-Serrano, S.M., Pena-Angulo, D., Beguería, S., Domínguez-Castro, F., Tomas-Burguera, M., Noguera, I., Gimeno-Sotelo, L., El Kenawy, A., 2022. Global drought trends and future projections. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. A Math. Phys. Eng. Sci. 380 (2238), 20210285. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2021.0285.

[67]

Vicente-Serrano, S.M., Quiring, S.M., Peña-Gallardo, M., Yuan, S., Domínguez-Castro, F., 2020. A review of environmental droughts: increased risk under global warming? Earth-Sci. Rev. 201, 102953. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earscirev.2019.102953.

[68]

Wang, T., She, D., Bao, Z., Zhang, Q., Wang, L., Wei, Y., Niu, Q., 2025. Elucidating diverse population exposure to compound drought and heatwave events from two meteorological drought indices (SPI and SPEI). Environ. Res. Lett. 20 (3), 034027. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ad2f4a.

[69]

Wang, T., Tu, X., Singh, V.P., Chen, X., Lin, K., 2021. Global data assessment and analysis of drought characteristics based on CMIP6. J. Hydrol. 596, 126091. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2021.126091.

[70]

Wilhite, D.A., Sivakumar, M.V.K., Pulwarty, R., 2014. Managing drought risk in a changing climate: the role of national drought policy. Weather Clim. Extrem. 3, 4-13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wace.2014.01.002.

[71]

Williams, A.P., Seager, R., Abatzoglou, J.T., Cook, B.I., Smerdon, J.E., Cook, E.R., 2015. Contribution of anthropogenic warming to California drought during 2012-2014. Geophys. Res. Lett. 42 (16), 6819-6828. https://doi.org/10.1002/2015GL064924.

[72]

WMO, 2017. WMO guidelines on the calculation of climate normals. WMO-No. 1203. Geneva: World Meteorological Organization. November 2025).

[73]

WMO,2021. WMO atlas of mortality and economic losses from weather, climate and water extremes (1970-2019). WMO-No. 1267. Geneva: World Meteorological Organization. November 2025).

[74]

World Weather Attribution, 2024. Climate change, not El Niño, main driver of exceptional drought in highly vulnerable Amazon River Basin. World Weather Attribution. November 2025).

[75]

Wu, G., Chen, J., Shi, X., Kim, J.S., Xia, J., Zhang, L., 2022. Impacts of global climate warming on meteorological and hydrological droughts and their propagations. Earth’s Future 10 (3), e2021EF002542. https://doi.org/10.1029/2021EF002542.

[76]

Xu, L., Chen, N., Zhang, X., 2019. Global drought trends under 1.5 and 2 ° C warming. Int. J. Climatol. 39 (4), 2375-2385. https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.5958.

[77]

Yevjevich, V., 1969. An objective approach to definitions and investigations of continental hydrological droughts. J. Hydrol. 7 (3), 353.

[78]

Zhao, T., Dai, A., 2015. The magnitude and causes of global drought changes in the twenty-first century under a low-moderate emissions scenario. J. Clim. 28 (11), 4490-4512. https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-14-00363.1.

[79]

Zhao, T., Dai, A., 2022. CMIP 6 model-projected hydroclimatic and drought changes and their causes in the 21st century. J. Clim. 35 (3), 897-921. https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-21-0442.1.

[80]

Zhou, Z., Zhang, L., Chen, J., She, D., Wang, G., Zhang, Q., Xia, J., Zhang, Y., 2023. Projecting global drought risk under various SSP-RCP scenarios. Earth’s Future 11 (5), e2022EF003420. https://doi.org/10.1029/2022EF003420.

[81]

Zhu, M.M., Gao, L., Zhao, Q.K., 2024. Future increase in post-drought precipitation with a stronger response to warming. Geophys. Res. Lett. 51 (18), e2024GL110294. https://doi.org/10.1029/2024GL110294.

[82]

Zhuang, Y., Fu, R., Lisonbee, J., Sheffield, A.M., Parker, B.A., Deheza, G., 2024. Anthropogenic warming has ushered in an era of temperature-dominated droughts in the Western United States. Sci. Adv. 10 (45), eadn9389. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.adn9389.

[83]

Zscheischler, J., Westra, S., Van Den Hurk, B.J., Seneviratne, S.I., Ward, P.J., Pitman, A., AghaKouchak, A., Bresch, D.N., Leonard, M., Wahl, T., Zhang, X., 2018. Future climate risk from compound events. Nat. Clim. Change 8 (6), 469-477. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-018-0156-3.

PDF

0

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/