Exploring interactions and progress of sustainable development goals in China across multiple scenarios with a system dynamics model

Laihong Ni , Yan Zhang , Junze Zhang , Xiaodong Chen

Geography and Sustainability ›› 2026, Vol. 7 ›› Issue (4) : 100493

PDF
Geography and Sustainability ›› 2026, Vol. 7 ›› Issue (4) :100493 DOI: 10.1016/j.geosus.2026.100493
Research Article
research-article
Exploring interactions and progress of sustainable development goals in China across multiple scenarios with a system dynamics model
Author information +
History +
PDF

Abstract

While the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) embody humanity’s ambitious commitment to building a resilient and sustainable future for our planet, little is known about how the interactions among SDGs affect their progress and synergistic relations. In this study, we developed a system dynamics model to explore the progress of China’s SDGs and their interactions under different development scenarios by 2030. Results showed that the overall progress of SDGs could increase by 7.0 % under the scenario of sustainable transition compared to the baseline scenario. Network analysis revealed a strong synergy among SDG 2, SDG 6 and SDG 7, suggesting a potential enhancement of water-energy-food nexus through collaboration among departments. The differences in the progress of SDGs under different scenarios and the synergies and trade-offs among SDGs can largely be explained by the complex interactions among SDG indicators. The superior performance of sustainable transition scenario stemmed from the increases in educational investment and water-use efficiency, which could promote the decoupling of economic development from environmental pressure. The synergy among water, energy and food systems was attributed to the alleviation of water stress, which could promote agricultural productivity and support energy uses by expanding power capacity. In addition, educational attainment contributing to the achievement of multiple SDGs (e.g., SDG 7, SDG 9, SDG 12) through promoting technological progress and decreasing energy intensity served an important bridging role in the interactions among SDGs. This study highlights the importance of incorporating interactions into systematic management through cross-sectoral coordination strategies.

Keywords

Complex interactions / Feedbacks / Network analysis / Synergistic relations / Water–energy–food nexus

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Laihong Ni, Yan Zhang, Junze Zhang, Xiaodong Chen. Exploring interactions and progress of sustainable development goals in China across multiple scenarios with a system dynamics model. Geography and Sustainability, 2026, 7 (4) : 100493 DOI:10.1016/j.geosus.2026.100493

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

References

[1]

Allen, C., Metternicht, G., Wiedmann, T., Pedercini, M ., 2019. Greater gains for Australia by tackling all SDGs but the last steps will be the most challenging. Nat. Sustain. 2 (11), 1041-1050. doi: 10.1038/s41893-019-0409-9.

[2]

Asadullah, M.N., Webb, A., Islam, K.M.M., 2024. SDG 4 mid-point challenge: fixing the broken interlinkages between education and gender equality. Int. J. Educ. Dev. 106, 103015. doi: 10.1016/j.ijedudev.2024.103015.

[3]

Bandari, R., Moallemi, E.A., Lester, R.E., Downie, D., Bryan, B.A., 2022. Prioritising sustainable development goals, characterising interactions, and identifying solutions for local sustainability. Environ. Sci. Policy 127, 325-336. doi: 10.1016/j.envsci.2021.09.016.

[4]

Bar-Yossef, Z., Mashiach, L.T., 2008. Local approximation of PageRank and reverse PageRank. In: Bouzeghoub, M., Goble, C., Kashyap, V., Spaccapietra, S. (Eds.), Proceedings of the 17th ACM Conference on Information and Knowledge Management (CIKM 2008). ACM, New York, pp. 279-288. doi: 10.1145/1458082.1458122.

[5]

Biermann, F., Abbott, K., Andresen, S., Bäckstrand, K., Bernstein, S., Betsill, M.M., Bulkeley, H., Cashore, B., Clapp, J., Folke, C., Gupta, A., Gupta, J., Haas, P.M., Jordan, A., Kanie, N., Kluvánková-Oravská, T., Lebel, L., Liverman, D., Meadowcroft, J., Mitchell, R.B., Newell, P., Oberthür, S., Olsson, L., Pattberg, P., Sánchez-Rodríguez, R., Schroeder, H., Underdal, A., Vieira, S.C., Vogel, C., Young, O.R., Brock, A., Zondervan, R., 2012. Navigating the Anthropocene: improving Earth system governance. Science 335 (6074), 1306-1307. doi: 10.1126/science.1217255.

[6]

Biermann, F., Kanie, N., Kim, R.E., 2017. Global governance by goal-setting: the novel approach of the UN sustainable development goals. Curr. Opin. Environ. Sustain. 26-27, 26-31. doi: 10.1016/j.cosust.2017.01.010.

[7]

Biggeri, M., Clark, D. A., Ferrannini, A., Mauro, V., 2019. Tracking the SDGs in an ‘integrated’ manner: a proposal for a new index to capture synergies and trade-offs between and within goals. World Dev. 122, 628-647. doi: 10.1016/j.worlddev.2019.05.022.

[8]

Brin, S., Page, L., 1998. The anatomy of a large-scale hypertextual web search engine. Comput. Netw. ISDN Syst. 30 (1-7), 107-117. doi: 10.1016/S0169-7552(98)00110-X.

[9]

Chen, B.H., Zhang, X.M., Gu, B.J., 2025. Managing nitrogen to achieve sustainable food-energy-water nexus in China. Nat. Commun. 16, 4804. doi: 10.1038/s41467-025-60098-5.

[10]

Chen, M.Q., Gao, L., Guo, Z.X., Dong, Y.C., Moallemi, E.A., Xu, Y.F., Li, K., Lin, W.H., Yang, J., Xu, W.J., Pedercini, M., Bryan, B.A., 2024a. A cost-effective climate mitigation pathway for China with co-benefits for sustainability. Nat. Commun. 15, 9489. doi: 10.1038/s41467-024-53912-z.

[11]

Chen, X.D., Viña, A., Shortridge, A., An, L., Liu, J.G., 2014. Assessing the effectiveness of payments for ecosystem services: an agent-based modeling approach. Ecol. Soc. 19 (1), 7. doi: 10.5751/ES-05578-190107.

[12]

Chen, X.D., Xie, Y., Wu, Q., Sun, Y., Liu, J.G., 2024b. Dynamic disparities in clean energy use across rural-urban, regional, and ethnic boundaries in China. Ambio 53, 168-179. doi: 10.1007/s13280-023-01913-5.

[13]

Cohen, J., 1988. Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences, 2nd ed. Routledge, New York doi: 10.1016/C2013-0-10517-X.

[14]

Corona-López, E., Román-Gutiérrez, A.D., Otazo-Sánchez, E.M., Guzmán-Ortiz, F.A., Acevedo-Sandoval, O.A., 2021. Water-food nexus assessment in agriculture: a systematic review. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 18 (9), 4983. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18094983.

[15]

Dadebo, D., Obura, D., Kimera, D., 2023. Hydraulic modeling and prediction of performance for a drinking water supply system towards the achievement of sustainable development goals (SDGs): a system case study from Uganda. Groundw. Sustain. Dev. 22, 100951. doi: 10.1016/j.gsd.2023.100951.

[16]

Duan, X.Y., Huang, Q.X., Liu, Z.W., Zhang, L., Li, P.H., He, C.Y., Fang, D.L., Xu, Z.C., Li, Y.H., 2025. The differentiated impacts of interprovincial trade on achieving nine environment-related SDGs in China. Environ. Sustain. Indic. 25, 100589. doi: 10.1016/j.indic.2025.100589.

[17]

Emeka, E.T., Asongu, S.A., Bouanza, J.R.F.K., 2025. Lifelong gender inclusive education, productive capacity, and governance quality in Africa. Int. J. Educ. Dev. 117, 103312. doi: 10.1016/j.ijedudev.2025.103312.

[18]

Fowler, K., Peel, M., Saft, M., Nathan, R., Horne, A., Wilby, R., McCutcheon, C., Peterson, T., 2022. Hydrological shifts threaten water resources. Water Resour. Res. 58 (8), e2021WR031210. doi: 10.1029/2021WR031210.

[19]

Fu, B.J., Wang, S., Zhang, J.Z., Hou, Z.Q., Li, J.H., 2019. Unravelling the complexity in achieving the 17 sustainable-development goals. Natl. Sci. Rev. 6 (3), 386-388. doi: 10.1093/nsr/nwz038.

[20]

Gómez-Sanabria, A., Lindl, F., 2024. The crucial role of circular waste management systems in cutting waste leakage into aquatic environments. Nat. Commun. 15, 5443. doi: 10.1038/s41467-024-49555-9.

[21]

Hecking, T., Steinert, L., Masias, V.H., Hoppe, H.U., 2019. Positional analysis in cross-media information diffusion networks. Appl. Netw. Sci. 4 (1), 1. doi: 10.1007/s41109-018-0108-x.

[22]

Hunjra, A.I., Bouri, E., Azam, M., Azam, R.I., Dai, J.P., 2024. Economic growth and environmental sustainability in developing economies. Res. Int. Bus. Finance 70, 102341. doi: 10.1016/j.ribaf.2024.102341.

[23]

Islam, H., 2025. Nexus of economic, social, and environmental factors on sustainable development goals: the moderating role of technological advancement and green innovation. Innov. Green Dev. 4 (1), 100183. doi: 10.1016/j.igd.2024.100183.

[24]

Katz, L., 1953. A new status index derived from sociometric analysis. Psychometrika 18 (1), 39-43. doi: 10.1007/BF02289026.

[25]

Li, C.J., Lu, T., Fu, B.J., Wang, S., Holden, J., 2022. Sustainable city development challenged by extreme weather in a warming world. Geogr. Sustain. 3 (2), 114-118. doi: 10.1016/j.geosus.2022.04.001.

[26]

Li, X.X., Song, W., Cao, S.S., Mo, Y., Du, M.Y., He, Z., 2024. The impact of multidimensional urbanization on sustainable development goals (SDGs): a long-term analysis of the 31 provinces in China. Ecol. Indic. 169, 112822. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2024.112822.

[27]

Liu, J.G., Diamond, J., 2005. China’s environment in a globalizing world. Nature 435, 1179-1186. doi: 10.1038/4351179a.

[28]

Llach, J., Palau-Pinyana, E., Lei, L.N., Perramon, J., 2025. Key enablers for energy firms in implementing the SDGs: lessons based on a resource-based view approach. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change 213, 124011. doi: 10.1016/j.techfore.2025.124011.

[29]

Lozano, S., Borrego-Marín, M.M., 2024. A metafrontier network DEA approach for water usage efficiency assessment in the light of SDG target 6.4. Environ. Sci. Policy 160, 103857. doi: 10.1016/j.envsci.2024.103857.

[30]

Martins, F., Lima, A., Diep, L., Cezarino, L., Liboni, L., Tostes, R., Parikh, P., 2023. COVID-19, SDGs and public health systems: linkages in Brazil. Health Policy OPEN 4, 100090. doi: 10.1016/j.hpopen.2023.100090.

[31]

Miranda, M., Pereda, M., Sánchez, A., Estrada, E., 2024. Indirect social influence and diffusion of innovations: an experimental approach. PNAS Nexus 3 (10), 409. doi: 10.1093/pnasnexus/pgae409.

[32]

Newman, M.E.J., 2005. A measure of betweenness centrality based on random walks. Soc. Netw. 27 (1), 39-54. doi: 10.1016/j.socnet.2004.11.009.

[33]

Nilsson, M ., 2017. A Guide to SDG Interactions: from Science to Implementation. International Council for Science, Paris.

[34]

Nilsson, M., Griggs, D., Visbeck, M., 2016. Policy: map the interactions between sustainable development goals. Nature 534 (7607), 320-322. doi: 10.1038/534320a.

[35]

Ojeda-Matos, G., Jones-Crank, J.L., 2025. The potential of the water-energy-food nexus approach in advancing the sustainable development goals: a PRISMA-based systematic review. Environ. Sci. Policy 163, 103961. doi: 10.1016/j.envsci.2024.103961.

[36]

Pedercini, M., Arquitt, S., Collste, D., Herren, H., 2019. Harvesting synergy from sustainable development goal interactions. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 116 (46), 23021-23028. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1817276116.

[37]

Pianosi, F., Beven, K., Freer, J., Hall, J.W., Rougier, J., Stephenson, D.B., Wagener, T., 2016. Sensitivity analysis of environmental models: a systematic review with practical workflow. Environ. Model. Softw. 79, 214-232. doi: 10.1016/j.envsoft.2016.02.008.

[38]

Pradhan, P., Costa, L., Rybski, D., Lucht, W., Kropp, J.P., 2017. A systematic study of Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) interactions. Earths Future 5 (11), 1169-1179. doi: 10.1002/2017EF000632.

[39]

Rahman, M.M., Hossain, M.E., 2024. Green technology, policy and sustainable finance nexus with SDG-12: moderating effects of stakeholder awareness. Sustain. Futures 8, 100405. doi: 10.1016/j.sftr.2024.100405.

[40]

Sachs, J.D., Schmidt-Traub, G., Mazzucato, M., Messner, D., Nakicenovic, N., Rockström, J., 2019. Six transformations to achieve the sustainable development goals. Nat. Sustain. 2, 805-814. doi: 10.1038/s41893-019-0352-9.

[41]

Schober, P., Boer, C., Schwarte, L.A., 2018. Correlation coefficients: appropriate use and interpretation. Anesth. Analg. 126 (5), 1763-1768. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000002864.

[42]

Sebestyén, V., Bulla, M., Rédey, Á., Abonyi, J., 2019. Network model-based analysis of the goals, targets and indicators of sustainable development for strategic environmental assessment. J. Environ. Manage. 238, 126-135. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.02.096.

[43]

Soergel, B., Kriegler, E., Weindl, I., Rauner, S., Dirnaichner, A., Ruhe, C., Hofmann, M., Bauer, N., Bertram, C., Bodirsky, B.L., Leimbach, M., Leininger, J., Levesque, A., Luderer, G., Pehl, M., Wingens, C., Baumstark, L., Beier, F., Dietrich, J.P., Humpenöder, F., von Jeetze, P., Klein, D., Koch, J., Pietzcker, R., Streffler, J., Lotze-Campen, H., Popp, A., 2021. A sustainable development pathway for climate action within the UN 2030 agenda. Nat. Clim. Chang. 11, 656-664. doi: 10.1038/s41558-021-01098-3.

[44]

Steffen, W., Rockström, J., Richardson, K., Lenton, T.M., Folke, C., Liverman, D., Summerhayes, C.P., Barnosky, A.D., Cornell, S.E., Crucifix, M., Donges, J.F., Fetzer, I., Lade, S.J., Scheffer, M., Winkelmann, R., Schellnhuber, H.J., 2018. Trajectories of the earth system in the anthropocene. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 115 (33), 8252-8259. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1810141115.

[45]

Tenaw, D., 2025. The dynamics of green energy, energy efficiency, economic productivity, and energy-driven emissions in SDG context: is there a synergistic interplay? Energy Econ. 141, 108063. doi: 10.1016/j.eneco.2024.108063.

[46]

United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs (UN DESA), 2023. The Sustainable Development Goals Report 2023: Special Edition. United Nations, New York (accessed 10 March 2025).

[47]

Wang, Q., Ren, F., Li, R.R., 2024. Does geopolitical risk impact sustainable development? A perspective on linkage between geopolitical risk and sustainable development research. J. Clean. Prod. 451, 141980. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2024.141980.

[48]

Xing, Q., Wu, C.Y., Chen, F., Liu, J.G., Pradhan, P., Bryan, B.A., Schaubroeck, T., Carrasco, L.R., Gonsamo, A., Li, Y.K., Chen, X.Z., Deng, X.Z., Albanese, A., Li, Y.J., Xu, Z.C., 2024. Intranational synergies and trade-offs reveal common and differentiated priorities of sustainable development goals in China. Nat. Commun. 15, 2251. doi: 10.1038/s41467-024-46491-6.

[49]

Xu, Z.C., Chau, S.N., Chen, X.Z., Zhang, J., Li, Y.J., Dietz, T., Wang, J.Y., Winkler, J.A., Fan, F., Huang, B.R., Li, S.X., Wu, S.H., Herzberger, A., Tang, Y., Hong, D.Q., Li, Y.K., Liu, J.G., 2020. Assessing progress towards sustainable development over space and time. Nature 577 (7788), 74-78. doi: 10.1038/s41586-019-1846-3.

[50]

Yoon, D.K., 2012. Assessment of social vulnerability to natural disasters: a comparative study. Nat. Hazards 63 (2), 823-843. doi: 10.1007/s11069-012-0189-2.

[51]

Zhang, J.Z., Wang, S., Pradhan, P., Zhao, W.W., Fu, B.J., 2022. Untangling the interactions among the sustainable development goals in China. Sci. Bull. 67 (9), 977-984. doi: 10.1016/j.scib.2022.01.006.

[52]

Zhang, S., Chen, W.Y., Zhang, Q., Krey, V., Byers, E., Rafaj, P., Nguyen, B., Awais, M., Riahi, K., 2024. Targeting net-zero emissions while advancing other sustainable development goals in China. Nat. Sustain. 7 (9), 1107-1119. doi: 10.1038/s41893-024-01400-z.

[53]

Zhao, W.W., Yin, C.C., Hua, T., Meadows, M.E., Li, Y., Liu, Y.X., Cherubini, F., Pereira, P., Fu, B.J., 2022. Achieving the sustainable development goals in the post-pandemic era. Humanit. Soc. Sci. Commun. 9, 258. doi: 10.1057/s41599-022-01283-5.

[54]

Zhou, X., Moinuddin, M., Xu, M., 2017. Sustainable Development Goals Interlinkages and Network Analysis: A Practical Tool for SDG Integration and Policy Coherence. Institute for Global Environmental Strategies (accessed 10 March 2025).

PDF

0

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/