Socioeconomic responses to managing woody plant encroachment

David J Eldridge; Jingjing Meng; Letao Li; Jingyi Ding

doi:10.1016/j.geosus.2026.100518

Geography and Sustainability ›› 2026, Vol. 7 ›› Issue (4) :100518 DOI: 10.1016/j.geosus.2026.100518

Editorial

research-article

Socioeconomic responses to managing woody plant encroachment

Author information +

History +

PDF

Cite this article

Download citation ▾

David J Eldridge, Jingjing Meng, Letao Li, Jingyi Ding. Socioeconomic responses to managing woody plant encroachment. Geography and Sustainability, 2026, 7 (4) : 100518 DOI:10.1016/j.geosus.2026.100518

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户忘记密码

References

Publishing order | Descend order by publishing year | Descend order by cited within

[1]	Anadón, J.D., Sala, O.E., Turner II, B.L., Bennett, E.M., 2014. Effect of woody-plant encroachment on livestock production in North and South America. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 111 (35), 12948-12953. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1320585111.

[2]	Bestelmeyer, B.T., Burkett, L.M., James, D., Gamon, J., Schooley, R.L., 2026. Large-scale experimental evaluation of woody plant removal in desert grassland: restoration, novelty, or degradation? Ecol. Appl. 36 (3), e70240. doi: 10.1002/eap.70240.

[3]

Chen, L.Y., Li, H., Zhang, P.J., Zhao, X., Zhou, L.H., Liu, T.Y., Hu, H.F., Bai, Y.F., Shen, H.H., Fang, J.Y., 2015. Climate and native grassland vegetation as drivers of the community structures of shrub-encroached grasslands in Inner Mongolia, China. Landsc. Ecol. 30 (9), 1627-1641. doi: 10.1007/s10980-014-0044-9.

[4]	Cunningham, G.M., 2008. Listening to the managers: a report on the invasive native scrub ‘Landholder Knowledge’ project. Report prepared for the Central West and Western Catchment Management Authorities. Killara, NSW.

[5]	DCCEEW, 2022. Nature Positive Plan: better for the environment, better for business. Department of Climate Change, Energy, the Environment and Water (DCCEEW), Canberra.

[6]	Ding, J.Y., Eldridge, D.J., 2023. The success of woody plant removal depends on encroachment stage and plant traits. Nat. Plant. 9 (1), 58-67. doi: 10.1038/s41477-022-01307-7.

[7]	Ding, J.Y., Eldridge, D.J., 2024. Woody encroachment: social-ecological impacts and sustainable management. Biol. Rev. 99 (6), 1909-1926. doi: 10.1111/brv.13104.

[8]

Eldridge, D.J., Bowker, M.A., Maestre, F.T., Roger, E., Reynolds, J.F., Whitford, W.G., 2011. Impacts of shrub encroachment on ecosystem structure and functioning: towards a global synthesis: synthesizing shrub encroachment effects. Ecol. Lett. 14 (7), 709-722. doi: 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2011.01630.x.

[9]	Eldridge, D.J., Sala, O., 2023. Australia’s carbon plan disregards evidence. Science 382 (6673), 894. doi: 10.1126/science.adm7310.

[10]	Eldridge, D.J., Soliveres, S., 2015. Are shrubs really a sign of declining ecosystem function? Disentangling the myths and truths of woody encroachment in Australia. Aust. J. Bot. 62 (7), 594-608. doi: 10.1071/bt14137.

[11]	Gao, L.P., Kinnucan, H.W., Zhang, Y.Q., Qiao, G.H., 2016. The effects of a subsidy for grassland protection on livestock numbers, grazing intensity, and herders’ income in Inner-Mongolia. Land Polic. 54, 302-312. doi: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2016.02.016.

[12]	Gray, E.F., Bond, W.J., 2013. Will woody plant encroachment impact the visitor experience and economy of conservation areas? Koedoe 55, a1106. doi: 10.4102/koedoe.v55i1.1106.

[13]	Herzog, T.R., Kutzli, G.E., 2002. Preference and perceived danger in field/forest settings. Environ. Behav. 34 (6), 819-835. doi: 10.1177/001391602237250.

[14]

Hinchee, M.A.W., Mullinax, L.N., Rottmann, W.H., 2010. Woody biomass and purpose-grown trees as feedstocks for renewable energy. In: Mascia, P., Scheffran, J., Widholm, J. (Eds.), Plant Biotechnology for Sustainable Production of Energy and Co-Products. Biotechnology in Agriculture and Forestry, vol 66. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, pp. 155-208.

[15]	Hua, L., Squires, V.R., 2015. Managing China’s pastoral lands: current problems and future prospects. Land Use Policy 43, 129-137. doi: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2014.11.004.

[16]	Jones, S.A., Fisher, L.A., Soto, J.R., Archer, S.R., 2024. Shrub encroachment and stakeholder perceptions of rangeland ecosystem services: balancing conservation and management? Ecol. Soc. 29 (3), art13. doi: 10.5751/es-15113-290313.

[17]	Kreuter, U.P., Tays, M.R., Conner, J.R., 2004. Landowner willingness to participate in a Texas brush reduction program. J. Range Manage. 57, 230-237. doi: 10.2111/1551-5028(2004)057[0230:LWTPIA]2.0.CO;2.

[18]	Li, C.H., Kotz, M., Pradhan, P., Chen, G.Q., 2026. Climate change drives a decline in global grazing systems. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 123, e2534015123. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2534015123.

[19]	Li, Y., Guo, J.C., Guo, Y.X., Chai, Y.F., Yue, M., 2025. Shrubland carbon storage in northern China: a synergistic analysis of climate, plant community and soil traits. J. Plant Ecol. 18 (6), rtaf097. doi: 10.1093/jpe/rtaf097.

[20]	Liu, Y.S., Shi, Z.J., Gong, L.Y., Cong, R.C., Yang, X.H., Eldridge, D.J., 2019. Is the removal of aboveground shrub biomass an effective technique to restore a shrub-encroached grassland? Restor. Ecol. 27 (6), 1348-1356. doi: 10.1111/rec.13012.

[21]	Luvuno, L., Biggs, R., Stevens, N., Esler, K., 2022. Perceived impacts of woody encroachment on ecosystem services in Hluhluwe, South Africa. Ecol. Soc. 27, art4. doi: 10.5751/es-12767-270104.

[22]	Miyasaka, T., Miyamori, E., Okuro, T., Zhao, X.Y., Takeuchi, K., 2021. Comparison of nurse effect zones of shrubs versus trees for dryland rehabilitation in Northeast China. Restor. Ecol. 29 (6), e13364. doi: 10.1111/rec.13364.

[23]	O’Connor, R.C., Wilcox, K.R., Koerner, S.E., Komatsu, K.J., Wedel, E.R., Avolio, M.L., 2026. Cutting, herbicide, and fire: a case study for managing woody plants in tallgrass prairies. Restor. Ecol. doi: 10.1111/rec.70403.

[24]	Rajala, K., 2019. Ecosystem transformation across a changing social landscape: landowner perceptions and responses to woody plant encroachment. M.S. Thesis, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, Virginia, USA.

[25]

Stafford, W., Birch, C., Etter, H., Blanchard, R., Mudavanhu, S., Angelstam, P., Blignaut, J., Ferreira, L., Marais, C., 2017. The economics of landscape restoration: benefits of controlling bush encroachment and invasive plant species in South Africa and Namibia. Ecosyst. Serv. 27, 193-202. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoser.2016.11.021.

[26]

Tanaka, J., Brunson, M., Torrell, A., 2011. A social and economic assessment of rangeland conservation practices. In: Briske, D.D. (Ed.), Conservation Benefits of Rangeland Practices: Assessment, Recommendations, and Knowledge Gaps. USDA-Natural Resource Conservation Service, Washington, D.C., pp. 371-422.

[27]	Van Auken, O.W., 2000. Shrub invasions of North American semiarid grasslands. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 31, 197-215. doi: 10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.31.1.197.

[28]	Xie, L.N., Guo, H.Y., Chen, W.Z., Liu, Z., Gu, S., Ma, C.C., 2018. Effects of grazing on population growth characteristics of Caragana stenophylla along a climatic aridity gradient. Rangel. Ecol. Manag. 71 (1), 98-105. doi: 10.1016/j.rama.2017.07.005.

[29]	Zhu, T.T., Hai, L., Cao, W.X., Li, X., Li, Q.H., 2024. Effects of Caragana microphylla on vegetation and soil in the restoration of desertified grasslands. Arid Zone Res. 41 (11), 1875-1886. doi: 10.13866/j.azr.2024.11.08.