Carbon compensation and carbon neutrality: Regional variations based on net carbon transfer of trade in China

Abstract

Inter-provincial carbon compensation is an important means for a country to realize regional environmental protection and achieve coordinated regional development and realize the carbon neutral goal. It is easier to realize inter-provincial carbon compensation compared with the national level. Based on the multi-regional input-output model and the input–output data of 30 provinces in China, this study measured the carbon transfer in, carbon transfer out and net carbon transfer of each province, and based on the undesirable slacks-based measurement model under the common frontier, the provinces were given the shadow price of carbon emission in line with the situation of the local economic development, resource endowment, and industrial structure, and based on which, the amount of carbon compensation of each province was measured. The results show that: China's provinces and regions have a larger share of trade-implied carbon emissions; the net carbon transfer in areas mainly concentrated in the traditional energy provinces, which provide industrial products for other regions and undertake the transfer of carbon emissions, and become the main carbon compensation recipient areas; the net carbon transfer out is mainly concentrated in the economically developed and densely populated areas such as Beijing–Tianjin region and the eastern and southern coasts, which satisfy the end-consumption by purchasing a large number of industrial products and generate a large amount of carbon emissions. Transfer out; becoming the main carbon offset payment area. Based on the results of this study, it is proposed to improve the national provincial carbon offset mechanism and implement a differentiated and synergistic carbon emission reduction cooperation approach. The research program of this study can provide a reference for the development of inter-regional carbon offset programs.

Keywords

Carbon transfer / Shadow price / Carbon emission responsibility / Carbon compensation

References

E.B. Ali, S. Shayanmehr, R. Radmehr, R. Bayitse, E. Agbozo. Investigating environmental quality among G20 nations: The impacts of environmental goods and low-carbon technologies in mitigating environmental degradation. Geosci. Front., 15 (1) (2024), Article 101695,

R. Amar, K. Satish. Are environment-related technologies key to unlock the path towards sustainable development: An econometric analysis. Geosci. Front., 14 (2023), Article 101702,

L.P. Amaral, N. Martins, J. Gouveia. A review of energy theory, its application and latest developments. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev., 54 (2016), pp. 882-888,

F.D. Cao, J.K. Zhang. Carbon tax, economic uncertainty and tourism: A DSGE approach. J. Hosp. Tour. Manag., 49 (2021), pp. 494-507,

R. Chen, Z.D. Jiang. Transverse space ecological compensation of low-carbon agriculture in China. China Population, Resources and Environment, 28 (4) (2018), pp. 87-97, 10.12062/cpre.20170906

X. Chen, Y. Liu. Estimation of China’s carbon dioxide shadow price and analysis of the difference in transaction price: Output function based on quadratic directional distance. Ecol. Econ., 34 (06) (2018), pp. 14-20

Y. Deng, S. Apurbo, C. Yu. Ecological compensation of grain trade within urban, rural areas and provinces in China: a prospect of a carbon transfer mechanism. Environ. Dev. Sustain., 23 (2021), pp. 16688-16712,

E. Eijgelaar. Voluntary carbon offsets a solution for reducing tourism emissions? Assessment of communication aspects and mitigation potential. Eur. J. Transp. Infrastruct. Res., 11 (3) (2011), pp. 281-296, 10.18757/ejtir.2011.11.3.2933

R. Fare, S. Grosskopf, C.K. Lovell, S. Yaisawarng. Derivation of shadow prices for undesirable outputs: A distance function approach. Rev. Econ. Stat., 75 (2) (1993), pp. 374-380

Fisher, J.A., Cavanagh, C.J., Sikor, T., Mwayafu, D.M., 2018. Linking notions of justice and project outcomes in carbon offset forestry projects: Insights from acomparative study in Uganda. Land Use Policy 73, 259-268. http://10.101016/ J.LANDUSEPOL.2017.12.055.

S. Gert, P.J. Arthur. Carbon flows, carbon markets, and low-carbon lifestyles: Reflecting on the role of markets in climate governance. Environ. Polit., 22 (1) (2013), pp. 174-193,

P.H. Gleick, R.M. Adams, R.M. Amasino, E. Anders, D.J. Anderson, W.W. Anderson, et al.. Climate change and the integrity of science. Science, 328 (5979) (2010), pp. 689-690,

S. Gössling. Carbon neutral destinations: A conceptual analysis. J. Sustain. Tour., 17 (1) (2009), pp. 17-37

X. Hou, J. Liu, D. Zhang. Regional sustainable development: The relationship between natural capital utilization and economic development. Sustain. Dev., 27 (1) (2019), pp. 183-195

M. Huang, Y. Chen, Y. Zhang. Assessing carbon footprint and inter-regional carbon transfer in China based on a multi-regional input-output model. Sustainability, 10 (12) (2018),

T. Knoke, O.E. Steinbeis, M. Bösch, R.M. Román-Cuesta, T. Burkhardt. Cost-effective compensation to avoid carbon emissions from forest loss: An approach to consider price–quantity effects and risk-aversion. Ecol. Econ., 70 (06) (2011), pp. 1139-1153,

A. Kollmuss, H. Zink, C. Polycarp. Making Sense of the Voluntary Carbon Market: A Comparison of Carbon Offset Standards. WWF Germany (2008), pp. 1-23

G.S. Latta, D.M. Adams, K.P. Bell, J.D. Kline. Evaluating land-use and private forest management responses to a potential forest carbon offset sales program in western Oregon (USA). Forest Policy Econ., 65 (2016), pp. 1-8,

M. Li, Q. Li, Y.N. Wang, W. Chen. Spatial path and determinants of carbon transfer in the process of inter provincial industrial transfer in China. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 95 (2022), Article 106810,

J.C. Li. Discussion on Ecological Value. Chongqing University Press, Chongqing (1999), pp. 100-106

K.R. Li. Land Use Change and Net Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Terrestrial Ecosystem Carbon Cycle. China Meteorological Press, Beijing (2002)

K.R. Li. . Land use change and net greenhouse gas emissions and terrestrial ecosystem carbon cycle, China Meteorological Press, Beijing (2002),

H.G. Liu, X.M. Fan. CO2 emissions transfer embedded in inter-regional trade in China. Acta Ecol. Sin., 34 (11) (2014), pp. 3016-3024,

Q.Q. Liu, S.J. Wang, W.Z. Zhang, J. Li, Y. Kong. Examining the effects of income inequality on CO2 emissions: Evidence from non-spatial and spatial perspectives. Appl. Energ., 236 (2019), pp. 163-171,

H. Lovell, D. Liverman. Understanding carbon offset technologies. New Political Econ., 15 (2) (2010), pp. 255-273,

J.L. Lu, C.Y. Wang. Investigating the impacts of air travellers' environmental knowledge on attitudes toward carbon offsetting and willingness to mitigate the environmental impacts of aviation. Transportation Research Part d: Transport and Environment, 59 (2018), pp. 96-107,

X. Luo, X. Ao, Z. Zhang, Q. Wan, X. Liu. Spatiotemporal variations of cultivated land use efficiency in the Yangtze River Economic Belt based on carbon emission constraints. J. Geogr. Sci., 30 (4) (2022), pp. 535-552

W.D. Nordhaus. . Managing the Global Commons: the Economics of Climate Change, vol. 31, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA (1994)

J.H. Pan, J. Phillips, Y. Chen. China’s balance of emissions embodied in trade: approaches to measurement and allocating international responsibility. Oxford Rev. Econ. Pol., 24 (2) (2008), pp. 354-376,

Y.G. Pan, W.Q. Pan, T. Wu. Measurement of embodied CO2 in China’ s regional trade. Statist. Res., 30 (9) (2013), pp. 21-28

G.P. Peters, E.G. Hertwich. Post-Kyoto greenhouse gas inventories: production versus consumption. Climatic Change, 86 (2008), pp. 51-66,

B. Shui, R.C. Harriss. The role of CO2 embodiment in US-China trade. Energ. Policy, 34 (18) (2006), pp. 4063-4068,

J.R. Soto, D.C. Adams, F.J. Escobedo. Land owner attitudes and willingness to accept compensation from forest carbon offsets: Application of best-worst choice modeling in Florida USA. Forest Policy Econ., 63 (2016), pp. 35-42,

L. Stosic-Mihajlovic, S. Trajkovic. The importance of energy for the economy, sustainable development and environmental protection: an economic aspect. J. Process Manage. New Technol., 6 (1) (2018), pp. 20-26,

A.J. Wang, Z.X. Feng, B. Meng. Measure of carbon emissions and carbon transfers in 30 provinces of China. Research on Quantitative Economics and Technology Economy, 34 (08) (2017), pp. 89-104

J.N. Wang, W. Jiannan, A. Waseem. Natural resource scarcity, fossil fuel energy consumption, and total greenhouse gas emissions in top emitting countries. Geosci. Front., 15 (2) (2023), pp. 1674-9871,

W.Z. Wang. Recalculation of responsibility distribution of China’s provincial consumption-side carbon emissions: Based on the perspectives of shared Responsibility and technical compensation. Statistical Research, 39 (06) (2022), pp. 3-16

Weber, C.L., Matthews, H.S., 2007. Embodied environmental emissions in U.S. international trade, 1997-2004. Environ. Sci. Technol. 41(14), 4875-4881. doi:

H.K. Wittman, C. Caron. Carbon offsets and inequality: social costs and co-benefits in Guatemala and Sri Lanka. Soc. Nat. Resour., 22 (8) (2009), pp. 710-726,

H. Yang, X. Huang, J. Hu, J.R. Thompson, R.J. Flower. Achievements, challenges and global implications of China's carbon neutral pledge. Front. Environ. Sci. Eng., 16 (8) (2022), p. 111,

J.K. Yu, Z.K. Yang, G.L. Shao. Analysis on carbon compensation amount of carbon sink fisheries based on shadow price model: Take seawater shellfish aquaculture industry of Shandong Province as an example. Agricultural Economics and Management, 10 (06) (2011), pp. 83-90,

D. Zhang, S. Rausch, V.J. Karplus, X. Zhang. Quantifying regional economic impacts of CO2 intensity targets in China. Energ. Econ., 40 (2013), pp. 687-701,

Y.J. Zhang, A.D. Wang, Y.B. Da. Regional allocation of carbon emission quotas in China: Evidence from the Shapley value method. Energ. Policy, 74 (2014), pp. 454-464,

R.Q. Zhao, Y. Liu, Y.X. Li, M.L. Ding, Z.P. Zhang, X.W. Chuan, S.X. Jiao. Overview of regional carbon compensation: mechanism, pattern and policy suggestions. Areal Research and Development, 34 (5) (2015), pp. 116-120